Workflow
投资承诺
icon
Search documents
特朗普9000亿美元投资要求碰壁 日韩持谨慎态度
智通财经网· 2025-09-29 07:03
他补充道:"我们的立场并非是一种谈判策略。" 今年7月,韩国与美国达成了一项3500亿美元的投资承诺,作为一项更广泛的贸易协议的一部分,该协 议旨在将美国关税从25%降至15%。但双方在如何安排这一投资计划的问题上仍存在分歧。 日本也做出了一项类似的5500亿美元投资承诺,但具体实施细节仍不明确,而该协议中披露的细节令首 尔官员感到担忧。 韩国总理金珉奭上周表示,若不与美国达成货币互换协议,这笔投资将对韩国经济造成严重冲击。3500 亿美元的投资相当于韩国外汇储备的80%以上。 日本也对其5500亿美元的美国投资计划也表达了谨慎态度。日本执政党领导人的热门候选人高市早苗表 示,如果与美国的协议不符合日本的利益,那么日本可能会与美国重新进行贸易谈判。 高市早苗周日就该投资基金表示:"如果在协议执行过程中发现任何不公平、不符合日本利益的情况, 我们必须坚持立场。这可能意味着需要重新谈判。" 据报道,美国商务部长霍华德·卢特尼克告诉韩国官员,华盛顿更倾向于以现金而非贷款的方式进行投 资。 魏圣洛表示,韩国政府正在探索替代方案,并希望两国领导人下个月在庆州举行的亚太经合组织峰会上 会面时能够取得进展。 智通财经APP ...
财经观察:多国对美投资承诺为何纷纷“缩水”?
Huan Qiu Shi Bao· 2025-08-06 22:51
Group 1: Investment Commitments - The U.S. government has announced significant investment commitments from allies, with Japan pledging $550 billion, South Korea $350 billion, and the EU $600 billion, but these figures often represent loans or guarantees rather than direct investments [1][2][4] - Japan's direct investment in the U.S. is only expected to account for 1% to 2% of the total commitment, raising questions about the actual impact of these investments [2][3] - The EU's $600 billion commitment is based on corporate intentions rather than guaranteed investments, highlighting the uncertainty surrounding these figures [6][7] Group 2: Profit Distribution and Economic Impact - The U.S. claims that 90% of the profits from these investments will go to American taxpayers, while the remaining 10% will be allocated to Japan, leading to differing interpretations of profit distribution [2][4] - Concerns have been raised in Japan about the potential negative impact on domestic investment and economic growth due to the focus on U.S. investments [3][5] - South Korea's investment commitment, which represents 18.7% of its GDP, raises questions about the rationale behind a larger proportional investment compared to Japan [5] Group 3: Political and Strategic Implications - The differing interpretations of investment commitments reflect a broader trend of U.S. allies reassessing their economic strategies and reducing unconditional support for U.S. initiatives [9][10] - The lack of formal agreements and clarity in negotiations has led to concerns about the enforceability and seriousness of these commitments [9][10] - The potential for increased tariffs from the U.S. if these investment commitments are not met adds pressure on allied nations to fulfill their promises [10]
美国高级行政官员:美国总统特朗普有权在其他国家未履行投资承诺时恢复更高关税水平。
news flash· 2025-07-27 22:31
Core Viewpoint - U.S. President Trump has the authority to reinstate higher tariff levels if other countries fail to meet their investment commitments [1] Group 1 - The statement emphasizes the U.S. government's stance on enforcing trade agreements and investment commitments from other nations [1] - This policy could impact international trade relations and investment flows, particularly for countries that have not fulfilled their obligations [1] - The potential for increased tariffs may serve as a leverage tool for the U.S. in negotiations with foreign governments [1]
外媒:韩国考虑以对美投资承诺换取汽车关税下调
news flash· 2025-07-24 02:02
Group 1 - The core idea of the article is that South Korea is considering a commitment to invest in U.S. projects in exchange for a reduction in automotive tariffs [1] - The negotiations between the U.S. and South Korea are focused on lowering tariffs on goods, including automobiles, to 15% [1] - South Korea's trade delegation is currently in Washington for discussions, with a proposed investment scale of $400 billion mentioned by Commerce Secretary Raimondo [1] Group 2 - The investment commitment being discussed is similar to a recent agreement between Japan and the U.S., which included procurement of Boeing aircraft and agricultural products [1] - The total investment commitment sought by the U.S. is in the range of hundreds of billions of dollars, reflecting a significant economic engagement [1] - The challenge for South Korea lies in matching the investment commitment of Japan, which is more than double South Korea's economic size [1]
特朗普中东行一路“签大单”,超千亿美元协议能否最终落实?
Di Yi Cai Jing· 2025-05-16 05:58
Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the articles highlights the potential for high-value agreements signed by the U.S. with Gulf countries to become "unfinished projects" rather than actualized investments [1][5] - During President Trump's visit to the Middle East, over $1 trillion in commercial agreements were signed with Saudi Arabia, Qatar, and the UAE, covering sectors such as defense, aviation, energy, and artificial intelligence [1][3] - The visit aimed to strengthen economic cooperation between the U.S. and Gulf nations, with a focus on attracting increased investments from these countries [1][4] Group 2 - Saudi Arabia committed to a $600 billion investment over four years, although Trump sought to increase this to $1 trillion [3][5] - Qatar signed agreements worth over $243.5 billion, including a $96 billion deal for Boeing aircraft [3] - The UAE reached agreements exceeding $200 billion, involving aircraft purchases and oil and gas project expansions [3] Group 3 - There are concerns regarding the actual implementation of these agreements, with skepticism about the inflated figures presented by Trump [5][6] - Historical context shows that previous agreements, such as a $350 billion deal from Trump's 2017 visit to Saudi Arabia, have not been fulfilled [5][6] - The actual foreign direct investment (FDI) from Saudi Arabia in the U.S. is significantly lower than the promised amounts, indicating that many figures may be more aspirational than realistic [6]