Workflow
用户隐私
icon
Search documents
What's going On With AppLovin Shares After Hours? - AppLovin (NASDAQ:APP), Apple (NASDAQ:AAPL)
Benzinga· 2025-10-07 05:08
AppLovin Corp (NASDAQ:APP) shares are trending on Tuesday.Check out the current price of APP stock here.Shares of the mobile technology company fell 2.29% in after-hours trading to $573.57, dropping $13.43 per share. During regular trading on Monday, the stock closed at $587.00, down $95.76, or 14.03%, from the previous day's close, according to Benzinga Pro data.SEC Investigating Data-Collection PracticesThe Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) is investigating AppLovin's data-collection practices, inc ...
微软暗藏后门监控中国用户!
国芯网· 2025-09-16 14:23
Core Viewpoint - The article highlights concerns regarding Microsoft's UCPD.sys, which is alleged to contain a backdoor that monitors Chinese users and restricts the use of domestic software, raising issues of privacy and unfair competition [1][12][13]. Summary by Sections Microsoft UCPD.sys Overview - UCPD.sys is described as a "User Choice Protection Driver" intended to prevent unauthorized changes to default applications, but it is revealed to have complex functionalities that extend beyond its stated purpose [2][12]. - The driver reportedly writes encrypted data in the system registry, allowing Microsoft to monitor changes and potentially execute unknown programs without user consent [2][12]. Monitoring of Chinese Users - UCPD.sys activates additional monitoring features specifically for users in China, including logging detailed system activities and sending this data back to Microsoft [3][4][5]. - The logs include comprehensive information such as process names, registry paths, and version details, which can reconstruct user software preferences and habits [5][6]. Discriminatory Practices Against Chinese Software - The article notes that UCPD.sys has a built-in mechanism to restrict certain Chinese software, including popular applications from companies like 360, Tencent, and WPS [6][10]. - A three-tiered blacklist system is employed, which includes checks on digital signatures, process names, and installation paths to block Chinese software [8][10][11]. Implications of Remote Code Execution - The existence of a remote code execution mechanism within UCPD.sys is highlighted as a significant security risk, effectively creating a backdoor in the system [12]. - The article references past incidents where U.S. intelligence agencies exploited vulnerabilities in Microsoft products to conduct cyberattacks on Chinese entities, raising further concerns about the security of international products [12][13]. Trust and Privacy Concerns - The article concludes that Microsoft's actions may undermine user trust, transforming the company from a privacy protector to a potential surveillance entity, which could have broader implications for user privacy and data security [12][13].
微软疑似暗藏“后门”:用户隐私何存?
3 6 Ke· 2025-09-15 09:38
Core Points - The core issue revolves around Microsoft's UCPD.sys component, which is alleged to contain a backdoor that collects data from users in China while restricting their ability to change default applications [1][2][3] Group 1: UCPD.sys Functionality - UCPD.sys is presented by Microsoft as a "User Choice Protection Driver" aimed at preventing malware from altering default browser settings, but its actual behavior includes writing encrypted data to the system registry and potentially releasing unknown programs [2][3] - The component interferes with user preferences, forcing users to revert to Microsoft’s Edge browser, which can lead to decreased download efficiency and workflow disruptions for professionals [2][5] Group 2: Regional Disparities - UCPD.sys activates data collection mechanisms specifically for users in mainland China, Hong Kong, Macau, and Taiwan, while these mechanisms do not trigger for users in Europe and the US [3][4] - This differential treatment raises concerns about targeted strategies rather than technical limitations, contrasting with Microsoft's compliance with the EU's Digital Markets Act, which promotes user choice [4][5] Group 3: Impact on Chinese Software - The restrictions imposed by UCPD.sys extend to major Chinese software companies, including 360, Tencent, and Lenovo, limiting their functionality and competitive edge within the Windows ecosystem [5][7] - The component acts as a tool for Microsoft to protect its own ecosystem by controlling third-party software interactions, thereby undermining competition [7][10] Group 4: Security Risks - The limitations on Chinese security software due to UCPD.sys could expose users to greater risks, as these tools are hindered from performing their protective functions [10][11] - Historical data indicates that vulnerabilities in Microsoft systems have been exploited for cyberattacks against sensitive sectors in China, raising alarms about the potential misuse of UCPD.sys [8][10] Group 5: User Rights and Transparency - The ongoing situation highlights a broader issue of user rights, with Microsoft’s practices perceived as infringing on user autonomy regarding data collection and software choices [11][12] - Calls for transparency and the restoration of user choice emphasize the need for fair competition and the protection of personal privacy and security in the digital landscape [13][14]
连遭追问是否要出访客记录,网易云音乐否认!已非首次引争议
Nan Fang Du Shi Bao· 2025-08-26 02:57
Group 1 - The core point of the article is that NetEase Cloud Music officially stated it does not have a "visitor record" feature, ensuring user privacy and security [1][2] - Users can visit profiles and music artist pages without generating any visitor records or other forms of tracking [1][2] - The platform emphasizes its commitment to user privacy, adhering to principles of user awareness, consent, and minimal necessity in data protection [2] Group 2 - There was a public inquiry on social media regarding the potential introduction of a visitor record feature on NetEase Cloud Music, which sparked significant attention [2] - In March 2024, a user raised a question about a small eye icon on the dynamic sharing page, which led to further speculation about visitor records [2] - A customer service representative from NetEase Cloud Music acknowledged the inquiry and mentioned that a small-scale test for dynamic reading volume had been completed, but it would not be displayed [2]
X @𝘁𝗮𝗿𝗲𝘀𝗸𝘆
Security Alert - A vulnerability in the Immersive Translate plugin, specifically related to improper permission control, has been identified [1] - The vulnerability potentially leads to significant user privacy breaches [1] - Users are strongly advised to immediately uninstall the plugin to prevent potential asset loss and information leakage [1] Response Needed - The founder of Immersive Translate (@OwenYoungZh) has been mentioned, indicating a need for a response or statement regarding the vulnerability [1]
你和ChatGPT的私密对话正在全网裸奔,网友炸锅:我把ChatGPT当知己,它却把我隐私挂网上
3 6 Ke· 2025-08-05 07:24
1、谷歌搜索上惊现 ChatGPT 用户私人对话 《Fast Company》周三曝光了这一隐私问题,报道称,谷歌搜索结果中发现了 4500 条 ChatGPT 对话,但其中很多对话并不包含个人信息或身份信息。这 可能并非全部数据,因为谷歌可能不会索引所有对话。这些对话很可能只是"数百万人可见"的聊天样本。 近日,ChatGPT 用户们震惊地发现,自己与该人工智能模型的聊天记录竟出现在了谷歌搜索结果中。有用户发现,他们可以通过谷歌搜索" site:chatgpt.com/share "来查找数千条陌生人与人工智能助手的对话。 《Fast Company》发现,谷歌是利用用户在 ChatGPT 上主动点击 "分享" 按钮后生成的链接部分,通过基本的谷歌网站搜索进行索引的。而这些被曝光的 对话中,包含了用户透露的大量深层个人信息,涉及特殊的个人经历以及健康等私密内容。更具讽刺意味的是,有些用户在对话中甚至还表达了对人工智 能模型可能在监视自己的担忧。尽管 ChatGPT 不会显示用户身份,但部分人因在聊天中分享了高度具体的个人信息,可能会因此暴露身份。 例如,在这些搜索结果中,就有人正在寻求帮助,一位用户希望 C ...
美国人最痛恨的四家企业,为何他们会如此招黑?
Sou Hu Cai Jing· 2025-05-23 11:22
Core Insights - The article discusses four companies that consistently rank high on the "public dislike list" due to various controversies surrounding their business practices and ethical standards [1] Group 1: Meta (formerly Facebook) - Meta is criticized for its handling of user privacy, particularly following the Cambridge Analytica scandal where over 87 million user data was misused, resulting in a $5 billion settlement, the largest corporate fine in U.S. history [3] - A 2022 Pew Research Center survey indicated that 72% of U.S. social media users believe Meta lacks transparency in data collection [3] Group 2: Comcast - Comcast has been named the "worst customer service company" for seven consecutive years, facing complaints about hidden fees and frequent service interruptions [5] - In 2021, the Federal Communications Commission received over 120,000 complaints regarding Comcast's bundled sales and billing disputes [5] - Despite a 40% profit margin in its broadband business reported in 2022, customer satisfaction remains 15 percentage points below the industry average [5] Group 3: Ticketmaster - Ticketmaster controls over 80% of the U.S. market for large event ticketing, following its acquisition of Live Nation [8] - The company charges service fees that can reach up to 75% of the ticket price, generating over $2 billion in service fee revenue in 2021 [8] - Dynamic pricing practices have led to significant price increases shortly after ticket sales begin, prompting investigations from 34 state attorneys general [8] Group 4: Boeing - Boeing's reputation suffered after two fatal 737 MAX crashes in 2018-2019, which resulted in 346 deaths and revealed serious design flaws that were concealed to expedite delivery [10] - Internal documents indicated that engineers had warned about the system risks as early as 2016 [10] - The company reported a net loss of $5 billion in 2022, as its market share was overtaken by Airbus due to a loss of public trust [10] Group 5: Broader Implications - The controversies surrounding these companies highlight the tension between profit motives and public interest, with issues such as data ownership, lack of competition, regulatory lag, and ethical failures being central themes [12] - Public backlash is driving change, as consumers shift towards alternatives that prioritize transparency and ethical practices [12]
苹果 Siri 隐私风波新动态:9500 万美元和解赔偿启动
Sou Hu Cai Jing· 2025-05-07 22:35
Group 1 - Apple has agreed to pay $95 million (approximately 685 million RMB) to settle a proposed class-action lawsuit regarding privacy violations by its Siri voice assistant [1] - The lawsuit claims that Siri unexpectedly activates, recording private conversations and sharing them with third parties such as advertisers [1] - Users who experienced unexpected Siri activation between September 17, 2014, and December 31, 2024, may be eligible for compensation, with a maximum of $20 (approximately 144 RMB) per device [2] Group 2 - A dedicated compensation application website has been launched by Apple, and eligible users have been notified via email [2] - Eligible devices include iPhone, iPad, Apple Watch, Mac, HomePod, iPod touch, and Apple TV that support Siri [2] - Users can apply for compensation for up to five devices, and the final compensation amount will be adjusted based on the total number of valid claims [2]