2025.09. 25 本文字数：674，阅读时长大约2分钟 作者 | 第一财经 吕倩 事件起始于9月20日，火绒安全在公众号发文称，火绒威胁情报中心近期监测到一款专门锁定浏览器 主页的病毒正加速蔓延。经溯源，该病毒的源头指向搜狗输入法。 9月25日，"腾讯搜索输入法"知乎账号发文称：近日，我们关注到有关搜狗输入法"存在病毒漏 洞"的不实信息。经核查，该问题源于一项尚未正式发布的测试功能，由于测试配置异常导致外部可 访问。 微信编辑 | 雨林 第 一 财 经 持 续 追 踪 财 经 热 点 。 若 您 掌 握 公 司 动 态 、 行 业 趋 势 、 金 融 事 件 等 有 价 值 的 线 索 ， 欢 迎 提 供 。 专 用 邮 箱 ： bianjibu@yicai.com （注：我们会对线索进行核实。您的隐私将严格保密。） 推荐阅读 捷豹路虎3.3万名员工被告知"停工停产" t查询行者 2 代 H t a a 二十 11 - - . . 7 图 ND ROVER the state res HDR W a a 火绒方面表示，搜狗输入法通过Shiply终端基础（搜狗输入法客户端的底层基础组件）发布通用模 块，向 ...

一款专门锁定浏览器主页的病毒正加速蔓延，经溯源，该病毒源头指向搜狗输入法。 另外，该病毒的推广模块会首先检测用户设备上的杀毒软件，随后通过篡改配置文件的方式，强制修改Edge与Chrome两款主流浏览器的主页及默认搜索引 擎设置。目前，火绒安全产品可对上述推广模块进行拦截与查杀。 "腾讯搜索输入法"方面称，发现问题后，称已于第一时间（9月20日）完成修复，不会对用户的实际使用造成影响。对此给大家带来的困扰深表歉意。后续 将进一步加强测试流程的管理，防止类似情况再次发生。 9月25日，"腾讯搜索输入法"知乎账号发文称：近日，我们关注到有关搜狗输入法"存在病毒漏洞"的不实信息。经核查，该问题源于一项尚未正式发布的测 试功能，由于测试配置异常导致外部可访问。 事件起始于9月20日，火绒安全在公众号发文称，火绒威胁情报中心近期监测到一款专门锁定浏览器主页的病毒正加速蔓延。经溯源，该病毒的源头指向搜 狗输入法。 火绒方面表示，搜狗输入法通过Shiply终端基础（搜狗输入法客户端的底层基础组件）发布通用模块，向云端请求控制配置。在下发这些云控配置中，会结 合用户画像：例如所在地区、时间等诸多维度进行精准推送。由于Ship ...

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses allegations against Microsoft regarding its Windows system's differential treatment of users in Europe and Asia, particularly China, raising concerns about privacy violations and national data security [2][3]. Group 1: Allegations Against Microsoft - A network security technician named "Xuandao" claims that Microsoft uses its monopoly position to hide encrypted data and dynamically release unknown programs to collect user data through the UCPD.sys driver [2][3]. - UCPD.sys is alleged to contain mechanisms that specifically target Chinese software vendors, employing blacklists to restrict competition and maintain Microsoft's market dominance [2][4]. - Legal experts suggest that if these allegations are true, Microsoft may be violating personal privacy laws and engaging in unfair competition practices [2][3][15]. Group 2: Technical Analysis of UCPD.sys - UCPD.sys, which is designed to protect user default application settings, has been found to operate in a way that undermines user control, automatically reverting settings to Microsoft applications after user attempts to change them [3][6]. - The driver is reported to have a "remote loading and execution" capability, allowing it to monitor and modify system settings without user awareness, which experts have labeled as an "invisible backdoor" [3][7]. - The driver includes a blacklist of numerous Chinese software products, indicating a systematic effort to limit their functionality and market presence [4][6]. Group 3: Regional Disparities in User Experience - UCPD.sys reportedly has built-in regional detection logic, leading to significant differences in user experience between Chinese and European users, with the latter enjoying more freedom to modify default applications [8][10]. - In Europe, users can easily switch default applications without interference from the system, while in China, the system enforces data collection and restricts user choices [10][11]. Group 4: Implications for User Security and Market Competition - The restrictions imposed by UCPD.sys on Chinese security software weaken user defenses, exposing them to higher security risks as these applications are unable to function effectively [7][15]. - The article highlights a broader concern that such practices may facilitate foreign attacks on critical information infrastructure in China, posing risks to personal privacy and corporate secrets [15][16].

Core Points - The core issue revolves around Microsoft's UCPD.sys component, which is alleged to contain a backdoor that collects data from users in China while restricting their ability to change default applications [1][2][3] Group 1: UCPD.sys Functionality - UCPD.sys is presented by Microsoft as a "User Choice Protection Driver" aimed at preventing malware from altering default browser settings, but its actual behavior includes writing encrypted data to the system registry and potentially releasing unknown programs [2][3] - The component interferes with user preferences, forcing users to revert to Microsoft’s Edge browser, which can lead to decreased download efficiency and workflow disruptions for professionals [2][5] Group 2: Regional Disparities - UCPD.sys activates data collection mechanisms specifically for users in mainland China, Hong Kong, Macau, and Taiwan, while these mechanisms do not trigger for users in Europe and the US [3][4] - This differential treatment raises concerns about targeted strategies rather than technical limitations, contrasting with Microsoft's compliance with the EU's Digital Markets Act, which promotes user choice [4][5] Group 3: Impact on Chinese Software - The restrictions imposed by UCPD.sys extend to major Chinese software companies, including 360, Tencent, and Lenovo, limiting their functionality and competitive edge within the Windows ecosystem [5][7] - The component acts as a tool for Microsoft to protect its own ecosystem by controlling third-party software interactions, thereby undermining competition [7][10] Group 4: Security Risks - The limitations on Chinese security software due to UCPD.sys could expose users to greater risks, as these tools are hindered from performing their protective functions [10][11] - Historical data indicates that vulnerabilities in Microsoft systems have been exploited for cyberattacks against sensitive sectors in China, raising alarms about the potential misuse of UCPD.sys [8][10] Group 5: User Rights and Transparency - The ongoing situation highlights a broader issue of user rights, with Microsoft’s practices perceived as infringing on user autonomy regarding data collection and software choices [11][12] - Calls for transparency and the restoration of user choice emphasize the need for fair competition and the protection of personal privacy and security in the digital landscape [13][14]

Core Viewpoint - The U.S. Department of Justice's antitrust ruling against Google has clarified the winners and losers in the case, allowing Google to continue paying for default search engine status while prohibiting exclusive contracts with partners like Apple [1][2]. Group 1: Winners - Google benefits significantly from the ruling as it does not have to divest its Chrome browser, which is crucial for directing users to its search engine [1][2]. - Apple stands to gain as it can continue receiving approximately $20 billion from Google for being the default search engine on iPhones, which constitutes about 20% of Apple's annual services revenue [3]. - AI competitors such as OpenAI and Perplexity may benefit from the ruling, as Apple can now promote their services without violating agreements with Google, and they may gain access to shared search data from Google [5]. Group 2: Losers - Competitors to Google's Chrome browser, such as Microsoft's Edge and Apple's Safari, are at a disadvantage since the ruling allows Google to maintain its significant distribution channel with over 3 billion active users [6]. - The inability to force Google to divest Chrome means that the competitive landscape for browsers remains unchanged, making it difficult for rivals to gain market share [6].

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the recent surge in interest around AI browsers, particularly in light of Perplexity's bid to acquire Google's Chrome browser for $34.5 billion, which is nearly double its own valuation of $18 billion. This reflects a broader trend where major tech companies are focusing on integrating AI capabilities into traditional browsers to create a new strategic entry point in the AI era [6][22]. Group 1: AI Browser Definition and Types - AI browsers are defined as traditional browsers enhanced with AI functionalities such as intelligent search, content understanding, task automation, and personalized recommendations, transforming them from mere tools to intelligent systems [7][12]. - There are two main types of AI browsers: integrated models, which add AI as a module to existing browsers (e.g., Google's Chrome and Microsoft's Edge), and native models, which are built from the ground up with AI capabilities (e.g., Perplexity's Comet and TheBrowserCompany's Dia) [10][12]. Group 2: Market Dynamics and Competition - The global browser market is dominated by Chrome (67.9%), Safari (16.2%), and Edge (5.1%), with significant competition from domestic players like 360 and QQ browsers. The article highlights that the browser's role has diminished in the mobile era but is being revitalized in the AI context [15][22]. - The competition for acquiring Chrome is driven by the need to capture market share and user data, as Chrome's extensive user base offers a valuable resource for AI development [22][25]. Group 3: Challenges and Limitations - AI browsers face challenges such as the phenomenon of "hallucination," where AI generates plausible but incorrect information, and the need for a mature ecosystem to support their functionalities [25][26]. - User adaptation to AI browsers is also a concern, as traditional browsing habits differ significantly from the proactive service model of AI browsers [26][27]. Group 4: Future Outlook - The article suggests that the future of AI browsers is intertwined with the development of Agents, which act as intelligent assistants that require browser capabilities to perform complex tasks. This collaboration is seen as essential for enhancing user experience and operational efficiency [19][20][28]. - The ongoing competition for Chrome not only has implications for the browser market but also for data sovereignty and technological standards in the AI era [28].

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the recent surge in interest around AI-integrated browsers, particularly the competitive landscape involving major players like Perplexity and OpenAI aiming to acquire Google's Chrome browser, highlighting the browser's renewed significance in the AI era [5][6][18]. Group 1: AI Browser Definition and Types - AI browsers are defined as traditional browsers enhanced with AI capabilities, including intelligent search, content understanding, task automation, and personalized recommendations, marking a shift from mere tools to intelligent systems [7][11]. - There are two main types of AI browsers: integrated models, like those from Google and Microsoft, which add AI as a module to existing browsers, and native models from startups, which are built on AI-first architectures [10][11]. Group 2: Market Dynamics and Competition - The global browser market is dominated by Chrome (67.9% share), Safari (16.2%), and Edge (5.1%), with Chrome's extensive user base making it a prime target for acquisition by AI companies [24][26]. - Acquiring Chrome would allow AI startups to quickly gain access to a large user base and valuable data, which is more efficient than building a browser from scratch [25][26]. Group 3: Functional Differences and User Experience - AI browsers vary in functionality, with most being non-autonomous and focusing on summarizing web content, generating frameworks, and providing recommendations, while a few, like Comet and Dia, offer more autonomous capabilities [14][15]. - The transition from traditional to AI browsers may challenge user habits, as users are accustomed to active searching rather than the proactive service model of AI browsers [27][28]. Group 4: Future Implications and Challenges - The article suggests that if agents (AI assistants) have a future, so too will browsers, as they serve as essential platforms for executing complex tasks [21][20]. - Despite their potential, AI browsers face challenges such as reliability issues, the phenomenon of "hallucination" where AI generates false information, and the need for a mature ecosystem to support their functionality [26][29].

Core Insights - The recent bidding war for Google's Chrome browser, with Perplexity offering $34.5 billion, highlights the renewed interest in browsers as strategic assets in the AI era [1][20][29] - Major tech companies, including Tencent, Alibaba, and 360, are also focusing on AI browsers, indicating a shift in the competitive landscape [1][7] - The integration of AI into browsers is seen as a way to enhance user experience and functionality, transforming traditional browsers into intelligent tools [1][5][20] Group 1: AI Browser Landscape - AI browsers can be categorized into two main types: integrated models, like those from Google and Microsoft, and native AI models from startups like Perplexity and TheBrowserCompany [4][5][9] - Integrated AI browsers maintain a similar interface to traditional browsers while adding AI capabilities, whereas native AI browsers prioritize AI interaction and functionality [5][9] - The current AI browser market is characterized by varying levels of intelligence, with most being non-autonomous and focusing on tasks like summarizing web content and generating recommendations [7][10][20] Group 2: Market Dynamics - Chrome holds a dominant market share of 67.9% globally, making it a highly sought-after asset for AI companies looking to quickly gain user access [21][22] - The complexity of developing a new browser comparable to Chrome is significant, as most existing browsers are built on the Chromium framework [22] - Acquiring Chrome would not only provide immediate user access but also valuable user data for AI model optimization [21][24] Group 3: Challenges and Future Outlook - AI browsers face challenges such as reliability issues and the potential for generating inaccurate information, known as "hallucinations" [24][25] - The ecosystem for AI browsers is still maturing, with technical limitations in understanding and interacting with complex web pages [24][28] - The competition for Chrome could reshape the browser market and influence data sovereignty and technology standards in the AI era [29][30]

Core Viewpoint - Perplexity's proposal to acquire Chrome for $34.5 billion has raised significant attention in Silicon Valley and Wall Street, especially as it comes shortly after the launch of its AI-driven browser, Comet, and amid ongoing antitrust considerations regarding Google [1][2]. Group 1: Perplexity's Strategy and Comet Browser - Comet browser aims to transform the browsing experience into a conversational interaction, allowing users to engage with the browser at the speed of thought [2][3]. - The integration of AI search capabilities into traditional browsing is seen as a shift towards a highly personalized and context-aware information retrieval method [3][4]. - Comet's AI assistant is designed to provide end-to-end automation and context tracking, which distinguishes it from Chrome's recent AI features that rely on plugins [1][3]. Group 2: Challenges and Market Dynamics - The acquisition of Chrome could significantly enhance Perplexity's user base and data access, but the challenges of scaling infrastructure and gaining user trust are substantial [4][5]. - Experts express skepticism about Perplexity becoming the next Google, highlighting the high barriers to entry and the need for user habit formation [4][6]. - Competitors like Microsoft and OpenAI are also developing their own AI-driven browsers, which could challenge Perplexity's position in the market [6][7]. Group 3: Industry Implications - The emergence of AI-driven browsers is setting the stage for profound industry changes, potentially disrupting Google's long-standing dominance as the default search engine [7]. - The success of Perplexity's acquisition and its browser innovation will depend not only on technology but also on building user trust and achieving scale [7].

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the ongoing competition between Google and Microsoft in the AI-enhanced browser market, highlighting Google's funding of the Browser Choice Alliance to counter Microsoft's promotion of its Edge browser through its Windows operating system [2][3]. Group 1: AI Competition Landscape - The desktop and laptop computers remain essential tools for work, making them a new battleground for AI competition, with a focus on browser innovation [4][5]. - New players like The Browser Company and Perplexity are emerging in the browser market, with OpenAI reportedly developing its own browser [5]. - Microsoft's recent AI upgrade to Edge, featuring the CoPilot assistant, aims to transform it into a powerful AI interaction center rather than just a web browsing tool [5]. Group 2: Browser Choice Alliance's Actions - The Browser Choice Alliance, which includes Google, Opera, and Vivaldi, is collecting evidence against Microsoft for unfair competition practices [6][7]. - Allegations include Microsoft's use of "dark patterns" to manipulate users into setting Edge as their default browser and unnecessary security warnings when downloading alternative browsers [7][8]. - The alliance aims to raise public awareness in the U.S. and has already lobbied European regulators regarding Microsoft's compliance with competition laws [8]. Group 3: Microsoft's Defense - Microsoft counters the allegations by stating that Google is the dominant player in the browser market, holding a 68% share compared to Edge's 5% [9][10]. - Microsoft emphasizes that Google has previously been found guilty of abusing its market position, suggesting that the complaints from Google may be hypocritical but still valid [10]. - The article suggests that regulatory bodies should focus on Microsoft's influence in shaping consumer behavior in the AI era, advocating for fair competition in the browser market [10].