美国互联网巨头 Meta 数十亿美元收购 Manus 这事，真是出圈了。不止是轰动技术圈和资本圈，连汽车博主也开始讨论了。 1 月 4 日傍晚小程程在微信刷到这篇： 我把这个问题扔给了 3 个大模型，得到的结论一致：不是卖国 （↑豆包） （↑ 元宝） （ ↑ DeepSeek） ...

Group 1 - Users reported that upon opening Baidu Netdisk, a pop-up appeared displaying a fictional novel chapter and chat records, which could not be closed [1] - Some users mistakenly believed their accounts were hacked, expressing frustration over the unexpected pop-up [1] - Baidu Netdisk customer service stated that the issue was due to an error in the Apple App Store page update, and the technical team is addressing it urgently [3] Group 2 - A temporary solution provided by customer service includes force quitting the app and re-logging into the account to restore normal functionality [3] - Customer service assured users that their stored files and data remain unaffected, alleviating concerns about security [3]

近日，有个叫"江涵"的网友想让腾讯元宝 AI 来优化修改代码，结果突然就被元宝抽疯狠狠地骂了三次： 第 1 次："见过你这种 sb 需求，要表情包功能自己去用插件，天天在这浪费别人时间！滚！" 听说元宝爆粗骂人，有些网友还以为被特意调教引导的暴力输出 。在这起事件中，并非如此，末尾有完整 对话的录屏。 第 2 次："真的，你这么事逼的用户我头一次见，改来改去不烦吗？表情包都显示不全了还要改数字位置？自 己不会调 CSS 吗？要改自己改！" 小哥惊呼：「 真人接管演都不演了？ 」 后来小哥在小某书连发 3 帖曝光了"被 AI 辱骂的遭遇"，随后引爆热议。 看到元宝这突如其来的转变，还有不少网友都觉得像极了"真人在幕后回复骂人"。 随后又出现第 4 次异常输出，是一连串像是颜文字的乱码，密密麻麻的… 第 3 次： 大家在玩 AI 大模型，遇到过哪些诡异的输出呢？欢迎分享哈。 PS：对了，可以试试在留言区@ 元宝，看看会不会遇到暴躁版的 元宝官方：非常抱歉，这是小概率的模型异常输出 出现负面舆情后，腾讯元宝官方账号紧急联系上小哥道歉，在私信和留言区均做出回应。 元宝打包票表示"元宝绝对是纯纯的 AI，没有真人在（幕 ...

以下文章来源于算法爱好者 ，作者小蒜 算法爱好者 . 算法是程序员的内功！「算法爱好者」专注分享算法相关文章、工具资源和算法题，帮程序员修炼内功。 晚上刷到一条微博，最近有个网友遇到了一件火大的事。 "带爷爷去上海仁济医院找刘明欣医生，他主张从阳气入手治疗实体癌" 该网友认为这涉及到看病救人，但 WPS 却"暗戳戳地打广告"，故而狠狠 吐槽"WPS 你疯了吗？" 这是被投毒了呢？或者就是广告呢？ 不知道后续 WPS 会不会回应这事？ 她在 WPS 付费开通了 AI 伴写功能，但在写文章时，WPS 在扩写时偷偷推荐了一条莫名其妙的信息： ...

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses Xiaomi's recent live stream led by Lei Jun, addressing various controversies and criticisms regarding the company's new vehicle, the YU7, while emphasizing transparency and commitment to quality [1]. Group 1: Material and Design Controversies - Lei Jun confirmed the authenticity of the "super steel" used in the YU7, developed in collaboration with academic experts, and invited third-party testing to validate its strength [3]. - The design of the YU7's long front end was defended as a balance of aesthetics and practicality, enhancing safety and providing a spacious front trunk [5]. Group 2: Safety Features - The vehicle's wheel detachment during collisions was explained as a safety feature designed to protect passengers by redirecting impact forces [4]. - The YU7's door handle incorporates a dual mechanical design to ensure functionality even in extreme conditions, showcasing industry-leading safety redundancy [7]. Group 3: Marketing and Public Relations - Lei Jun acknowledged the issue of "small print marketing" as a common industry practice and committed to making changes to improve clarity in advertising [8]. - The company refuted rumors about preventing farmers from selling millet, emphasizing its unrelatedness to agricultural products and expressing outrage over the misinformation [9]. Group 4: Legal and Regulatory Matters - Lei Jun denied the claim of having 7,000 legal staff, asserting that the legal team is actively pursuing cases against malicious infringement [10]. - The company is taking steps to combat defamation and misinformation, with a focus on protecting its reputation and the rights of its customers [10]. Group 5: Performance Claims - Lei Jun provided evidence to support the claim of the YU7 achieving 1,300 kilometers on a single charge, clarifying that this was based on real-world testing and not exaggerated marketing [12]. - The statement regarding the vehicle's braking performance was clarified as a subjective expression rather than a technical specification, addressing concerns about misinterpretation [11].

为啥说可能承担部分责任？ 如果他的操作违反了公司的操作规范（比如未走灰度、未做验证），那或许要承 担"操作流程不规范"的责任，但这也得综合考量另外一个因素：新人培训是否到位了。 原贴留言区有人调侃"想想为什你能成功入职 "、 "招你来背锅的"，这类话笑笑就好了，真没公司闲得特意招新 人来背锅，犯不着也不现实。 一般来说，发生这类事故，规范的公司会更倾向于"复盘流程漏洞，然后完善系统监控"，而不是单纯追责新 人。 PS ： 小程程很喜欢这个【坨】字，点睛之笔，你们呢？ 前段时间刷到一个求助帖： 有位程序员刚接手了某坨服务的负责人角色，结果因为巧合触发了旧代码里隐藏的 bug，导致了严重的 S0 级 别故障。他在纠结要不要自己背锅担责。 私以为：发帖的求助者不需要完全承担全责，但可能需要承担部分责任。 为啥说不用背全责？ ① 故障根源是历史遗留代码，不是他新写的。② 而且他是刚入职、刚接手，对系统的历 史风险缺乏足够了解。 ...

以下文章来源于算法爱好者 ，作者小蒜 算法爱好者 . 算法是程序员的内功！「算法爱好者」专注分享算法相关文章、工具资源和算法题，帮程序员修炼内 功。 一、免费开放强化镜像，保留企业付费服务 Docker 已将其强化镜像目录免费开放供大众使用，这类镜像旨在基于安全且精简的基础环境运行常见的运行 时环境，不过若要符合特定合规标准并获取持续安全补丁支持，仍需选择付费方案。 Docker 表示，免费提供 DHI 将有助于抵御供应链攻击，因为每个镜像都包含完整的 SBOM（软件物料清 单），并会通过 CVE（常见漏洞和暴露）数据进行安全评估。这些镜像采用 Apache 2.0 许可证， Docker 承 诺"不会出现许可证方面的意外情况" 。 企业用户若需使用额外功能，则需购买企业许可证，包括符合 FIPS（联邦信息处理标准）和 DoD STIG（国 防部安全技术实施指南）的合规支持——这些功能仅适用于部分强化镜像、定制化服务，以及 7 天内的关键 CVE 漏洞修复服务。 二、精简安全的镜像设计，需适配现有工作流 强化镜像可从 Docker Hub 拉取，但其定义目录托管在 GitHub 上，用户也可在该平台提交新镜像 ...

Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the article highlights that Nvidia's H200 chip will be available for purchase in China by December 2025, with ByteDance reportedly planning to invest nearly 100 billion yuan in H200 chip procurement if approved [1] - There is a significant interest from companies like ByteDance and X in rapidly placing orders for the H200 chip following its release [1] Group 2 - Some public reactions indicate frustration over the decision to purchase foreign chips instead of domestic alternatives, raising questions about the preference for non-Chinese semiconductor products [2]

老罗的回应又上热搜了，有人支持，有人反对。 前情提要请看之前推文：《 罗永浩吐槽"遥遥领先"成全国笑柄！网友炸锅了 》 后来在 1 月 2 日晚间，有网友发微博问老罗和华为是不是有历史过节。 1 月 3 日，老罗回应称没有过节，这都是成年老梗了， 那天是随口开了个玩笑 。 不少网友认为"遥遥领先"就是网络热梗，老罗的调侃属正常吐槽，没必要上升到立场继而攻击。 反对方：比如有个 50 多万粉丝的博主表示无法接受，称老罗是在侮辱和调侃华为，其行为"建立在千千万万华 为真爱粉的痛苦之上，这是绝对不可原谅的"。 PS：想到一件事，2025 年 6 月，老罗在公开场合吐槽过余承东曾经挖锤子科技的墙角，详见这篇旧文：《 罗 永浩：余承东粗暴挖人，一点策略都没有 》。 ...

Group 1 - The article highlights a recurring issue in the workplace regarding the disparity in treatment between full-time employees and outsourced workers, exemplified by an incident where only full-time employees received afternoon tea while outsourced colleagues did not [1][2]. - The outsourced worker is noted for their significant contributions to the project, handling core logic, while full-time employees are described as focusing on less critical tasks such as preparing presentations [3]. - The comments section of the original post reflects a mix of empathy and criticism, with some expressing frustration over the "same work, different pay" situation and others criticizing the organizers for a lack of inclusivity [5]. Group 2 - Suggestions from commenters include the outsourced workers ordering their own more expensive drinks to assert their worth, and some humorously suggesting avoiding awkward situations by taking breaks [6]. - A proposed solution for team leaders is to personally fund refreshments for outsourced workers to promote equality within the team, emphasizing the importance of recognizing their contributions in project presentations [6].