北交所年内第2单——广泰真空被暂缓审议，业绩的真实性被强烈质疑。 北交所审议意见直指收入确认的准确性问题，要求公司梳理发货后超一年未验收项目情况。这家拟募集1.68亿元资金的公司，正在面 临监管对其财务真实性的严格审视。 今天上午，北交所上市委员会召开了2025年第50次审议会议，沈阳广泰真空科技股份有限公司的上市申请被暂缓审议。 一、业绩增长与财务疑云 广泰真空的财务数据看起来颇为亮眼。2022年至2025年前9个月，公司营业收入分别为2.81亿元、3.12亿元、3.79亿元和3.42亿元。 数字表面光鲜却难掩背后问题，尤其在存货和合同负债这两个关键指标上显得矛盾重重。 各报告期末，公司存货账面价值均高于同期营收。2024年末存货达4.23亿元，而同期营收为3.79亿元。公司生产和销售节奏明显失 衡。 二、收入确认成争议焦点 北交所的审议意见直接将矛头指向广泰真空的收入确认问题。上市委要求公司核实发货后超过1年未验收项目的情况。 具体来说，监管要求公司按项目列示发货时间、收货时间、调试时间等时间节点，梳理客户已完成调试或已实际投入使用但未及时确 认收入的情形。 更严格的是，审议会议还要求公司说明报告期内发货 ...

转自：每日甘肃网-丝路话语 □ 丁慎毅 近日，河南一男子发视频称，在网购平台下单购买卤蛋时，看到商品页面标注"10-9枚"，实付3.6元，本 以为能收到9至10枚卤蛋，结果收到货后却发现，仅有1枚卤蛋。当男子联系商家客服询问时，对方回应 称："页面上的'-'不是区间符号，而是数学减号，10减9就是1枚。"据了解，男子向媒体表示，视频发完 第二天，已收到商家的10倍赔偿。12月25日，记者尝试搜索涉事店铺的"10-9枚卤蛋"商品链接，发现该 链接已无法被搜索到。（12月25日《羊城晚报》） "10-9=1"，这话一出，网友炸了："要是9-10枚，是不是我还得倒贴商家1枚？"连调侃都透着心酸—— 不是我们太笨，是套路太深。有网友调侃："以前购物靠喜欢，现在购物靠推理。"这背后，是消费者被 迫提升的"防御成本"。 这年头，商家的"脑洞"比消费者的钱包还深。就像那"10086"写成"I0086"，玩的是视觉魔术；"逆光之 王"后面跟着一行"仅为设计目标"，打的是预期差。商家们不再比谁的产品更好，而是在比谁的"表述技 巧"更"高明"，谁能更巧妙地游走在规则的模糊地带。反正是"解释权归商家所有"，白纸黑字，却全是 坑。 ...

Core Viewpoint - The article highlights a troubling incident involving an e-commerce platform that unilaterally canceled a consumer's gold order worth 45,000 yuan, reflecting a broader issue of consumer rights violations and lack of commercial integrity in digital transactions [1][3][5]. Group 1: Platform's Actions - The platform's explanation for the cancellation was deemed inadequate, suggesting a possible attempt to evade responsibility by citing "payment anomalies" [3]. - The timing of the cancellation coincided with a significant rise in gold prices, leading to suspicions that the platform was attempting to avoid fulfilling a costly contract [3][5]. - The platform's actions are characterized as a breach of contract, as the order was already in the fulfillment stage when it was canceled without consumer consent [3][5]. Group 2: Consumer Rights Violations - The platform's cancellation of the order and deletion of purchase records infringed upon the consumer's right to information, as it attempted to erase evidence and avoid accountability [3][5]. - The compensation offered to the consumer, a mere 200 yuan, starkly contrasts with the original order value, highlighting the unfairness of the resolution [5]. - This incident exemplifies a systemic issue where platforms, acting as both players and referees, exploit their power to shift business risks onto consumers [5][6]. Group 3: Regulatory Implications - The article calls for regulatory intervention to investigate the claims of "payment anomalies" and to prevent platforms from using vague terms to justify contract cancellations [5][6]. - There is a need for stricter regulations and penalties against platforms that unilaterally cancel established orders, to protect consumer rights and restore trust in the e-commerce industry [5][6].

Core Points - The controversy surrounding the "Duoban" (多半) slogan of White Elephant instant noodles highlights a significant issue of consumer trust and brand integrity in marketing practices [1][2][3] - The use of ambiguous language in branding, such as registering common phrases as trademarks, is seen as a manipulation of consumer perception, leading to potential legal and ethical violations [2][3] - The incident reflects a broader trend in the industry where companies prioritize short-term sales over long-term brand reputation, risking irreversible damage to their image [2][3] Company Summary - White Elephant's marketing strategy of using "Duoban" as a trademark instead of a weight descriptor has sparked consumer backlash and raised questions about the company's integrity [1][2] - The company's response to the controversy, including an apology, indicates recognition of the potential long-term consequences of such marketing tactics [2] Industry Summary - The incident is part of a larger pattern in the food and consumer goods industry where misleading marketing practices are becoming more common, leading to a "broken windows effect" [2] - Regulatory bodies are urged to enhance trademark examination standards to prevent consumer deception through the registration of everyday language as trademarks [3] - The shift from "traffic economy" to "retention economy" in the Chinese market emphasizes the need for companies to focus on genuine product innovation rather than clever marketing gimmicks [2][3]