特朗普还计划将所有国际事务与关税挂钩。他曾以巴西政府对前总统博索纳罗的"政治迫害"为由，宣布将对巴西进口商品的关税从10%提高至50%。面对美 国日益强硬的立场，巴西总统卢拉并未屈服，而是采取了审慎而坚定的态度，指示其内阁团队，在与美国的谈判中必须保持坚定立场，不能被特朗普的压力 所击倒。卢拉还指出，美国对巴西长期存在贸易顺差，因此对巴西加征关税不仅会影响美国对巴西的出口，还可能导致美国消费者承担更高的成本，显示出 特朗普此举的经济意义并不大。 o 0 随着"对等关税"措施的实施期限到来，美国特朗普政府不仅宣布了推迟期限的决定，还向170多个国家发送了关税通知，单方面宣布对这些国家输往美国的 商品实行阶梯式加征关税的政策，绕过了传统的谈判机制，直接发布了最后通牒。此前，美国曾为谈判提供了一定的空间，尽管如此，实际效果并不理想， 最终仅与英国达成了协议。 这一次，美国选择跳过谈判的过程，直接采取行动，且覆盖的范围极为广泛。在8日，美国向12个国家发出了关税通知函，其中部分商品的关税税率高达 60%至100%。随后，美国又宣布了14国的名单，并对其中的日本和韩国征收25%的关税，对柬埔寨和泰国的关税为36%，对老 ...

马科斯无论如何也没有想到，菲律宾替美国鞍前马后，竟然也会有今天，被特朗普当做"软柿子"捏。 日前，美总统特朗普公布第二批关税名单，继第一批的14国之后，又对8国宣布征税，其中菲律宾"光荣上榜"，将面临美国20%的对等关税，高于4月2日最 初宣布的17%。 特朗普在写给马科斯的信中，还劝菲律宾政府包容理解，这已经是美国做出的最大让步了，按照美菲的贸易逆差，这个数字原本应该更高，言外之意就是菲 律宾受了惩罚，马科斯应该对他感恩戴德。 那么，如何看待美国的关税大棒砸向菲律宾呢？ 首先，其实早在特朗普挑起全球关税战的一开始，美国的眼里就没有盟友可言，相反越是盟友宰得越狠，最典型的就是加拿大和欧盟，如今美国的"屠刀"砍 向菲律宾，完全在预料之内。 本质上讲，美国的对等关税其实十分随意，保持"恃强凌弱"的加税原则，同时非常关注转口贸易。 对此，马科斯政府倒是表现得比较平静，只是表示将与美方展开进一步谈判，正在安排人员访美，倒是拜登政府时期的美国官员，表现得比菲律宾还着急， 称此举将削弱美国对盟友的公信力，质问特朗普还想不想跟中国竞争。 举例来讲，美国一开始将中国关税加到了超过100%，这是为了迫使中国接受美国主导的贸易规 ...

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the escalating trade tensions between the United States and Brazil, particularly focusing on the recent imposition of a 50% tariff by the U.S. on Brazilian goods, which is perceived as a political maneuver by Trump rather than a purely economic decision [3][7][10]. Group 1: U.S.-Brazil Trade Relations - The U.S. has raised tariffs on Brazil to 50%, which is seen as an aggressive move to pressure Brazil into compliance with U.S. demands [3][7]. - Brazil's President Lula has highlighted that since 2010, the U.S. has enjoyed a trade surplus of over $400 billion with Brazil, challenging the U.S. narrative of a trade deficit [7]. - The tariff increase is viewed as a personal vendetta from Trump, especially after Lula's comments about global leadership [7][9]. Group 2: Brazil's Response - Brazil has retaliated by imposing a similar 50% tariff on U.S. goods, demonstrating a strong stance against U.S. pressure [15]. - Lula's administration is actively seeking to strengthen ties with China, indicating a shift away from reliance on the U.S. market [15][16]. - Brazil's commitment to "de-dollarization" and promoting trade in local currencies is a significant challenge to U.S. economic dominance [16]. Group 3: Political Implications - Trump's tariff strategy is seen as an attempt to influence Brazilian internal politics, particularly to support former President Bolsonaro, who had a pro-U.S. stance [12][13]. - The current political climate in Brazil, including investigations into Bolsonaro, complicates U.S.-Brazil relations and highlights the shifting political landscape [13][21]. - The article suggests that Brazil's firm response is part of a broader movement among emerging nations to resist unilateralism and assert their independence [18][21]. Group 4: Global Trade Dynamics - The collaboration between Brazil and China is positioned as a counterbalance to U.S. hegemony, with potential implications for global trade patterns [16][19]. - The article emphasizes that the ongoing tariff conflict could lead to increased prices for U.S. consumers, indicating that the economic fallout may affect both nations [19]. - Brazil's actions signal a growing trend of emerging economies uniting against perceived economic bullying, reshaping the global trade landscape [18][21].

Group 1 - The core viewpoint emphasizes that Australia-China cooperation can continue to expand and achieve mutual benefits as long as differences and disputes do not dominate the bilateral agenda [1][3] - Trade is a major topic in Australia-China exchanges, with China being Australia's largest export destination for minerals, energy, agricultural products, and seafood, as well as the largest source of international students and tourists [1][2] - Australia-China trade supports approximately 600,000 local jobs in Australia and has increased the average disposable income of Australian households by nearly 5% [1] Group 2 - The close trade relationship between Australia and China is primarily due to the high economic complementarity between the two countries, supported by constructive policy initiatives [2] - Since the implementation of the Australia-China Free Trade Agreement in 2015, Australia's trade with China has increased by 125%, while trade with other regions has only grown by 77% during the same period [2] - A recent survey indicates that over half of the surveyed companies believe that business operations in China have become more convenient since the resumption of high-level dialogues, and more than three-quarters feel that the improvement in Australia-China relations positively impacts their long-term plans in the Chinese market [2] Group 3 - Political, economic, and cultural factors are interrelated in promoting the development of Australia-China relations [3] - Australian leaders have expressed a desire to expand trade with China, rejecting the notion of following the U.S. in limiting trade with China [3] - There is a notable shift in public opinion in Australia, with an increasing number of Australians considering China a more reliable trading partner than the U.S. [3]

据央视新闻报道，当地时间7月10日，美国总统特朗普表示计划对几乎所有尚未加征关税的贸易伙伴征 收15%或20%的统一关税。这一消息瞬间在国际社会掀起波澜，而在此之前，特朗普的关税大棒早已四 处挥舞，其中巴西的强硬回击尤为引人注目，成为首个退回美国关税信函的国家。 当地时间7月9日，特朗普通过其社交媒体平台"真实社交"发布了致巴西总统卢拉的信。信中言辞激烈， 指责巴西联邦最高法院对前总统博索纳罗进行"政治迫害"。博索纳罗与特朗普在两人担任总统期间关系 密切，目前博索纳罗在巴西面临审判。特朗普还以巴西"攻击自由选举和美国人言论自由的基本权利"等 为由，宣布美国将从8月1日起对巴西所有输美产品征收50%的关税，这一税率是目前他宣布对各国加征 关税中的最高值 。 巴西总统卢拉（资料图） 而从国际舆论来看，众多分析认为特朗普的关税政策缺乏合理依据。美国Axios新闻网称，特朗普正试 图利用美国的经济实力来影响另一个国家的内政，为他的盟友谋取利益。英国《卫报》评论称，特朗普 对巴西的关税可能有助于卢拉明年连任，因为博索纳罗家族的行为可能被解读为"不爱国、反巴西" 。 特朗普（资料图） 特朗普在信中声称，巴西的"关税、非关 ...

文｜冰禾 编辑｜削桐作琴 特朗普遭遇尴尬打脸！首个拒绝接收退关税信函的国家终于出现，令其怒火中烧，特朗普当机立断决定对剩余120多个国家统一征收关税。 令人意外的是，就在此时，昔日盟友日本竟然公开宣布要走独立自主的道路。 7月2日，美国正式向其27个主要贸易伙伴以及欧盟递交协商请求函，要求各国在45天内接受美国提出的新贸易条款，否则将面临高达20%的惩罚性关税。 美国官方将此举称为"针对性关税措施"，目的是通过差别化的谈判方式，重新塑造全球贸易规则。 然而，在首批接收函的国家中，超过三分之一明确拒绝了协商条件。 其中，巴西外交部率先于7月9日迅速退回了正式文书，紧接着日本、印度等十二个国家也纷纷表态不接受美国单方面制定的条款。 面对连番遭拒，特朗普的怒气难以抑制，随即宣布从8月1日起，对未收到关税函的120多个国家一律征收15%至20%的统一进口关税。 作为首个公开拒绝关税信函的国家，巴西的反应尤为迅速和果断。 7月9日，特朗普在社交媒体上公布了最新关税名单，巴西被征收高达50%的关税。 巴西总统卢拉看到这一消息后，当天便强硬回应，强调巴西绝不会被任何外力操控。 此外，关于巴西与美国贸易逆差的数据也遭到质疑。 ...

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the European Union's (EU) efforts to diversify its trade partnerships in response to the trade policies of the Trump administration, particularly the imposition of tariffs on EU goods [1][3]. Group 1: EU's Trade Strategy - The EU and Indonesia have reached a political consensus to advance a trade agreement, aiming for Indonesian goods to enter the EU market tariff-free [3][4]. - EU Commission President Ursula von der Leyen emphasized the importance of partnerships in a turbulent world, indicating that countries affected by U.S. tariffs are welcome to rely on Europe [3][4]. - The EU plans to strengthen trade ties with other economies, including South America and India, to establish new bilateral trade agreements [1][4]. Group 2: Response to U.S. Tariffs - The EU has extended the suspension of its trade countermeasures against the U.S. until August 1, allowing more time for negotiations [4]. - The EU aims to limit trade conflicts primarily to the U.S. market, which constitutes about 15% of global trade, while protecting the remaining 85% [4][5]. - The EU is also engaging with other affected partners like Canada and Japan to explore coordinated responses to U.S. tariffs [4][5]. Group 3: Global Trade Dynamics - Other major economies, including Canada and the UK, are also seeking to diversify their trade relationships in light of the changing global trade landscape [7][8]. - Canada is accelerating negotiations for a free trade agreement with ASEAN countries, while the UK is re-engaging in trade talks with Canada to strengthen global business ties [7][8]. - In Latin America, Brazil and Mexico are initiating preparatory talks to deepen trade agreements, highlighting a trend towards regional integration [8].

面对特朗普新一轮关税威胁，欧盟正在双线同时发力应对。 据媒体周一报道，欧盟高官透露，已准备价值210亿欧元的对美反制关税清单，同时积极寻求与印度等 亚太国家深化贸易合作，并计划与其他受美国关税冲击的国家协调行动。 Tajani进一步透露，如果与美国达成协议被证明不可能，欧盟准备的210亿欧元关税方案还可能跟进第二 套措施。不过他表示对谈判取得进展仍有信心。 关税伤害每一个人，首先是美国。如果股市下跌，将危及美国人的养老金和储蓄。 他强调目标应该是在加拿大、美国、墨西哥和欧洲之间实现"零关税"和开放市场。 深化亚太合作，寻求贸易新出路 面对美国关税威胁，欧盟正积极向亚太地区寻求新的贸易机会。欧盟竞争事务专员Teresa Ribera周一表 示，欧盟正寻求深化与印度和其他亚太国家的贸易协议。 综合央视新闻报道，当地时间7月12日，美国总统特朗普宣布自2025年8月1日起，美国将对来自墨西哥 和欧盟的输美产品征收30%的关税。作为回应，欧盟委员会主席冯德莱恩当地时间13日表示，将把对美 国关税的反制措施暂停期延长至8月初。 意大利外长Antonio Tajani周一接受媒体采访时表示，如果双方无法达成贸易协议，欧盟 ...

所有人都没有预料到，欧盟这个在国际贸易中常常"骑墙"的角色，竟然成为特朗普这次贸易战的最大输家，甚至最终遭到了"制裁"。根据昨晚的最新消息， 美国总统特朗普宣布，自8月1日起对欧盟和墨西哥征收高达30%的关税。这一消息一经传出，立刻引发了全球范围内的强烈反响。 在几天前，欧盟与美国的谈判进展已有所披露，当时欧盟在谈判中做出了相当大的让步，最终美国承诺对欧盟仅征收10%的对等关税，部分领域如汽车、药 品和航空航天等则加征25%的关税。然而，令所有人大跌眼镜的是，特朗普这次直接将税率从原本的10%提升至30%，这一变动远远超出了所有人的预期。 稍微算一算，欧盟征收的30%关税，与美国对中国征收的34%关税几乎持平。对此，欧盟感到震惊，甚至难以分辨自己到底是美国的盟友，还是中国才是。 那么，欧盟的27个成员国面对这一局面，是选择屈服妥协，还是像中国一样与美国展开激烈的对抗？这是否意味着新一轮的欧美贸易战即将爆发？接下来， 我们将探讨这个问题。写这篇文章并不容易，欢迎大家点赞、转发和收藏。 那么，特朗普为何对欧盟下如此狠手呢？从特朗普的角度来看，欧盟并非是美国的"商业盟友"，而恰恰是美国经济的一大威胁。虽然美国市场一 ...

Core Insights - Major economies are actively seeking trade diversification in response to the U.S. tariff policies under the Trump administration [1][6] - The EU is pursuing new trade agreements, particularly with Indonesia, to mitigate the impact of U.S. tariffs [3][5] Group 1: EU's Trade Strategy - The EU and Indonesia have reached a political consensus to advance a trade agreement, ensuring Indonesian goods can enter the EU market tariff-free [3][5] - EU Commission President von der Leyen emphasized the importance of partnerships in a turbulent world, signaling support for countries affected by U.S. tariffs [3][4] - The EU aims to limit trade conflicts primarily to the U.S. market, which accounts for about 15% of global trade, while protecting the remaining 85% [4] Group 2: Global Trade Dynamics - Other major economies, including Canada and the UK, are also seeking to diversify their trade relationships amid threats to the rules-based international order [6][7] - Canada is accelerating free trade negotiations with ASEAN countries, while the UK is re-engaging in trade talks with Canada to strengthen global business ties [6][7] - Brazil and Mexico are initiating preparatory talks to deepen trade agreements, highlighting the economic complementarity between the two nations [7]