Core Viewpoint - The co-branded credit card market is undergoing significant changes, with many banks halting or adjusting their co-branded credit card products due to a shift in strategy towards cost and revenue balance [1][2][3]. Group 1: Market Changes - Several major banks, including Postal Savings Bank and China Construction Bank, have announced the suspension of certain co-branded credit card products since January [2]. - Other banks such as Bank of China, China Merchants Bank, and others have followed suit, indicating a broader trend in the credit card market [2]. - The suspension of co-branded credit cards reflects a restructuring of the credit card business landscape [1][2]. Group 2: Regulatory Impact - The implementation of the "Credit Card New Regulations" in July 2022 has prompted banks to shift focus from acquiring new customers to retaining existing ones [3]. - The new regulations require banks to monitor and manage dormant credit cards, limiting the proportion of such cards to no more than 20% of total issued cards [3]. Group 3: Strategic Shifts - Banks are moving from aggressive customer acquisition strategies to a more value-driven approach, focusing on enhancing core competitiveness in credit card services [4][5]. - The future of credit card business is expected to integrate with other financial services, improving overall service quality for high-value customers [5].

据《证券日报》记者统计，今年已有长城人寿保险股份有限公司、阳光人寿保险股份有限公司、新华人 寿保险股份有限公司（以下简称"新华保险"）等6家保险公司合计举牌上市公司数量达10家。 本报记者 冷翠华 见习记者 杨笑寒 港交所最新信息显示，近日，瑞众人寿保险有限责任公司（以下简称"瑞众人寿"）增持中信银行股份有 限公司（以下简称"中信银行"）300万股，增持后，瑞众人寿所持中信银行股份约为7.44亿股，占其已 发行有投票权股份的5%，触及举牌线。 同时，通过举牌上市银行，险资也可以与被举牌上市银行形成协同效应，促进银保业务发展。例如，新 华保险在举牌杭州银行股份有限公司（以下简称"杭州银行"）后表示，本次权益变动完成后，新华保险 将通过股权纽带加强与杭州银行的深度合作，促进和杭州银行双方的银保业务发展，提升双方的价值。 今年以来，险资举牌上市公司"热情"不减，举牌标的中银行股居多。受访专家表示，险资举牌高股息大 盘股频次增加的原因，一是应对利率中枢下行带来的冲击；二是，在新会计准则实施的背景下平滑报表 波动。展望未来，预计险资举牌时将持续关注现金流稳定、估值合理、处于成长性行业的上市公司。 展望未来，杨帆认为，险 ...

Core Viewpoint - The establishment of Asset Investment Companies (AICs) by national commercial banks is accelerating, which is expected to enhance banks' participation in technology finance and equity markets, contributing to the high-quality development of the banking industry [1][2]. Group 1: Establishment of AICs - The National Financial Regulatory Administration has approved the establishment of AICs by several national commercial banks, including the first approval for Industrial Bank to set up an AIC [2]. - Following this, CITIC Bank announced a plan to invest 10 billion RMB to establish a wholly-owned subsidiary AIC, while China Merchants Bank plans to invest 15 billion RMB for the same purpose [2]. - The establishment of AICs aligns with the banks' strategies to support technology finance and meet the financing needs of innovative enterprises [3]. Group 2: Impact on Banks - The investments in AICs are seen as key measures for banks to support national strategies and enhance their service capabilities in the real economy [3]. - The establishment of AICs will help banks diversify their operations and improve their integrated business capabilities [3]. Group 3: Benefits and Challenges - The establishment of AICs is expected to bring comprehensive benefits to banks, including enhanced service offerings for technology enterprises and additional revenue streams beyond equity investments [5]. - However, challenges exist, such as the need for strong investment research capabilities and the high risks associated with equity investments, which require banks to develop appropriate long-term assessment mechanisms [6].

Core Viewpoint - The re-issuance of AIC licenses marks a shift in focus from debt-to-equity swaps to supporting the development of new productive forces in the financial sector [1] Group 1: AIC License and Bank Recognition - The National Financial Regulatory Administration approved the establishment of the Xingyin Financial Asset Investment Company by Industrial Bank, with other banks like China Merchants Bank and CITIC Bank also planning to set up similar companies pending regulatory approval [1] - This indicates regulatory recognition of the strength of these banks, which have carved out their positions in the market through innovation despite lacking the capital strength of state-owned banks [1] Group 2: Financial Performance Comparison - As of March 2025, the total assets of China Merchants Bank, Industrial Bank, and CITIC Bank were 12.5 trillion, 10.6 trillion, and 9.9 trillion yuan respectively, with China Merchants Bank leading in all major financial metrics [2][4] - China Merchants Bank's net profit for 2024 was 149.6 billion yuan, significantly higher than the 77.5 billion yuan of Industrial Bank and 69.5 billion yuan of CITIC Bank [2] Group 3: Retail Business Focus - Retail banking is identified as a cornerstone for future competition among these banks, with Industrial Bank and CITIC Bank actively working to enhance their retail business capabilities [3] - The ability to excel in retail banking and wealth management will likely determine which bank secures the second position among the joint-stock banks [3] Group 4: Asset Growth Trends - Over the past decade, while Industrial Bank and CITIC Bank have pursued aggressive growth strategies, the asset gap with China Merchants Bank has widened, with their total assets at 85% and 79% of China Merchants Bank's respectively by 2024 [4][7] - China Merchants Bank's financial investments grew 2.65 times from 2017 to 2024, indicating a strategic shift towards government bonds amid a challenging lending environment [7] Group 5: Net Interest Margin and Cost of Deposits - In 2024, China Merchants Bank's net interest margin was 1.98%, outperforming Industrial Bank and CITIC Bank by approximately 20 basis points [11][12] - The lower cost of deposits at China Merchants Bank, primarily due to a higher proportion of low-cost personal deposits, contributes to its competitive advantage [11] Group 6: Strategic Directions and Future Outlook - The transition from the old economic cycle to a new one focused on technology, industry, and finance presents opportunities for banks to identify new business avenues [20] - Industrial Bank's strategy of combining commercial and investment banking positions it well to capitalize on emerging trends in the financial landscape [21]

Core Viewpoint - The recent regulatory measures in Henan province aim to standardize auto consumer finance practices, capping the actual customer interest rate at no more than double the current one-year Loan Prime Rate (LPR), effectively addressing high commission issues and shifting the market focus from price wars to value competition [1][2][4]. Group 1: Regulatory Changes - Several banks in Henan, including Everbright Bank and Agricultural Commercial Bank of Henan, have announced new regulations to control financing costs for car buyers, setting the annualized interest rate cap at 6% and credit card installment fees at a maximum of 16% [2]. - The new regulations also prohibit auto dealers from coercing customers into high-commission financial products and aim to stabilize the auto consumer finance market in Henan [2][3]. Group 2: Market Dynamics - The previous high-interest, high-rebate model involved banks offering substantial commissions to auto dealers to boost market share, which led to unsustainable practices and risks for banks due to early loan repayments [3][4]. - The shift away from high-interest models is driven by narrowing interest margins for banks, prompting a need for strategic adjustments towards value-based competition, focusing on product design and service enhancement [4][5]. Group 3: Strategic Adjustments - Banks are beginning to adapt their auto finance strategies, with institutions like Ping An Bank enhancing their product offerings to meet comprehensive auto finance needs, including a focus on new energy vehicle loans and improved online loan processes [5].

Core Viewpoint - Data is being recognized as the fifth production factor, significantly reshaping the balance sheets of commercial banks as they actively explore the integration of data resources into their financial statements [1][2][3]. Group 1: Importance of Data Resource Integration - The integration of data resources into financial statements is crucial for commercial banks to accelerate digital transformation and enhance their ability to serve the real economy [1][2]. - The implementation of the "Interim Regulations on Accounting Treatment Related to Enterprise Data Resources" has provided a framework for converting data resources into data assets [2][5]. - Data resource integration is seen as a response to national policy initiatives aimed at developing digital finance and improving data governance [7][9]. Group 2: Current Practices and Developments - Several national joint-stock banks and city commercial banks have begun to establish standardized processes for data resource integration, including inventory, rights confirmation, and valuation [3][4]. - As of the end of 2024, banks like Hengfeng Bank and Citic Bank have reported data resource values in the range of hundreds of thousands to millions of yuan, with Everbright Bank leading at over 18 million yuan [3][4]. - City commercial banks are also actively participating, with Ningbo Bank reporting a data resource value of 6 million yuan and Hangzhou Bank at 327.4 thousand yuan [4]. Group 3: Challenges and Future Outlook - The current stage of data resource integration is exploratory, with the actual scale of integration remaining limited compared to other industries [5][8]. - The primary challenges include the valuation and rights confirmation of data resources, which are complicated by the diverse types and uses of data [8][9]. - The establishment of a comprehensive data asset valuation framework by the China Banking Association aims to address these challenges and facilitate the marketization of data resources [8][9]. Group 4: Strategic Recommendations - To enhance the integration of data resources, banks are encouraged to strengthen data governance, improve IT infrastructure, and develop a clear lifecycle management system for data assets [9][10]. - Collaboration among government, industry associations, and enterprises is essential to create standardized valuation methods and operational guidelines for data resource integration [9][10].

采用孰高原则 近期，建设银行、中信银行等银行纷纷上调代销的部分公募基金产品风险等级，农业银行发布代销 公募基金产品风险等级评价及动态评估规则的公告。 业内人士表示，银行此举主要是为了落实《商业银行代理销售业务管理办法》要求，对代销公募基 金产品风险等级从严评定，即按照风险孰高原则确定最终评级结果。随着《代理销售办法》正式实施日 期（10月1日）逐渐临近，基金销售适当性管理中的问题，如基金产品风险等级难以精准匹配客户真实 风险承受能力、部分银行在代销基金产品准入环节过度依赖第三方机构评估等，有望得到改善。 代销基金风险评级趋严 5月30日，建设银行发布关于调整部分代销公募基金产品风险等级的公告。建设银行表示，根据 《证券期货投资者适当性管理办法》《基金募集机构投资者适当性管理实施指引（试行）》等规定，为 切实履行适当性义务，保护投资者权益，该行遵循产品风险等级评定孰高原则，近期调整了部分代销公 募基金产品风险等级，包括将4只基金的风险级别由R3上调至R4。 这已是建设银行今年以来第二次发布调整部分代销公募基金产品风险等级的公告。今年2月该行发 布公告称，已对21只代销公募基金产品风险等级进行上调。 5月23日， ...

中国经济网北京7月8日讯 国家金融监督管理总局网站近日公布的国家金融监督管理总局江西监管 局行政处罚信息公开表显示，中信银行股份有限公司南昌分行及相关责任人存在贷款管理不到位、违规 发放贷款、违规办理国内信用证业务的违法违规行为。 国家金融监督管理总局江西监管局对中信银行股份有限公司南昌分行罚款190万元；对王品、彭 缨、章成、王旭、潘杰、郭淑文、蒋辰、张静、胡明睿、杜慧芳、李剑春、周志凌等责任人员警告并罚 款共计79万元。 以下为原文： | 序号 | 当事人名称 | 主要违法违规行为 | 行政处罚内容 对中信银行股 | 作出决定机关 | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | | | | 份有限公司南 昌分行罚款 190万元;对 | | | | | | 王品、彭缪、 | | | | 中信银行股 | 贷款管理不到位;违规 | 章成、王旭、 | 国际金融监督 | | | 份有限公司 | | 潘杰、郭淑 | | | 1 | | 发放贷款;违规办理国 | | 管理总局江西 | | | 南昌分行及 | 内信用证业务 | 文、蒋辰、张 | 监管局 | | | 相关责任人 | | 静、胡明睿、 ...

（责任编辑：魏京婷） 中国经济网北京7月11日讯 据中信银行股份有限公司纪委、六盘水市纪委监委消息：中信银行股份 有限公司财富管理部副总经理袁东宁涉嫌严重违纪违法，目前正在接受中信银行股份有限公司纪委纪律 审查和六盘水市监委监察调查。 ...

中国经济网北京7月15日讯 国家金融监督管理总局网站今日发布国家金融监督管理总局舟山监管分 局行政处罚信息公开表显示，中信银行股份有限公司舟山分行及相关责任人存在二手房按揭贷款业务管 理不审慎、固定资产贷款管理不审慎、贷前调查不到位、未严格执行贷款实贷实付要求的违法违规行 为。 国家金融监督管理总局舟山监管分局对中信银行股份有限公司舟山分行罚款125万元；对叶茹波警 告，对袁梓涵警告。 以下为原文： | 序号 | 当事人名称 | 主要违法违规行为 | 行政处罚内容 | 作出决定机关 | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 1 | 中信银行股份有 | 二手房按揭贷款业务 管理不审慎、固定资 | 对中信银行股份有 限公司舟山分行罚 | 国家金融监督管 | | | | 产品款管理不审慎 | | | | | 限公司舟山分行 | | 款125万元;对叶 | 理总局舟山监管 | | | 及相关责任人 | 合前调查不到位 | 茹波警告,对袁梓 | 分局 | | | | 未严格执行贷款实 | | | | | | | 濟警告 | | | | | 合实付要求 | | | （责任编辑：何潇） ...