上半年环保行业迎发债热潮，用于补充现金、偿还债务 【】【】[Table_Industry] 环保周报 吴柏莹 环保行业分析师 执业编号：S1500524100001 邮 箱：wuboying@cindasc.com 信达证券股份有限公司 CINDA SECURITIES CO.，LTD 北京市西城区宣武门西大街甲127号金隅大厦 B座 邮编：100031 [Table_Title] 上半年环保行业迎发债热潮，用于补充现金、偿还 债务 2025 年 8 月 16 日 本期内容提要: [Table_ReportDate] 2025 年 8 月 16 日 15666646523.tcy | 证券研究报告 | | | --- | --- | | 行业研究——周报 | | | [Table_ReportType] 行业周报 | | | [Table_StockAndRank] 环保 | | | 投资评级 | 看好 | | 上次评级 | 看好 | 郭雪 环保联席首席分析师 执业编号：S1500525030002 邮 箱：guoxue @cindasc.com 请阅读最后一页免责声明及信息披露 http://www.cin ...

Core Viewpoint - The China Interbank Market Dealers Association has issued a notification to regulate the issuance and underwriting of bonds in the interbank market, effective from August 11, 2025, emphasizing the need for improved management of underwriting quotes and the establishment of internal management systems by lead underwriters [1][2]. Group 1: Underwriting and Pricing Management - The notification mandates that lead underwriters must establish internal management systems for underwriting quotes, ensuring that quotes are based on comprehensive project cost assessments and not below cost [1]. - Issuers are required to set reasonable selection criteria for bids based on market principles, without interfering with the independent pricing decisions of lead underwriters [1][2]. Group 2: Subscription and Information Disclosure - The notification encourages investors to submit subscription requests early, and underwriters must use approved communication tools to maintain records of subscription information [1][2]. - Any withdrawal or modification of subscription orders within one hour before the closing time must be announced in real-time and reported to the association in writing before the trading circulation date [1]. Group 3: Pricing Mechanism and Distribution Management - Issuers and lead underwriters must determine the pricing range for bond issuance based on market principles and comparable bond rates, ensuring that the pricing reflects fair market levels [2]. - Lead underwriters are required to enhance the quality and standardization of market-based issuance services, with specific disclosure requirements for balance underwriting and self-investment [2][3]. Group 4: Underwriter Selection and Complaints Management - For short-term and medium-term financing instruments, issuers can select a limited number of lead underwriters based on the issuance scale, with specific limits set for different issuance sizes [3]. - The association will accept complaints regarding violations of laws and self-regulatory rules during the issuance process, with verified cases recorded in integrity archives for public disclosure [3].

Group 1 - The core announcement involves Beijing Energy International entering into a trust agreement with Xingye International Trust for the issuance of asset-backed commercial papers totaling RMB 2 billion, divided into two tranches: senior and subordinated [1] - The underlying assets include rights and interests related to receivable subsidies from eight photovoltaic project companies located across various provinces in China, with a total installed capacity of 494.6 MW as of the initial benchmark date [1] - The expected government renewable energy subsidies are anticipated to be received by October 2028 or around that time [1] Group 2 - The board believes that the issuance of asset-backed commercial papers will diversify the group's fundraising channels and secure low-cost funding, thereby improving the financing structure and enhancing operational activities and investments [2] - It is expected that the issuance interest rate of the asset-backed commercial papers will be lower than the company's average financing rate, which will reduce financing costs [2] - 70% of the proceeds from the issuance will be used to repay existing debts, effectively optimizing the group's debt-to-asset ratio [2] - The arrangement is expected to accelerate the overall turnover of the group's assets and increase total revenue generated [2] - The asset-backed commercial papers are designed as direct financing products for institutional investors, which will further expand the company's influence and recognition in the capital markets [2]

Report Summary 1. Report Industry Investment Rating There is no information about the report industry investment rating in the provided content. 2. Core Viewpoints The asset - backed note issuance scale has continuously increased, with asset - backed commercial paper accounting for about half, and personal consumer finance - related assets are active [3]. 3. Summary by Relevant Catalogs 3.1 Issuance Situation - In April 2025, 58 asset - backed note products were issued, with a total issuance scale of 59.188 billion yuan. Compared with the previous month, the number of issuances increased by 9, and the issuance scale grew by 33.71%. Compared with the same period last year, the number of issuances increased by 11, and the issuance scale grew by 55.01%. Only 4 were publicly issued, and the rest were privately placed [4][5]. - The top five initiators in terms of issuance scale were China Orient Asset Management Co., Ltd. (8.945 billion yuan, 15.11%), Beijing Jingdong Century Trading Co., Ltd. (8.725 billion yuan, 14.74%), China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd. (6.043 billion yuan, 10.21%), SDIC Taikang Trust Co., Ltd. (5.964 billion yuan, 10.08%), and Huaneng Guicheng Trust Co., Ltd. (4.4 billion yuan, 7.43%). The total issuance scale of the top ten initiators was 48.094 billion yuan, accounting for 81.26% [5]. - The underlying asset types included personal consumer finance, specific non - financial claims, accounts receivable, micro - loans, and financial leasing. Personal consumer finance products accounted for 47.96% of the scale [7]. - The highest single - product issuance scale was 6.043 billion yuan, and the lowest was 1.0 billion yuan. The number and scale of products with a single - issuance scale between (0, 10] billion yuan were the largest, with 52 products issued, accounting for 66.13% of the scale [9]. - The shortest product term was 0.25 years, and the longest was 5.02 years. Products with a term between (0, 1] years had the largest issuance scale, accounting for 49.24%. Products with a term between (1, 2] years had the largest number of issuances, with 26 products issued [10]. - According to the issuance scale of notes at each level, AAAsf - rated notes accounted for 91.44% [11]. - The lowest issuance interest rate of one - year - around AAAsf - rated notes was 1.94%, the highest was 3.60%, and the interest rate center was around 2.02% [13]. - In April 2025, 24 ABCP products were issued, with a total issuance scale of 29.368 billion yuan, accounting for 49.62% of the ABN issuance scale. Specific non - financial claim ABCP accounted for 51.03% of the ABCP issuance scale, personal consumer finance ABCP accounted for 27.54%, and accounts receivable ABCP accounted for 11.60% [17]. 3.2 Secondary Market Transaction Situation - In April 2025, there were 563 secondary - market transactions of asset - backed notes, with a transaction amount of 54.198 billion yuan. The transaction amount decreased by 10.76% month - on - month, and the number of transactions decreased by 20.59% month - on - month. The transaction amount increased by 46.82% year - on - year, and the number of transactions increased by 35.66% year - on - year [4][18]. - The more active underlying asset types in the secondary - market transactions were personal consumer finance, specific non - financial claims, class REITs, accounts receivable, and supply chains, with transaction - amount proportions of 26.43%, 18.42%, 16.75%, 13.13%, and 5.23% respectively [18].

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the significant impact of President Trump's tariff policy on the financial markets, leading to substantial losses and concerns about the stability of the financial system, prompting questions about the Federal Reserve's potential interventions [1][2]. Group 1: Market Reactions and Concerns - The stock market experienced losses amounting to trillions of dollars following the introduction of new tariff policies, causing trading stagnation on Wall Street and prompting hedge funds to liquidate high-risk trades [1]. - Concerns are rising about the potential risks within the financial system due to the scale of the market disruptions, leading to discussions on what actions the Federal Reserve might take to stabilize the situation [2]. - The Bloomberg index indicates that U.S. financial conditions have deteriorated to their worst level since May 2020, reflecting increased financial pressure across various markets [2]. Group 2: Federal Reserve's Potential Actions - The Federal Reserve is likely to intervene only when clear signs of market dysfunction appear, such as a freeze in capital flows, which could hinder trading activities [2][3]. - The Fed's decision-making is complicated by a resilient labor market and persistent inflation issues, which may limit its ability to lower interest rates or take actions that could further increase prices [3]. - Historical instances of Federal Reserve interventions highlight the need for a proactive approach in times of market distress, as seen in past crises [6]. Group 3: Historical Context of Federal Reserve Interventions - The article outlines five significant instances where the Federal Reserve intervened in the financial markets, including the 1998 hedge fund crisis, the 2001 economic turmoil post-9/11, the 2007-08 global financial crisis, the 2020 pandemic response, and the 2023 regional banking crisis [6][7][11][14][18][21]. - Each instance illustrates the Fed's role in providing liquidity and stabilizing markets during periods of extreme financial stress, emphasizing the importance of timely intervention [7][11][14][18][21].