Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the article highlights the disparity between the perceived success of the US-China trade negotiations and the underlying data that suggests otherwise, indicating a manipulation of information by the US administration [1][2] - The article emphasizes that the market's reaction to the trade talks is influenced by selective disclosure of information, which creates a false sense of security among investors [2][4] - It points out that the intervention by GJD is a strategic move to manage market liquidity and prevent potential market disruptions, reflecting a proactive stance by institutional investors [2][4] Group 2 - The article discusses the impending interest rate cuts by the Federal Reserve, driven by lower-than-expected CPI data and the ongoing debt crisis, which presents opportunities for the A-share market [4][10] - It notes that the current market environment is more favorable compared to previous trade conflicts, with ample internal liquidity and reduced external pressures, suggesting a potential for growth in A-shares [4][10] - The article highlights the importance of data-driven decision-making for investors, contrasting the emotional responses of retail investors with the analytical approaches of institutional players [4][6] Group 3 - The article underscores the significance of quantitative data in navigating market volatility, suggesting that retail investors often fall prey to psychological biases such as herd behavior [6][8] - It advocates for the use of quantitative tools to identify institutional footprints, enabling investors to make informed decisions rather than relying on price movements alone [6][8] - The discussion concludes that understanding market dynamics through data can empower investors to withstand psychological pressures and capitalize on opportunities [8][10]