| 项目 Item | 2025.01 | | 2025.02 | | 2025.03 | | 2025.04 | | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | | 亿美元 | 亿SDR | 亿美元 | 亿SDR | 亿美元 | 亿SDR | 亿美元 | 1 | | | 100million | 100million | 100million | 100million | 100million | 100million | 100million | 100 | | | USD | SDR | USD | SDR | USD | SDR | USD | | | 1. 外汇储备 Foreign currency reserves | 32090.36 | 24612.47 | 32272.24 | 24654.06 | 32406.65 | 24389.83 | 32816.62 | 2 | | 2. 基金组织储备头寸 IMF reserve position | 100.48 | 77.07 | 100.87 | 77.06 | 101. ...

Core Viewpoint - The People's Bank of China reported an increase in gold reserves, marking the ninth consecutive month of accumulation, with reserves reaching 7.396 million ounces (approximately 2300.41 tons) as of the end of July [2]. Group 1: Foreign Currency Reserves - As of July, China's foreign currency reserves stood at approximately $3.292 trillion, showing a slight increase from the previous month [2]. - The IMF reserve position for China was reported at $109.28 billion, reflecting a decrease from the previous month [2]. Group 2: Special Drawing Rights (SDRs) - The SDRs held by China were recorded at 552.69 million SDRs as of July, with a slight fluctuation observed in the preceding months [2]. Group 3: Gold Reserves - The gold reserves increased by 60,000 ounces (approximately 1.86 tons) from the previous month, continuing a trend of consistent growth [2]. - The value of gold reserves was reported at $2,439.85 per ounce, indicating a significant increase compared to earlier months [2]. Group 4: Other Reserve Assets - Other reserve assets showed a negative balance of -3.47 billion, indicating a slight improvement from the previous month [2].

Group 1 - The Chinese government firmly opposes sacrificing principles and international fairness for any agreements, as stated by the spokesperson of the Ministry of Commerce [1] - The U.S. Treasury Secretary emphasized the need for the U.S. to strengthen its leadership in the IMF and World Bank, aiming for greater transparency in global financial governance [3] - The U.S. tariffs have led to significant financial burdens on low-income families, with additional costs amounting to 6.2% of their income, compared to only 1.7% for high-income households [6] Group 2 - Predictions indicate that if the current U.S. tariff policies remain unchanged, prices for baby products could rise by approximately 30%, with specific tariffs on baby furniture and toys reaching as high as 129% and 113% respectively [8] - The recent congressional hearing highlighted the challenges faced by the U.S. Treasury Secretary in justifying the tariff policies, which are increasingly seen as detrimental to the economy [5][8] - The overall impact of the tariffs is perceived as counterproductive, with the policies described as a self-inflicted economic challenge rather than a protective measure for American interests [8]