Core Viewpoint - The case of Sun Qianhe vs. Tencent, known as "China's first game algorithm case," raises significant questions about player rights and the transparency of game matching mechanisms, potentially impacting consumer trust and industry practices [1][2]. Group 1: Legal Proceedings and Focus Areas - The lawsuit centers on the claim that Tencent's game "Honor of Kings" employs an algorithm that unfairly matches stronger players with weaker teammates, affecting game outcomes and player experience [1][4]. - Key issues discussed in court include players' right to know about the matching mechanism and whether such information constitutes a commercial secret [3][4]. - Tencent argues that the matching mechanism is influenced by various factors beyond the algorithm, and that disclosing it could harm fair competition and innovation in the gaming industry [4][8]. Group 2: Consumer Rights and Industry Balance - The case highlights the tension between consumer rights and industry development, emphasizing the need for a balance that protects both players and the gaming ecosystem [10][12]. - Legal experts suggest that while consumers should have some knowledge of game mechanics, the specifics of algorithms may not need to be disclosed to protect commercial interests [5][6][13]. - The ongoing debate reflects a broader trend in global gaming regulations, where countries are increasingly focusing on consumer protection and transparency in game mechanics [12][13].

Core Viewpoint - The lawsuit filed by a player against Tencent seeks to make the matchmaking mechanism of "Honor of Kings" public, focusing on the factors influencing player matchups and their respective weights in different game modes, raising concerns about whether game outcomes are manipulated by the matchmaking system [1][3]. Group 1: Legal Proceedings - The court hearing has concluded, and the next steps await notification from the court [1]. - The main dispute centers on whether the matchmaking mechanism can determine game outcomes and whether it should be made public [3]. - Tencent argues that the claim of controlling player win rates to maintain a 50% win rate is unfounded, providing examples of player win rates that vary significantly from 50% [3]. Group 2: Consumer Rights and Transparency - Tencent's defense cites the Consumer Rights Protection Law, stating that the law does not require the disclosure of technical details behind services, and previous cases have established boundaries for consumer rights [4]. - The court was informed that Tencent has provided information about the matchmaking mechanism through official channels, but the plaintiff believes this is insufficient and more of a promise than true transparency [4][5]. Group 3: Comparison with Other Platforms - The plaintiff argues that other large apps like Douyin and Weibo disclose their algorithms without claiming commercial secrets, questioning why Tencent does not do the same for its matchmaking mechanism [7]. - Tencent maintains that the matchmaking mechanism is a commercial secret and that its disclosure could lead to exploitation of the system, harming the gaming experience [10][11]. Group 4: Technical Aspects of Matchmaking - The matchmaking mechanism is described as a complex system that balances speed, fairness, and game quality, with the Elo rating system being used to match players of similar skill levels [12][13]. - Tencent emphasizes that the matchmaking system is a proprietary technology developed to create fair competition and that its disclosure could undermine market fairness and innovation [13].

文｜极速财讯 "广发南航明珠信用卡兑换里程的权益缩水了，而且一年多都没人通知我"，王洋很无奈。 王洋是一名销售，经常有出差的需求，因此他早在11年前就办理了广发银行南航明珠信用卡，用来兑换机票，办卡时的权益是每刷卡14元累计1个里程。 近日，王洋听朋友说兑换里程的权益缩水了，他咨询客服后得知，现在的权益变成了每刷卡18元累计1个里程，而且早在2023年6月份就调整了，"同样的消 费累计里程数缩水22%，而且到现在（广发信用卡）也没通知我"。 极速财讯注意到，2023年4月，广发信用卡官网曾发过公告表示，自2023年6月1日起，南航明珠信用卡金卡、普卡权益调整，刷卡累计里程的比例由原14:1 调整为18:1。 极速财讯致电广发银行信用卡中心，官方客服表示"已通知持卡人，在发现精彩APP权益专区是能看到权益调整通知的。" 王洋对广发信用卡客服的答复表示质疑，他告诉极速财讯，"我不看官网，但每个月还款时都会登录APP查账单，一直以来都没有收到权益变动的通知，包 括现在看也没有。" 广发信用卡权益变动却未能通知到用户是否合规呢？北京威诺律师事务所主任杨兆全指出，"广发信用卡在调整兑换比例后，未能有效通知到用户，可能侵 ...