收入差距
Search documents
Are You Really Earning Enough at 45–54? See How Your Income Compares Today
Yahoo Finance· 2025-12-23 12:49
Boris_Zec / Getty Images Key Takeaways Households ages 45–54 earn a median income of $91,880—the highest of any group—reflecting peak career years, greater experience, and often two full-time earners. Income levels vary widely across groups, with homeowners and college graduates earning substantially more than renters and those without a college degree. Income is just one piece of the puzzle—tracking your net worth offers a fuller picture of long-term financial health and overall stability. House ...
求是网:如何认识我国现行收入差距的成因
Sou Hu Cai Jing· 2025-12-11 03:09
城乡收入差距同样是一种发展现象。无论是农业经济还是以农业占主导的农村经济,在工业化和城镇化 过程中必然经历生产要素向外转移的过程,这也是资源重新配置的过程,最集中地表现为剩余劳动力的 转移,由此农业劳动生产率和国民经济整体劳动生产率同时得以提高。农业经营规模扩大、农业机械化 水平提高和剩余劳动力充分转移,可能由于各种因素受到阻碍,或者产生不协调现象,造成农业劳动生 产率提高速度滞后于非农产业的情形,导致务农收益偏低,最终表现为城乡收入差距扩大。例如,2024 年占劳动力总数22.2%的农业劳动力,仅生产了占GDP比重6.8%的农业增加值,这展示了农业劳动生产 率偏低的事实,由此可以理解为什么务农收入无法实现同非农产业收入的同步提高。同年在农户可支配 收入中,来自务农等家庭经营收入的比重仅为33.9%,显著低于工资性收入的比重42.4%。 基尼系数是一个综合性的指标,主要由农村收入差距、城镇收入差距和城乡之间收入差距三部分构成, 在统计意义上相对完整地反映全社会的收入分配状况。长期以来,城乡收入比率是整体收入差距的一个 主要的贡献因素。在21世纪第一个十年末收入差距达到最高点之前,城乡收入比率的变化同基尼系数保 ...
美国9月零售销售:增长0.2%,消费者动能三季度末减弱
Sou Hu Cai Jing· 2025-11-25 23:14
【11月26日美国公布9月零售销售数据,消费者动能三季度末减弱】11月26日,美国商务部公布因政府 关门推迟的9月零售销售数据。未调整通胀时,9月零售销售额增0.2%,低于8月0.6%的增幅。不含汽车 和汽油,仅增0.1%。 13个类别中8个增长,主要受加油站、个护商店等销售拉动。机动车销售四个月来 首降,电子、服装和体育用品零售也下滑。 消费者动能在三季度末减弱,虽整体支出受高收入消费者 支撑,但低收入消费者吃紧。物价上涨和就业走软使购物者谨慎,信心接近历史低位。 收入差距受美 联储关注,关于下月是否降息,决策者分歧明显。投资者仍认为12月降息可能性更大。 本文由 AI算法生成,仅作参考,不涉投资建议,使用风险自担 FOG hexun.com 和讯财经 和而不同 迅达天下 扫码查看原文 ...
Just 62% Of Americans Own Stock: Income, Education, And Race Drive Who Invests
Yahoo Finance· 2025-09-24 12:31
Core Insights - Approximately 62% of Americans own stock, indicating a significant portion of the population is engaged in the market, but nearly 40% remain uninvolved [1] Income Disparities - Among households earning $100,000 or more, stock ownership is at 87%, while it drops to 28% for those earning $50,000, highlighting the impact of income on investment participation [2] Educational Influence - About 84% of college graduates invest in the market, compared to only 42% of individuals with a high school diploma or less, demonstrating the correlation between education level and stock ownership [3] Racial and Ethnic Factors - Stock ownership rates are 70% for White adults, 53% for Black adults, and 38% for Hispanic adults, reflecting historical wealth disparities and access to investment resources [4] Accessibility and Resources - The decision to invest in stocks is influenced by available resources, knowledge, and opportunities, indicating that stock ownership is not solely a personal choice [5] Closing the Gaps - Addressing the disparities in stock ownership requires improved access to affordable investing platforms, policy changes, employer support, and enhanced financial education [6]
李迅雷:中国高收入群体与低收入群体的人均可支配收入差距在11倍左右,全国的高收入群体正在向一线城市集聚
Ge Long Hui· 2025-09-15 06:38
(责任编辑:宋政 HN002) 【免责声明】本文仅代表作者本人观点,与和讯网无关。和讯网站对文中陈述、观点判断保持中立,不对所包含内容 的准确性、可靠性或完整性提供任何明示或暗示的保证。请读者仅作参考,并请自行承担全部责任。邮箱: news_center@staff.hexun.com 格隆汇9月15日|中泰国际首席经济学家李迅雷9月13日发文称,我国当前的收入差距比90年代的日本要 大,日本是发达国家中贫富差距最小的国家之一。我国近年来官方没有公布基尼系数,但从国家统计局 的抽样调查数据表明,高收入群体与低收入群体的人均可支配收入差距在11倍左右。据说,上海壹号院 购买者包括实业企业家、影视明星及外籍人士等,其中上海本地买家占比约28.6%,江浙地区买家合计 占比30%。说明全国的高收入群体正在向一线城市集聚。 ...
CGI乡村振兴 | 田野对谈之对话李实(下):展望乡村振兴的未来
中金点睛· 2025-06-19 00:06
Core Viewpoint - The article emphasizes the importance of rural revitalization in addressing urban-rural disparities, regional differences, and income inequality in contemporary China [5][6]. Group 1: Rural Revitalization and Economic Development - Rural revitalization can lead to rural development, and if farmers' income increases at a faster rate than urban income, the urban-rural gap will continue to narrow [5]. - The income disparity between urban and rural areas constitutes a significant portion of overall income inequality, and rural revitalization can help mitigate this issue [5]. - Addressing rural revitalization in central and western regions is crucial for reducing regional disparities, as the differences between eastern and western regions are primarily rooted in rural conditions [5]. Group 2: Common Prosperity and Rural Revitalization - Common prosperity aims to tackle three major issues: urban-rural disparity, regional differences, and income inequality [6]. Group 3: Vision for the Future of Rural China - The ideal future for rural areas includes them serving primarily as agricultural production bases, with a decreasing population that may concentrate around cities and small towns [7]. - Future rural landscapes may be dominated by family farms and large farms, with less distinct agricultural geographical boundaries and minimal differences in public services [7]. - The quality of life for residents in small towns and large cities may converge, with the main differences between urban and rural populations being related to industry or occupation rather than location [7].
上海天价豪宅被一抢而空,业主大多是艺人,艺人名单被曝出
Sou Hu Cai Jing· 2025-05-31 19:22
Group 1 - The core point of the article highlights the surprising demand for luxury real estate in Shanghai, particularly in Huangpu District, where a property with a starting price of 50 million yuan was heavily sought after, even attracting celebrity buyers [1][4] - The property is located near the Bund, with the smallest unit measuring 313 square meters and a price per square meter of 185,000 yuan, leading to total prices exceeding 50 million yuan for each unit [2][4] - The presence of celebrity names in the lottery list for purchasing the property sparked significant public interest and speculation about their financial capabilities [4][5] Group 2 - The article discusses the stark contrast between the wealth of celebrities and the average person's financial situation, emphasizing that for many, 50 million yuan is an unattainable amount [5][9] - Comments from the public reflect a sense of frustration regarding income inequality, with many expressing that the wealth of celebrities highlights a broader societal issue [7][9] - The discussion raises questions about the value placed on different professions, suggesting that the disparity in earnings between entertainers and essential workers like scientists may influence young people's career choices [9][10]