格隆汇9月5日｜特斯拉董事会周五提出一项新的薪酬方案，若马斯克在未来十年内达成一系列极具挑战 性的目标，他将获得价值约1万亿美元的报酬。根据该方案，马斯克不会领取任何工资或奖金，其报酬 将以股票形式分期兑现，解锁条件包括实现特斯拉市值的大幅增长，以及实现盈利大幅提升、销售数百 万辆汽车等关键里程碑。董事会主席Robyn Denholm在致投资者的信中表示："留住并激励马斯克，对 特斯拉成为历史上最有价值的公司至关重要。这一薪酬方案旨在将非凡的长期股东价值与激励措施结合 起来，从而推动我们这位富有远见的领导人实现最佳业绩。"董事会强调，对马斯克的激励与投资者利 益高度一致。若特斯拉增长停滞，他将一无所获。然而，如此庞大的薪酬规模，很可能会重新引发关于 这位全球首富收入水平的激烈争论。 ...

Core Viewpoint - The company, Jiao Da Ang Li, has reported criminal actions against five former executives for allegedly harming the company's interests by using company funds to purchase group insurance and subsequently refunding the premiums to personal accounts [1][2][3]. Group 1: Background of the Incident - The five former executives involved are Yang Guoping, Zhu Minjun, Lou Jianying, Li Hong, and Li Kangming, who held various senior positions in the company from 2016 to 2019 [5][6]. - The company filed a criminal report with the Shanghai Public Security Bureau, transitioning from a civil lawsuit to address the alleged criminal behavior discovered during the civil proceedings [3][16]. Group 2: Details of the Insurance Transactions - The first group insurance policy was taken out in October 2016 with a total premium of 3.8 million yuan, and the beneficiaries included the five former executives [6][12]. - In November 2017, the company applied for a refund of the insurance premium, which was directly returned to the personal accounts of the five executives, totaling 1.0936 million yuan [14][17]. - A second insurance policy was purchased in 2018 for a total of 12.84 million yuan, which was also refunded to the personal accounts of the same executives in January 2019 [14][15]. Group 3: Company’s Response and Findings - The current management, led by Ji Lin, discovered these irregularities during a self-audit prompted by a tax authority inquiry into the insurance premiums [20][21]. - The management found no records of board resolutions or approval processes for these transactions, raising concerns about their legality [16][20]. - Legal experts noted that using group insurance to refund premiums to executives' personal accounts is an unusual practice and could indicate potential misconduct [18][21].