Group 1 - The core viewpoint is that the global computing power infrastructure is accelerating, highlighting issues of electricity and storage shortages, particularly affecting major companies like Microsoft and OpenAI [1] - The export value of transformers from China has shown a year-on-year increase, reflecting trends in U.S. electricity prices [1] - The rising prices of storage validate the high demand within the AI industry chain, with significant price increases observed since October, indicating substantial upward potential [1] Group 2 - The AI sector's industry allocation should focus on segments with clear resource gaps in computing power infrastructure, including electricity and storage, as well as related industries like storage, gas turbines, SOFC batteries, solid-state transformers, and energy storage [1] - The A-share market is experiencing continuous profit improvement, with the technology sector contributing significantly to absolute profit growth, particularly in the TMT industry, where electronics, computers, and communications contributed 1.4%, 0.6%, and 0.5% respectively [1] - The Science and Innovation ETF (588360) tracks the Science and Innovation 50 Index (931643), which has a daily fluctuation of 20%, selecting high-growth potential and innovative technology companies from the Sci-Tech Board [1]

科创板100ETF（588120）跟踪的是科创100指数（000698），单日涨跌幅达20%，该指数从科创板市场 中选取市值较大、流动性较好的100只证券作为指数样本，以反映科创板代表性上市公司证券的整体表 现。成分股覆盖了信息技术、生物医药、新材料等多个高科技领域，具有较强的创新性和成长潜力。 （文章来源：每日经济新闻） 野村东方国际证券指出，在科技转型过程中，由于指数行业权重的持续转变，历史相对估值的参考意义 下降，电子等行业在内的盈利增长持续带动科技领域的估值上修。估值分化加剧的现象将在A股市场持 续，指数的下行空间有限。中美贸易摩擦出现缓和，但双方都已展开中长期自主可控的产业链安全建 设，自主可控等题材将长期受益。科技题材中的医药等先于市场调整，可能成为科技内部轮动的首选。 此外，在"十五五"规划中，对安全韧性的描述（自主可控的投资加码）和新兴产业的商业化（商业航 天、卫星、6G、低空机器人）有望对A股形成积极影响。建议投资者同步增加对中美两国自主可控题材 的关注度，在中国资产中加大对军贸、AI基建、商业航天与6G基建、工控/办公/AI软件等题材的关注。 ...

Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the article is that E Fund Management has officially changed the name of its H-share ETF (510900) to "Hang Seng China Enterprises ETF" starting from November 18, 2025, aligning the name with the underlying index for better investor understanding [1] - The Hang Seng China Enterprises Index has evolved since its inception in 1994, initially covering only state-owned enterprises and later including red-chip stocks and private enterprises, now representing "core assets of Hong Kong-listed Chinese companies" [1] - The index currently consists of core enterprises rooted in the Chinese mainland market, focusing on the "China mainland story," with major companies like Tencent, Meituan, and Xiaomi, where consumer discretionary, information technology, and communication services account for over 60% of the index [1] Group 2 - The name change to "Hang Seng China Enterprises ETF" reflects a modernization effort and aligns with the index's essence, continuing E Fund's initiative for standardized naming of ETFs [1] - E Fund has taken the lead in the industry this year by batch-adjusting the names of its ETFs, achieving a standardized naming convention of "index name + ETF" or "index name + ETF + company name," enhancing investor recognition and searchability [1]

1. Report Industry Investment Rating No information about the report industry investment rating is provided in the content. 2. Core Viewpoints of the Report - The calendar effect in the convertible bond market results from the multi - dimensional intersection of macro - policy rhythms, micro - capital behaviors, and supply - demand changes. It provides a reference perspective for analyzing the fluctuations in the convertible bond and equity markets [4]. - There are significant "calendar effects" in the convertible bond and equity markets, which are formed by multiple factors such as policy meetings, capital - flow periodic fluctuations, earnings disclosure rhythms, and changes in investors' risk preferences. This offers a time - dimension reference for asset allocation [7]. - At the sector level, the "calendar effect" is related to industry rotation intensity, policy rhythms, and performance disclosure cycles. It can help identify phased allocation opportunities. In the short term, it is recommended to focus on industrial and information technology convertible bonds [8]. - From the perspective of supply - demand rhythms, the price center of convertible bonds is expected to continue rising. The supply - demand pattern of the convertible bond market shows certain seasonal characteristics, and grasping the rhythm changes may help in layout during phased supply - demand relaxation windows [9]. 3. Summary According to Relevant Catalogs 3.1 Periodically Appearing "Calendar Effect" - The "calendar effect" refers to the statistically repeatable return deviations or behavior patterns in the securities market within specific time cycles. The research focuses on the performance of A - share and convertible bond main indices from early 2018 to October 24, 2025 [18]. - In the weekly calendar effect, there is a "Monday strong" phenomenon. Mid - and large - cap indices like CSI 300 and CSI 500, as well as the CSI Convertible Bond Index, show a "Wednesday weak" feature, while small - and mid - cap indices like CSI 1000 and CSI 2000 show a "Friday weak" feature. This may be related to the "T + 1" trading mechanism and the influence of public funds [18][21]. - In the monthly performance, the overall performance of major indices in the late part of the month is usually weaker than that in the first and middle parts. The "calendar effect" within a month may be related to the periodic fluctuations of the capital flow. The CSI Convertible Bond market also shows a significant monthly calendar effect [27][30]. 3.2 "Calendar Effect" under Policy Guidelines - Policy releases have certain time rules and rhythms, which are important sources of the A - share market's "calendar effect". Key economic meetings should be highly concerned, such as the Politburo meeting, the Central Economic Work Conference, and the Central Financial Work Conference [35]. - The CSI Convertible Bond Index and the Wind All - A Index show certain monthly seasonal characteristics. The risk premium of the market has declined, and the equity market still has relatively high cost - effectiveness. The monthly periodic performance of these indices may be related to the annual policy release rhythm and important meeting arrangements [38][43]. 3.3 "Calendar Effect" from the Perspective of Financial Reports - The equity market shows periodic stock - price fluctuations around financial report releases. After the annual report season, the performance of small - and mid - cap indices weakens, while the large - cap style is dominant at the end of the year and the beginning of the year. Different sectors have different performances during and after the annual report performance disclosure period [45][47]. 3.4 "Calendar Effect" under Risk Preferences - Changes in risk preferences are a key factor driving the calendar effect in the convertible bond market. The convertible bond market is more active in the second and third quarters. The financing - margin trading volume ratio to the total A - share trading volume also shows periodic changes, which may be related to policy release rhythms and corporate earnings disclosure cycles [57][59]. 3.5 Opportunity Identification of the "Calendar Effect" at the Sector Dimension - Since September, the industry rotation intensity has increased. The periods of high rotation intensity are usually in April, August, September, and December, while February, June, October, and November are relatively flat. The narrowing of the conversion premium rate channel may indicate future directional changes in the convertible bond market [67][72]. 3.6 Monthly - Dimension Industry Rotation Rules - In the "Spring Rally" at the beginning of the year (January - February), technology - growth sectors perform prominently. During the annual report performance disclosure period (March - May), defensive sectors perform well. In the mid - year report performance game period (June - July), cyclical and growth sectors resonate. After the mid - year report is released (August - September), most sectors enter a callback. At the end of the year (October - December), there is a style switch and defensive allocation [75][81]. 3.7 Industrial Convertible Bonds Still Have Room for Growth during Supply - Demand Reconstruction - Industrial convertible bonds are a worthy allocation direction in November. Benefiting from the improvement of the supply - demand relationship and the overall contraction of the convertible bond market supply, industrial convertible bonds perform better than in previous years. Although the current valuation is high, it is still attractive, and the convertible bonds have the potential to rise after valuation digestion [85][90]. 3.8 The Information Technology Sector May Continue to Be the Main Line - The information technology sector has a higher probability of strengthening in March, July, and November. Currently, it is in the early stage of the "15th Five - Year Plan", and with policy support and technological iteration, its performance in the equity market may be sustainable. From August, the information technology convertible bond index has gradually recovered, and it may still have performance space from November to December [97].

两份新立项标准主要围绕系统基准测试、数据两个重点方向。EAI-bench《具身智能系统基准测试和评 价框架》，构建具身智能基准测试框架，规范智能水平和应用成效的评价方法，为具身智能从实验室走 向产业落地提供统一能力演进标尺。《面向真实场景的具身智能遥操作数据采集系统技术要求》，针对 遥操作数据采集系统定义数据采集要求和记录规范，促进具身智能数据的标准化和互通共享。 人民财讯11月17日电，近日，中国信息通信研究院(简称"中国信通院")主导推动的国际标准《具身智能 系统框架及能力要求》在ITU-T第21专业组(SG21)2025年第二次全体会议期间正式冻结，同期成功推动 2项新立提案：EAI-bench《具身智能系统基准测试和评价框架》和《面向真实场景的具身智能遥操作数 据采集系统技术要求》。 ...

（於 中 華 人 民 共 和 國 註 冊 成 立 的 股 份 有 限 公 司） Henan Union Information Technology Co., Ltd. 河南联合信息科技股份有限公司 警 告 本 公 告 乃 根 據 香 港 聯 合 交 易 所 有 限 公 司（「聯交所」）及 證 券 及 期 貨 事 務 監 察 委 員 會（「證監會」）的 要 求 而 刊 發，僅 用 作 向 香 港 公 眾 人 士 提 供 資 料。 香 港 聯 合 交 易 所 有 限 公 司 及 證 券 及 期 貨 事 務 監 察 委 員 會 對 本 公 告 的 內 容 概 不 負 責，對 其 準 確 性 或 完 整 性 亦 不 發 表 任 何 聲 明，並 明 確 表 示，概 不 對 因 本 公 告 全 部 或 任 何 部 份 內 容 而 產 生 或 因 依 賴 該 等 內 容 而 引 致 的 任 何 損 失 承 擔 任 何 責 任。 (e) 本 公 告（及 其 所 載 資 料）僅 供 參 考，並 不 構 成 或 組 成 於 美 國（包 括 其 領 土 及 屬 地、美 國 任 何 州 及 哥 倫 比 亞 特 區）或 進 行 有 ...

Core Insights - ESG has become a core issue for high-quality development of A-share listed companies amid deepening global sustainable development agendas and strengthening domestic and international regulatory policies [1][16] - A-share ESG practices in 2024 show strong policy-driven momentum, gradual deepening of practices, but still have shortcomings [1][2] Policy Landscape - The domestic regulatory framework for ESG is continuously improving, with ESG being incorporated into national strategic frameworks and mandatory disclosures set to begin in 2026 for certain companies [1][18] - International standards such as ISSB and CSRD are promoting standardized disclosures, while major overseas markets are tightening compliance requirements for cross-border operations [1][23] Practice Performance - There is a positive correlation between ESG practices and corporate value, with significant relationships observed between ESG ratings and return on assets (ROA) and return on equity (ROE) [1][38] - The disclosure rate of sustainability reports reached 45.85%, a significant increase from the previous year, with larger market capitalization and state-owned enterprises showing a stronger willingness to disclose [1][2] Strategic and Governance Aspects - Only 9.31% of listed companies fully articulate their ESG strategies, with 82% lacking any related strategy, indicating a predominance of basic-level practices and a scarcity of excellence [2][18] - Governance structure establishment rate is at 34.84%, with board-led governance becoming mainstream, but linking ESG to executive compensation remains concentrated in specific industries [2][18] Risk and Opportunity Management - 71.84% of companies conduct ESG risk identification, with industrial and information technology sectors being high-risk areas, yet only 32% identify climate-related risks and opportunities [2][18] - The application rate of scenario analysis is below 14%, indicating weak capability in opportunity identification [2][18] Sector-Specific Developments - Sustainable supply chain management is gradually advancing, with over 20% of suppliers in most industries establishing ESG assessment mechanisms [2][18] - Human resource management focuses on diversity, inclusion, and health safety, with an average female employee ratio of 33.2% [2][18] - The sustainable finance market is steadily developing, with green bonds as a core pillar and the scale of ESG public funds and bank wealth management gradually recovering [2][18] Overall Assessment - The development of ESG in A-shares has transitioned from conceptual advocacy to institutional implementation, yet challenges remain in strategic system completeness, uneven disclosure quality, and insufficient depth in specific practices [2][18] - Future efforts should focus on strengthening policy coordination, improving governance mechanisms, and enhancing data credibility to transform ESG from compliance costs into long-term competitive advantages [2][18]

Core Viewpoint - The company is undergoing a restructuring plan approved by the Guangzhou Intermediate People's Court, focusing on the disposal of inefficient assets to improve its asset structure and financial performance [1][3]. Group 1: Auction Progress - The company successfully auctioned its 3.0236% stake in Beijing Haidian Technology Financial Capital Holding Group Co., Ltd. for 3,053,110.05 yuan, with the buyer being Huang Jianfang [2]. - The buyer is required to pay the remaining auction price to the company's designated bank account within the publicized payment deadline, and failure to do so will result in a breach of contract [2]. Group 2: Related Explanation - The asset auction is conducted in accordance with the relevant provisions of the Enterprise Bankruptcy Law and the restructuring plan, which is expected to enhance the company's asset quality and profitability [3]. - The company will continue to monitor the progress of this matter and fulfill its information disclosure obligations as per legal requirements [3].

Market Overview - The A-share market experienced a downward trend from November 10 to November 14, with the Shanghai Composite Index closing at 3990.49 points, a slight decline of 0.18% for the week [2] - Growth sectors faced significant pullbacks, with the ChiNext and STAR Market indices dropping over 5%, indicating pressure on high-valuation sectors [2] - Structural differentiation continued, with the CSI Dividend Index rising 0.25%, showcasing the resilience of value styles, while the Wind Micro-Cap Index surged 4.11%, becoming one of the few market highlights [2] Industry Performance - The average performance of Wind's primary industry indices increased by 0.48%, with over half of the sectors achieving positive returns [9] - The healthcare sector rose by 3.27%, consumer staples by 2.72%, and real estate by 2.62%, marking the strongest performances [9] - Conversely, the information technology sector fell by 4.27%, industrials by 1.28%, and telecommunications services by 1.09%, indicating significant pressure on technology and manufacturing sectors [9] Fund Issuance - A total of 24 funds were issued last week, including 14 equity funds, 4 mixed funds, 2 bond funds, and 4 fund of funds (FOFs), with a total issuance of 14.173 billion units [13] Fund Performance - The Wind All-Fund Index decreased by 0.37% last week, with the ordinary equity fund index down by 0.40% and the mixed equity fund index down by 0.71% [3] - The bond fund index saw a slight increase of 0.06%, indicating a mixed performance across different fund types [3] Global Market Context - Global equity markets showed a mixed performance, with the US market stable and the Dow Jones rising by 0.34%, while European markets performed strongly, with France's CAC40 up by 2.77% and Germany's DAX up by 1.30% [4] - In the commodity market, natural gas rose by 4.47%, silver by 4.69%, and gold by 1.86%, while coking coal plummeted by 6.77% [4] - The US dollar index weakened amid strong expectations for a Federal Reserve rate cut in December, which diminished the dollar's attractiveness [4]

Market Overview - On November 13, U.S. stock markets experienced their largest single-day decline in over a month, with the Dow Jones Industrial Average dropping nearly 800 points, reflecting a 1.65% decrease [2] - The S&P 500 index fell by 1.66%, while the Nasdaq Composite index, heavily impacted by technology stocks, plummeted by 2.29% [2] - The decline was attributed to persistent inflation concerns, fluctuating Federal Reserve policies, and the aftermath of a government shutdown [2] Sector Performance - The technology sector, particularly the "Big Seven" tech companies, led the market downturn, with notable declines including Tesla down 6.64%, Nvidia down 3.58%, and Amazon down 2.71% [2] - In contrast, defensive value stocks saw an uptick, with the value stock index rising approximately 1% this week, while growth stocks fell by 0.6% [2] Individual Stock Movements - Cisco saw a 4.6% increase due to an upward revision of its revenue and profit forecasts, benefiting from increased demand for networking equipment [3] - Disney, however, faced a significant drop of 7.8% as concerns grew over a prolonged distribution dispute with YouTube TV, raising uncertainties about its traditional television business [3] Economic Impact of Government Shutdown - The recent government shutdown, lasting 43 days, resulted in an estimated economic loss of $1.5 trillion, significantly exceeding previous estimates [4] - Key social programs, such as the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, were affected, leading to disruptions for 42 million Americans [4] - The aviation sector was particularly hard hit, with a 10% reduction in flight volumes at 40 major airports due to increased absenteeism among air traffic controllers [4] Policy and Data Concerns - The shutdown has created a "data vacuum," with critical economic reports like the Consumer Price Index and employment data potentially never being released, complicating Federal Reserve policy decisions [5] - Market expectations for a 25 basis point rate cut in December have decreased from 70% to approximately 47% due to the uncertainty surrounding inflation and labor market resilience [5] Global and Domestic Implications - The turmoil in U.S. markets has had global repercussions, with concerns about slowing U.S. economic growth impacting oil prices and causing disruptions in transatlantic flight schedules [6] - The temporary resolution of the government shutdown does not address underlying governance issues, with significant budgetary disagreements remaining unresolved [7] - The potential for another government shutdown looms as only three of the twelve annual appropriations bills have been passed, indicating ongoing political instability [7]