| 短期融资券 | | | | | | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 反映发行人偿债能力的指标： | | | | | | | √适用 | □不适用 | | | | | | 主要指标 | | 报告期末 | | 上年末 | | | 资产负债率（%） | | | 61.47 | | 61.28 | | | | 本报告期 | | 上年同期 | | | EBITDA | 利息保障倍数 | | 17.70 | | 16.01 | | 中国建材股份有限公司 | | 国有法人 | | 41.00 1,082,389,012 | | | 0 | 无 | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 中国建筑材料科学研究总 | | | | | | | | | | 国有法人 | | 15.61 | | 412,123,292 | 366,878,106 | 无 | | | | 院有限公司 | | | | | | | | | | 香港中央结算有限公司 | | 境外法人 | | 2.35 | 62,028,252 | ...

Core Viewpoint - The article emphasizes the role of the securities industry in supporting national strategies and deepening financial supply-side reforms, highlighting the innovative approaches taken by Ping An Securities in serving technology enterprises and enhancing financing efficiency [1]. Group 1: Innovation in Financial Services - Ping An Securities has a strong focus on innovation, particularly in the realm of technology finance, which is evident in their development of unique financial products such as intellectual property securitization and carbon emission-linked bonds [2][3]. - The company is implementing a dual strategy of "full-cycle product innovation" and "regional precision service" to enhance investment and financing efficiency, transitioning from a scale-driven approach to a service and quality-driven model [3][4]. Group 2: Bond Business Development - Ping An Securities has established itself as a leader in the bond market, consistently ranking among the top ten in underwriting scale, and is actively exploring deep service models for technology enterprises [4][5]. - The company is focusing on two main areas to support the development of technology enterprises: enhancing collaboration between equity and debt financing, and strengthening the linkage between primary and secondary markets for technology bonds [4][6]. Group 3: Risk Sharing Mechanisms - To address the financing challenges faced by technology SMEs, Ping An Securities has developed core experiences in mechanism design, resource integration, and risk control [6]. - The company is enhancing credit enhancement measures by introducing innovative tools such as intellectual property pledges and data asset guarantees, which effectively improve bond credit ratings [6][7]. Group 4: Intellectual Property Securitization - Ping An Securities has pioneered the field of intellectual property securitization, launching the first intellectual property ABS product in China in 2019, and has since supported various financing projects for technology enterprises [8][9]. - The company employs a customized strategy for each enterprise, providing professional research and strategic consulting to help clarify market positioning and development direction [9].

近年来，随着监管层持续促进"科技—产业—金融"良性循环，证券公司针对科技型企业进行全链条全生 命周期的金融服务也不断增强。 发轫于深圳特区的平安证券，在三十余年发展历程中深度参与中国中小企业成长。"在竞争中求生存， 在创新中求发展"的企业基因始终传承，也使得平安证券在服务科技企业领域形成了鲜明特色。 证券时报记者在探访平安证券的科技金融服务路径时注意到，"创新"成为受访人士贯穿言谈的关键词。 作为公司的特色、优势板块，平安证券债券条线以系统性创新解答科技金融命题，包括研发知识产权证 券化、碳减排挂钩债券等特色产品。 创新基因 深植于金融服务中 率。具体操作方面，平安证券对合作的担保机构进行了系统梳理，全面评估其业务范围、担保能力与合 作模式；对担保额度、担保期限、担保准入范围、反担保措施等关键要素详尽落实，以确保增信措施切 实有效。 证券时报记者获悉，平安证券正实施"全周期产品创新"与"区域精准服务"双轨战略，通过创新产品矩阵 提升投融资效能。基于对科创企业需求的深度洞察，平安证券已构建覆盖企业全生命周期的多元化"接 力式"投融资服务体系，推进从"规模+质量驱动"到"服务体系+品质驱动"的升级。 在股权业务领 ...

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the significance of the "Guiding Opinions on Financial Support for New-Type Industrialization," which aims to inject financial resources into China's new industrialization efforts, focusing on 18 targeted support measures [1]. Group 1: Positive Impacts of the Opinions - The Opinions provide financial "lifeblood" to promote new industrialization by increasing the supply of financial resources, especially medium- and long-term funding [13]. - It emphasizes the need for a comprehensive financial product and service system, including support for technology transfer and encouraging intellectual property pledge financing [13]. - The Opinions serve as an action guide for financial support to the manufacturing sector and are crucial for enhancing China's production capabilities [13][14]. Group 2: Structural Changes in New-Type Industrialization - New-type industrialization is expected to undergo three structural transformations: technology-driven breakthroughs, deep restructuring of traditional industries, and regional resource reallocation [17]. - The financial structure for manufacturing will become more rational, with a focus on advanced manufacturing and improved collaboration within the industrial chain [17][18]. - The Opinions aim to establish a mature financial system by 2027 that supports high-end, intelligent, and green development in manufacturing [17][18]. Group 3: Role of Capital Markets - Capital markets are identified as key platforms for supporting new industrialization by providing long-term, low-cost funding for technology-intensive manufacturing enterprises [21]. - The article highlights the importance of a multi-tiered capital market system to meet the long-term funding needs from research and development to industrialization [21][22]. - Capital markets can help improve corporate governance and transparency, which is essential for aligning with international standards [21][22]. Group 4: Investment End Reform and Long-Term Assessment - The Opinions stress the need for investment end reform and long-term assessment mechanisms to shift focus from short-term profits to strategic direction and technological breakthroughs [25][27]. - Challenges in emerging industries include long technology conversion cycles and insufficient early-stage capital supply, which the reform aims to address [26][28]. - Long-term assessment mechanisms will enhance the willingness of long-term capital to invest in cutting-edge fields, facilitating the transition from laboratory results to industrial applications [25][27]. Group 5: Preventing "Involution" in Competition - The Opinions emphasize the need to prevent "involution" in competition by guiding financial resources towards innovative and high-tech enterprises [33][34]. - Financial institutions are encouraged to implement differentiated credit policies and optimize supply through industry self-regulation [33][34]. - The "anti-involution" approach aims to shift competition from price-based to technology-based, enhancing overall industry quality and reducing systemic risks [33][35]. Group 6: Investment Opportunities in Emerging Industries - The article identifies key investment opportunities in sectors such as innovative pharmaceuticals, AI applications, and industrial internet, driven by policy support and market demand [41][42]. - Focus areas include high-end manufacturing, smart equipment, and digital infrastructure, which are expected to benefit from financial support and technological breakthroughs [41][42][43]. - The emphasis on green finance tools will aid enterprises in their transition towards sustainability, enhancing resource utilization [18][41].

1. Report Industry Investment Rating No relevant content provided. 2. Core Viewpoints of the Report - The policy support for science - innovation bonds has led to significant growth in issuance and trading activity. The bonds have unique characteristics compared to overall credit bonds, and specific types of science - innovation bonds show investment value [2]. - It is recommended to focus on inter - bank science - innovation bonds (medium - term notes and general short - term financing) and target bonds excluding science - innovation bond ETF index component bonds [2]. 3. Summary by Directory 3.1 Policy Support for Science - Innovation Bonds - **Issuance and Listing Review Rules**: In December 27, 2024, the Shanghai, Shenzhen, and Beijing stock exchanges issued rules for the issuance and listing review of special - variety corporate bonds, including science - innovation bonds. Four types of issuers (science - innovation enterprises, science - innovation upgrade, science - innovation investment, and science - innovation incubation) can issue such bonds under certain conditions, with specific requirements for the proportion of funds invested in the science - innovation field and supporting mechanisms [7]. - **Support for Issuance and Construction of a Multi - tiered Bond Market**: On May 7, 2025, the People's Bank of China and the China Securities Regulatory Commission jointly issued an announcement to support the issuance of science - innovation bonds, aiming to enrich the product system, build a multi - tiered bond market, and improve supporting mechanisms. The issuance subject scope was expanded to financial institutions, technology - based enterprises, private equity investment institutions, and venture capital institutions [10]. 3.2 Overview of Outstanding Science - Innovation Bonds - **Distribution of Different Bond Types**: Medium - term notes and corporate bonds are the core issuance types of science - innovation bonds. Exchange - issued science - innovation bonds are more active than those issued in the inter - bank market. In terms of issuance quantity and bond balance, exchange - issued bonds account for 57.93% and 66.28% respectively, while inter - bank issued bonds account for 42.07% and 33.72% [14]. - **Remaining Maturity Characteristics**: The remaining maturity of outstanding science - innovation bonds is mainly short - to medium - term, concentrated below 5 years. In terms of bond quantity, those with a remaining maturity below 5 years account for 89.44%, and in terms of bond balance, they account for 88.80% [16]. - **Comparison of Basic Elements with Overall Credit Bonds**: Outstanding science - innovation bonds are concentrated in high - credit - rated bonds. The proportion of AAA - rated bonds is 77.45%, 30.68% higher than that of overall credit bonds. They have a longer issuance term and a lower coupon rate compared to overall credit bonds [17][19]. 3.3 Overview of the Primary Market for Science - Innovation Bonds - **Issuance Volume**: With strong policy support, the issuance volume of science - innovation bonds has increased significantly. In May 2025, the issuance volume increased by 120.51% year - on - year, and from May to July 18, 2025, the issuance volume reached 7668.48 billion yuan, accounting for 22.32% of the total issuance volume [25]. - **Rating Distribution**: Science - innovation bonds are concentrated in the AAA high - credit - rating category. The issuance volume and quantity of AAA - rated bonds account for 84.55% and 71.38% respectively, indicating high overall credit quality [29]. - **Industry Distribution**: Compared to overall credit bonds, the industry distribution of science - innovation bonds is more balanced. Although the issuance scale in the banking, non - banking, comprehensive, and building decoration industries is high, the issuance scale in industries such as coal, steel, and electronics is significantly higher than that of overall credit bonds. Science - innovation bonds have certain interest - rate advantages in most industries, with the lowest rate in the national defense and military industry at 0.89% [30][35]. - **Regional Distribution**: Science - innovation bonds in economically developed regions have a large issuance scale and a low issuance rate. Beijing has the largest issuance scale, accounting for 27.85% of the total, followed by Shanghai at 9.29% [36]. - **Issuance Industries after the New Policy**: With policy support, the issuance scale of science - innovation bonds in the financial industry has increased significantly. After the new policy, the issuance quantity of science - innovation bonds in the banking and non - banking financial industries accounted for 5.81% and 15.83% respectively [41]. 3.4 Overview of the Secondary Market for Science - Innovation Bonds - **Trading Volume**: After the new policy, the trading activity of science - innovation bonds has increased significantly. In May 2025, the trading volume was 196.097 billion yuan, a 71.01% month - on - month increase. After the issuance subject was expanded to financial institutions, the trading activity of bank - issued science - innovation bonds ranked first [45][49]. - **Monthly Average Volatility**: Before the new policy, the monthly average volatility of science - innovation bonds remained above 2% for six consecutive months, while after the new policy, it was below 2%, indicating a significant reduction [50]. - **Turnover Rate**: The turnover rate of science - innovation bonds has been rising, increasing from 6.25% in April to 9.16% in June 2025, which has improved the liquidity and pricing efficiency of the secondary market [53]. - **Price Fluctuations**: After the new policy, the quantile curves of price fluctuations of science - innovation bonds have converged, and the trading volatility has narrowed [54]. - **Credit Spread Curve**: Among different types of science - innovation bonds, inter - bank medium - term notes and general short - term financing bonds have certain cost - effectiveness. Non - AAA science - innovation bond index component bonds have relative value [59][71]. 3.5 Investment Recommendations - Recommend focusing on inter - bank science - innovation bonds (medium - term notes and general short - term financing) and target bonds excluding science - innovation bond ETF index component bonds [79].

Core Viewpoint - The article emphasizes the need for high-level technological self-reliance and strong financial support for innovation, as outlined in the recent policy measures issued by multiple government departments, including the Ministry of Science and Technology and the People's Bank of China [1][3]. Financial Support for Technological Innovation - China Life Insurance actively responds to the policy by leveraging its comprehensive financial services across insurance, investment, and banking sectors to support technological innovation [1][3]. - The insurance sector has seen a significant increase in coverage for strategic emerging industries, with a year-on-year growth of over 181% in insurance coverage for specialized "little giant" enterprises [3]. - The banking sector has provided substantial loans, with Guangfa Bank's loans to technology enterprises exceeding 253.5 billion yuan [3]. Insurance Product Innovation - China Life has developed over 200 technology insurance products, including the first "Laboratory All-Risk Insurance" in the country, to provide comprehensive risk coverage for research and development activities [5][7]. - The company has introduced various innovative insurance products aimed at protecting intellectual property and providing financial support for technology enterprises [5][7]. Credit Support for Technology Enterprises - Guangfa Bank has tailored financial products to meet the unique needs of technology enterprises, particularly those in the early and growth stages, by offering small, short-term loans without collateral [8][10]. - The bank has successfully provided credit support to high-growth technology companies, such as an 8 million yuan credit line to a unicorn company before it became profitable [10][11]. Investment Strategies - China Life is focusing on strategic investments in emerging industries, utilizing diverse financial tools such as equity investments and asset securitization to support technological innovation [13][14]. - The company has established a 5 billion yuan investment plan to support technology innovation, which has mobilized over 80 billion yuan in social capital for technology enterprises [14][16]. Future Outlook - China Life aims to continue enhancing its financial products and services to foster innovation in the technology sector, contributing to the national strategy for technological self-reliance [17].

Core Viewpoint - The development of credit risk mitigation tools (CRM) in China's financial market infrastructure is enhancing the innovation and effectiveness of credit derivatives, particularly benefiting the financing needs of technology enterprises [1][2][7]. Group 1: Credit Risk Mitigation Tools and Technology Board - The integration of CRM tools with the "Technology Board" is helping to increase debt financing scale and reduce costs, addressing the financing difficulties faced by private enterprises [2][10]. - Since the launch of the "Technology Board," credit risk mitigation certificates (CRMW) have supported the issuance of technology innovation bonds, with a total of 6 registrations amounting to 395 million yuan, facilitating the issuance of 1.25 billion yuan in technology innovation bonds [1][7]. Group 2: Market Infrastructure and Business Models - The CRMW creation and bond issuance model has created approximately 150 billion yuan in support for over 340 billion yuan in bond issuances since its introduction in 2018 [3][6]. - Major banks such as Zheshang Bank, Ping An Bank, and Bank of Communications have been leading in CRMW creation, with amounts of 1.215 billion yuan, 1.056 billion yuan, and 410 million yuan respectively in the first half of 2025 [4][3]. Group 3: Regulatory and Operational Enhancements - Recent revisions to the CRM business guidelines have streamlined processes and improved operational efficiency, allowing for a more comprehensive regulatory framework for CRM activities [6][7]. - The Shanghai Clearing House has enhanced its services for CRM, enabling online processing for credit events and early termination of CRMW, significantly improving operational convenience [6][7]. Group 4: Broader Economic Impact - CRM tools are increasingly recognized as effective financing aids, helping to mitigate credit risks in the bond market and ensuring smooth financing for the real economy [10][11]. - Local financial institutions are expected to play a crucial role in the creation of CRMW, leveraging their regional knowledge to provide credit risk protection for local enterprises [10][11].

1. Report Industry Investment Rating No information provided in the document. 2. Core View of the Report In the critical period of China's economic transformation towards high - quality development and accelerated industrial restructuring, the capital market's support for technological innovation has entered a new stage. The launch of the "Technology Board" in the bond market in early May and the subsequent deployment at the Lujiazui Forum have further enriched the multi - level capital market system. Although the sci - tech innovation bond market is still in the cultivation stage and faces some structural problems, overseas mature markets have accumulated useful experience in supporting technological innovation financing, which can provide important references for China. In the future, efforts should be made to build a long - term mechanism for the bond market to serve technological innovation, deepen the function of the "Technology Board" in the bond market, and provide strong financial support for China's high - level technological self - reliance and strength [2][4]. 3. Summary According to Relevant Catalogs Policy Evolution - China's sci - tech innovation bond development can be divided into three stages: the pilot exploration period (2015 - 2020), the rapid growth period (2021 - 2024), and the multi - level development period (2025 to date). In the pilot exploration period,双创孵化债 and双创债 were piloted to broaden direct financing channels. In the rapid growth period, products like sci - tech corporate bonds and sci - tech notes were launched, and the market scale expanded rapidly. In the multi - level development period, the "Technology Board" was launched, and a series of measures were taken to improve the market [2][4][5]. Development Status - The sci - tech innovation bond market has expanded rapidly to a trillion - level scale. As of June 17, 2025, the cumulative issuance scale this year is close to 90 billion yuan, and the stock scale is about 230 billion yuan, accounting for over 70% of the total issuance scale of innovative varieties. - The issuance is mainly short - to medium - term, with a further short - term tendency, which has a certain mismatch with long - term capital needs. - There is a cost advantage, with an average issuance cost lower than that of bonds of the same term and type. - The issuer structure is mainly central and local state - owned enterprises, accounting for about 90%, and the issuers' credit ratings are mainly above AA +, with AAA - rated entities issuing the most bonds. - Traditional industries have a relatively high scale, and emerging industries are actively exploring issuance. After the new regulations in May, financial institutions issued a large number of sci - tech innovation bonds. - Regional performance is differentiated, with Beijing, Shanghai, Shandong, and Guangdong having larger issuance scales, and the issuance in the eastern coastal areas is relatively more active [2][10][11]. Contradiction Analysis - The sci - tech innovation bond market is in the cultivation stage and has structural problems. The issuer structure is differentiated, with insufficient support for small and medium - sized enterprises. - Investors have a low risk preference, and their lack of willingness to buy low - quality sci - tech innovation bonds affects the bond structure. - The trading activity is average, and the market liquidity needs to be improved. - The application of credit enhancement tools is insufficient, and the risk - sharing function remains to be realized [2][23][25]. International Experience - Developed countries support technological innovation financing through multiple means, including building a multi - level capital market system, developing high - yield bond and ABS markets, optimizing the stock - bond - loan linkage model, introducing patient capital, and using funds, index products, and derivatives markets to balance risks [28][30][32]. Policy Recommendations - Anchor the direction of technological innovation, combine the enterprise life cycle to open up diversified financing channels, and deepen the construction of the "Technology Board" in the bond market. - Optimize the investment - side ecosystem, introduce diversified funds, and improve market liquidity. - Further improve the risk - sharing and credit - enhancement mechanism to strengthen risk sharing. - Guide the market to objectively view and correctly understand risks, and give full play to the role of credit ratings in risk disclosure [34][36][38].

Core Insights - The China Securities Regulatory Commission (CSRC) has approved the launch of the first batch of 10 Science and Technology Innovation Bond ETFs (科创债ETF) on July 2, 2023, following the proposal made by CSRC Chairman Wu Qing at the Lujiazui Forum [2][3] - The Science and Technology Innovation Bond market has evolved significantly, growing from a pilot program in 2016 to a market size of 3.2 trillion yuan by June 2025, with a compound annual growth rate of 116% from 2022 to 2024 [6][7][29] - The "May New Policy" has been a driving force behind the growth of the Science and Technology Innovation Bond market, encouraging the issuance of bonds by technology companies and expanding the scope of fund usage [4][8][14] Group 1: Policy and Market Development - The "May New Policy" introduced a comprehensive set of measures to support Science and Technology Innovation Bonds, including broadening the types of issuers and the use of raised funds [8][9] - The policy encourages investment institutions to increase their allocation to Science and Technology Innovation Bonds, enhancing liquidity through mechanisms like pledging and market-making [10][11] - The market for Science and Technology Innovation Bonds has matured, with a significant shift from real estate and local government bonds to technology-related bonds as key investment products [4][6] Group 2: Characteristics of Science and Technology Innovation Bonds - Science and Technology Innovation Bonds can be categorized into two types: bonds issued by technology innovation companies listed on exchanges and notes issued in the interbank market [5] - The bonds are characterized by high credit ratings, with 99% of the issuers being state-owned enterprises, ensuring a high level of safety for investors [19][24] - The average duration of the bonds is around four years, which aligns with the funding needs of the technology sector and may yield higher returns in a declining interest rate environment [27][29] Group 3: Performance and Investment Appeal - The first batch of Science and Technology Innovation Bond ETFs is expected to attract significant investor interest due to their higher yields compared to government bonds, especially in a bond bull market [32][33] - Historical performance shows that the Shanghai AAA Science and Technology Innovation Bond Index has delivered a cumulative return of 14.11% since June 30, 2022, outperforming other indices [29] - The ETFs offer T+0 trading, providing high flexibility for investors, making them suitable for both active traders and long-term allocators seeking higher yield products [33][35]

Core Viewpoint - The People's Bank of China, along with other financial regulatory bodies, has issued a set of 30 key measures to enhance financial support for the development of Nansha and the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area, focusing on innovation in financial services and cross-border financial cooperation [1][2][3] Group 1: Financial Support for Innovation and Entrepreneurship - The measures aim to support the development of technology innovation, high-end manufacturing, digital industries, marine industries, and future industries, as well as youth entrepreneurship [1] - New business models such as "loans + external direct investment" will be explored, and insurance institutions will be encouraged to invest in venture capital funds or directly in tech enterprises [1] - Qualified manufacturing and tech enterprises in Nansha will be supported in issuing tech bonds and exploring mixed financing models [1] Group 2: Enhancing Cross-Border Financial Services - The measures will facilitate cross-border payment services and credit financing, and expand the pilot program for Hong Kong and Macao residents to open bank accounts [2] - There will be a focus on developing a cross-border asset management center in Nansha and encouraging multinational companies to establish regional headquarters [2] - The initiative includes the promotion of cross-border wealth management services and the simplification of application processes for cross-border equity investments [2] Group 3: Opening Up the Financial Sector - The measures propose the establishment of an international commercial bank in the Greater Bay Area and the introduction of diverse investment institutions such as sovereign wealth funds and venture capital [3] - There will be an emphasis on aligning with international high-standard regulatory frameworks and exploring pilot programs for institutional openness in the financial sector [3] - The initiative supports the participation of qualified foreign institutions in financial business trials, aiming to streamline restrictive measures [3]