小区没取得房产证 无法享受民用电价 果园西小区 按照商用电价收费 只因没有民电接口 家住通州区果园西小区的张先生近日反映，小区的电动自行车充电桩按1.2元/度的商业用电价格向居民 收取电费，而根据政府规定，本应按照居民生活用电的标准（即0.5103元/度）收取。由于认为充电价 格过高，一些居民在单元门门口飞线充电，安全隐患不小。 10月4日记者来到果园西小区，该小区30余个充电桩集中设置于小区南侧的一处车棚内，这里既有充满 即走的临时充电区，也有可以长期停放的固定充电区。这两处充电区内的充电桩分别由"驴充充"和"万 威智充"两家公司安装和运营。记者分别扫取充电桩上的二维码后看到，两家公司在计费标准一栏都明 确标注着电费为1.2元/度。车棚南侧的墙上张贴着充电站的收费标准，其中在电费一栏不仅写着"1.2元/ 度"，旁边还专门注明该价格为"商业电价"。 在采访中记者看到，小区北侧距离车棚较远的部分居民楼的确存在飞线充电的情况。当天中午时分，小 区10号楼前，多条电线被从楼上甩下，三辆电动自行车、一辆电动三轮车以及一辆京B号牌的四轮代步 车正在楼前飞线充电。其中一位车主还在单元门旁外墙上装了一个小铁箱，从楼上甩下的 ...

华夏时报记者 李未来 襄阳报道 "这边充电桩已经满了，前面还有四个充电桩，你可以开到那边去。"10月2日，福银高速枣阳服务区充 电站工作人员引导车主有序停车和充电。双节8天假期，该服务区两个充电站运营商湖北交投和国家电 网都安排了工作人员引导车主充电，很少看到长时间排队的现象。 今年双节期间，新能源车长途出行司空见惯，《华夏时报》记者从多名新能源车主处了解到，高速服务 区充电紧张的情况已经有所缓解，一方面不断增长的充电桩数量和不断升级的充电桩质量给了车主很大 便利；另一方面新能源车主也从过往出行中总结了经验：不到"油尽灯枯"时才充电，也不必一口气充 满，高速充电只做补充，可以充一会跑一段。 较受车主诟病的是充电收费，北京一名新能源车主告诉记者，部分时段服务费比充电费用还高，他从北 京开到山东乳山，途中充了3次电，其中有一次充电一个小时，电费只有22元，服务费却高达30多元。 边走边充 今年双节期间，陕西车主郑磊（化名）带上一家人去江西庐山游玩，从陕西渭南出发到江西庐山全程需 要将近1000公里，但他的车实际最长续航只有280公里左右，他的策略是：在沿途边走边玩，在高速边 走边充。 10月2日，记者与郑磊在福银 ...

10月2日，记者与郑磊在福银高速枣阳服务区偶遇，他表示，自己前一天在襄阳市区充满电，走了大约 70公里，电量消耗了25%，而去往庐山还有将近500公里路程，他先把电补满再出发，走一段后再充 电，这样更保险一些。 图为福银高速枣阳服务区充电站。李未来/摄 本报（chinatimes.net.cn）记者李未来 襄阳报道 "这边充电桩已经满了，前面还有四个充电桩，你可以开到那边去。"10月2日，福银高速枣阳服务区充 电站工作人员引导车主有序停车和充电。双节8天假期，该服务区两个充电站运营商湖北交投和国家电 网都安排了工作人员引导车主充电，很少看到长时间排队的现象。 今年双节期间，新能源车长途出行司空见惯，《华夏时报》记者从多名新能源车主处了解到，高速服务 区充电紧张的情况已经有所缓解，一方面不断增长的充电桩数量和不断升级的充电桩质量给了车主很大 便利；另一方面新能源车主也从过往出行中总结了经验：不到"油尽灯枯"时才充电，也不必一口气充 满，高速充电只做补充，可以充一会跑一段。 较受车主诟病的是充电收费，北京一名新能源车主告诉记者，部分时段服务费比充电费用还高，他从北 京开到山东乳山，途中充了3次电，其中有一次充电一 ...

用了1.01度电，扣费3.2元，其中电费0.56元，服务费2.64元。济南市绿地泉景嘉园的居民李先生看着手机上的扣费记录，觉得"有点儿难以接受"。 2024年6月，我国发布《关于规范电动自行车充电收费行为的通知》（以下简称《通知》），要求全国电动自行车户外充电设施实行"价费分离"政策：充 电费用需将电费和服务费分别标示、分别计价，自2025年1月1日起正式实施。 但是，在政策落地过程中，不少市民反映服务费过高、定价机制不透明、收费标准混乱等问题。那么，电动自行车充电这笔账，究竟怎样算才能更合理？ 电动车充电 服务费比电费高 李先生所在小区的充电桩，今年刚提升了收费标准，电动自行车电池容量166AH、电压60AV，两个多月就用了80多元钱。 李先生手机支付记录显示，充电订单详情里包含电费、服务费，其中服务费价格均高于电费。"充个电比去年贵了将近一倍，我认为不合理。" 根据相关规定，居民住宅小区充电设施执行"居民生活用电"类别中合表用户电价，现行标准为每千瓦时0.555元。但是，服务费却成了推高充电成本的无 形之手。 在济南市洪家楼商圈，几家不同品牌的充电桩并排而立，扫码后显示的收费标准也不一样：有的在扫码页面标 ...

Core Viewpoint - The charging service provided by Zhaoxiaomeng in Nantong has faced significant complaints from residents regarding inaccurate charging time, unreasonable fee structures, and lack of transparency in pricing [1][6][8]. Group 1: Complaints and Issues - Residents of Jinding Bay community reported discrepancies between the charging time displayed on the Zhaoxiaomeng app and their electric vehicle's app, with one instance showing a difference of 40 minutes [1]. - The service fee charged by Zhaoxiaomeng has been criticized for being disproportionately high, sometimes exceeding the cost of electricity consumed [1][4]. - A resident conducted tests showing that the same amount of electricity charged resulted in different fees based on the method of disconnection, indicating potential manipulation of charging times to increase costs [4]. Group 2: Fee Structure Changes - Initially, Zhaoxiaomeng charged a service fee based on charging duration, which led to complaints about high costs. In response, they announced the removal of service fees and switched to a pricing model based on charging power [6][8]. - Despite the changes, residents reported that the costs remained high, with one instance showing a charge of 1.54 yuan for a similar charging duration that previously cost only 0.72 yuan [6][8]. Group 3: Regulatory Response - The local market supervision bureau has initiated an investigation into the pricing practices of Zhaoxiaomeng following numerous complaints from residents [12]. - The investigation is being conducted with the involvement of various regulatory departments, highlighting the widespread concern over the charging fee issues [12].

Core Insights - The rapid growth of China's charging infrastructure is highlighted, with public charging piles expected to reach 4.17 million by June 2025, showing a monthly increase of 91,000 and a year-on-year growth of 50% [1][5] - The ratio of public to private charging piles is approaching 1:1, indicating a balanced growth in charging infrastructure relative to electric vehicle sales [1][17] - Despite the growth, challenges remain in the charging infrastructure, including uneven distribution, outdated technology, and service quality issues [1][9] Charging Pile Overview - As of June 2025, there are 4.17 million public charging piles and 10.6 million private charging piles, with public piles showing a monthly increase of 91,000 and private piles increasing by 285,000 [1][5] - The average monthly charging per public pile is 1,608 kWh, up from 1,461 kWh in June of the previous year [1][5] - The charging utilization rate of public piles is three times that of private piles, indicating higher efficiency in public charging infrastructure [1][17] Growth Trends - In 2023, public charging piles increased by 930,000, with a year-on-year growth rate of 43%, while private piles grew by 2.46 million, marking a 27% increase [5] - The growth rate of public charging piles in 2024 is projected to be 850,000, with a slight decline in growth rate compared to 2023 [5] - The first half of 2025 is expected to see a continued increase in both public and private charging infrastructure, maintaining a balanced growth trajectory [1][5] Regional Analysis - Regions such as Guangdong, Jiangsu, and Zhejiang have shown significant growth in public charging infrastructure, while cities like Beijing and Shanghai are experiencing slower growth despite having a large existing base [9][8] - The distribution of charging piles is uneven, with developed cities having a higher concentration, leading to disparities in access and utilization [9] Industry Characteristics - The charging infrastructure industry is characterized by a mix of operators, including manufacturers, state-owned enterprises, and third-party service providers, each adopting different business models [10][11] - The market is becoming increasingly concentrated, with leading operators capturing a larger share of the market due to competitive advantages in funding, location, and technology [12][15] - The trend towards high-power DC charging stations is evident, with a growing demand for faster charging solutions to meet the needs of electric vehicle users [14][15]

Group 1: Market Barriers and Fair Competition - Local protectionism creates invisible barriers for businesses, such as "directory lists" and "exclusive agreements" [2] - Companies like Li Yan's and Chen Fei's faced challenges entering markets due to restrictive local regulations, such as the requirement for a local branch to qualify for bids [3][4] - The implementation of the "Fair Competition Review Regulations" in August 2024 aims to eliminate these barriers and promote a unified national market [5] Group 2: Regulatory Changes and Impact - In June 2024, investigations led to the cancellation of restrictive bidding qualifications in Baise City, allowing Li Yan's company to conduct educational activities [5] - Chen Fei's company benefited from the removal of the "exclusive operating rights" for charging stations, enabling them to install over 100 charging devices shortly after the regulatory change [6] - The competitive environment improved service quality in the charging station sector, benefiting consumers [7] Group 3: Remote Evaluation and National Integration - The introduction of remote evaluation for government procurement has increased fairness in the bidding process, allowing companies from across the country to compete equally [10][11] - Remote evaluation reduces costs for bidders, with significant savings reported by companies participating in the process [15] - The percentage of external companies participating in bids increased from 58% to 83%, with their success rate rising from 15% to 70% [15] Group 4: Regional Cooperation and Development - The establishment of the Deep-Shan Special Cooperation Zone has facilitated a collaborative environment for businesses, allowing for better resource allocation and policy alignment with Shenzhen [16][17] - The cooperation zone has seen significant economic growth, with a 40% increase in GDP and a 77.3% rise in industrial output value in the first quarter of 2023 [19] - The "reverse flying land" concept promotes industrial transfer and collaboration between regions, enhancing innovation and market access for companies [20][21]

Group 1 - The construction of a unified national market is essential for establishing a new development pattern and promoting high-quality development in China [2][4] - The initiative aims to eliminate local protectionism, market segmentation, and "involution" competition, as emphasized by President Xi Jinping during the National People's Congress [2][4] - The implementation of the Fair Competition Review Regulation in 2024 is expected to facilitate fair market access for various business entities [8][9] Group 2 - Local governments are taking decisive actions to dismantle barriers to market entry, such as abolishing restrictive practices like "directory lists" and exclusive agreements [3][9] - In Guangxi, the establishment of an anti-monopoly and unfair competition committee aims to prevent and resolve market monopolies and administrative monopolies [8] - In Jiangxi, a comprehensive review mechanism for fair competition has been created, leading to the assessment of 4,459 new policy measures and the modification of 615 existing ones in 2024 [8] Group 3 - The introduction of remote and cross-regional evaluation for government procurement has increased participation from external companies, with the proportion of external bidders in Beihai rising from 58% to 83% [16][22] - The remote evaluation system enhances fairness by preventing local biases and reducing costs for bidders, leading to significant savings for companies [22][18] - The implementation of remote evaluation has resulted in a 150% increase in the amount won by external companies in Beihai [22] Group 4 - The establishment of the Deep-Shan Special Cooperation Zone has provided ample development space and favorable policies for companies, leading to significant growth in production and sales [25][26] - The cooperation zone has seen a 40% year-on-year increase in GDP and a 77.3% increase in industrial output value in the first quarter of 2023 [28] - The "reverse flying land" strategy has facilitated the establishment of innovation centers that connect resources between Shenzhen and other regions, fostering cross-border industrial cooperation [30][31]

Group 1 - The construction of a nationwide unified market is essential for building a new development pattern and promoting high-quality development in China, leveraging its large population and growing middle-income group [1][2] - The central government emphasizes the need to deepen the market-oriented allocation of resources and eliminate local protectionism and market segmentation [1][3] - The implementation of the Fair Competition Review Regulations in 2024 aims to dismantle barriers to market entry for various business entities, promoting fair competition [5][7] Group 2 - Local governments are taking decisive actions to eliminate local protectionism, as seen in the case of the education and charging station sectors, where previous restrictions have been lifted [8][9] - The introduction of remote evaluation for government procurement has increased participation from external companies, with the proportion of external bidders in Beihai rising from 58% to 83% [11][17] - The remote evaluation system enhances fairness and reduces costs for companies, allowing them to complete the bidding process online, saving significant expenses [17][21] Group 3 - The establishment of the Deep-Shan Special Cooperation Zone has attracted companies by providing favorable policies and a conducive business environment, leading to significant growth in local production and industrial output [18][21] - The concept of "reverse flying land" has been introduced to facilitate industrial transfer and cooperation between regions, enhancing resource sharing and innovation [22][23] - The collaboration between Shenzhen and Nanning has resulted in the successful incubation of numerous enterprises, demonstrating the effectiveness of cross-regional cooperation [24]

Charging Station Operation Models - The operation of charging stations for electric vehicles is characterized by diverse models, including independent operation by charging companies, collaboration with property management, government subsidies, and special bond issuance for funding [1][2][3]. Independent Operation by Charging Companies - Charging companies can independently manage the entire process from investment to maintenance, as exemplified by China Tower's operation in Changsha, which involves thorough assessments of residential areas and adherence to national standards for construction and operation [1]. Collaboration with Property Management - Successful partnerships between property management companies and charging operators leverage each party's strengths, as seen in the case of Dezhengyuan community in Hengyang, where property management provides space and infrastructure while charging companies handle installation and maintenance [2]. Government Subsidies - Local governments can play a crucial role in promoting charging station construction through subsidies, as demonstrated in Yiyang, where a special fund incentivizes companies to participate, and residents only pay for electricity, enhancing public usage of charging stations [2]. Special Bond Issuance - Governments can issue special bonds to fund charging station projects, as illustrated by the North Lake District in Chenzhou, where a public-private partnership model is employed to ensure comprehensive management from construction to operation [3]. Collaborative Task Forces - In areas with limited resources for charging infrastructure, task forces can collaborate with charging companies to optimize space and resources, as seen in Shaoyang, where local government and companies work together to establish charging stations in public areas [3].