Core Viewpoint - The article emphasizes the importance of fintech as a leading business segment for banks and financial institutions, highlighting the proactive approach of these entities in embracing technological advancements [1]. Group 1: Development of Fintech in Regional Banks - Many regional banks, particularly city and rural commercial banks, are following the lead of larger banks in developing fintech, although their progress may be limited by resources [2]. - Zhejiang Rural Commercial Bank has reported that since launching its fintech pilot in Jiaxing, the proportion of technology enterprise loans has exceeded 30% of corporate loans, covering 7,200 tech enterprises [2]. - Various county-level rural commercial banks in Jiaxing have begun to establish specialized mechanisms for fintech, such as dedicated departments and service models [3]. Group 2: Challenges and Strategies - The development of fintech is challenging for regional banks, which need to root their efforts in local economic structures and overcome internal limitations [5]. - A listed rural commercial bank indicated that it had been considering fintech since 2017, but only completed team formation in 2021, reflecting the long-term commitment required [4]. Group 3: Growth in Technology Loans - Despite smaller loan scales compared to larger banks, regional banks are accelerating their technology loan offerings, with significant growth rates reported [6]. - For instance, Jiangsu Bank's technology loan balance reached 2,740 billion yuan, growing by 17.80% year-on-year, while Hangzhou Bank's technology loans increased by 21.77% [7]. - Other regional banks, such as Qilu Bank and Qingdao Bank, also reported substantial growth in technology loans, with increases of 17.60% and 20.85% respectively [7]. Group 4: Organizational Structure and Specialization - Banks are adapting their organizational structures to support fintech, with many establishing dedicated departments and specialized branches [9]. - For example, Ningbo Bank has set up a technology finance department to provide comprehensive services to tech enterprises, while Qingdao Bank has developed a specialized mechanism for fintech [10]. - Hangzhou Bank has created a well-structured fintech system with multiple regional centers and specialized institutions [11].

Core Insights - The city commercial bank sector experienced a decline of 1.0% on September 30, with Suzhou Bank leading the drop [1] - The Shanghai Composite Index closed at 3882.78, up 0.52%, while the Shenzhen Component Index closed at 13526.51, up 0.35% [1] Stock Performance Summary - Qingdao Bank: Closed at 4.76, unchanged; trading volume of 223,200 shares, turnover of 106 million [1] - Shanghai Bank: Closed at 8.96, down 0.55%; trading volume of 416,300 shares, turnover of 373 million [1] - Beijing Bank: Closed at 5.51, down 0.72%; trading volume of 2,311,600 shares, turnover of 1.272 billion [1] - Hangzhou Bank: Closed at 15.27, down 0.78%; trading volume of 157,990 shares, turnover of 883 million [1] - Lanzhou Bank: Closed at 2.36, down 0.84%; trading volume of 339,500 shares, turnover of 80.379 million [1] - Guiyang Bank: Closed at 5.76, down 0.86%; trading volume of 271,900 shares, turnover of 157 million [1] - Chongqing Bank: Closed at 8.93, down 0.89%; trading volume of 99,700 shares, turnover of 89.151 million [1] - Changsha Bank: Closed at 8.83, down 0.90%; trading volume of 276,800 shares, turnover of 244 million [1] - Chengdu Bank: Closed at 17.25, down 0.92%; trading volume of 279,700 shares, turnover of 482 million [1] - Zhengzhou Bank: Closed at 1.98, down 1.00%; trading volume of 756,400 shares, turnover of 150 million [1] Capital Flow Analysis - The city commercial bank sector saw a net outflow of 462 million from main funds, while speculative funds had a net inflow of 331 million, and retail investors had a net inflow of 131 million [2] - Suzhou Bank: Main fund net inflow of 55.9396 million, speculative fund net outflow of 11.5337 million, retail net outflow of 44.4059 million [3] - Changsha Bank: Main fund net inflow of 33.8793 million, speculative fund net outflow of 13.6525 million, retail net outflow of 20.2268 million [3] - Qilu Bank: Main fund net inflow of 8.6825 million, speculative fund net outflow of 2.7980 million, retail net outflow of 5.8846 million [3] - Hangzhou Bank: Main fund net inflow of 7.6881 million, speculative fund net inflow of 44.2474 million, retail net outflow of 51.9354 million [3] - Guiyang Bank: Main fund net inflow of 4.8665 million, speculative fund net outflow of 1.6412 million, retail net outflow of 3.2254 million [3]

自今年5月7日债券市场"科技板"推出以来，济南市委金融办密集施策，通过组织专题培训、全面摸排企 业、建立联动机制、争取政策试点、提供发行辅导等一揽子措施，全力推进科创债融资工作。一系列举 措旨在积极承接"央地协同、风险共担"机制，全力推进济南企业通过科创债融资。 工作启动迅速且深入，一方面通过高频次、多层次的宣传培训传导政策红利，于5月14日、6月18日及8 月26日连续组织多场专题培训及宣讲会，面向部门干部、企业融资负责人及国有企业等不同群体，有效 提升了市场认知。 另一方面，扎实做好后备资源储备，联合发改、科技、工信等多部门全面摸排科技企业，共筛选出45家 企业纳入科创债后备资源储备库。 在机制建设与合力凝聚上取得关键突破，不仅成功争取到上交所"债券市场城市行动计划"在济南试点， 建立了债券融资服务联动机制，还积极承接国家"央地协同"风险分担机制，制定配套补助政策，激励担 保和增信机构为科创债发行提供支持。 与此同时，服务主动靠前，邀请上交所及专业服务机构专家实地走访10家意向企业，"面对面"指导制定 发行方案。 值得注意的是，济南财金集团所属济南财投成功发行济南市属国有企业首单科技创新公司债券。 其中， ...

Investment Rating - The report maintains a recommendation for the banking industry [3] Core Insights - The report provides a comprehensive analysis of the asset-liability structure and interest margin changes of 42 A-share listed banks during the "14th Five-Year Plan" period, highlighting a shift towards corporate loans on the asset side and a stronger retail focus on the liability side [12][14] - The asset-liability structure indicates a significant increase in the proportion of corporate loans, rising from 57.02% to 63.22% from the end of 2020 to mid-2025, while the proportion of demand deposits decreased from 41.94% to 30% [12][14] - The report notes a decline in both asset yield and interest margin, with the yield on interest-earning assets dropping from 4.43% to 3.32% and the net interest margin decreasing from 2.23% to 1.53% during the same period [14][15] Summary by Sections Overall Asset-Liability Structure and Interest Margin Changes - The asset-liability structure shows an increase in loan-to-earning asset ratio from 54.19% to 56.49%, with corporate loans making up a larger share of total loans [14][15] - The average yield on interest-earning assets decreased significantly, with the loan yield falling from 5.34% to 3.82% [15] - The net interest margin for listed banks remains higher than that of commercial banks, despite a decline [14][15] Changes in Each Banking Sector's Asset-Liability Structure and Interest Margin - City commercial banks experienced a more significant increase in the proportion of corporate loans, with their interest margin narrowing less compared to other banks [18] - The report highlights that the proportion of deposits in interest-bearing liabilities for state-owned banks decreased, while it increased for rural commercial banks [18] - The decline in interest-bearing liabilities' cost rate was most pronounced in city commercial banks, leading to a smaller reduction in their interest margin [18]

Group 1 - Laishang Bank issued a 5-year sci-tech bond, raising 1 billion yuan, marking Jinan's total sci-tech bond issuance at 201 billion yuan, making it the first city in Shandong to exceed this threshold [1] - Since the launch of the "Technology Board" on May 7, Jinan has led Shandong in the number, volume, and amount of sci-tech bond issuances within just over four months [1] - Jinan Municipal Financial Office has implemented various measures to leverage the opportunities presented by the sci-tech bond policy, including training sessions and resource support [1][2] Group 2 - Jinan has established a bond financing service linkage mechanism and successfully secured the Shanghai Stock Exchange's "Bond Market City Action Plan" pilot [2] - The Municipal Financial Office has developed policies to subsidize guarantee and credit enhancement institutions, encouraging support for the issuance of sci-tech bonds by technology enterprises [2] - Jinan has organized experts to provide face-to-face guidance to 10 potential issuing companies, focusing on assisting private technology enterprises in accessing bond financing [2] Group 3 - Currently, 13 enterprises in Jinan have issued a total of 22 sci-tech bonds, accounting for 37.1%, 32.8%, and 34.9% of the total number, volume, and amount of issuances, respectively [3] - Notable issuances include the first national and Shandong sci-tech bonds by Inspur Electronic Information Industry Co., Ltd., and the first financial institution and city commercial bank sci-tech bonds in Shandong by Zhongtai Securities and Qilu Bank, respectively [3] - The two city commercial bank sci-tech bonds in Jinan will specifically support technology innovation through technology loans and investments in innovative enterprises [3]

齐鲁晚报·齐鲁壹点记者 黄寿赓 9月25日，工商银行、农业银行、中国银行、建设银行、交通银行发布公告，均宣布公司章程修订已获监管核准，不再设立监事会。 国有大行之外，城商行监事会也在加速撤销。9月23日，齐鲁银行召开股东大会，表决通过了《关于不再设立监事会的议案》。议案表示，根据相关法律法 规、监管制度的规定，结合实际情况，该行拟不再设立监事会及其下设专门委员会，由董事会审计委员会行使公司法和监管制度规定的监事会职权。 据不完全统计，42家上市银行中，已有20余家上市银行宣布取消或推进撤销监事会。具体来看，招商银行、华夏银行、光大银行、民生银行、浦发银行等股 份制银行已跟进。此外，北京银行、上海银行、长沙银行、重庆银行、瑞丰农商行、紫金农商行等地方银行也在加速撤销。 银行取消监事会始于2024年7月1日起施行的新《公司法》。根据新规，公司可以在董事会中设置由董事组成的审计委员会，行使监事会的职权，不设监事会 或者监事。此后，国家金融监督管理总局发布相关通知称，金融机构可以按照公司章程规定，在董事会中设置由董事组成的审计委员会，行使公司法和监管 制度规定的监事会职权，不设监事会或者监事。 2024年底，证监会发 ...

最近，发行科技创新债券的风吹到了城商行。 《国际金融报》记者注意到，9月以来，青岛银行（002948）、苏州银行（002966）、齐鲁银行 （601665）等10家机构纷纷布局科创债，合计发行总额达到129亿元，城商行成为发行主力军。与此同 时，市场认购热情高涨，有的债券认购倍数高达2.87倍，实现超额增发。 9月24日晚间，青岛银行发布公告称，近日在全国银行间债券市场成功发行"青岛银行股份有限公司2025 年科技创新债券"，并已于9月23日发行完毕。据悉，该期债券发行规模为人民币10亿元，品种为5年期 固定利率债券，票面利率为1.87%。 青岛银行同时称，该期债券募集资金将依据适用法律和主管部门的批准，通过贷款、债券等多种途径， 专项支持科技创新领域业务。 记者注意到，也有机构设置了超额增发权，并最终顶格发行科创债。9月23日，重庆三峡银行公告了该 行2025年科技创新债券（第一期）发行结果，该期债券基本发行规模为人民币20亿元，票面利率为 1.95%。 三峡银行公告还指出，若实际全场申购倍数（全场申购量／基本发行规模）α≥1.4，发行人有权选择行 使超额增发权，增加发行不超过人民币5亿元。最终，该只科创债 ...

由新公司法驱动的银行治理变革正加速落地。近日，齐鲁银行、兴业银行等上市银行纷纷宣布不再设立 监事会。 业内人士认为，以审计委员会取代监事会可以提升公司治理效率、降低运营成本，但需解决监督的独立 性与专业性问题。此外，如何将原则性规定转化为可行的具体方案，也是银行需要面对的挑战。 纷纷取消监事会 9月23日，齐鲁银行召开股东大会，表决通过了《关于不再设立监事会的议案》。议案表示，根据相关 法律法规、监管制度的规定，结合实际情况，该行拟不再设立监事会及其下设专门委员会，由董事会审 计委员会行使公司法和监管制度规定的监事会职权。 齐鲁银行并非是取消监事会的唯一一家银行。4月29日，工商银行、农业银行、建设银行、中国银行、 交通银行五家国有大行集体宣布撤销监事会，招商银行、兴业银行、北京银行等股份行和城商行也陆续 跟进。 银行取消监事会需要从去年7月1日起施行的新公司法说起。根据法律规定，公司可以在董事会中设置由 董事组成的审计委员会，行使监事会的职权，不设监事会或者监事。此后，国家金融监督管理总局发布 相关通知称，金融机构可以按照公司章程规定，在董事会中设置由董事组成的审计委员会，行使公司法 和监管制度规定的监事会 ...

由新公司法驱动的银行治理变革正加速落地。近日，齐鲁银行、兴业银行等上市银行纷纷宣布不再设立 监事会。 业内人士认为，以审计委员会取代监事会可以提升公司治理效率、降低运营成本，但需解决监督的独立 性与专业性问题。此外，如何将原则性规定转化为可行的具体方案，也是银行需要面对的挑战。 纷纷取消监事会 9月23日，齐鲁银行召开股东大会，表决通过了《关于不再设立监事会的议案》。议案表示，根据相关 法律法规、监管制度的规定，结合实际情况，该行拟不再设立监事会及其下设专门委员会，由董事会审 计委员会行使公司法和监管制度规定的监事会职权。 齐鲁银行并非是取消监事会的唯一一家银行。4月29日，工商银行、农业银行、建设银行、中国银行、 交通银行五家国有大行集体宣布撤销监事会，招商银行、兴业银行、北京银行等股份行和城商行也陆续 跟进。 ● 李静 李蕴奇 业内人士认为，以审计委员会取代监事会有助于提升公司治理效率、降低运营成本，但必须确保监督的 独立性与专业性。 "由审计委员会替代监事会的监督职能，一是有助于提升银行治理效率；二是可以减少机构冗余，精简 公司治理结构；三是董事会对经营和监督全面负责，权责更加清晰，激励与约束机制更为一 ...

Market Performance - The city commercial bank sector declined by 0.94% on September 25, with Chongqing Bank leading the decline [1] - The Shanghai Composite Index closed at 3853.3, down 0.01%, while the Shenzhen Component Index closed at 13445.9, up 0.67% [1] Individual Stock Performance - Chongqing Bank closed at 8.94, down 1.65% with a trading volume of 170,700 shares and a transaction value of 153 million [1] - Other notable declines include Xi'an Bank down 1.50% to 3.95, Zhengzhou Bank down 1.48% to 2.00, and Qingdao Bank down 1.44% to 4.78 [1] - Shanghai Bank and Xiamen Bank also saw declines of 1.43% and 1.39%, respectively [1] Capital Flow Analysis - The city commercial bank sector experienced a net outflow of 278 million from institutional investors, while retail investors saw a net inflow of 152 million [1] - The table indicates that Suzhou Bank had a significant net outflow from institutional investors of 48.08 million, while Qilu Bank had a net inflow of 25.86 million [2] - Chongqing Bank specifically had a net outflow of 5.68 million from institutional investors but a net inflow of 10.91 million from retail investors [2]