Core Points - The ceasefire agreement between Israel and Iran, advocated by President Trump, faced immediate challenges within hours of its announcement [2][4] - Israel accused Iran of violating the ceasefire by launching ballistic missiles, prompting Israel to prepare for a strong military response against Tehran [3][4] - Trump expressed dissatisfaction with both Israel and Iran for their actions, urging Israel to halt bombings and emphasizing the fragile nature of the ceasefire [4][5] Summary by Sections Ceasefire Agreement - The ceasefire agreement was announced by Trump but quickly encountered issues as Israel reported missile launches from Iran shortly after its implementation [2][3] - A senior White House official indicated that the ceasefire was facilitated through direct communication between Trump and Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu, with conditions set for Iran to refrain from attacks [5] Military Actions and Responses - Israel's Defense Minister instructed the military to respond forcefully to Iran's actions, with public alerts issued for citizens to seek shelter [3] - Trump ordered Israel to stop bombing Iran, labeling such actions as serious violations of the newly announced ceasefire [4] Nuclear Concerns - The situation remains precarious with unresolved issues regarding Iran's uranium reserves and the potential for discussions on Tehran's nuclear program [10] - Following the ceasefire announcement, U.S. officials claimed that recent military actions had successfully targeted Iran's nuclear capabilities, although the status of Iran's enriched uranium remains unclear [6][10] Market Reactions - Oil market sentiment remained optimistic despite the ceasefire's fragility, with Brent crude oil prices experiencing a decline, reflecting reduced uncertainty in the region [8] - Analysts noted that if the ceasefire holds, it could alleviate inflationary pressures and support economic growth [8]

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the recent U.S. military action against Iran's nuclear facilities and its implications for potential conflict or negotiation between the two nations [1][7][10]. Summary by Sections U.S. Military Action - On June 22, U.S. President Trump ordered a surprise bombing of Iranian nuclear facilities, utilizing over 125 aircraft and a submarine, resulting in the destruction of three nuclear sites [2][3]. - The operation was named "Midnight Hammer" and involved the deployment of 14 Gbu-57 bombs and 24 cruise missiles [2]. International Reactions - The U.S. action was met with global condemnation, including a strong denunciation from China, which highlighted violations of international law and the potential for nuclear disaster [4][5][6]. Potential Consequences - The article posits that the key indicator of future relations will be whether Iran retaliates against U.S. military bases in the region [7][8]. - Iran's Revolutionary Guard has threatened severe retaliation, labeling U.S. personnel in the region as legitimate targets [8]. Iran's Possible Responses - Iran has two potential responses: a limited, symbolic retaliation or a decision to refrain from further conflict [12][14]. - The article suggests that Iran may choose to avoid escalation, as indicated by their communication to the International Atomic Energy Agency that radiation levels remained stable post-attack [15][16]. Future Negotiations - Despite the military action, the article concludes that the door for negotiations regarding the Iran nuclear issue has not yet opened, primarily due to ongoing hostilities between Israel and Iran [17][18].

Core Points - The U.S. launched an operation named "Operation Midnight Hammer" targeting Iran's nuclear facilities, specifically at Fordow, Natanz, and Isfahan [1][2] - Over 125 U.S. aircraft participated in the operation, including B-2 stealth bombers, which were used for both direct strikes and diversionary tactics [1][2] - The operation involved the use of over 30 Tomahawk missiles and multiple bunker buster bombs aimed at key nuclear infrastructure [1][3][4] Summary by Sections - **Operation Details** - The operation commenced late on June 20 and continued into the early hours of June 21, with B-2 bombers flying stealthily towards their targets [2] - A U.S. submarine launched over 20 Tomahawk cruise missiles at the Isfahan nuclear facility around 5 PM on June 21 [3] - The first B-2 bombers dropped two large bunker buster bombs on the Fordow facility at approximately 6:40 PM, with subsequent strikes occurring until 7:05 PM [4] - **Return and Engagement** - Following the strikes, U.S. forces began their return journey, with no reported fire from Iranian forces during the operation [5]

Group 1 - The Iranian Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps stated that the U.S. must await severe punishment and indicated that all U.S. interests in the Middle East would be targeted [1] - Iranian state television reported that every American citizen and military personnel in the region are considered "legitimate targets" [1] Group 2 - The U.S. military launched six bunker-buster bombs at the Fordow nuclear facility and fired 30 Tomahawk missiles at other Iranian nuclear sites [2] - U.S. officials communicated through diplomatic channels that the attack was entirely planned by the U.S., but regime change in Iran was not the objective [2] - The U.S. is not expected to conduct further attacks but is prepared to respond to any retaliatory actions from Iran [2] Group 3 - Iranian officials confirmed that three nuclear facilities were attacked, including the Fordow facility, which was targeted after the air defense system identified enemy targets [3] - Reports indicated that explosions were heard in Isfahan and Natanz, with local air defense systems activated shortly before the attacks [3]

Core Viewpoint - The United States has conducted a military operation against Iran's nuclear facilities, indicating a significant escalation in tensions between the two nations [1] Military Actions - The U.S. launched six bunker-buster bombs targeting the Fordow nuclear facility in Iran [1] - Additionally, 30 Tomahawk missiles were fired at other Iranian nuclear sites [1] Diplomatic Communication - U.S. officials have communicated with Iran through diplomatic channels, clarifying that the attack was solely planned by the U.S. [1] - The regime change in Iran is not considered a goal of the U.S. operation [1] Future Actions - The U.S. is not expected to initiate further attacks but is prepared to respond to any retaliatory actions from Iran [1]

Market Overview - The Hong Kong stock market jumped 1.26% amid international capital reacting to U.S. President Trump's management of expectations regarding potential military action against Iran [1] - Trump's decision to delay military action against Iran for two weeks aligns with Israel's urgency to target Iranian nuclear facilities, particularly the Fordow nuclear site [1] Geopolitical Risks - Iran's missile attacks have decreased in intensity, averaging 20-30 high-intensity missiles daily, but threats to Israeli targets in Europe have emerged [2] - The Iraqi Shiite militia "Hezbollah" has threatened to block the Strait of Hormuz if the U.S. intervenes in the Israel-Iran conflict, leading to a decline in shipping traffic through the strait [2] Financial Developments - The People's Bank of China and the Hong Kong Monetary Authority launched a cross-border payment system, enhancing efficiency and reducing costs for cross-border remittances [3] - Major Chinese banks involved in the cross-border payment system saw stock increases of around 2% [3] - Insurance stocks also surged, with companies like China Life and New China Life rising over 4% due to stable investment returns [3] Industry Innovations - China's domestic EUV lithography machine has achieved a significant milestone with a production yield exceeding 70%, marking a critical point in the development of high-end chip manufacturing [6] - This advancement indicates a potential shift in the global semiconductor landscape, reducing reliance on foreign technology [6] Company-Specific Insights - China Coal Energy reported a decline in revenue and profit due to falling coal prices, with average prices for various coal types down significantly compared to the previous year [7] - The company is implementing cost-reduction measures and has seen its major shareholder increase their stake, reflecting confidence in the company's future [8]

Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the article revolves around the escalating military conflict between Israel and Iran, highlighting significant military actions and their implications for regional stability [2][3][4]. - Israel's military launched a large-scale airstrike involving over 200 aircraft and dropped more than 330 munitions, resulting in the deaths of Iranian military leaders and scientists [3][4]. - Iran has retaliated by launching over 100 drones towards Israel, indicating a potential for further escalation in military actions [1][4]. Group 2 - The article reports that the recent Israeli airstrikes targeted multiple Iranian nuclear facilities and resulted in the deaths of at least 10 Iranian nuclear scientists [2][4]. - Following the attacks, there was a significant spike in oil prices, with WTI crude oil rising over 14% at one point, reflecting market concerns about potential disruptions in Middle Eastern oil supplies [2]. - Iran's Supreme Leader, Khamenei, has vowed to retaliate against Israel, labeling the casualties as martyrs and condemning the attacks as exposing Israel's "evil nature" [6][7][8]. Group 3 - The article mentions that the U.S. has distanced itself from the Israeli military actions, with officials expressing concerns about the potential for increased violence in the region and urging restraint from both Israel and Iran [10]. - The U.S. State Department has begun evacuating non-essential personnel from the region due to heightened security risks [10]. - Jordan has temporarily closed its airspace in response to the escalating situation, indicating the broader regional impact of the conflict [4][5].