从田间地头的优质食材，到餐桌上的各色美食，大家对食品安全的关注度越来越高。作为中国人餐桌上 补充蛋白质的主要来源之一，鸡蛋是不少家庭均衡饮食的关键食材，而无菌蛋因其被宣称的"更安 全""更营养""更健康"的标签，吸引了众多消费者的目光。无菌蛋真的"无菌"吗？ 吉林大学食品科学与工程学院教授刘静波解释，鸡蛋作为食用农产品，很难达到绝对"无菌"的状态。现 行相关标准中也没有"无菌蛋"这一概念，市场上所谓的"无菌蛋"更为科学地表述应该是"可生食鸡蛋"。 可基本实现无沙门氏菌等致病性微生物的检出，也就是达到可生食条件，这种蛋商品可以提供差异化的 食用体验，但其在营养价值上与普通鸡蛋并无明显区别。 刘静波：我国到目前为止还没有制定可生食鸡蛋的国家标准或行业标准，但可生食鸡蛋的团体标准已经 作出了明确的规范。 食品添加剂问题同样备受关注。在中国食品科学技术学会名誉副理事长潘迎捷看来，去年引发公众关注 的"保水虾仁"事件，其本质是过量使用食品添加剂复合磷酸盐类物质，这类食品水分保持剂主要用于增 强食品的持水性、口感和稳定性。《食品安全国家标准食品添加剂使用标准》（GB 2760-2024）明确， 保水剂可以应用在冷冻水产品 ...

添加剂的过量，鸡蛋能否生吃，"长保食品"受质疑……回顾2025年，每张餐桌上，食品安全之争在上 演。 热议之下，专家们如何分析？2026年1月7日，在中国食品科学技术学会主办的"2025年食品安全与健康 热点科学解读研讨会"上，孙宝国、陈君石等多位中国工程院院士、专家释疑食品安全的常见误区，并 对接下来食品产业发展提出针对性建议。 "长保食品"一定不安全吗？ 民以食为天，"安全性"无疑是人们对食品的第一要求。"保水虾仁"在2025年被"3·15"晚会曝光后，成为 过去一年的热点话题。保水剂是一类食品添加剂，如磷酸盐等，按照标准合理使用不会带来健康风险。 根据《食品安全国家标准食品添加剂使用标准》( GB 2760-2024)规定，保水剂可用在冷冻水产品中，且 最大使用量为5.0g/ kg （以磷酸根计）。但某涉事企业冷冻虾仁产品磷酸盐含量超出标准145%。 21世纪经济报道记者 贺佳雯 北京报道 "1斤虾仁7两冰？" "1岁的娃吃上了2岁的西兰花。" 江南大学副校长刘龙解读，合成生物技术已经成为发展新质生产力和大国博弈的关键。D-阿洛酮糖获 批为新食品原料，表明我国合成生物技术在食品领域应用的技术能力、政策保 ...

Core Viewpoint - The market regulatory authorities have intensified their enforcement actions against food safety violations, resulting in significant penalties and legal actions against non-compliant companies [1] Group 1: Regulatory Actions - In the first half of the year, the regulatory system handled 181,000 food safety violation cases, imposing fines and confiscations totaling 740 million yuan [1] - The authorities have reported five typical cases of food safety violations, highlighting the ongoing commitment to consumer protection [1] Group 2: Case Summaries - **Case 1: Guangdong Zhanjiang "Water Shrimp" Incident** Four companies were found to have illegally added excessive phosphates to frozen shrimp products, resulting in fines totaling 7.4943 million yuan and the revocation of their food production licenses for five years [2] - **Case 2: Beijing Haidian "Toxic Candy" Incident** A product sold through live streaming was found to contain a banned diuretic, leading to the arrest of over 40 suspects and the closure of 15 live streaming channels, with the case involving over 50 million yuan [3] - **Case 3: Chongqing Munibro Beer Incident** A beer product was found to contain a harmful substance similar to a prescription drug, resulting in a fine of 150,000 yuan and the referral of the case to criminal authorities [4] - **Case 4: Zhejiang Shaoxing Sifang Food Co. Incident** The company was found to be producing vinegar that did not meet safety standards, with over 900 boxes of problematic vinegar seized and the case referred to criminal authorities [5] - **Case 5: Fujian Shishi Restaurant Incident** A restaurant was found to have illegally used borax in food products, leading to an investigation and referral to criminal authorities [7] Group 3: Industry Implications - The reported cases indicate a lack of legal awareness and responsibility among some food producers, emphasizing the need for stricter compliance with food safety regulations [6] - The market regulatory authorities are committed to enhancing enforcement measures, including joint law enforcement and credit penalties, to ensure food safety and protect consumers [6]

Core Viewpoint - The market regulatory authorities have intensified their enforcement actions against food safety violations, revealing significant illegal activities in the food industry and emphasizing the importance of compliance and consumer safety [1]. Summary by Relevant Sections Enforcement Actions - In the first half of the year, the regulatory system handled 181,000 food safety violation cases, imposing fines and confiscations totaling 740 million yuan, and referred 653 cases to judicial authorities [1]. Case Summaries - **Case 1: Guangdong Zhanjiang "Water Shrimp" Incident** - Four frozen shrimp companies were found to have illegally added excessive phosphates and falsely labeled their products as "zero additives," resulting in fines totaling 7.4943 million yuan and the revocation of their food production licenses for five years [2]. - **Case 2: Beijing Haidian "Toxic Candy" Incident** - A product sold through live streaming was found to contain a banned diuretic, leading to a criminal investigation that resulted in the arrest of over 40 suspects and the closure of 15 live streaming channels, with the case involving over 50 million yuan [3]. - **Case 3: Chongqing Munibro Brewery Illegal Additives** - A beer was found to contain a substance similar to a prescription drug, leading to a fine of 150,000 yuan and the referral of the case to criminal authorities [4]. - **Case 4: Zhejiang Shaoxing Sifang Food Co. Vinegar Incident** - The company was found to be using acetic acid to produce counterfeit vinegar, with over 900 boxes of non-compliant products seized, and the case has been referred to criminal authorities [5]. - **Case 5: Fujian Shishi Restaurant Borax Use** - A restaurant was found to have illegally used borax in food products, leading to an investigation and referral to criminal authorities [6]. Regulatory Emphasis - The regulatory body highlighted the need for food producers to adhere to legal standards and emphasized that violations will result in severe penalties, urging societal participation in monitoring food safety [1][6].

Core Viewpoint - The market regulatory authorities have intensified their enforcement actions against food safety violations, resulting in significant penalties and legal actions against offending companies [1] Summary by Relevant Sections Enforcement Actions - In the first half of the year, a total of 181,000 food safety violation cases were investigated, resulting in fines and confiscations amounting to 740 million yuan, with 653 cases referred to judicial authorities [1] Case Summaries - **Case 1: Guangdong Zhanjiang "Water Shrimp" Incident** - Four companies were found to have illegally added excessive amounts of phosphates to frozen shrimp products while falsely labeling them as "zero additives." Fines totaled 7.4943 million yuan, and all four companies had their food production licenses revoked for five years [2] - **Case 2: Beijing Haidian "Toxic Candy" Incident** - A product sold through live streaming was found to contain a banned diuretic. The sales network spanned nine provinces, and over 40 suspects were arrested, with the case involving over 50 million yuan [3] - **Case 3: Chongqing Munibro Beer Illegal Additives** - A beer product was found to contain a substance similar to a prescription drug, leading to a fine of 150,000 yuan and referral of the case to criminal authorities [4] - **Case 4: Zhejiang Shaoxing Sifang Food Company** - The company was found to be producing vinegar that did not meet safety standards, with over 900 boxes of problematic vinegar seized, involving over 1 million yuan [5] - **Case 5: Fujian Shishi Restaurant Using Borax** - A restaurant was found to have illegally used borax in food products, leading to a criminal investigation [6] Regulatory Insights - The regulatory authorities emphasize the importance of legal compliance and consumer safety, urging businesses to adhere to laws and ethical standards to avoid severe penalties [6]

Core Viewpoint - The market regulatory authority has intensified its enforcement actions against food safety violations, resulting in significant penalties and legal actions against offending companies [1]. Summary by Relevant Sections Enforcement Actions - In the first half of the year, the regulatory system handled 181,000 food safety violation cases, imposing fines and confiscations totaling 740 million yuan, and referred 653 cases to judicial authorities [1]. Case Summaries - **Case 1: Guangdong Zhanjiang "Water Shrimp" Incident** - Four frozen shrimp companies were found to have illegally added excessive phosphates and falsely labeled their products as "zero additives," resulting in fines of 7.4943 million yuan and revocation of their food production licenses for five years [2]. - **Case 2: Beijing Haidian "Toxic Candy" Incident** - A product sold through live streaming was found to contain a banned diuretic, leading to a criminal investigation that resulted in the arrest of over 40 suspects and involved an estimated 50 million yuan in illicit sales [3]. - **Case 3: Chongqing Munibro Beer Illegal Additives** - A beer product was found to contain a harmful substance similar to a prescription drug, leading to a fine of 150,000 yuan and referral of the case for criminal prosecution [4]. - **Case 4: Zhejiang Shaoxing Sifang Food Co. Vinegar Fraud** - The company was caught using acetic acid to produce counterfeit vinegar, with over 900 boxes of non-compliant products seized, and the case has been referred to law enforcement [5]. - **Case 5: Fujian Shishi Restaurant Borax Use** - A restaurant was found to have illegally used borax in its dumpling fillings, leading to an investigation and referral for criminal charges [6].

Core Viewpoint - The misuse of food additives has become a significant concern for consumers, prompting the Chinese government to implement a comprehensive governance plan to address the issue across the entire food supply chain [1][3]. Group 1: Governance Actions - The State Council's food safety office and six other departments have issued a comprehensive governance plan to combat the misuse of food additives [1]. - The plan includes strict enforcement against illegal practices in agricultural production, management of chemical products, and enhanced customs inspections for imported food additives [3]. - Market regulatory authorities will enforce strict supervision over the production, sale, and use of food additives, including penalties for exceeding permissible limits [3]. Group 2: Regulatory Focus Areas - The governance action emphasizes a full-chain and full-process supervision approach, from agricultural production to food consumption [5]. - Inspections will focus on key production areas, including raw material storage and production processes, ensuring compliance with supplier management and ingredient verification [5]. - Specific attention will be given to the food production sector, where certain food categories, such as canned goods and baked products, are prohibited from using preservatives [7]. Group 3: Prohibited Substances - In the food service sector, there are strict prohibitions against the use of certain harmful substances, including industrial oxalic acid, nitrite preservatives, and illegal additives like poppy husk [7]. - Regulatory bodies are actively encouraging food service businesses to verify the safety and compliance of their food additives [7]. Group 4: Proper Use of Additives - Food additives are not inherently harmful; their safety depends on correct usage and adherence to specified limits [9]. - Each food additive is required to indicate its permissible food categories and maximum allowable amounts, with misuse defined as exceeding these limits [9].

Group 1 - Li Xiang's reported salary of 639 million yuan is inaccurate; actual compensation is 2.66 million yuan, with the majority being stock-based compensation [1] - The People's Bank of China announced a 0.5% reduction in the reserve requirement ratio and a 0.1% decrease in policy interest rates, providing approximately 1 trillion yuan in long-term liquidity [1] Group 2 - Kweichow Moutai officially announced Zhang Yixing as its first brand ambassador, aiming to attract younger consumers [2] - Skechers announced its decision to go private, clarifying that this does not affect its operations in China [2] - Changan Automobile refuted rumors of merging with Dongfeng Group and is pursuing legal action against those spreading false information [2] Group 3 - The Federal Reserve decided to maintain the federal funds rate between 4.25% and 4.50%, marking the third consecutive meeting without a rate change [3] Group 4 - SpaceX received permission to increase its Starship launch frequency from 5 to 25 times per year [4] - Samsung's Harman International acquired Masimo's audio business for $350 million, aiming to strengthen its position in the consumer audio market [4] Group 5 - Geely Auto proposed to privatize Zeekr at a price of $2.57 per share, representing a premium of approximately 13.6% over the last trading price [7] - Reading Group and Japan's CCC Group established a strategic partnership to co-create IP and open a pop-up store in Japan [8] Group 6 - Uber reported Q1 revenue of $11.533 billion, a 14% year-over-year increase, with a net profit of $1.776 billion [13] - Disney's Q2 revenue grew 7% to $23.621 billion, with adjusted EPS increasing 20% to $1.45 [13] - Novo Nordisk reported Q1 net sales of 78.087 billion Danish kroner (approximately $11.01 billion), with a growth of 18% at fixed exchange rates [14]

Group 1 - Four companies involved in the "water-retaining shrimp" scandal have had their food production licenses revoked and have been fined over 8 million yuan [1][3] - The companies are Zhanjiang Baohui Aquatic Products Co., Zhanjiang Liangji Frozen Food Co., Zhanjiang Shangfangzhou Food Co., and Zhanjiang Zhongqing Ocean Products Co. [1][3] - The use of phosphates in shrimp products exceeded the national safety standards, with Baohui's shrimp containing 7.57 grams of phosphates per kilogram, 51.4% over the limit, and Liangji's shrimp containing 12.5 grams, 145% over the limit [1][3] Group 2 - Companies have been found to use water-retaining agents and ice packaging to increase the weight of shrimp, with claims that 100 pounds of shrimp can be increased to 124 pounds [2] - The regulatory actions include a five-year ban on applying for food production licenses for the involved companies [3][4] - Specific penalties include fines and confiscation of illegal profits, with Baohui fined over 2.12 million yuan and Liangji fined over 1.28 million yuan for violations [3][4]

Core Viewpoint - The article highlights the issue of excessive use of food additives, specifically water-retaining agents, in shrimp products by several companies, leading to regulatory penalties and health concerns for consumers [1][4][6]. Summary by Sections Regulatory Actions - Multiple companies involved in the shrimp industry have been penalized for exceeding the allowable limits of food additives, resulting in confiscation of products and fines. For instance, Zhanjiang Baohui Aquatic Products Co., Ltd. faced a fine of approximately 2.123 million yuan and had its food production license revoked [1]. - Zhanjiang Shangfangzhou Food Co., Ltd. was fined 2.264 million yuan and also had its food production license revoked, and it has been listed as a seriously untrustworthy enterprise [2]. - Zhanjiang Zhongqing Marine Products Co., Ltd. was fined approximately 1.8185 million yuan, with additional fines imposed on its legal representative and main responsible person [2]. Industry Practices - The article discusses the practice of using water-retaining agents, which are often phosphate-based, to enhance the weight and shelf life of shrimp products. Some companies reportedly add these agents in excessive amounts, with one case showing a phosphate content of 30 grams per 1,000 grams of shrimp, significantly exceeding regulatory limits [4]. - Companies often do not disclose the use of these additives on product packaging, misleading consumers about the actual content of the shrimp products [4]. Health Concerns - Long-term excessive intake of phosphates can pose health risks, including digestive issues, calcium-phosphorus imbalance, and cardiovascular diseases [6]. Consumer Awareness - The article emphasizes the need for consumer awareness regarding the potential health risks associated with the consumption of shrimp products that may contain excessive food additives [4][6].