Group 1: Core Insights - The report analyzes the fund flow of exchange-traded index funds from September 15 to September 19, 2025, highlighting significant trends in various categories [1][2]. - The overall fund flow indicates a mixed performance across different index categories, with notable outflows in major indices like the Shanghai Composite and CSI 300 [6][7]. Group 2: Fund Flow by Category - The Shanghai 50 index had a fund size of 159.46 billion yuan, with a weekly decline of 1.71% and a net outflow of 5.98 billion yuan [6]. - The CSI 300 index, with a fund size of 983.45 billion yuan, experienced a slight decline of 0.39% and a significant net outflow of 33.92 billion yuan [6]. - The ChiNext index showed a positive trend with a weekly increase of 2.17% and a net inflow of 5.76 billion yuan, indicating investor interest in growth sectors [6]. - In the technology sector, the large technology category saw a fund size of 216.69 billion yuan, with a weekly increase of 2.20% and a substantial net inflow of 58.01 billion yuan [7]. - The large financial category faced a decline of 3.20% with a net inflow of 140.61 billion yuan, suggesting a shift in investor sentiment [7]. Group 3: Sector Performance - The healthcare sector had a fund size of 100.16 billion yuan, with a weekly decline of 2.11% and a modest net inflow of 5.94 billion yuan, reflecting cautious investor behavior [7]. - The manufacturing sector reported a fund size of 72.82 billion yuan, with a weekly increase of 2.19% and a net inflow of 64.79 billion yuan, indicating resilience in this area [7]. - The consumer sector showed a slight decline of 0.24% with a net inflow of 32.55 billion yuan, suggesting mixed investor confidence [7]. Group 4: International Indices - The Nasdaq 100 index had a fund size of 78.42 billion yuan, with a weekly increase of 1.84% and a net outflow of 0.67 billion yuan, indicating fluctuating investor interest [11]. - The S&P 500 index reported a fund size of 20.84 billion yuan, with a slight increase of 0.50% and a net inflow of 0.77 billion yuan, reflecting stable performance [11]. - The Hang Seng index had a fund size of 19.17 billion yuan, with a weekly increase of 0.40% and a net outflow of 3.72 billion yuan, suggesting challenges in the Hong Kong market [11].

1. Report Information - Report Title: Weekly Report on Capital Flows of Exchange-Traded Index Funds - Data Date: September 8 - 12, 2025 - Research Institution: Great Wall Securities Industrial Finance Research Institute - Analyst: Jin Ling - Report Date: September 17, 2025 [1] 2. Core View - The report presents the capital flow, fund scale, and weekly price change data of various exchange-traded index funds from September 8 - 12, 2025, covering comprehensive, industry theme, style strategy, enterprise nature, regional, QDII, bond, commodity, and index-enhanced funds. 3. Summary by Category Comprehensive Index Funds - **Fund Performance**: The Shanghai Composite 50 had a fund scale of 15.9456 billion yuan, a weekly increase of 0.99%, and a net weekly capital outflow of 394 million yuan; the CSI 300 had a scale of 98.3449 billion yuan, a rise of 1.51%, and an outflow of 4.095 billion yuan; the CSI 500 had a scale of 14.012 billion yuan, a 3.41% increase, and an inflow of 1.174 billion yuan [6]. Industry Theme Index Funds - **Sector Performance**: The large technology sector had a fund scale of 21.6688 billion yuan, a 5.13% increase, and an outflow of 6.616 billion yuan; the large finance sector had a scale of 12.8483 billion yuan, a 0.92% rise, and an inflow of 11.468 billion yuan; the large health sector had a scale of 10.0161 billion yuan, a 0.50% decline, and an inflow of 6.432 billion yuan [7]. Style Strategy Index Funds - **Style Performance**: The dividend style had a fund scale of 5.9877 billion yuan, a 1.01% increase, and an inflow of 633 million yuan; the growth style had a scale of 730.6 million yuan, a 3.02% increase, and an outflow of 252 million yuan; the value style had a scale of 330.8 million yuan, a 1.11% increase, and an outflow of 102 million yuan [9]. QDII Index Funds - **Overseas Market Performance**: The Nasdaq 100 had a fund scale of 7.8421 billion yuan, a 0.73% increase, and an outflow of 197 million yuan; the S&P 500 had a scale of 2.0837 billion yuan, a 0.69% increase, and an outflow of 38 million yuan; the German DAX had a scale of 975 million yuan, a 0.43% decline, and an inflow of 101 million yuan [11]. Bond Index Funds - **Bond Type Performance**: The 30-year bond had a fund scale of 896.9 million yuan, a 1.18% decline, and an inflow of 149 million yuan; the 10-year bond had a scale of 409 million yuan, a 0.20% decline, and no net inflow; the 5 - 10-year bond had a scale of 3.8952 billion yuan, a 0.26% decline, and an outflow of 302 million yuan [12]. Commodity Index Funds - **Commodity Performance**: Gold had a fund scale of 7.0887 billion yuan, a 2.33% increase, and an inflow of 2.095 billion yuan; soybean meal had a scale of 419.3 million yuan, a 0.75% increase, and an inflow of 12 million yuan; non-ferrous metals had a scale of 74.5 million yuan, a 1.40% increase, and an inflow of 7.7 million yuan [12]. Index-Enhanced Funds - **Index Enhancement Performance**: The Shanghai Composite 50 index-enhanced fund had a scale of 76 million yuan, a 0.99% increase, and no net inflow; the CSI 300 had a scale of 320.9 million yuan, a 1.30% increase, and an outflow of 108 million yuan; the CSI 500 had a scale of 197.8 million yuan, a 2.72% increase, and an inflow of 21.6 million yuan [12].

Group 1 - The article emphasizes the dominance of the US dollar in the global economy, highlighting its role in shaping wealth, borrowing costs, and economic stability in the US [1][2][3] - The concept of "American exceptionalism" is discussed as a double-edged sword, granting the US significant power while also leading to potential overreach and mismanagement of its economic privileges [6][13] - Historical examples of reserve currencies, such as the Dutch Guilder, illustrate the risks associated with over-leveraging and the eventual decline of once-dominant currencies [15][28] Group 2 - The article identifies five current trends indicating a shift in the global economic landscape, including excessive national debt, rising wealth inequality, and a move towards protectionist policies [38][42][45] - It notes that the international order is transitioning from cooperative multilateralism to confrontational unilateralism, with an increased use of financial and military power [50] - The potential for significant changes in the next 5-10 years is highlighted, suggesting that understanding these fundamental shifts is crucial for risk management and investment strategies [51][52]

Report Information - Report Title: Weekly Report on Capital Flows of Exchange-Traded Index Funds [1] - Data Date: August 18 - 22, 2025 [1] - Analyst: Jin Ling [1] - Report Date: August 28, 2025 [1] Core Findings Domestic Passive Equity Funds - Different index funds showed varying performance in terms of fund size, weekly returns, and net weekly capital inflows. For example, the Shanghai - Shenzhen 300 index fund had a size of 983.449 billion yuan, a weekly return of 4.27%, and a net weekly capital outflow of 34.74 billion yuan; while the ChiNext Index fund had a size of 126.448 billion yuan, a weekly return of 5.81%, and a net weekly capital inflow of 22.61 billion yuan [4]. Overseas Index Funds - International index funds also had diverse performance. The Nasdaq 100 index fund had a size of 78.421 billion yuan, a weekly return of -3.08%, and a net weekly capital inflow of 7.78 billion yuan; the S&P 500 index fund had a size of 20.837 billion yuan, a weekly return of -1.63%, and a net weekly capital outflow of 1.44 billion yuan [5]. Bond Funds - Bond funds had different performance based on factors such as maturity and credit rating. The 30 - year bond fund had a size of 8.969 billion yuan, a weekly return of -1.25%, and a net weekly capital inflow of 59.60 billion yuan; the short - term financing bond fund had a size of 29.341 billion yuan, a weekly return of 0.01%, and a net weekly capital outflow of 28.50 billion yuan [6]. Commodity Funds - Commodity funds, including gold, soybean meal, and others, also had distinct performance. The gold fund had a size of 70.887 billion yuan, a weekly return of -0.29%, and a net weekly capital outflow of 0.94 billion yuan; the energy and chemical fund had a size of 2.93 billion yuan, a weekly return of 0.76%, and a net weekly capital inflow of 0.88 billion yuan [6]. Index - Enhanced Funds - Index - enhanced funds based on different indices had different performance. The CSI 500 index - enhanced fund had a size of 1.978 billion yuan, a weekly return of 3.76%, and a net weekly capital inflow of 0.12 billion yuan; the ChiNext Index - enhanced fund had a size of 0.469 billion yuan, a weekly return of 5.46%, and a net weekly capital outflow of 0.04 billion yuan [6].

Report Information - Report Title: Weekly Report on Capital Flows of Exchange-Traded Index Funds [1] - Data Date: July 7, 2025 - July 11, 2025 [1] - Analyst: Jin Ling [1] - Report Date: July 16, 2025 [1] Core Viewpoints - The report presents the fund scale, weekly price change, and weekly net capital inflow of various domestic passive stock funds, overseas funds, bond funds, commodity funds, and index-enhanced funds from July 7 to July 11, 2025 [4][5][6] Summary by Categories Domestic Passive Stock Funds - The scale of Shanghai Stock Exchange 50 funds is 15.9456 billion yuan, with a weekly increase of 1.30% and a net capital inflow of 0.669 billion yuan [4] - The scale of CSI 300 funds is 98.3449 billion yuan, with a weekly increase of 1.20% and a net capital outflow of 0.351 billion yuan [4] - The scale of CSI 500 funds is 14.012 billion yuan, with a weekly increase of 1.98% and a net capital inflow of 0.457 billion yuan [4] - The scale of CSI 1000 funds is 11.6917 billion yuan, with a weekly increase of 2.42% and a net capital inflow of 2.541 billion yuan [4] - The scale of ChiNext Index funds is 12.6448 billion yuan, with a weekly increase of 2.30% and a net capital outflow of 1.433 billion yuan [4] Overseas Funds - The scale of Nasdaq 100 funds is 7.8421 billion yuan, with a weekly increase of 0.01% and a net capital outflow of 1.093 billion yuan [5] - The scale of S&P 500 funds is 2.0837 billion yuan, with a weekly decrease of 0.13% and a net capital inflow of 0.21 billion yuan [5] - The scale of Dow Jones funds is 0.1708 billion yuan, with a weekly decrease of 0.17% and a net capital outflow of 0.001 billion yuan [5] Bond Funds - The scale of 30-year bond funds is 0.8969 billion yuan, with a weekly decrease of 0.30% and a net capital inflow of 0.1691 billion yuan [6] - The scale of 10-year bond funds is 0.409 billion yuan, with a weekly decrease of 0.15% and a net capital inflow of 0.0443 billion yuan [6] - The scale of 5 - 10-year bond funds is 3.8952 billion yuan, with a weekly decrease of 0.17% and a net capital inflow of 0.0446 billion yuan [6] Commodity Funds - The scale of gold funds is 7.0887 billion yuan, with a weekly decrease of 0.40% and a net capital inflow of 0.0523 billion yuan [6] - The scale of soybean meal funds is 0.4193 billion yuan, with a weekly increase of 0.52% and a net capital inflow of 0.0012 billion yuan [6] - The scale of non-ferrous metal funds is 0.0745 billion yuan, with a weekly decrease of 1.17% and a net capital outflow of 0.0017 billion yuan [6] Index-Enhanced Funds - The scale of Shanghai Stock Exchange 50 index-enhanced funds is 0.0076 billion yuan, with a weekly increase of 1.75% and a net capital outflow of 0.0001 billion yuan [6] - The scale of CSI 300 index-enhanced funds is 0.3209 billion yuan, with a weekly increase of 1.14% and a net capital outflow of 0.0084 billion yuan [6] - The scale of CSI 500 index-enhanced funds is 0.1978 billion yuan, with a weekly increase of 1.96% and a net capital outflow of 0.0014 billion yuan [6]

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the insights from Ray Dalio's new book "Why Nations Fail: Big Cycles," which explores the underlying forces that control national economic destinies and the implications of debt cycles on global power dynamics [1][21]. Group 1: Big Debt Cycle and Its Evolution - The big debt cycle refers to the accumulation of debt assets and liabilities over a long period, leading to uncontrollable debt levels and potential national bankruptcy [3][4]. - The cycle typically consists of five stages: 1. **Sound Money Stage**: Low net debt levels and stable currency, allowing for productive debt growth [4]. 2. **Debt Bubble Stage**: Abundant and cheap funding drives economic expansion, leading to rising demand and prices [4]. 3. **Peak Stage**: The bubble bursts, causing simultaneous contraction in debt, credit, and the economy [4]. 4. **Deleveraging Stage**: Painful adjustments align debt levels with income, returning to sustainability [4]. 5. **Debt Crisis Dissipation**: A new balance is achieved, initiating a new cycle [4]. - Countries like the U.S. and others are currently in the late stages of the debt cycle, with a 65% chance of significant debt restructuring within five years and an 80% chance within ten years [3][4]. Group 2: Five Forces and Internal-External Order - The big debt cycle is one of five interconnected forces that drive the transition from an "old order" to a "new order," including domestic political harmony and conflict, international geopolitical dynamics, natural forces, and technological breakthroughs [8][9]. - Internal order is crucial as governments may implement austerity measures, tax increases, or currency devaluation to manage debt, potentially leading to political crises and social unrest [9]. - External order, particularly the stability of the global monetary system and geopolitical relationships, significantly impacts national power. The U.S. has historically benefited from its reserve currency status, but this is threatened by rising debt levels and geopolitical tensions [10][11]. Group 3: Impact of Technological Revolution - Technological advancements have historically improved living standards and military capabilities but can also lead to significant internal conflicts if they rely on unsustainable credit expansion [12][13]. - The competition between the U.S. and China in technology, particularly in areas like artificial intelligence and semiconductor production, will significantly influence their economic and military strengths [14][15]. - The next five years are expected to see substantial technological progress, with the potential for revolutionary changes driven by creative and practical applications of new technologies [14]. Group 4: Future of the Big Cycle - The current big cycle, which began in 1945, is nearing its end, suggesting imminent significant changes in global order, including potential conflicts and transformations in monetary and internal orders [10][11][16]. - The article emphasizes the importance of cooperation among nations to address challenges and seize opportunities, suggesting that the outcomes will depend on how societies choose to interact [15][18].

1. Report Industry Investment Rating - No relevant content provided 2. Core View of the Report - The report presents the weekly capital flow and performance data of various types of trading - index funds from June 16, 2025, to June 20, 2025, including domestic passive stock funds, overseas - related funds, bond funds, commodity funds, and index - enhanced funds [4][5][6] 3. Summary by Relevant Catalogs Domestic Passive Stock Funds - **Fund Scale and Performance**: The scale of different concept funds varies greatly, such as the Shanghai - Shenzhen 300 fund with a scale of 9834.49 billion yuan, while the State - owned Enterprise Reform fund has a scale of only 0.61 billion yuan. The weekly price changes also differ, with the ChiNext Index rising by 5.61% and the Public Utilities rising by only 0.65%. The net weekly capital inflows and outflows are also diverse, with the A500 fund having a net inflow of 75.70 billion yuan and the Shanghai - Shenzhen 300 fund having a net outflow of 71.25 billion yuan [4] Overseas - related Funds - **Fund Scale and Performance**: For overseas - related funds, the Nasdaq 100 fund has a scale of 784.21 billion yuan, with a weekly increase of 3.68% and a net capital outflow of 10.53 billion yuan. The Hong Kong Stock Medical fund has a scale of 272.31 billion yuan, with a 2.24% increase and a net capital inflow of 13.37 billion yuan [5] Bond Funds - **Fund Scale and Performance**: Among bond funds, the 30 - year bond fund has a scale of 89.69 billion yuan, with a - 0.33% change and a net capital outflow of 16.93 billion yuan. The convertible bond fund has a scale of 438.59 billion yuan, with a 1.97% increase and a net capital inflow of 24.94 billion yuan [6] Commodity Funds - **Fund Scale and Performance**: In commodity funds, the gold fund has a scale of 708.87 billion yuan, with a - 1.49% change and a net capital inflow of 14.52 billion yuan. The energy - chemical fund has a scale of 2.93 billion yuan, with a - 4.15% change and a net capital outflow of 0.12 billion yuan [6] Index - enhanced Funds - **Fund Scale and Performance**: For index - enhanced funds, the Shanghai - Shenzhen 300 index - enhanced fund has a scale of 32.09 billion yuan, with a 1.82% increase and a net capital outflow of 5.18 billion yuan. The CSI 1000 index - enhanced fund has a scale of 6.56 billion yuan, with a 4.58% increase and a net capital inflow of 0.24 billion yuan [6]

Report Overview - Report name: Weekly Report on Capital Flows of Exchange-Traded Index Funds - Data date: May 26 - May 30, 2025 - Report date: June 3, 2025 - Analyst: Jin Ling - Analyst's certificate number: S1070521040001 [1] 1. Report Industry Investment Rating - Not provided in the content 2. Report's Core View - Not explicitly stated in the given content 3. Summary by Related Catalogs Domestic Passive Stock Funds - Different concepts have varying fund scales, weekly price changes, and net weekly capital inflows. For example, the Shanghai - Shenzhen 300 has a large fund scale of 9834.49 billion yuan, a weekly decline of 0.81%, and a net weekly capital inflow of 22.15 billion yuan; the ChiNext Index has a scale of 1264.48 billion yuan, a weekly decline of 1.00%, and a net weekly capital inflow of 12.57 billion yuan [4]. Overseas - Related Index Funds - Overseas indexes also show different performance. The Nasdaq 100 has a fund scale of 784.21 billion yuan, a weekly increase of 1.18%, and a net weekly capital outflow of 0.55 billion yuan; the Hong Kong Stock Technology concept has a scale of 926.09 billion yuan, a weekly decline of 1.45%, and a net weekly capital inflow of 0.28 billion yuan [5]. Other Types of Index Funds - Bond funds: Different maturities and types of bonds have different performance. For example, 30 - year bonds have a scale of 89.69 billion yuan, a weekly decline of 0.32%, and a net weekly capital inflow of 8.64 billion yuan; 5 - year - below bonds have a scale of 227.25 billion yuan, a weekly increase of 0.02%, and a net weekly capital outflow of 16.65 billion yuan. - Commodity funds: Gold funds have a scale of 708.87 billion yuan, a weekly decline of 1.11%, and a net weekly capital outflow of 0.95 billion yuan. - Index - enhanced funds: Different indexes also show different performance. For example, the CSI 1000 index - enhanced fund has a scale of 6.56 billion yuan, a weekly increase of 0.87%, and a net weekly capital inflow of 0.18 billion yuan [6].

Group 1: Report Information - Report Title: Transactional Index Fund Capital Flow Weekly Report [1] - Data Date: May 19 - May 23, 2025 [1] - Analyst: Jin Ling [1] - Report Date: May 29, 2025 [1] Group 2: Domestic Passive Stock Funds - **Comprehensive Category**: - Funds like Shanghai Composite 50 had a scale of 159.456 billion yuan, a weekly decline of 0.09%, and a net capital outflow of 912 million yuan; CSI 300 had a scale of 983.449 billion yuan, a decline of 0.04%, and an outflow of 2.504 billion yuan; CSI 500 had a scale of 140.12 billion yuan, a decline of 0.81%, and an outflow of 624 million yuan; CSI 1000 had a scale of 116.917 billion yuan, a decline of 1.09%, and an outflow of 1.163 billion yuan; ChiNext Index had a scale of 126.448 billion yuan, a decline of 0.79%, and an outflow of 1.876 billion yuan; STAR Market and ChiNext 50 had a scale of 32.965 billion yuan, a decline of 0.94%, and an outflow of 59 million yuan; STAR 50 had a scale of 181.221 billion yuan, a decline of 1.28%, and an inflow of 1.227 billion yuan; STAR 100 had a scale of 25.701 billion yuan, a decline of 1.28%, and an inflow of 237 million yuan; STAR 200 had a scale of 547 million yuan, a decline of 1.31%, and no net inflow; A50 had a scale of 36.101 billion yuan, an increase of 0.24%, and an outflow of 741 million yuan; A500 had a scale of 198.099 billion yuan, a decline of 0.10%, and an outflow of 4.363 billion yuan; Hang Seng Index had a scale of 6.723 billion yuan, an increase of 0.38%, and an inflow of 14 million yuan; Hang Seng China Enterprises Index had a scale of 915 million yuan, an increase of 0.71%, and an outflow of 1 million yuan; Others had a scale of 129.449 billion yuan, a decline of 0.20%, and an outflow of 1.715 billion yuan [4]. - **Industry - Theme Category**: - Big Technology funds had a scale of 216.688 billion yuan, a decline of 1.56%, and an outflow of 375 million yuan; Big Finance had a scale of 128.483 billion yuan, a decline of 1.15%, and an inflow of 1.136 billion yuan; Big Health had a scale of 100.161 billion yuan, an increase of 2.41%, and an outflow of 4.06 billion yuan; Big Manufacturing had a scale of 72.818 billion yuan, a decline of 1.03%, and an inflow of 2.928 billion yuan; Big Consumption had a scale of 56.089 billion yuan, a decline of 0.09%, and an outflow of 45.5 million yuan; Big Cycle had a scale of 21.416 billion yuan, an increase of 0.35%, and an inflow of 137 million yuan; Public Utilities had a scale of 6.614 billion yuan, a decline of 0.05%, and an outflow of 6.5 million yuan; Carbon Neutrality had a scale of 13.051 billion yuan, an increase of 0.21%, and an outflow of 9.8 million yuan; State - owned Enterprise Reform had a scale of 61 million yuan, a decline of 0.68%, and no net inflow; Others had a scale of 74.2 million yuan, an increase of 0.24%, and an outflow of 200,000 yuan [4]. - **Style - Strategy Category**: - Dividend funds had a scale of 59.877 billion yuan, an increase of 0.90%, and an outflow of 56.9 million yuan; Growth had a scale of 7.306 billion yuan, a decline of 0.48%, and an inflow of 1.1 million yuan; Value had a scale of 3.308 billion yuan, an increase of 0.18%, and an outflow of 300,000 yuan; Dividend Low - Volatility had a scale of 43.535 billion yuan, an increase of 0.59%, and an inflow of 52.9 million yuan; Quality had a scale of 1.332 billion yuan, an increase of 0.27%, and an outflow of 30,000 yuan; Low - Volatility had a scale of 25.5 million yuan, a decline of 0.27%, and no net inflow; Others had a scale of 11.1 million yuan, a decline of 0.14%, and no net inflow [4]. - **Enterprise - Nature and Region Category**: - China Special Valuation had a scale of 51.633 billion yuan, an increase of 0.20%, and an outflow of 78.3 million yuan; Regional funds had a scale of 4.342 billion yuan, a decline of 0.07%, and an outflow of 300,000 yuan [4]. Group 3: Overseas - Related Funds - **Comprehensive Category**: - Nasdaq 100 had a scale of 78.421 billion yuan, a decline of 1.22%, and an outflow of 994 million yuan; S&P 500 had a scale of 20.837 billion yuan, a decline of 0.92%, and an outflow of 60 million yuan; Dow Jones had a scale of 1.708 billion yuan, a decline of 1.18%, and an outflow of 60 million yuan; German DAX had a scale of 975 million yuan, an increase of 1.19%, and an inflow of 44 million yuan; French CAC40 had a scale of 601 million yuan, an increase of 1.14%, and no net inflow; Nikkei 225 had a scale of 3.611 billion yuan, a decline of 0.41%, and an outflow of 8.2 million yuan; Tokyo Stock Price Index had a scale of 771 million yuan, an increase of 0.69%, and an outflow of 5.6 million yuan; Saudi Arabia had a scale of 540 million yuan, a decline of 1.86%, and an inflow of 6.2 million yuan; Hang Seng Index had a scale of 19.174 billion yuan, an increase of 0.45%, and an outflow of 7.7 million yuan; Hang Seng China Enterprises Index had a scale of 12.002 billion yuan, an increase of 0.54%, and an outflow of 6.9 million yuan; Others had a scale of 3.713 billion yuan, an increase of 0.10%, and an outflow of 11.5 million yuan [5]. - **Industry - Theme Category**: - Hong Kong Stock Technology had a scale of 92.609 billion yuan, a decline of 1.18%, and an outflow of 3.8 million yuan; Chinese Internet had a scale of 45.35 billion yuan, a decline of 1.13%, and an outflow of 25.4 million yuan; Hong Kong Stock Medical had a scale of 27.231 billion yuan, an increase of 5.49%, and an outflow of 239 million yuan; Hong Kong Stock Consumption had a scale of 968 million yuan, an increase of 0.04%, and an outflow of 9.8 million yuan; Others had a scale of 16.931 billion yuan, a decline of 0.95%, and an inflow of 6.2 million yuan [5]. - **Style - Strategy Category**: - Dividend had a scale of 1.269 billion yuan, an increase of 2.40%, and an inflow of 10.9 million yuan; Dividend Low - Volatility had a scale of 77.7 million yuan, an increase of 0.95%, and an inflow of 1.8 million yuan [5]. Group 4: Bond and Commodity Funds - **Bond Funds**: - **Interest - Rate Bonds**: 30 - year bonds had a scale of 8.969 billion yuan, an increase of 0.28%, and an inflow of 821 million yuan; 10 - year bonds had a scale of 4.09 billion yuan, an increase of 0.16%, and an inflow of 113 million yuan; 5 - 10 - year bonds had a scale of 38.952 billion yuan, an increase of 0.18%, and an inflow of 365 million yuan; 5 - year bonds had a scale of 6.948 billion yuan, an increase of 0.09%, and an inflow of 66 million yuan; Bonds under 5 - year had a scale of 22.725 billion yuan, an increase of 0.02%, and an outflow of 195 million yuan; Others had a scale of 371 million yuan, an increase of 0.10%, and an outflow of 2.8 million yuan [6]. - **Credit Bonds**: Medium - to - high - grade bonds had a scale of 10.916 billion yuan, an increase of 0.12%, and an inflow of 893 million yuan; Urban Investment Bonds had a scale of 13.817 billion yuan, an increase of 0.18%, and an inflow of 328 million yuan; Short - term Commercial Papers had a scale of 29.341 billion yuan, an increase of 0.03%, and an inflow of 1.707 billion yuan [6]. - **Convertible Bonds**: Had a scale of 43.859 billion yuan, an increase of 0.07%, and an outflow of 688 million yuan [6]. - **Commodity Funds**: - Gold had a scale of 70.887 billion yuan, an increase of 3.78%, and an outflow of 563 million yuan; Soybean Meal had a scale of 4.193 billion yuan, an increase of 0.84%, and an inflow of 11 million yuan; Non - ferrous Metals had a scale of 745 million yuan, a decline of 0.36%, and an inflow of 1.5 million yuan; Energy and Chemicals had a scale of 293 million yuan, a decline of 1.75%, and an outflow of 3 million yuan [6]. Group 5: Index - Enhanced Funds - Index - enhanced funds related to Shanghai Composite 50 had a scale of 76 million yuan, a decline of 0.38%, and no net inflow; CSI 300 had a scale of 3.209 billion yuan, an increase of 0.13%, and an outflow of 1.5 million yuan; CSI 500 had a scale of 1.978 billion yuan, a decline of 0.50%, and an outflow of 500,000 yuan; CSI 1000 had a scale of 656 million yuan, a decline of 0.97%, and an outflow of 70,000 yuan; ChiNext Index had a scale of 469 million yuan, a decline of 0.92%, and an outflow of 50,000 yuan; STAR Market and ChiNext 50 had a scale of 62 million yuan, a decline of 1.38%, and no net inflow; STAR 50 had a scale of 935 million yuan, a decline of 1.63%, and an inflow of 1.5 million yuan; STAR 100 had a scale of 317 million yuan, a decline of 1.49%, and an inflow of 10,000 yuan; Others had a scale of 194 million yuan, a decline of 0.70%, and an outflow of 90,000 yuan [6]

Report Information - Report Title: Weekly Report on Capital Flows of Exchange-Traded Index Funds [1] - Data Date: April 21 - April 25, 2025 [1] - Analyst: Jin Ling [1] - Report Date: April 28, 2025 [1] Core Viewpoints - The report presents the capital flow, fund scale, and weekly price change data of domestic passive stock funds, overseas index funds, and other types of index funds from April 21 to April 25, 2025, helping investors understand the market dynamics of different types of index funds [4][5][6] Summary by Category Domestic Passive Stock Funds - **Composite Concepts**: Among them, the CSI 1000 had a weekly price increase of 1.95% and a net capital inflow of 594 million yuan; the Science and Technology Innovation 100 had a weekly price increase of 0.69% and a net capital inflow of 391 million yuan; while the Shanghai - Shenzhen 300 had a weekly price increase of 0.38% but a net capital outflow of 2.783 billion yuan [4] - **Industry Themes**: The large - technology concept had a weekly price increase of 1.10% and a net capital inflow of 4.849 billion yuan; the large - health concept had a weekly price increase of 2.36% and a net capital inflow of 479 million yuan; the large - consumer concept had a weekly price increase of 0.36% and a net capital outflow of 1.397 billion yuan [4] - **Style Strategies**: The dividend - low - volatility concept had a weekly price increase of 0.76% and a net capital inflow of 87 million yuan; the growth concept had a weekly price increase of 1.84% and a net capital outflow of 109 million yuan [4] - **Enterprise Nature**: The China Special Valuation (C - Special Valuation) concept had a weekly price change of - 0.05% and a net capital outflow of 242 million yuan [4] - **Region**: The regional concept had a weekly price increase of 1.62% and a net capital outflow of 600,000 yuan [4] Overseas Index Funds - **Composite Concepts**: The Nasdaq 100 had a weekly price increase of 4.79% and a net capital inflow of 1.052 billion yuan; the S&P 500 had a weekly price increase of 3.35% and a net capital inflow of 366 million yuan; the Nikkei 225 had a weekly price increase of 1.50% and a net capital outflow of 16 million yuan [5] - **Industry Themes**: The Hong Kong Stock Technology concept had a weekly price increase of 3.73% and a net capital inflow of 553 million yuan; the China Internet concept had a weekly price increase of 5.22% and a net capital outflow of 51 million yuan; the Hong Kong Stock Medical concept had a weekly price increase of 9.53% and a net capital outflow of 3.053 billion yuan [5] - **Style Strategies**: The dividend concept had a weekly price increase of 1.18% and a net capital inflow of 200,000 yuan; the dividend - low - volatility concept had a weekly price increase of 1.85% and a net capital inflow of 100,000 yuan [5] Other Types of Index Funds - **Bond Funds**: Among interest - rate - related bond funds, the 10 - year bond fund had a weekly price increase of 0.05% and a net capital inflow of 3 million yuan; the 5 - 10 - year bond fund had a weekly price change of - 0.04% and a net capital outflow of 195 million yuan [6] - **Commodity Funds**: The gold fund had a weekly price change of - 0.70% and a net capital inflow of 1.8109 billion yuan; the non - ferrous metal fund had a weekly price increase of 1.70% and a net capital outflow of 400,000 yuan [6] - **Index - Enhanced Funds**: The CSI 500 index - enhanced fund had a weekly price increase of 1.92% and a net capital outflow of 18 million yuan; the GEM index - enhanced fund had a weekly price increase of 2.45% and a net capital outflow of 500,000 yuan [6]