3. 投资者选择将持有的本期债券全部或部分回售给发 行人的，须于回售登记期内登记；若投资者未做登记，则视 为继续持有债券。 4. 回售价格：人民币100元/张（不含利息）。投资者选 择回售等同于以人民币100元/张（不含利息）卖出持有的"21 侨城06"。投资者选择回售可能会带来损失，敬请投资者注 意风险。 深圳华侨城股份有限公司 关于"21 侨城 06"票面利率调整和回售实施办法 第二次提示性公告 重要提示： 1. 利率调整：根据《深圳华侨城股份有限公司2021年面 向合格投资者公开发行公司债券（第三期）》（以下简称"《募 集说明书》"）的约定，公司作为"21侨城06"（债券代码： 149439.SZ）的发行人，有权决定在存续期的第5年末调整本 期债券存续期后2年的票面利率。根据当前的市场行情，公 司决定下调本期债券票面利率100个基点，即"21侨城06" 债券存续期后2年的票面利率为2.95%。 2. 投资者回售选择权：根据《募集说明书》中设定的投 资者回售选择权，投资者有权选择在投资者回售登记期内进 行登记，将持有的本期债券按面值全部或部分回售给发行人， 或选择继续持有本期债券。 5. 回售登记期：20 ...

深圳华侨城股份有限公司 2. 投资者回售选择权：根据《募集说明书》中设定的投 资者回售选择权，投资者有权选择在投资者回售登记期内进 行登记，将持有的本期债券按面值全部或部分回售给发行人， 或选择继续持有本期债券。 3. 投资者选择将持有的本期债券全部或部分回售给发 行人的，须于回售登记期内登记；若投资者未做登记，则视 为继续持有债券。 4. 回售价格：人民币100元/张（不含利息）。投资者选 择回售等同于以人民币100元/张（不含利息）卖出持有的"21 侨城06"。投资者选择回售可能会带来损失，敬请投资者注 意风险。 5. 回售登记期：2026年2月25日至2026年3月3日（仅限 1 交易日）。 关于"21 侨城 06"票面利率调整和回售实施办法 第一次提示性公告 重要提示： 1. 利率调整：根据《深圳华侨城股份有限公司2021年面 向合格投资者公开发行公司债券（第三期）》（以下简称"《募 集说明书》"）的约定，公司作为"21侨城06"（债券代码： 149439.SZ）的发行人，有权决定在存续期的第5年末调整本 期债券存续期后2年的票面利率。根据当前的市场行情，公 司决定下调本期债券票面利率100个基点，即 ...

Core Viewpoint - The company, Overseas Chinese Town A, has indicated that investors should pay attention to the upcoming disclosure of its "2025 Annual Report" for information regarding its operational status [2] Group 1 - The company responded to investor inquiries on its operational situation through an interactive platform [2]

Core Viewpoint - The real estate industry is experiencing significant executive turnover at the beginning of 2026, with over ten companies undergoing management changes, reflecting a broader trend of organizational restructuring and strategic realignment in response to market pressures [3][5]. Group 1: Executive Changes - In early 2026, companies such as Diyi City Holdings, Zhongliang Holdings, and New World Development have reported executive resignations, with reasons ranging from retirement to personal choices [3][6]. - Zhongliang Holdings saw the resignation of He Jian, who had been with the company since 2015, and the appointment of Zhao Peng as the new executive director and co-president [6]. - Other companies like Rongsheng Development and Guangming Real Estate have also experienced frequent executive changes, indicating a trend across the industry [7]. Group 2: Organizational Restructuring - The beginning of the year is a critical period for real estate companies to implement reforms, with 21 companies making 31 organizational adjustments since January 2025 [9]. - Major firms such as Poly, China Overseas, and Longfor have initiated new rounds of optimization adjustments, indicating ongoing efforts to refine their operational structures [9][10]. - The restructuring aims to enhance resource allocation and core business management, reflecting a shift towards quality-focused survival strategies in the industry [10]. Group 3: Industry Trends and Challenges - The frequent changes in management are symptomatic of the broader challenges facing the real estate sector, including sales pressure and ongoing financial losses since 2022 [11]. - The shift from large-scale development to refined operations and asset-light models necessitates new leadership capable of navigating these changes [11]. - Companies are urged to focus on financial safety, operational efficiency, and precise investment strategies to adapt to the evolving market landscape [11].

Group 1 - Over ten real estate companies have experienced executive changes within just over a month since the beginning of 2026 [2][3] - Notable companies undergoing changes include Joy City Holdings, Zhongliang Holdings, New World Development, Rongsheng Development, Bright Realty, and others, with reasons ranging from retirement to personal resignations [2][3] - The adjustments in management are closely aligned with the companies' business development and strategic needs, indicating a trend of organizational restructuring within the industry [2][3] Group 2 - The trend of executive turnover in real estate companies has been ongoing since last year and continues into 2026, with significant changes reported [3][4] - For instance, Joy City Holdings announced the resignation of director Chen Lang due to retirement, while Zhongliang Holdings saw the resignation of He Jian and the appointment of Zhao Peng as new executive director [3][4] - Other companies like Rongsheng Development and Bright Realty have also reported multiple executive resignations for personal reasons, reflecting a broader pattern of leadership changes across the sector [3][4] Group 3 - A new wave of organizational restructuring is occurring, with 21 real estate companies implementing 31 adjustments since January 2025 [5][6] - Major firms such as Poly, China Overseas, and Longfor are undergoing multiple rounds of restructuring, indicating a shift towards optimizing organizational efficiency [5][6] - The adjustments aim to enhance resource allocation and core business management, reflecting a transition towards quality-focused operations in the real estate sector [6][7] Group 4 - The frequent changes in management are indicative of the broader challenges faced by the real estate industry, including sales pressure and financial losses since 2022 [7] - The need for management adjustments is driven by the shift from large-scale development to refined operations and asset-light models, necessitating new leadership with different skill sets [7] - Companies are now focusing on financial security, operational efficiency, and precise investment strategies to adapt to the evolving market landscape [7]

Core Viewpoint - The real estate industry is experiencing significant executive turnover, with over ten companies undergoing leadership changes within a month, reflecting a broader trend of organizational restructuring and strategic realignment in response to market pressures [2][3][7]. Group 1: Executive Changes - More than ten real estate companies, including Joy City Holdings, Zhongliang Holdings, and New World Development, have reported executive changes since the beginning of 2026, with reasons ranging from retirement to personal resignations [2][3]. - Joy City Holdings announced the resignation of director Chen Lang due to reaching retirement age, while Zhongliang Holdings saw the departure of executive director He Jian and the appointment of Zhao Peng as his successor [3]. - Other companies like Rongsheng Development and Guangming Real Estate have also experienced frequent executive changes, indicating a trend of leadership turnover across the sector [4][5]. Group 2: Organizational Restructuring - The beginning of the year is a critical period for real estate companies to implement reforms, with 21 companies undergoing 31 organizational adjustments since January 2025 [5]. - Major firms such as Poly, China Overseas, and Longfor have initiated new rounds of optimization adjustments, with China Overseas restructuring its management model from a three-tier to a two-tier system [6]. - The adjustments aim to enhance resource allocation and core business management, reflecting a shift towards quality-focused operations in response to market challenges [6][7]. Group 3: Industry Trends and Challenges - The frequent changes in leadership are indicative of the industry's response to ongoing sales pressures and financial losses experienced by publicly listed real estate companies since 2022 [7]. - The shift from large-scale development to refined operations and asset-light models necessitates new leadership capable of navigating these changes [7]. - Companies are urged to focus on financial security, operational efficiency, and precise investment strategies to adapt to the evolving economic landscape [7].

Group 1: Monetary Policy and Market Operations - The central bank conducted a 7-day reverse repurchase operation on February 10, with a fixed rate and a total amount of 311.4 billion yuan, at an interest rate of 1.40%, resulting in a net injection of 205.9 billion yuan for the day after accounting for 105.5 billion yuan in reverse repos maturing [2][4] - The interbank market showed a tightening in liquidity, with the weighted average rate of DR001 rising over 9 basis points to 1.36%, while overnight borrowing rates for non-bank institutions increased to above 1.6% and 1.65% for overnight and cross-period funding, respectively [4] - The latest overnight financing rate in the US was reported at 3.64% [6] Group 2: Financial Instruments and Yield Trends - The latest transaction rate for one-year interbank certificates of deposit from major banks was around 1.59%, showing a slight increase from the previous day [7] - The closing yields for government bond futures showed a slight increase, with the 30-year and 10-year contracts rising by 0.01%, while the 5-year and 2-year contracts remained unchanged [12] Group 3: Fiscal Policy and Investment Trends - In the context of increasing fiscal revenue and expenditure contradictions, there is a noticeable shift in China's fiscal spending structure, with more funds being directed towards human capital and a decline in infrastructure investment. However, manufacturing and high-tech service investments remain resilient, indicating a transition in investment structure from traditional infrastructure to new productive forces [13] - The Ministry of Finance and the People's Bank of China conducted a tender for 2026 central treasury cash management deposits on February 10, with a total bid amount of 150 billion yuan at an interest rate of 1.73% [13] Group 4: Bond Market Developments - Fitch Ratings upgraded Vanke's long-term foreign and local currency issuer ratings from "RD" to "CC" [15] - The first batch of ESG standardized bonds for financing leasing in Tianjin has been issued [15] - Following refinancing policy changes, Zhongke Shuguang plans to issue convertible bonds not exceeding 8 billion yuan [15]

Group 1: Open Market Operations - The central bank conducted a 7-day reverse repurchase operation of 118.5 billion yuan at a fixed rate of 1.40%, with a total bid amount of 118.5 billion yuan and a successful bid amount of 118.5 billion yuan [1] - Additionally, a 14-day reverse repurchase operation of 300 billion yuan was conducted using a fixed quantity and multi-price bidding method [1] - On the same day, 354 billion yuan of reverse repos matured, resulting in a net injection of 64.5 billion yuan, or a net withdrawal of 235.5 billion yuan if excluding the 14-day operation [1] Group 2: Market Liquidity - The interbank market liquidity remains stable but slightly loose, with the weighted average rate of DR001 staying around 1.32% [3] - Overnight quotes in the anonymous click (X-repo) system are around 1.3%, indicating ample supply; non-bank institutions are borrowing overnight against credit bonds at rates around 1.5% or slightly lower [3] - The latest overnight financing rate in the U.S. is reported at 3.69% [3] Group 3: Interbank Certificates of Deposit - The latest transaction rate for one-year interbank certificates of deposit among major banks is around 1.60%, showing a slight decline from the previous day [6] Group 4: Bond Market Overview - Major interest rate bonds in the interbank market have generally seen a decline in yields [8] - The closing prices for government bond futures indicate a rise, with the 30-year main contract up by 0.38%, the 10-year main contract up by 0.08%, the 5-year main contract up by 0.07%, and the 2-year main contract up by 0.04% [14] Group 5: Recent News and Developments - The Ministry of Finance, General Administration of Customs, and State Taxation Administration jointly issued a notice regarding tax exemptions for residents of Hainan Free Trade Port on imported goods within specified limits [12] - The U.S. has officially formed a critical minerals alliance, emphasizing the importance of maintaining a stable and secure global supply chain for critical minerals [12] - U.S. Treasury Secretary Basant noted continued significant inflows of foreign capital into U.S. Treasury bonds and the stock market [15]

Group 1 - The company, Overseas Chinese Town A, responded to investor inquiries regarding its land reserve situation, indicating that details can be found in the company's periodic reports under "new land reserve projects" and "cumulative land reserve situation" [2]

Core Viewpoint - The company is expected to report a significant loss of over 10 billion in its 2025 performance forecast, which raises concerns about its financial stability and operational logic over the past three years [1] Group 1 - The company disclosed its 2025 annual performance forecast on January 31, 2026, indicating a substantial loss that could negate the benefits accrued over the past two decades [1] - Investors are questioning the company's fundamental logic and the sustainability of its projects that could lead to such massive losses [1] - The company has advised stakeholders to refer to the upcoming 2025 annual report for more detailed information [1]