Core Viewpoint - The recent controversy surrounding Chen Xingjia, known as the "internet celebrity county party secretary," highlights the ongoing debate about the appropriateness of salaries for professionals in the public welfare sector, particularly after it was revealed that he received an annual salary exceeding 700,000 RMB from the Shenzhen Henghui Foundation [1] Group 1: Salary and Compensation - Chen Xingjia announced he would no longer receive income from the foundation and will instead serve as a senior advisor for New Oriental Education with an annual salary of 1.5 million RMB [1] - The Henghui Foundation's funding model relies heavily on monthly donations from the public, which is considered a stable and healthy source of funding [10] - Chen's salary, reported as approximately 700,000 RMB, is a pre-tax figure that includes various components such as basic salary and performance bonuses [12] Group 2: Public Perception and Professionalism - There is a common public sentiment that salaries in the public welfare sector should not be excessively high, reflecting a misunderstanding of the need for professional compensation to attract top talent [13] - Chen argues that modern public welfare requires specialized skills and that competitive salaries are necessary to retain professionals who can effectively address complex social issues [13][14] - Transparency in salary structures is emphasized as a means to build public trust, with Chen noting that the foundation's compensation is determined by the board based on industry standards [13] Group 3: Challenges and Perspectives - The transition from a government role to a public welfare position presents challenges in resource mobilization, requiring a shift from managing public resources to creating and inspiring social resources [17] - Chen highlights the different perspectives gained from his experiences in government and public welfare, noting that the former focuses on macro-level issues while the latter emphasizes individual stories and needs [20] - The public welfare sector is seen as a complement to government efforts, addressing gaps that may not be covered by public policy [19] Group 4: Future of Public Welfare - The future of the Henghui Foundation is envisioned as a provider of solutions to social problems, aiming to become a trusted brand in public welfare [24] - The public welfare sector is expected to become more professional, diverse, and integrated with business and technology, leading to a more rational approach to donations [24] - New projects will be selected based on the intersection of social needs and the foundation's capabilities, focusing on urgent issues that existing systems do not adequately address [26]

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the transition of Chen Xingjia from a government official to a prominent figure in the public welfare sector, emphasizing the need for professional compensation in the charity industry to attract and retain talent [1][12][13]. Group 1: Salary and Compensation in Public Welfare - Chen Xingjia's annual salary at the Shenzhen Henghui Foundation exceeds 700,000 RMB, sparking discussions on the appropriateness of salaries for public welfare workers [1]. - He announced his resignation from the foundation to focus on a new role as a consultant for New Oriental Education, with a salary of 1.5 million RMB, while also committing to donate at least 1 million RMB annually to the Henghui Public Welfare Foundation [1]. - The foundation's salary structure is based on industry standards and is publicly disclosed to ensure transparency and accountability [12][13]. Group 2: Mental Health and Support for Public Servants - Chen emphasizes the necessity of a social support system for public servants, particularly those at the grassroots level, to address mental health issues [5][6]. - He advocates for a culture that destigmatizes mental health issues and promotes professional psychological services for public servants [6]. - The mental well-being of public servants is crucial for effective social governance, as stressed individuals may struggle to manage complex community issues [6]. Group 3: Public Welfare Strategy and Project Focus - The Henghui Foundation allocates over 60% of its funds to the "Lianai Project," which focuses on major illness assistance for disadvantaged children, highlighting a strategic decision to address significant social issues [10][11]. - The foundation aims to create a sustainable and impactful model for child illness assistance, integrating government insurance, public organizations, and social contributions [11]. - Chen argues that modern public welfare requires professional management and competitive salaries to attract top talent capable of addressing complex social problems [12]. Group 4: Future of Public Welfare in China - The future of public welfare in China is expected to be more professional, diverse, integrated, and rational, with a focus on specialized issues such as mental health and environmental protection [22]. - The foundation plans to expand its project areas cautiously, ensuring alignment with its core mission and addressing urgent social needs [23][24]. - Chen envisions the Henghui Foundation as a provider of comprehensive solutions to social problems, rather than merely a charity organization [22].

（原标题：万科债获展期 A股H股双涨） 1月21日 ，万科境内外股价出现异动，A股万科A涨超5%，港股万科企业涨超3%。 公司11亿规模的"21 万科02"债券展期议案获得通过。这为万科争取了一年时间。 ...

Core Viewpoint - The examination system in ancient China, known as the imperial examination or "keju," served as a means to select officials through public examinations, promoting social mobility and breaking the constraints of aristocratic lineage. Established during the Sui dynasty, it flourished through the Tang, Song, Ming, and Qing dynasties, ultimately ending in the late Qing dynasty, and significantly contributed to the education and development of Chinese society [1]. Group 1: Evolution of the Examination System - The tradition of valuing talent has been a hallmark of Chinese culture, transitioning from hereditary systems to merit-based selections, such as the "xiang ju li xuan" during the pre-Qin period, which allowed local recommendations for talented individuals to serve in government [2]. - The Zhou dynasty implemented a system where local gentry selected individuals based on virtue and talent, leading to formal recommendations for government positions after rigorous assessments [3]. - The Qin dynasty introduced a military meritocracy, breaking the hereditary system by appointing officials based on military achievements [4]. - The Han dynasty's "chajü" system became the mainstream method for selecting officials, with annual examinations assessing various virtues and talents [5]. Group 2: Development and Standardization - The Nine-Rank System during the Wei, Jin, and Northern and Southern dynasties categorized individuals based on family background, talent, and moral character, influencing the selection process [6]. - The Sui dynasty abolished the Nine-Rank System and established a more open examination system, allowing candidates to take exams without needing recommendations from officials [7]. - The Tang dynasty further developed the examination system, creating a two-tiered examination structure and emphasizing the importance of testing as the primary means of selecting talent [8]. Group 3: Impact and Legacy - The examination system was instrumental in breaking the monopoly of aristocratic families on government positions, allowing for a more equitable selection of officials based on merit [31]. - It fostered a culture of education and scholarship, leading to the establishment of various educational institutions and a societal emphasis on learning [32]. - The influence of the examination system extended beyond China, impacting the selection processes in neighboring countries and even Western nations, establishing a "civil service examination" tradition [33].

（原标题：资本"利益实质"的数字重构——从"剩余价值独占"到"γ系数争夺"） 引言：价值源泉的变迁与分配格局的重塑 马克思在《资本论》第三卷中深刻指出，资本家的思考"完全是由他的利益和他的利己的动机决定的"。 对剩余价值（M）最大化的无止境追求，是资本运动的终极目标。在工业时代，剩余价值的生产与分配 主要围绕产业资本、商业资本、生息资本和土地所有者展开，其核心矛盾是资本（K）与活劳动（L） 在可变资本（V）与剩余价值（M）之间的对立。然而，在数字时代，一种新的生产要素——数据 （D）——以前所未有的深度和广度参与到价值创造与分配过程中，彻底重构了资本利益的实质。利益 争夺的焦点，从传统的"剩余价值独占"，转向了对数据贡献系数γ 的控制权博弈。本文将从理论演进、 现实表现、深层矛盾与中国实践四个层面，深入剖析这场关乎数字文明财富分配格局的深刻变革。 一、理论基石：马克思论资本的利益实质与分配关系 马克思对资本利益实质的分析，是一个从抽象到具体、从生产到分配的完整体系。 数字经济的革命性在于，它引入了一个全新的、至关重要的生产要素——数据（D），并使其在价值创 造和分配中扮演了核心角色，从而要求我们对经典公式进行 ...

（原标题：增长模型失灵，耐克为何选择一位"零售派"高管接管中国） 北京时间 1 月 21 日，耐克公司宣布，其现任大中华区领导董炜（Angela Dong）女士将于 3 月 31 日正 式卸任。同时，耐克任命拥有 25 年以上资历的资深高管 Cathy Sparks 为新任耐克大中华区副总裁兼总 经理。这一人事调整，正值耐克试图扭转其在中国市场持续下滑的关键节点，被外界视为公司对大中华 区战略的一次重要"重置"。 从这一任命不难看出，耐克正试图通过更强的零售与消费者运营能力，回应中国市场的深层变化。相比 过去依赖规模扩张和渠道铺设的增长模式，如今的中国运动消费市场更强调产品差异化、文化认同以及 线下体验与数字触点的精细化运营。Cathy 所代表的，并非简单的"换人"，而是一种更偏向前端、执行 与体验导向的管理逻辑。 这同样与耐克集团层面的战略重心调整相呼应。自埃利奥特·希尔（Elliott Hill）履新耐克首席执行官以 来，公司已多次强调中国市场的重要性。去年 12 月，希尔明确表示，大中华区已被提升至耐克全球战 略优先级首位，并要求加快相关举措的落地节奏。此次在关键市场引入一位以零售转型和消费者增长见 长 ...

因为，包括台积电赴美建厂在内，台湾方面承诺的对美投资金额高达5000亿美元。卢特尼克还称，这只 是头期款，如果台湾不兑现，来自台湾的电子产品（芯片）将被课以重税。 在笔者看来，作为特朗普政府的内阁成员，卢特尼克有失风度。他上述言语中表现出的对台湾的轻视、 蔑视，深深地刺痛了岛内蓝营。连日来，蓝营高层和蓝营媒体纷纷发表看法和评论，批评赖清德当局出 卖台湾利益。 1月21日，台湾《联合报》发表社论，题目是《卢特尼克三个大巴掌，打在谁脸上？》。 该社论也认定卢特尼克的表现是"得意洋洋"，并指出"卢特尼克接受财经媒体CNBC专访，解读美台关 税谈判结果，得意洋洋道出血淋淋的谈判真相，结结实实打了赖政府三个大巴掌"。这三个巴掌分别 是：让特朗普开心、确认美国独赢、顺手搬走5000亿美元头期款和台积电四成先进产能。 岛内绿营，一方面对卢特尼克的言论装作听不见，一方面对台美协议进行粉饰。台湾行政部门负责人卓 荣泰说，台美达成共识，台湾谈判团队干得漂亮；民进党的"立委"们则表示，台美关税谈判是双赢、漂 亮的一仗。绿营最大的报纸《自由时报》甚至为此发表社论，题目是《对美关税谈判的重大胜利》。 （原标题：台海观澜 | 卢特尼克的 ...

东湖高新区党工委组织部相关负责人表示，此次出台3551人才举荐制的核心目的，在于通过构建更开放 的选才机制、更精准的助才体系，最终实现更深层次的产才融合，推动人才工作与区域产业发展主线深 度绑定。 针对以往评价机制中存在的痛点堵点，新政策创新性地提出了"三维统筹"的核心逻辑：统筹产业需求导 向，精准对接重点领域与用人主体，推动人才供给与产业政策融合；统筹不同规模主体，兼顾不同规模 企业与平台的诉求，分类遴选，让各类单位在公平环境中竞争举荐；统筹产业人才和服务人才，既聚 焦"高精尖缺"产业人才，也培育公共服务专才，实现产业硬实力与服务软实力同步提升。 针对不同主体、不同场景的引才用才需求，3551人才举荐制创新构建了"绿色通道+快速通道+专向通 道"的立体化举荐体系。 （原标题：向用人主体放权 光谷发布3551人才举荐制新政） 经济观察网 程久龙 实习生 雷宇 1月20日，武汉市东湖高新区（以下简称"光谷"）正式发布《东湖高新 区3551人才举荐制实施办法》（以下简称"3551人才举荐制"），这一新政策旨在通过构建科学规范、开 放包容、务实高效的人才发现与赋能体系，将人才评价的话语权充分下放给各类用人主体，加速 ...

（原标题：从符号炫耀到价值消费 老铺黄金引领中国高奢换轨） 2025年，长期被西方品牌垄断的中国高端消费市场格局被老铺黄金打破。 在全球奢侈品持续遭遇增长放缓压力时，本土品牌老铺黄金却上演着一幕截然相反的景象：在万象城、 SKP、恒隆等高端商业中心的门店外，排队等候的人群常年不断。 贝恩公司资深全球合伙人布鲁诺（Bruno Lannes）在2025年底发出的警示，或许能解释这一幕发生的原 因：奢侈品行业正站在十字路口，价格与价值失衡，品牌亟需以真诚重建信任。 与国际奢侈品牌过于依赖符号炫耀的叙事不同，老铺黄金用文化、工艺、审美以及真切的产品价值，正 开创全新的价值消费赛道，提升和满足了消费者成熟理性的新需求，也让奢侈品回归本质——时间和价 值。 奢侈品行业的岔路口 贝恩咨询《2025年全球奢侈品市场研究》显示，全球奢侈品市场进入关键调整期，中国市场持续收缩， 按固定汇率计算预计在3%至5%，活跃客户从2022年的4亿缩减至2025年3.3亿，消费转向本土品牌及体 验型品类。 下滑的数据被高净值人群的选择不断印证。近几年，奢侈品消费里的一个明显变化：真正有钱的人，越 来越不愿意"被看出来"，外露的LOGO似乎不 ...

（原标题：音律相和，以乐化人，缺少"宫"音会怎样？） 文博时空 作者 李冰 《拾遗录》记载，幽州一带，羽山北面，有一种善于鸣叫的飞禽。长着人面鸟嘴， 八只翅膀一只脚，毛色像野雉，行走时不踩地面，名叫鸐（dí） 。它的叫声像钟磬笙竽。《世说新 语》上说："青鸐鸣叫，则天下太平。"说的就是昌盛繁荣的时代，它在沼泽上鸣叫，叫声符合音律，只 飞而不行走。大禹治水之后，它便栖息在高山大川上。它们聚集的地方，一定有圣人出世。自从上古开 始铸造各种鼎器，都用鸟的形象做图案铸在鼎器上。 商 鸟纹石磬 中国国家博物馆藏 古人十分重视音乐与天象、社会的关系。《乐记》中有"声音之道与政通"的说法，说的是治世之音、乱 世之音、亡国之音各自匹配当时的政治情况。也就是说，国家想要安定，重视音乐，繁荣礼乐制度，保 持社会的秩序与规约，是应有的举措。古代人认为音乐可以上通鬼神，下达人伦，使得宗族团结、兄友 弟恭，音乐在古代有着团结和教化民众的效果。周公"制礼作乐"，奠定礼乐文明的基础。孔子提出"兴 于诗，立于礼，成于乐"的乐教思想，强调"以乐化人"。和谐的乐音不仅具有乐律学的意义，也具有音 乐心理学的意义，能够"使人心和而不乱"。 春秋战国 ...