液晶显示
Search documents
沙河股份营收仅2086万转亏或披星戴帽 拟收购晶华电子70%股权谋划转型
Chang Jiang Shang Bao· 2025-12-30 02:40
面临披星戴帽的沙河股份(000014.SZ),急需通过重组实现转型。 12月28日,沙河股份发布公告称,公司拟以支付现金的方式购买深圳晶华显示电子股份有限公司(以下 简称"晶华电子")70%的股权。 资料显示,晶华电子专业生产液晶显示屏(LCD)、液晶显示模块(LCM)、触摸屏、玻璃盖板、 SMT及相关OEM、ODM产品。公司曾拟在深交所创业板上市,但随后主动"撤单"。 数据显示,2025年前三季度,沙河股份实现营业收入2085.89万元,同比下降93.58%;归母净利润亏损 3222.23万元,同比由盈转亏。 长江商报消息●长江商报记者 黄聪 一家上市公司财务人员向长江商报记者表示,根据主板规则,若上市公司归母净利润为负值、营业收入 低于3亿元,将被实施*ST。"从当前情况来看,沙河股份2025年全年利润和收入很可能不达标,从而披 星戴帽。" 晶华电子曾终止创业板IPO 12月28日,沙河股份发布公告称,公司拟以支付现金的方式购买深业鹏基(集团)有限公司(以下简 称"深业鹏基")持有的晶华电子70%的股权。本次交易完成后,晶华电子将成为公司的控股子公司,纳 入公司合并报表范围。 公告中,沙河股份介绍,本次收 ...
沙河股份营收仅2086万转亏或披星戴帽 拟收购晶华电子70%股权谋划转型突围
Chang Jiang Shang Bao· 2025-12-29 23:46
登录新浪财经APP 搜索【信披】查看更多考评等级 长江商报消息 ●长江商报记者 黄聪 面临披星戴帽的沙河股份(000014.SZ),急需通过重组实现转型。 12月28日,沙河股份发布公告称,公司拟以支付现金的方式购买深圳晶华显示电子股份有限公司(以下 简称"晶华电子")70%的股权。 数据显示,2025年前三季度,沙河股份实现营业收入2085.89万元,同比下降93.58%;归母净利润亏损 3222.23万元,同比由盈转亏。 一家上市公司财务人员向长江商报记者表示,根据主板规则,若上市公司归母净利润为负值、营业收入 低于3亿元,将被实施*ST。"从当前情况来看,沙河股份2025年全年利润和收入很可能不达标,从而披 星戴帽。" 晶华电子曾终止创业板IPO 12月28日,沙河股份发布公告称,公司拟以支付现金的方式购买深业鹏基(集团)有限公司(以下简 称"深业鹏基")持有的晶华电子70%的股权。本次交易完成后,晶华电子将成为公司的控股子公司,纳 入公司合并报表范围。 公告中,沙河股份介绍,本次收购预计构成《上市公司重大资产重组管理办法》规定的重大资产重组, 因深业鹏基控股股东深圳控股有限公司与公司控股股东深业沙河( ...
经纬辉开8.5亿元跨界并购:溢价高达1077% 标的资产负债率高达96%|并购谈
Xin Lang Cai Jing· 2025-12-11 07:02
Core Viewpoint - The company Jingwei Huirun plans to acquire 100% equity of Zhongxing System Technology Co., Ltd. for 850 million yuan in cash, resulting in a stock price surge. The acquisition comes with a staggering premium of 1077%, while the company's cash reserves are only 811 million yuan, which is less than the acquisition price [1][10]. Group 1: Financial Performance and Valuation - In the first half of 2025, Jingwei Huirun reported revenue of 1.275 billion yuan, a year-on-year decline of 20.23%, and a net profit of 14.08 million yuan, down 70.78% [2][11]. - The target company, Zhongxing System, is projected to have a net profit of 65.92 million yuan in 2024 and 31.70 million yuan in the first half of 2025, which is more than double Jingwei Huirun's net profit for the same period [2][11]. - The valuation premium of 1077% is contentious, with Zhongxing System's total equity assessed at 853 million yuan, while its net assets were only 72.49 million yuan as of June 2025 [2][11]. Group 2: Debt and Financial Structure - Zhongxing System has a high debt-to-asset ratio of 96%, indicating a leveraged operation that significantly affects its risk resilience [3][12]. - Jingwei Huirun's acquisition is entirely cash-based, putting pressure on its cash flow, as its cash reserves of 811 million yuan are below the acquisition cost of 850 million yuan. The company's interest-bearing liabilities, including short-term loans and current portion of non-current liabilities, total 852 million yuan [5][14]. - The target company's total liabilities amount to 1.819 billion yuan against total assets of 1.892 billion yuan, resulting in a debt ratio of 96.17% [7][16]. Group 3: Strategic Considerations - The funding for the acquisition is described as "self-owned funds or self-raised funds," leaving room for potential future debt financing [6][15]. - This acquisition represents a cross-industry merger, as Jingwei Huirun's main business is in liquid crystal displays and electromagnetic wire products, while Zhongxing System specializes in private network communication systems and digital technology services [6][15]. - The rapid technological updates in the private network communication industry necessitate continuous R&D investment, posing new challenges for Jingwei Huirun, which primarily operates in traditional manufacturing [6][15].
超声电子:生产的印制板、液晶显示器产品可用于新能源汽车领域
Ge Long Hui· 2025-11-14 08:41
Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the article is that the company, 超声电子 (Sonic Electronics), produces printed circuit boards and liquid crystal display products that can be utilized in the new energy vehicle sector [1] Group 2 - The company has indicated its involvement in the production of components that are essential for the development of new energy vehicles [1]
巴中市巴州区:聚链成势集群崛起 工业动能锻造区域发展硬支撑
Zhong Guo Jing Ji Wang· 2025-10-22 15:00
Core Viewpoint - The Baizhou District is focusing on building a modern industrial system with a strong emphasis on high-quality development, aiming to create billion-level intelligent manufacturing and food and beverage industry clusters through investment attraction and green industrial guidance [1][2]. Group 1: Industrial Development - The Baizhou District is transforming its industrial layout into a strong driving force for high-quality development, positioning industry as a backbone of regional growth [2]. - The district's industrial matrix is evolving from isolated operations to a "chain symbiosis" model, enhancing collaboration among enterprises [3]. - The Huahuo New Energy Technology Company launched new smart kitchen appliances in Baizhou, attracting 1,600 national distributors within three months of operation [3]. - Sichuan Gaoxian Technology expects its output to exceed 150 million yuan this year, up from 106 million yuan last year, showcasing significant growth in key industry sectors [3][4]. Group 2: Ecosystem and Collaboration - The Clejiang Industrial Park is described as an organic industrial ecosystem, with 30 companies currently operating and an expected total output of 620 million yuan for the year [4]. - The park has implemented a "service empowerment" model, providing a "Happiness Center" for enterprises that streamlines administrative processes and enhances operational efficiency [5]. - The park has organized over 40 enterprise-government interaction events and facilitated 62 administrative tasks since its opening [5]. Group 3: Policy and Value Creation - The industrial appeal of Baizhou is shifting from traditional policy incentives to deeper "value symbiosis," fostering collaboration between government and enterprises [7][8]. - The district is leveraging partnerships, such as with Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, to promote standardized agricultural practices that benefit both industry and local farmers [8]. - Future plans include expanding smart manufacturing facilities and enhancing cross-regional cooperation to strengthen the industrial ecosystem [8].
惠科337诉讼案已撤诉
Xin Lang Cai Jing· 2025-09-25 10:53
Core Points - The U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) issued a final ruling on September 24, 2025, regarding certain glass substrates for liquid crystal displays, confirming the termination of investigations related to specific patent claims due to the withdrawal by the complainant [1][6][7] Summary by Sections - **Investigation Termination** The ITC decided not to review the administrative law judge's initial ruling from August 26, 2025, which led to the termination of investigations concerning U.S. Patent No. 7,851,394 and U.S. Patent No. 9,512,025 based on the complainant's withdrawal [1][3][5] - **Previous Developments** On February 26, 2025, the ITC partially terminated the investigation related to the "394 patent" following the withdrawal of the complaint. Further, on July 14, 2025, the investigation concerning claims related to the "025 patent" was also partially terminated due to similar withdrawals [3][4] - **Settlement Agreements** A settlement agreement between Corning and VIZIO was reached, leading to the termination of the investigation against VIZIO. This agreement was approved without opposition on August 14, 2025 [4][6]
美国企业对特定液晶器件、组件及其下游产品提起337调查申请,多家中国企业为列名被告
Sou Hu Cai Jing· 2025-09-04 04:11
Core Points - BH Innovations LLC has filed a complaint with the U.S. International Trade Commission under Section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, alleging violations related to certain liquid crystal devices and components [1] - The complaint includes multiple Chinese companies as defendants, such as HKC Corporation Ltd. and Chongqing HKC Optoelectronics Technology Co., Ltd. [1] Summary by Category Legal Action - The complaint was filed on September 2, 2023, claiming that specific liquid crystal devices, components, and their downstream products exported to and sold in the U.S. violate U.S. trade laws [1] Involved Companies - The defendants listed in the complaint include several Chinese enterprises, notably HKC Corporation Ltd. and Chongqing HKC Optoelectronics Technology Co., Ltd. [1]
外国企业对特定液晶器件、组件及其下游产品提起337调查申请
Zheng Quan Shi Bao Wang· 2025-09-04 04:06
Core Viewpoint - BH Innovations LLC has filed a complaint with the U.S. International Trade Commission, alleging violations of Section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930 regarding specific liquid crystal devices, components, and their downstream products exported to and sold in the U.S. [1] Group 1 - The complaint was submitted on September 2, 2025 [1] - The allegations pertain to both imports and sales of the specified products in the U.S. market [1]
美企对特定液晶器件、组件及其下游产品提起337调查申请
Xin Lang Cai Jing· 2025-09-04 03:46
Core Viewpoint - The application for a Section 337 investigation has been filed by BH Innovations LLC against various companies for alleged violations related to specific liquid crystal devices, components, and downstream products imported and sold in the U.S. [1] Group 1: Companies Involved - The defendants listed in the investigation include multiple companies from China, such as HKC Corporation Ltd., Chongqing HKC Optoelectronics Technology Co., Ltd., and HiSense Group Co., Ltd. [1] - U.S. companies such as HiSense US Corporation and VIZIO Holding Corp. are also named in the complaint [1] - Other international companies involved include LG Electronics from South Korea and various subsidiaries of TCL from Hong Kong and China [1] Group 2: Legal Context - The investigation is initiated under Section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, which addresses unfair practices in import trade [1] - The focus of the investigation is on the alleged infringement of intellectual property rights concerning liquid crystal technology [1]
美企对特定液晶器件、组件及其下游产品提起337调查申请,多家中企为列名被告
Xin Lang Cai Jing· 2025-09-04 03:32
Group 1 - BH Innovations LLC filed a complaint with the U.S. International Trade Commission under Section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, alleging violations related to certain liquid crystal devices, components, and downstream products exported to and imported into the U.S. [1] Group 2 - The defendants named in the complaint include multiple companies from China, such as HKC Corporation Ltd., Chongqing HKC Optoelectronics Technology Co., Ltd., and several subsidiaries of HiSense, as well as companies from the U.S. like HiSense US Corporation and VIZIO Holding Corp. [2]