Group 1: Report Industry Investment Rating - No information provided regarding the industry investment rating Group 2: Core Viewpoints of the Report - In the recent week, most A - share ETFs declined, while gold ETFs led the gains with a 3.26% increase, and the technology sector mostly fell. Funds were deployed in the science - innovation sector against the trend, and the ETFs targeting SGE Gold 9999 had the largest net inflow of funds [2][9] Group 3: Summary by Directory 1. Index Product Establishment, Raising, and Application - **Product Establishment and Listing**: Five products were listed, with a concentration on Hong Kong Stock Connect products. Eight products were established, including index - enhanced products such as Zhongjia Beizheng 50 Component Index Enhanced A and Huatai Baorui Shanghai Stock Exchange Science and Technology Innovation Board Comprehensive Index Enhanced A [1][4] - **Product Issuance Information**: Two index products ended their fundraising in the coming week, and no index products were set to start fundraising [6] - **Product Application Information**: A total of 28 index products were applied for in the recent week, maintaining the diversified characteristics of industry themes, including 18 theme funds and 6 linked funds [7] 2. ETF Market Review - **Overall ETF Performance**: Most A - share ETFs declined, with the declines of Kechuang 50ETF, ChiNext 50ETF, and CSI 500ETF being - 3.83%, - 3.67%, and - 1.24% respectively. Among Hong Kong - stock ETFs, only the Hang Seng ETF rose by 1.30%, and among US - stock ETFs, the S&P 500ETF rose by 2.68%. In commodity ETFs, the non - ferrous ETF rose by 1.26%, and gold rebounded strongly by 3.26% [2][9] - **Industry - based A - share ETF Performance**: The medical category rose significantly, with the Chinese medicine ETF having the highest increase of 3.61%. The chemical ETF also had a relatively high increase of 3.38%. The technology category declined significantly, with the communication ETF, electronic ETF, and chip ETF having declines of - 6.99%, - 5.62%, and - 4.81% respectively [2][13] - **Cross - border ETF Performance**: In the recent week, the major broad - based indices of cross - border markets had mixed performance. The France CAC40 had the highest increase of 2.77%. Among corresponding ETFs, Boshi Hang Seng Healthcare ETF and Hua'an France CAC40ETF rose significantly, while Huatai Baorui CSI Korea Exchange Sino - Korean Semiconductor ETF declined by 4.20% [16] 3. ETF Fund Flow - **Overall ETF Scale**: As of November 14, 2025, there were 1304 ETFs in the entire market, with a total scale of 563.3719 billion yuan, a decrease of 3.914 billion yuan from the previous week. A - share and cross - border ETFs ranked first and second in scale [22] - **Non - monetary ETF Fund Inflow and Outflow**: Among non - monetary ETFs, the ETFs targeting SGE Gold 9999 had the largest net inflow of 5.567 billion yuan, while the ETFs of CSI A500 had the largest net outflow of 4.04 billion yuan [24] - **High - Inflow and High - Liquidity ETFs**: Huaxia Shanghai Stock Exchange Science and Technology Innovation Board 50ETF and Southern ChiNext Artificial Intelligence ETF had high fund inflows of 2.495 billion yuan and 2.028 billion yuan respectively. Haifutong CSI Short - term Financing ETF and E Fund CSI Hong Kong Securities Investment Theme ETF had high liquidity [26]

1. Report Industry Investment Rating No information provided in the content. 2. Core View of the Report - In the recent week, gold ETFs led the gains, and the science and technology sector mostly declined. Funds were deployed in the science and technology innovation sector against the trend, with SGE Gold 9999 having the highest net inflow [1][2][11]. 3. Summary According to the Table of Contents 3.1 Index Product Establishment, Fund - raising, and Application - **Product Establishment and Listing**: Five products were listed, with a concentration of Hong Kong Stock Connect products. Eight products, including Chang Sheng CSI A500 Index Enhancement A, were established, and index - enhancement products such as Zhong Jia Beizheng 50 Component Index Enhancement A were established intensively [1][5]. - **Product Issuance Information**: Two index products ended their fund - raising in the coming week, and no index products were to start fund - raising. The products were Chuang Jin He Xin CSI A500 Index Enhancement A and Hua Tai Bao Xing CSI All - Index Enhancement A [1][7]. - **Product Application Information**: A total of 28 index products were applied for in the recent week, maintaining the diversified characteristics of industry themes. There were 18 theme funds focusing on different content tracks and 6 linked funds [1][9]. 3.2 ETF Market Review - **Overall ETF Performance**: In the recent week (2025/11/10 - 2025/11/14), most A - share ETFs declined. Among them, the declines of Kechuang 50ETF, ChiNext 50ETF, and CSI 500ETF were - 3.83%, - 3.67%, and - 1.24% respectively. Among Hong Kong - stock ETFs, only the Hang Seng ETF rose by 1.30%. Among US - stock ETFs, the S&P 500ETF rose by 2.68%. In terms of commodity ETFs, the non - ferrous ETF rose by 1.26%, and gold strongly rebounded by 3.26%, attracting risk - averse funds [2][11]. - **A - share ETF Performance by Industry**: Medical - related ETFs rose significantly, with the Chinese medicine ETF having the highest increase of 3.61%, followed by the innovative drug ETF and medical device ETF with increases of 2.82% and 1.94% respectively. The chemical ETF also had a relatively high increase of 3.38%. The science and technology sector declined significantly, with the communication ETF, electronic ETF, and chip ETF declining by - 6.99%, - 5.62%, and - 4.81% respectively [2][15]. - **Cross - border ETF Performance**: In the recent week, the major broad - based indices of cross - border markets rose and fell differently. The French CAC40 had the highest increase of 2.77%. Among the corresponding ETFs, Boshi Hang Seng Healthcare ETF and Hua An French CAC40ETF rose significantly, with increases of 5.90% and 3.22% respectively, while Huatai Baorui CSI KRX Korea Semiconductor ETF declined by 4.20% [19]. 3.3 ETF Fund Flow - **Overall Scale and Change**: As of November 14, 2025, there were 1,304 ETFs in the entire market, with a latest total scale of 5,633.719 billion yuan, a decrease of 39.14 billion yuan from the previous week. The scale of A - share ETFs decreased by 36.404 billion yuan in the recent week [2][25]. - **Net Inflow and Outflow of Funds**: Among non - currency ETFs, the ETFs targeting SGE Gold 9999 had the largest net inflow of funds, reaching 5.567 billion yuan, while the ETFs of CSI A500 had the largest net outflow of funds, with a total outflow of 4.04 billion yuan. Huaxia Shanghai Stock Exchange Science and Technology Innovation Board 50ETF and Southern ChiNext Artificial Intelligence ETF had relatively high fund inflows, with 2.495 billion yuan and 2.028 billion yuan respectively [2][28][31]. - **Liquidity**: Haifu Tong CSI Short - Term Financing ETF led in liquidity in the recent week, with an average daily trading volume of 28.769 billion yuan. E Fund CSI Hong Kong Securities Investment Theme ETF also had relatively high liquidity, with an average daily trading volume of 9.648 billion yuan [31].

Core Viewpoint - The recent cautious stance of ETF managers contrasts sharply with the heated market environment, indicating a shift towards a more prudent investment approach among institutional investors as they navigate market volatility and style rebalancing [1][5]. ETF Positioning - Several newly established ETFs are adopting a "low position" strategy, with some having equity positions as low as 10% or even close to zero, reflecting a wait-and-see approach before fully deploying capital [1][3]. - For instance, the Huaxia CSI Photovoltaic Industry ETF had an equity position of 33.19% as of November 11, which is below the required thresholds for investment in index components [2]. - Other ETFs, such as the Jiashi CSI Sub-Sector Chemical Industry Theme ETF and the Yifangda CSI Satellite Industry ETF, reported equity positions of 19.99% and 10.02%, respectively, as of early November [2]. Institutional Caution - The cautious behavior of ETFs is notable, as they typically aim to quickly align with their benchmark indices. However, recent listings show a significant delay in building positions, suggesting a more conservative approach from fund managers [4]. - Regulatory guidelines emphasize the need for fund managers to ensure compliance with investment ratios before listing, yet many funds are still in the process of building their portfolios, indicating a cautious market sentiment [4]. Market Dynamics - The Shanghai Composite Index has experienced volatility around the 4000-point mark, with a shift in market focus from technology stocks to sectors like new energy and cyclical stocks, which are showing improved performance [5]. - Institutional attitudes have shifted from aggressive to cautious, with passive funds slowing their pace of investment and actively managed funds also adopting a more conservative stance [5]. Investment Strategies - The concepts of "balanced allocation" and "barbell strategy" are regaining prominence among institutional investors, moving away from the previously favored growth-oriented strategies [6]. - Historical data suggests a tendency for a shift from growth to value styles in the fourth quarter, indicating a potential rebalancing rather than a complete style switch [6]. - Investment firms recommend a barbell strategy, combining high-dividend assets with a focus on quality growth assets, to navigate the current market conditions [6][7].

Core Viewpoint - The recent cautious stance of newly established ETFs contrasts sharply with the heated market environment, indicating a more prudent attitude among institutional investors as they navigate market volatility and style rebalancing [1][5]. ETF Positioning - Several newly launched ETFs are adopting a "low position" strategy, with some having equity positions as low as 10% or even close to zero, reflecting a wait-and-see approach before fully deploying their capital [1][3]. - For instance, the Huaxia CSI Photovoltaic Industry ETF had an equity position of 33.19% as of November 11, which is below the required thresholds set by its fund contract [2]. - Other ETFs, such as the Jiashi CSI Sub-Sector Chemical Industry Theme ETF and the Yifangda CSI Satellite Industry ETF, reported equity positions of only 19.99% and 10.02%, respectively [2]. Market Dynamics - The cautious approach of ETFs comes amid a backdrop of the Shanghai Composite Index fluctuating around the 4000-point mark, with a notable shift in market styles as technology stocks face adjustments while new energy and cyclical sectors show improved performance [4][6]. - The market is currently experiencing a "rebalancing" rather than a complete "switch," with institutions returning to more balanced strategies after a period of aggressive growth-focused investments [6]. Investment Strategies - The "balanced allocation" and "barbell strategy" are re-emerging as core investment strategies among institutions, emphasizing a mix of dividend-paying assets and high-quality growth assets [5][6]. - Historical data suggests that after a strong performance in growth styles during the third quarter, a shift towards value styles in the fourth quarter is common, reinforcing the need for a balanced approach [6]. Recommendations - Fund managers are encouraged to consider increasing allocations to high-dividend stocks while maintaining a focus on quality growth assets, particularly in the context of the current market dynamics [7].

Core Insights - Two stock ETFs have announced their listing, with Jiashi's ETF holding 19.99% and Yifangda's ETF holding 10.02% [1] - A total of 12 stock ETFs have announced listings in November, with an average holding of 20.01%, and the highest being 45.33% for Nanfang's ETF [1] - The average fundraising for the newly announced ETFs is 4.35 million shares, with the largest being 9.35 million shares for the Zhaoshang ETF [1][2] ETF Holdings - Institutional investors hold an average of 13.40% of the shares, with the highest being 31.99% for Guolianan's ETF [2] - The ETFs with the lowest institutional holdings include Tianhong's ETF at 0.59% and Yifangda's ETF at 3.54% [2] ETF Listing Details - Jiashi's ETF was established on November 6, 2025, with a fundraising of 9.26 million shares and a holding of 19.99% [2] - Nanfang's ETF was established on October 29, 2025, with a holding of 45.33% and a fundraising of 2.70 million shares [2] - The average holding for newly listed ETFs is 20.01%, with significant variations among different funds [1][2]

Core Insights - Four stock ETFs have recently announced their listing, with varying stock positions, indicating a diverse investment strategy among these funds [1] - The average stock position for newly listed ETFs in November is 21.02%, with the highest being 45.33% for the Southern CSI Hong Kong Internet ETF [1][2] - Institutional investors hold an average of 14.84% of the shares in these newly listed ETFs, with some funds having significantly higher institutional ownership [2] Group 1: ETF Listings and Positions - The Guolianan Hong Kong Stock Connect Technology ETF has a stock position of 0.06% [1] - The Huabao CSI Hong Kong Stock Connect Information Technology Comprehensive ETF has a stock position of 16.34% [1] - The Tianhong National Index Hong Kong Stock Connect Technology ETF has a stock position of 11.20% [1] - The招商中证800自由现金流ETF has a stock position of 44.72% [1] - The highest stock position among newly listed ETFs is 45.33% for the Southern CSI Hong Kong Internet ETF [1][2] Group 2: Fund Size and Institutional Ownership - The average number of shares raised for newly listed ETFs in November is 3.80 million [2] - The largest share amounts are for the 招商国证港股通科技ETF (9.35 million shares), Tianhong National Index Hong Kong Stock Connect Technology ETF (6.45 million shares), and 兴业中证金融科技ETF (4.07 million shares) [2] - Institutional ownership is highest in the Guolianan Hong Kong Stock Connect Technology ETF (31.99%), followed by the Huabao CSI Hong Kong Stock Connect Information Technology Comprehensive ETF (29.99%) [2]

Market Overview - The Shanghai Composite Index rose by 0.11% to close at 3954.79 points, with a weekly high of 4025.7 points [1] - The Shenzhen Component Index increased by 0.67% to 13378.21 points, reaching a peak of 13700.25 points [1] - The ChiNext Index gained 0.5%, closing at 3187.53 points, with a maximum of 3331.86 points [1] - Global markets saw most major indices rise, with the Nasdaq Composite up 2.24%, the Dow Jones Industrial Average up 0.75%, and the S&P 500 up 0.71% [1] - In the Asia-Pacific region, the Hang Seng Index fell by 0.97%, while the Nikkei 225 Index surged by 6.31% [1] ETF Market Performance - The median weekly return for stock ETFs was 0.23% [2] - The highest weekly return among scale index ETFs was 2.4% for the Jiashi Zhongchuang 400 ETF [2] - The South China CSI New Energy ETF led industry index ETFs with a return of 5.94% [2] - The highest return in strategy index ETFs was 2.37% for the China Southern CSI All-Share Dividend Quality ETF [2] - The Jiashi CSI Battery Theme ETF achieved the highest return among thematic index ETFs at 7.75% [2] ETF Performance Rankings - The top five stock ETFs by weekly return were: - Jiashi CSI Battery Theme ETF (7.75%) - Huatai-PB CSI Battery Theme ETF (7.56%) -招商中证电池主题ETF (7.52%) - 富国中证电池主题ETF (7.51%) - 浦银安盛中证光伏产业ETF (7.04%) [4][5] - The five stock ETFs with the largest declines were: - 国联安上证科创板芯片设计主题ETF (-5.35%) - 华安上证科创板芯片ETF (-5.11%) - 国泰上证科创板芯片ETF (-5.06%) - 博时上证科创板芯片ETF (-5.05%) - 南方上证科创板芯片ETF (-5.05%) [4][5] ETF Liquidity - Average daily trading volume for stock ETFs increased by 13.3%, with average daily trading volume rising by 46.7% and turnover rate increasing by 0.22% [6] ETF Fund Flows - The top five stock ETFs by fund inflow were: - 华泰柏瑞沪深300ETF (inflow of 5.084 billion) - 华夏上证科创板50成份ETF (inflow of 1.647 billion) - 华夏上证50ETF (inflow of 1.535 billion) - 国泰中证全指证券公司ETF (inflow of 1.353 billion) - 嘉实上证科创板芯片ETF (inflow of 959 million) [9] - The five stock ETFs with the largest outflows were: - 鹏华中证酒ETF (outflow of 351 million) - 华安创业板50ETF (outflow of 334 million) - 汇添富中证电池主题ETF (outflow of 284 million) - 南方中证申万有色金属ETF (outflow of 279 million) - 嘉实中证稀土产业ETF (outflow of 256 million) [10] ETF Financing and Margin Trading - The financing balance for stock ETFs increased from 47.486 billion to 49.145 billion, while the margin balance rose from 2.5678 billion to 2.6069 billion [11] ETF Market Size - The total market size for ETFs reached 5699.032 billion, an increase of 6.878 billion from the previous week [15] - Stock ETFs accounted for 3724.471 billion, representing 65.4% of the total ETF market size [15][17] ETF Issuance and Establishment - No new ETFs were issued last week, but eight new ETFs were established, including 天弘国证港股通科技ETF and 摩根恒生港股通50ETF [18] Institutional Insights - 财通证券 is optimistic about the solid-state battery industry, expecting breakthroughs in technology and increased industrialization by 2025 [18] - 中国银河证券 believes traditional lithium battery equipment manufacturers will maintain their advantages in the solid-state battery market, suggesting a focus on developments in equipment and orders [18]

Group 1 - The recent surge in fund issuance indicates a recovery in market sentiment, providing incremental capital support for the equity market, creating a positive cycle of "hot issuance, capital inflow, and strong market" [1][2] - From October 20 to 24, 30 public funds were launched, with a significant majority being index and actively managed equity products, marking a peak in recent fund issuance [1][2] - The number of new funds issued has shown a clear upward trend since September 2024, with 66 new funds launched in September 2024 and 151 in September 2025, reflecting a growing interest in equity investments [2][3] Group 2 - The total fundraising scale for public funds reached a new high in September 2025, with a total of 152.1 billion yuan raised, a 26.99% increase month-on-month and a 90.62% increase year-on-year [3] - Index funds led the fundraising efforts, with 107.9 billion yuan raised, followed by mixed funds at 22.9 billion yuan and bond funds at 12.7 billion yuan [3] - The trend of early closure of fundraising periods has become common, with several funds announcing early termination of their fundraising due to meeting the necessary conditions ahead of schedule [4]

Group 1 - The core point of the article is that 29 new funds were launched for subscription this week, with equity funds remaining the dominant type [1][4] - A total of 29 new funds were issued this week, with 26 of them launched on Monday, accounting for nearly 90% of the total [2][3] - The average subscription period for the new funds this week was 28.79 days, which is significantly longer than previous periods, likely due to recent market adjustments [3] Group 2 - Among the new funds, 24 were equity funds, making up over 80% of the total, with 11 being index funds and 4 enhanced index funds [4] - There were 8 actively managed equity funds, all of which were mixed funds, with 7 being high-equity mixed funds [5] - Only 3 bond funds were launched this week, indicating a slowdown in bond fund issuance due to recent market adjustments [5] Group 3 - The new funds included 2 mixed FOFs, both of which are characterized by a conservative investment style [6] - The longest subscription period among the new funds was 3 months, while the shortest was 5 days for two passive index funds [2][3] - The fundraising targets for the new funds varied, with 3 funds aiming for 8 billion units and the lowest target set at 500 million units [3]

Market Overview - The A-share market saw all major indices rise last week, with the Sci-Tech 50, Small and Medium-sized Enterprises Index, and CSI 500 Index leading with returns of 5.48%, 3.66%, and 3.38% respectively, while the CSI 300, Shanghai Composite, and ChiNext Index lagged with returns of 1.38%, 1.52%, and 2.10% respectively [1][9] - In terms of trading volume, all major indices except the Sci-Tech 50 experienced a decline in trading volume last week [10] - The electronic, real estate, and agriculture sectors performed well, with returns of 5.98%, 5.82%, and 4.52% respectively, while the banking, comprehensive finance, and pharmaceutical sectors underperformed with returns of -0.64%, -0.58%, and -0.28% respectively [1][14] Fund Issuance and Performance - A total of 46 funds were reported last week, a decrease from the previous week, including 3 FOFs and 3 QDIIs [2] - Last week, 40 new funds were established with a total issuance scale of 21.794 billion yuan, which is a decrease from the previous week [3] - The Huashang Hong Kong Stock Connect Value Return Fund completed its fundraising on September 8, raising over 1 billion yuan with a subscription confirmation ratio of 32.95% [5] - The performance of open-end public funds showed that active equity, flexible allocation, and balanced mixed funds had returns of 2.18%, 1.73%, and 0.91% respectively [29][36] Fund Sales and Management - As of last week, there were 243 ordinary FOF funds, 119 target date funds, and 152 target risk funds in the open-end public fund category [35] - The top three fund sales institutions by equity fund holdings were Ant Fund, China Merchants Bank, and Tian Tian Fund, with holdings of 822.9 billion yuan, 492 billion yuan, and 349.6 billion yuan respectively [7] - The target date funds had the best median performance this year, with a cumulative return of 13.94% [36] Bond Market - As of last Friday, the central bank's reverse repo net injection was 196.1 billion yuan, with reverse repos maturing at 1,068.4 billion yuan, resulting in a net open market injection of 1,264.5 billion yuan [17] - The yield on government bonds of different maturities has increased, with credit spreads widening by 3.69 basis points [18][23] Sector Performance - Over the past month, the communication sector has seen the highest cumulative increase of 25.38%, while the comprehensive finance sector has experienced a cumulative decline of 5.53% [14] - Year-to-date, the communication, non-ferrous metals, and electronics sectors have shown high cumulative returns of 63.94%, 60.31%, and 38.03% respectively, while sectors like coal, transportation, and food and beverage have the lowest returns [14][16]