【#汇丰控股拟私有化恒生银行#】#市值近3000亿恒生银行拟被私有化# 在香港的地铁站跟朋友见面， 应该如何选择地点？一些香港本地人的通常做法是：在恒生银行（00011.HK）柜员机旁边。 作为香港最大的本土银行之一，恒生银行可能即将退市。这家市值3000亿港元的香港本地银行，将被母 公司汇丰控股（00005.HK）私有化。 10月9日早上，恒生银行、汇丰控股联合公告称，建议撤销恒生银行股份的上市地位，私有化价格为155 港元/股。9日上午，恒生银行大涨26.3%，中午报收150.3港元，汇丰控股跌6.24%，报收103.7港元。 公开资料显示，汇丰控股在恒生银行持股比例超过63%，私有化可能花费上千亿港元现金。该公司汇宣 布，未来三个季度不再回购自身股份。 业内人士认为，恒生银行依然有部分地产方不良资产需要消化，私有化之后，汇丰控股要承担这部分责 任，这是两者股价表现差异的原因之一；展望未来，协同效应还有进一步再提升的空间，符合现在汇丰 内部改革的总体思路。 ...

恒生银行(00011)及汇丰控股(00005)联合公告，汇丰亚太(香港上海汇丰银行有限公司，为汇丰控股的全 资附属公司)作为要约人，已要求恒生银行董事会向计划股东提呈建议，根据公司条例第673条以协议安 排方式将恒生银行私有化。 倘若计划生效，计划股份将予以注销，以换取计划对价，即持有每股计划股份可获现金港币155.00元 (扣除股息调整金额，如有)，较恒生银行股份于10月8日收市价每股港币119.00元溢价约30.3%。 恒生银行股东将获得2025年第三次中期股息，该股息不会从计划对价中扣除。恒生银行于本公告日期后 宣派且记录日期为计划生效日期前的所有其他股息，将从计划对价中扣除。 计划对价将不会提高，汇丰控股及汇丰亚太亦不保留提高计划对价的权利。 截至本公告日期，恒生银行为汇丰控股的间接非全资附属公司。恒生银行植根中国香港近百年，有着深 厚的传统。汇丰十分尊重恒生银行的独特地位，计划继续透过汇丰及恒生银行两大品牌，服务香港市 场。因此，恒生银行将保留其根据香港银行业条例所独立获授的持牌银行认可，并维持独立的企业管 治、品牌形象、独特的市场定位，以及分行网络。此外，汇丰深知恒生银行在本地社区所担当的重要角 ...

来源：豆豆君的纸飞机 不知道哪位王子喜欢上了《FIFA》，现在可以对比一下，不在需要回报股东的EA能爆发出什么火花， 作为《fifa 》游戏迷，希望EA可以好好做做游戏吧，别再当美国腾讯，想着各种变着花的圈钱。 #海外新鲜事# 沙特财团收购EA，将其私有化退市 沙特阿拉伯以 550 亿美元收购了美国艺电公司（EA），这次以后EA完成了私有化退市，对于游戏界可 以说创造历史了，对于沙特来说，这是新一轮的投资换取收益，扩大自己的资产。 ...

受此影响，9月23日，长虹佳华股价高开22.83%，报1.13港元/股，市值达到16.44亿港元。 资料显示，长虹佳华成立于2000年，2004年加入长虹集团，2013年在香港创业板上市，2020年转主板交 易，是四川长虹的重要子公司，主要从事ICT产品、解决方案及数字智能综合服务业务。 资料显示，四川长虹通过下属全资子公司香港长虹、安健控股持有长虹佳华77.43%股权(含可转换优先 股)。四川长虹电子控股集团有限公司是四川长虹的控股股东，虹图投资则是长虹控股集团的全资子公 司。 对于本次私有化原因，四川长虹指出：由于长虹佳华股价长期低于净资产，难以利用港股平台进行资本 运作，上市公司平台优势难以体现。本次长虹控股集团将长虹佳华私有化退市后，长虹佳华可降低上市 相关成本，并借助长虹控股集团整体资源统筹及规划，探索新的发展机会。 具体来看交易事宜，本次私有化的收购范围为除四川长虹所控制股份外的长虹佳华其他已发行普通股股 份，即长虹佳华的其他股东合计持有的 5.8亿股普通股，约占长虹佳华普通股股份总数的39.87%。此次 交易每股的交易对价为1.223 港元，交易规模合计7.09亿港元。 截止复牌前的最后一个交易 ...

Core Viewpoint - Sichuan Changhong Electric Co., Ltd. announced the privatization plan for its subsidiary, Changhong Jiahua Holdings Co., Ltd., by its wholly-owned subsidiary, Hongtu Investment Co., Ltd., which will lead to the delisting of Changhong Jiahua from the Hong Kong Stock Exchange [2][4]. Financial Overview - As of December 31, 2024, Changhong Jiahua's total assets were approximately 16.73 billion yuan, with total liabilities of about 13.97 billion yuan, resulting in a debt-to-asset ratio of 83.51% and net assets of approximately 2.76 billion yuan [2]. - For the fiscal year 2024, Changhong Jiahua reported revenue of approximately 36.48 billion yuan and a net profit of about 346 million yuan. For the first half of 2025, the unaudited revenue was approximately 19.48 billion yuan, with a net profit of around 167 million yuan [3]. Privatization Details - The privatization plan involves the cancellation of all planned shares, with a cash consideration of 1.223 HKD per share for the shareholders, excluding Sichuan Changhong's controlled shares [4]. - Following the privatization, Changhong Jiahua will issue new shares to the offeror to maintain the total number of shares consistent before and after the transaction [4]. - The Hong Kong Securities and Futures Commission has issued a no-objection letter regarding the privatization plan, which was announced on September 22, 2025 [4]. Strategic Implications - The privatization is expected to reduce the listing-related costs for Changhong Jiahua and allow for better resource allocation and planning under the umbrella of Sichuan Changhong Group, exploring new development opportunities [5]. - The ownership structure of Changhong Jiahua will remain unchanged post-privatization, and it is not anticipated to have a significant impact on the financial status or operations of Sichuan Changhong [5].

Core Points - Geely Automobile Holdings Limited has officially passed the ordinary resolution regarding the privatization of Zeekr at a special shareholder meeting held on September 5, 2025 [2] - The resolution received 2,282,375,159 votes in favor, accounting for 95.14%, while 116,609,273 votes were against, representing 4.86% [2] - The approval of the resolution indicates a significant step in the privatization process of Zeekr, aligning with the best interests of the company and all shareholders [2] Voting Details - A total of 10,118,052,286 shares were issued by Geely Automobile, with 10,086,615,033 shares recorded in the company's shareholder register [2] - Independent shareholders holding 5,881,723,833 shares had the right to attend the special meeting and vote on the resolution [2] - The resolution was passed as it received more than 50% of the votes in favor [2]

Core Viewpoint - Beijing Construction (Holdings) Limited has officially withdrawn from the Hong Kong Stock Exchange, marking the end of its journey as a listed company [1] Company Summary - Beijing Construction was established in July 2009 as an overseas investment and financing platform backed by Beikong Group, focusing on various real estate projects and food supply chain business [2] - The company went public through a reverse takeover in 2009 and has since made several acquisitions, including Shanghai Fanyi and Waigaoqiao Holdings in 2013 [2] - Financial data indicates that Beijing Construction has reported net losses attributable to the parent company for seven consecutive years since 2018, totaling over 2.5 billion yuan [2] - In 2024, the company achieved revenue of 865 million yuan, a year-on-year decline of 41.1%, and reported a net loss of 537 million yuan, compared to a loss of 901 million yuan in the previous year [2] Privatization Plan - On June 18, 2023, a privatization plan was announced by Haoming Holdings, offering to acquire all public shares of Beijing Construction at a price of 0.14 HKD per share, a 2.5 times premium over the pre-suspension price of 0.04 HKD [2][3] - The public shares, excluding those held by the controlling shareholder, account for 30.9% of the total shares, with a maximum cash consideration of approximately 302 million HKD [3] - Following the plan's implementation, the controlling entities will hold approximately 55.5%, 36.26%, 6.99%, and 1.25% of the issued shares, all ultimately controlled by Beikong Group [3] Market Context - Despite an active IPO market in Hong Kong this year, 37 companies have withdrawn from the stock exchange, with the real estate sector seeing the highest number of exits, totaling nine companies [3] - The reasons for delisting include privatization due to poor stock performance and internal restructuring, as well as forced delisting due to issues like delayed annual reports [3] - The Chairman of the Hong Kong Securities and Futures Commission emphasized the importance of corporate governance in maintaining investor interest in a competitive financial market [4]

Core Viewpoint - Canada Goose (GOOS.US) shares rose over 17%, reaching $14.249, following news of a privatization offer from private equity firms Hillhouse Capital and Advent International, valuing the company at $1.35 billion [1] Group 1: Company Developments - The controlling shareholder, Bain Capital, has received a verbal privatization offer for Canada Goose [1] - Bain Capital is considering selling its stake in Canada Goose, with Goldman Sachs acting as the advisor for the transaction [1] - Other potential buyers include Bosideng (03998) and a consortium formed by FountainVest Partners and Anta (02020) [1]

Core Viewpoint - Japan's privatization transactions are expected to reach a record high this year, surpassing $40.3 billion in 2023, driven by pressure to enhance investor returns and a shift in corporate attitudes towards private equity [1] Group 1: Market Trends - The total amount of private equity transactions in Japan reached $27.6 billion as of August 20, 2023, nearly three times the $9.5 billion recorded in the same period of 2024 [1] - Recent significant transactions include Blackstone's $3.5 billion acquisition of TechnoPro and EQT's $2.7 billion bid for Fujita [1] Group 2: Corporate Governance and Strategy - The Tokyo Stock Exchange has implemented stricter corporate governance standards, prompting companies to explore various development options, including delisting [2] - There is a notable trend of companies engaging in share buybacks, asset sales, and management buyouts as a response to the market's undervalued stocks [2] Group 3: Activist Investors and Private Equity - Increasing activist investor activities are raising target companies' stock price expectations, often leading to speculative price increases that make reasonable acquisition offers difficult [6] - The case of Fujita illustrates how the stock price more than doubled over three years, yet the final acquisition offer was below the market price at the time [7] Group 4: Management and Private Equity Engagement - Private equity offers existing management teams an opportunity to restructure away from public market scrutiny [8] - Many discussions between private equity firms and companies are initiated by the companies themselves, indicating a proactive approach to potential privatization [7][8]

Core Viewpoint - Beijing Construction (Holdings) Limited has received court approval for the privatization proposal by Haoming Holdings Limited, which will lead to the delisting of Beijing Construction from the Hong Kong Stock Exchange on August 29, 2023 [1] Company Overview - Beijing Construction was established in July 2009, with major shareholders including Beikong Real Estate (Hong Kong) Limited (36.26%), Haoming Holdings (22.35%), and Jingtai Industrial (Group) Limited (6.99%), all controlled by Beikong Group [1][2] - Beikong Group, founded in January 2005, is a large state-owned enterprise group established by the Beijing Municipal Government, focusing on real estate development through its subsidiaries, including Beikong Real Estate Group and Beijing Construction [2] Financial Performance - Beijing Construction has reported continuous losses for seven years since 2018, with net losses of 900 million yuan in 2023 and 537 million yuan in 2024, alongside a 41% year-on-year decline in revenue to 865 million yuan in 2024 [3] - The company has been actively preparing for asset sales since 2018, but delays in completing these sales have led to increased financial costs and declining asset prices, contributing to ongoing losses [3] - The daily trading volume of Beijing Construction has been below one million Hong Kong dollars, resulting in rising compliance costs relative to revenue, making the decision to delist a rational choice [3]