Core Viewpoint - The investigation confirmed that a car owner was overcharged for gasoline due to a malfunction in the fuel dispenser, which resulted in a duplicate billing of 27.18 liters, leading to a total charge of 67.96 liters instead of the actual 40.78 liters filled [2][3]. Investigation Summary - The initial complaint was made on August 9, 2023, when the car owner reported a dispute at the Tianshan gas station, which was followed by a series of investigations and communications with regulatory authorities [1]. - The Chengdu High-tech Zone Market Supervision Bureau conducted a thorough investigation from August 20 to August 27, involving multiple expert institutions to assess the situation [2]. - The fuel dispenser's key components were found to be intact and compliant with regulations, with no evidence of tampering or intentional misconduct by the gas station staff [2][3]. - The investigation included tests on the vehicle's fuel tank capacity, confirming it was consistent with the manufacturer's specifications of 50 liters [3]. - The malfunction was traced back to a software and hardware issue in the fuel dispenser, which caused the erroneous billing [3]. Next Steps - The Chengdu High-tech Zone Market Supervision Bureau will require the China National Petroleum Corporation (CNPC) to implement comprehensive corrective measures, publicly apologize to consumers, and improve service quality [3].

Core Viewpoint - The investigation revealed that a car owner was overcharged for fuel due to a malfunction in the fuel dispenser, leading to a double charge of 200 yuan for a transaction that should have been 40.78 liters instead of 67.96 liters [1][2]. Group 1: Preliminary Situation - On August 9, a car owner reported a dispute at the Tianshan gas station after being charged for 67.96 liters of fuel for a 50-liter tank, prompting police involvement and subsequent investigation [1]. - The gas station sealed the involved fuel dispenser, and the local market supervision authority began an investigation after receiving a complaint on August 11 [1]. - The gas station provided initial compensation to the car owner, and follow-up communications confirmed the dispute was resolved by August 17 [1]. Group 2: Investigation Findings - The investigation confirmed the car owner's complaint of being overcharged by 200 yuan, attributed to a software and hardware malfunction in the fuel dispenser [2]. - Key components of the fuel dispenser were found to be intact and compliant with measurement standards, with no evidence of tampering or intentional misconduct by the gas station staff [2]. - Tests conducted on the vehicle confirmed that the fuel tank's capacity was consistent with its rated 50 liters, ruling out the possibility of an oversized tank [2]. - Data analysis revealed that the fuel dispenser erroneously added the previous transaction's volume to the current one, resulting in the overcharge [2]. Group 3: Next Steps - The market supervision authority will require the gas station to implement comprehensive corrective measures, publicly apologize to consumers, and improve service quality [3]. - There will be an emphasis on enhancing supervision and management, improving complaint mechanisms, and addressing public concerns to protect consumer rights [3].

Group 1 - The core issue involves a complaint from a car owner regarding being charged for 67.96 liters of gasoline for a 50-liter fuel tank, leading to an investigation by the Chengdu High-tech Zone Market Supervision Administration [1][2] - The investigation confirmed that the car owner was overcharged by 200 yuan due to a malfunction in the fuel dispenser's software and hardware, which caused a duplicate billing [3][7] - The Chengdu High-tech Zone Market Supervision Administration will require the China National Petroleum Corporation (CNPC) to implement comprehensive rectifications and publicly apologize to consumers [7] Group 2 - The fuel dispenser's key components were found to be intact and compliant with measurement standards, with no evidence of tampering or intentional inaccuracies [4] - Investigators did not find any abnormal operational behavior from the staff at the gas station during the incident [5] - Tests conducted on the vehicle confirmed that its fuel tank capacity was consistent with the manufacturer's specifications, ruling out the possibility of an oversized tank [6]

Group 1 - The incident involved a car owner who reported being charged for 67.96 liters of gasoline despite having a 50-liter fuel tank, leading to a consumer dispute at the Tianshan gas station [1][2] - The investigation confirmed that the car owner was overcharged by 200 yuan, attributed to a malfunction in the gas pump's software and hardware, causing duplicate billing [2][5] - The gas pump's key components were found to be intact and compliant with measurement standards, with no evidence of tampering or operational misconduct by the gas station staff [3][4] Group 2 - Tests conducted on the vehicle confirmed that its fuel tank capacity was consistent with the manufacturer's specifications, ruling out the possibility of an oversized tank [4] - The investigation revealed that the gas pump's system erroneously added the previous transaction's volume of 27.18 liters to the current transaction, resulting in the overcharge [5] - The Chengdu High-tech Zone Market Supervision Administration plans to enforce comprehensive rectifications at the gas station, including public apologies and improvements in service quality [5][6]

【环球时报综合报道】烈日下，车辆蜿蜒驶入扎墨公路（从西藏林芝市波密县扎木镇到墨脱县城），转 弯处突然排起长龙，司机摇下车窗说："大车在拐弯，要堵上好一会儿。"这是我们环球网采访组随车队 进入墨脱时遇到的第一幕。今年7月，雅鲁藏布江下游水电工程（简称"雅下水电工程"）开工仪式在林 芝市举行。这一世纪工程的启动，意味着墨脱的发展迎来新的契机。作为中国最后一个通公路的县城， 墨脱过去长期因交通受限而与外界几近隔绝，而如今伴随着上述重大工程的实施，这片高原秘境正获得 前所未有的发展动力。 墨脱，藏语意为"莲花秘境"。该县位于西藏东南部，地处喜马拉雅山脉东段南麓、雅鲁藏布江中下游。 2013年贯通运营的扎墨公路，让墨脱与外界紧紧相连。随着雅下水电工程的开工，当地更加热闹起 来。"没有通路以前，这里的人都是靠人驮马拉翻越嘎隆拉山，冬天下雪更难，几乎就不出去了。"中国 石油西藏销售林芝分公司副总经理戴宇娜回忆说，过去离开墨脱要花上两天两夜，如今只需几个小时。 扎墨公路上，挤满了外地游客的车。有人趁机下车拍照，远处是雅鲁藏布江大拐弯，近处摊位上摆着柠 檬、松茸和茶叶。有商贩笑着说："这几年游客多了，我们的生意也好做了。"沿途 ...

Core Viewpoint - The article highlights the effective implementation of the "Oil Benefit Double Wallet" campaign by the management team in Zhalantun, aiming to deliver tangible benefits to car owners while enhancing service at gas stations [1] Group 1: Campaign Implementation - The Zhalantun management team actively sought ways to ensure the "Oil Benefit Double Wallet" campaign was effectively executed, focusing on delivering real benefits to car owners [1] - The campaign includes a promotional offer where customers can receive a glass water and fuel vouchers for 30 yuan, with a more attractive option available for 84 yuan [1] Group 2: Service Transformation - The gas station employees transitioned from a passive approach of waiting for inquiries to a proactive strategy of actively informing customers about the promotional offers [1] - The use of an A4 paper to communicate the campaign details has proven effective, allowing employees to engage with customers and encourage them to take advantage of the offers [1] - This shift in service approach has resulted in positive customer feedback, with many expressing appreciation for the reminders about the useful discounts [1]

会上，张志鹏总会计师带领与会人员逐章逐条深入研读，重点剖析新旧条款的显著变化，特别是针对强 化会计监督、压实主体责任、规范会计行为、加大违法惩戒力度等关键修订内容进行了系统讲解。他结 合行业特性和公司实际运营，阐释了新法对公司会计核算、信息披露及内部控制的风险把控，为财务人 员精准把握法规精髓提供了清晰指引。 总会计师张志鹏亲自主持并领学，强调此次学习是适应国家法规新要求、夯实公司财务工作基石的迫切 任务。 在集体学习的基础上，各岗位结合日常工作中遇到的天然气暂估、加油卡对账、资产调拨、加油站交接 油品损耗处理、税务衔接及风险防控等具体疑难问题踊跃发言。张志鹏总会计师凭借深厚的专业积累和 丰富的实践经验，对每一个问题进行了耐心细致的解答，并分享了合规高效的实务操作思路。 为全面提升财务管理水平，规范会计核算，强化依法合规意识，2025年8月4日，济南公司组织财务部全 体人员开展新修订《中华人民共和国会计法》专题学习会。主要目的是规范会计行为，强化会计监督与 责任意识，提升会计管理水平。 围绕下一步工作，张志鹏总会计师要求：学习新《会计法》不能仅仅停留在理论层面，更要落实到实际 行动中。我们可以通过参加专业培训 ...

"创新行动"，异业合作赋新能。加强异业资源应用，主动对接市商务局争取汽车促销费政策，落地购车 赠加油卡活动。尝试滴滴加油合作。（通讯员： 陈修龙） "拓客行动"，打造增量宽赛道。按照价值排序落实点将开发，锚定驾校、婚庆车队、租车平台，着力推 动银行系统、医护行业的总对总团体客户开发，加快存量单位客户团体转化，深挖抖音客户库潜力，开 展睡眠抖音客户促活专项行动。 "留客行动"，迁移存客促消费。抓好存量客户迁移。针对停业改造、退租的油站，实施"三好"服务：提 前20天进行客户梳理，做好停业前（加油赠分流券、即时短信触达）客户梳理，做好停业中（跟踪分流 消费、电话引导提醒）客户引导，做好营业后（回流权益生效、睡眠客户唤醒）客户回流。组建团组阿 米巴运行模式，创新停业站分流营销，客户留存率达到53%以上。 7月份，济南公司积极落实山东公司年度工作会议精神，瞄定"跑赢大势、跑赢同行、上半年销量同比不 降"总体目标，以市场为导向、客户为中心，完成率达109%，全省排名第3，同比增幅10%，市场份额 同比提升4.5%，为下半年市场攻坚注入强劲动能。 "提质行动"，筑牢存量基本盘。丰富营销工具，消除抖音油品券下架不利因素，着 ...

中新网四川新闻8月21日电 (记者 刘忠俊)8月21日，成都高新区市场监督管理局针对网络关注的"50升油 箱加出67.96升油"情况发布通报称，相关情况正在调查中，将根据调查结果依法依规处置。 8月21日，成都高新区市场监督管理局针对网络关注的这一情况发布了通报。通报明确，涉事加油站为 中国石油天然气股份有限公司四川成都销售分公司高新天山加油站，位于成都高新区芳草街街道，涉事 的是06#加油枪。值得注意的是，在2025年8月9日事发当天，工作人员就对该加油枪进行了封存，截至 目前仍处于停用状态。 成都高新区市场监督管理局情况通报截 此外，通报还提及，8月11日，成都高新区芳草街街道市场监督管理所在收到投诉人杨先生的反映后， 及时与其进行了沟通联系，并于12日前往加油站开展现场核查工作。 图。成都高新区市场监督管理局供图 目前，相关情况正在全面深入的调查中，成都高新区市场监督管理局表示，下一步将根据调查结果依法 依规进行处置。(完) 近日，车主杨先生驾驶油箱设计最大容量为50升的小车，在一家中石油加油站加油时，加油显示竟加注 了67.96升汽油，这一远超油箱容量的数字让杨先生满是疑惑，也让网友们议论纷纷。 杨先 ...

Summary of Key Points Core Viewpoint - The Chengdu High-tech Zone Market Supervision Administration is investigating a complaint regarding a gas station that allegedly overcharged a customer by filling a 50-liter fuel tank with 67.96 liters of gasoline, indicating potential issues with fuel dispensing accuracy and regulatory compliance [1][5][6]. Group 1: Incident Details - A customer named Mr. Yang reported that on August 9, he was charged for 67.96 liters of gasoline at a gas station operated by China Petroleum & Chemical Corporation (Sinopec) in Chengdu, despite his vehicle's fuel tank capacity being only 50 liters [5][6]. - The gas station insisted on charging based on the pump's reading, leading to Mr. Yang's complaints to multiple authorities and a request to seal the faulty pump [5][6]. - The gas station's management later attempted to refund the excess charge privately, but the pump remained unsealed for ten days without further explanation [5][6]. Group 2: Regulatory Context - The incident is part of a broader issue, as the Market Supervision Administration has been conducting a nationwide campaign against fuel dispenser fraud since August 2023, with 1,249 cases investigated and a total of 2 billion yuan involved [6]. - The campaign aims to address consumer complaints regarding fuel dispensing accuracy and ensure compliance with regulations [6]. Group 3: Industry Insights - There have been previous instances of consumers believing they were overcharged due to discrepancies between the actual fuel tank capacity and the labeled capacity, as demonstrated by a case in Shanxi where a 28-liter tank was filled with 42 liters [7][10]. - The industry acknowledges that while some discrepancies may arise from consumer misunderstanding, there are also genuine cases of malpractice by gas stations [10].