Core Viewpoint - The long-standing legal dispute between Huaying Technology and its former controlling shareholder has concluded, with the Supreme People's Court ruling in favor of Huaying Technology, ordering a compensation payment of 3.029 billion yuan from Huaying Bermuda and joint liability from Datong Company and China Display [4][7]. Group 1: Legal Proceedings - The lawsuit initiated by Huaying Technology against Huaying Bermuda for performance compensation began on December 29, 2018, and was accepted by the Fujian High Court on January 4, 2019 [6]. - The initial claim was for 1.914 billion yuan, which was later increased to 3.029 billion yuan based on audited results from 2018 [6]. - The first-instance judgment in June 2023 ordered Huaying Bermuda to pay the compensation within ten days, with Datong Company and China Display bearing joint liability [6][7]. Group 2: Company Background - Huaying Technology, originally known as Mindong Electric (Group) Co., Ltd., was listed on the Shenzhen Stock Exchange in 1993 and primarily engages in the R&D, design, production, and sales of display panels and modules [9]. - The company underwent a significant asset restructuring in 2010, leading to Huaying Bermuda becoming the controlling shareholder, and the business focus shifted from motor manufacturing to flat panel display devices [9][10]. - As of September 30, 2023, the top three shareholders of Huaying Technology are Fujian Electronic Information Industry Venture Capital Partnership (13.73%), Fujian Electronic Information Group (10.73%), and Huaying Bermuda (9.09%) [11]. Group 3: Financial Performance - Huaying Technology has faced ongoing financial challenges, reporting a revenue of 1.039 billion yuan for the first three quarters of this year, a year-on-year decline of 21.03%, and a net loss of 722 million yuan [11].

Core Viewpoint - Huaying Technology has won a final judgment in a long-standing lawsuit against its former controlling shareholders, resulting in a compensation payment of 3.029 billion yuan, which is expected to positively impact the company's operations and development [1][2]. Group 1: Lawsuit Background - The lawsuit between Huaying Technology and its former controlling shareholder, Huaying Bermuda, dates back to January 4, 2019, when the Fujian High Court accepted the case [2]. - The initial ruling required Huaying Bermuda to pay 3.029 billion yuan in performance compensation, with Da Tong Company and China Display also held jointly liable [2][3]. - After years of legal proceedings, the Supreme People's Court upheld the original ruling, dismissing the appeal from Huaying Bermuda and Da Tong Company [2]. Group 2: Financial Implications - Huaying Technology reported a revenue of 1.739 billion yuan for 2024, with a cumulative net loss of nearly 4.2 billion yuan over the past four years [1][3]. - The successful execution of the 3.029 billion yuan compensation could significantly improve Huaying Technology's financial situation [1]. - Da Tong Company, the parent company, reported revenues exceeding 8 billion yuan in the first three quarters of 2025, indicating its operational strength despite Huaying Technology's challenges [5]. Group 3: Company History and Operations - Huaying Technology, originally established as Mindong Electric (Group) Co., Ltd., underwent a major asset restructuring in 2010, acquiring stakes in four LCD module companies [3]. - The company primarily engages in the research, design, production, and sales of display panels and modules, positioning itself as a significant player in the global flat panel display manufacturing sector [5]. - The company has faced ongoing operational difficulties due to cyclical downturns in the panel industry, with a reported revenue decline of 21.03% year-on-year in the first three quarters of 2025 [5].

Core Viewpoint - Huaying Technology has won a final judgment in a long-standing lawsuit against its former controlling shareholder, resulting in a compensation payment of 3.029 billion yuan, which is expected to have a positive impact on the company's operations and development [1][2][3]. Group 1: Lawsuit Background - The lawsuit between Huaying Technology and its former controlling shareholder, Huaying Bermuda, dates back to 2019 when the Fujian High Court accepted the case [2]. - The initial ruling by the Fujian High Court ordered Huaying Bermuda to pay 3.029 billion yuan in performance compensation to Huaying Technology, with Da Tong Company and China Display also held jointly liable [2][4]. - The final judgment was issued by the Supreme People's Court, which upheld the original ruling and dismissed the appeal from Huaying Bermuda and Da Tong Company [3]. Group 2: Financial Implications - Huaying Technology reported a revenue of 1.739 billion yuan for 2024, with a cumulative net loss of nearly 4.2 billion yuan over the past four years [1]. - The compensation of 3.029 billion yuan, if successfully executed, could significantly improve Huaying Technology's financial situation [1]. - Da Tong Company, despite Huaying Technology's bankruptcy, continues to operate normally, reporting over 8 billion yuan in revenue for the first three quarters of 2025 [5]. Group 3: Company Background - Huaying Technology, originally known as Mindong Electric (Group) Co., Ltd., was listed in 1993 and underwent a major asset restructuring in 2010, acquiring stakes in several companies under China Display [4]. - The company primarily engages in the research, design, production, and sales of display panels and modules, positioning itself as a significant manufacturer in the flat panel display industry [5]. - The company has faced ongoing challenges due to cyclical downturns in the panel industry, leading to poor financial performance [5].

Core Viewpoint - Huaqing Technology has won a final victory in a long-standing lawsuit against its former controlling shareholder and actual controller, resulting in a court ruling that requires the defendants to pay a performance compensation of 3.029 billion yuan [2][5]. Group 1: Lawsuit Background - The lawsuit between Huaqing Technology and its former controlling shareholder, Huaqing Bermuda, dates back to January 4, 2019, when the Fujian High Court accepted the case [4]. - The Fujian High Court ruled that Huaqing Bermuda must pay 3.029 billion yuan in performance compensation within ten days of the ruling [4]. - Huaqing Bermuda and other defendants appealed the first-instance judgment, but the Supreme Court upheld the original ruling [5]. Group 2: Financial Impact - Huaqing Technology reported a revenue of 1.739 billion yuan for 2024, with a cumulative net loss of nearly 4.2 billion yuan over the past four years [2]. - The 3.029 billion yuan compensation, if successfully executed, is expected to have a significant positive impact on Huaqing Technology's business development [2]. Group 3: Company History and Operations - Huaqing Technology, originally known as Mindong Electric (Group) Co., Ltd., was listed on the Shenzhen Stock Exchange in 1993 and underwent a major asset restructuring in 2010 [7]. - The company primarily engages in the research, design, production, and sales of display panels and modules, making it a significant player in the global flat panel display manufacturing industry [9]. - Due to the cyclical downturn in the panel industry, Huaqing Technology has faced ongoing poor performance, with a revenue of 1.039 billion yuan in the first three quarters of 2025, a year-on-year decline of 21.03% [9].

Core Viewpoint - Huaying Technology has won a final judgment in a long-standing lawsuit against its former controlling shareholders, resulting in a compensation payment of 3.029 billion yuan, which is expected to positively impact the company's operations and development [2][5][8]. Group 1: Lawsuit Background - The lawsuit between Huaying Technology and its former controlling shareholders dates back to 2019, initiated due to contract disputes related to performance commitments made during a major asset restructuring in 2010 [7][10]. - The initial ruling by the Fujian High Court ordered Huaying Bermuda to pay 3.029 billion yuan in performance compensation, with Da Tong Company and China Display also held jointly liable [7][8]. Group 2: Financial Implications - Huaying Technology reported a revenue of 1.739 billion yuan for 2024, with a cumulative net loss of nearly 4.2 billion yuan over the past four years [5][12]. - The successful execution of the 3.029 billion yuan compensation could significantly improve Huaying Technology's financial situation and operational prospects [5][12]. Group 3: Company Status - Huaying Technology has been facing continuous operational challenges, with a reported revenue decline of 21.03% year-on-year in the first three quarters of 2025, amounting to 1.039 billion yuan [12]. - The company is a key player in the display panel manufacturing industry, focusing on the research, design, production, and sales of display panels and modules [12].

Core Viewpoint - Huaying Technology has won a significant legal case against three defendants, resulting in a compensation payment of 3.029 billion yuan and related costs, which is expected to positively impact the company's business development [3][4]. Group 1: Legal Proceedings - The case was initially filed by Huaying Technology in January 2019 at the Fujian Provincial High Court, involving contractual disputes with Huaying Bermuda and later adding Datong Company and China Display as co-defendants [3]. - The first-instance judgment ordered Huaying Bermuda to pay 3.029 billion yuan in performance compensation within ten days, with Datong Company and China Display jointly liable for the payment [4]. - After the first-instance ruling, Huaying Bermuda and Datong Company appealed, but Huaying Bermuda's appeal was dismissed due to failure to pay the appeal fee, leading to a final ruling by the Supreme People's Court that upheld the original judgment [4]. Group 2: Financial Implications - The total costs associated with the case, including court fees and other expenses, amounted to 17.8426 million yuan, which will be shared among the three defendants [4]. - The final ruling is expected to have a positive impact on Huaying Technology's operational development, enhancing its financial position following the successful litigation [4].

Group 1: Economic Indicators - As of the end of November, the total social financing scale reached 440.07 trillion yuan, with a year-on-year growth of 8.5% [3][4] - The broad money supply (M2) stood at 336.99 trillion yuan, reflecting a year-on-year increase of 8.0% [3][4] - In the first eleven months, the cumulative increase in social financing was 33.39 trillion yuan, which is 3.99 trillion yuan more than the same period last year [3] Group 2: Monetary Policy - The People's Bank of China emphasized the continuation of a moderately loose monetary policy, aiming to support stable economic growth and reasonable price recovery [4] - The bank plans to utilize various monetary policy tools flexibly, including reserve requirement ratio cuts and interest rate reductions, to maintain ample liquidity [4] Group 3: Industry Developments - The China Photovoltaic Industry Association announced the establishment of a "polysilicon capacity integration acquisition platform," aimed at addressing intense competition within the photovoltaic sector [4] - The China Securities Investment Fund Industry Association issued a draft regulation to standardize the sales behavior of publicly offered securities investment funds, covering various aspects such as promotional activities and performance assessments [4] Group 4: Company News - *ST Bosen announced the termination of a major asset restructuring due to failure to reach agreement on key terms [6] - Chip Origin Technology also decided to terminate its major asset restructuring transaction to protect shareholder interests [6] - More Thread plans to invest 7.5 billion yuan of idle fundraising in safe, liquid financial products [6] - Renfu Pharmaceutical received a notice of administrative penalty for false financial reporting, leading to a temporary suspension of its stock [7] - China High-Tech announced a potential change in control due to the transfer of shares by its major shareholder [8]

登录新浪财经APP 搜索【信披】查看更多考评等级 证券代码：000536 证券简称：华映科技 公告编号：2025-079 华映科技（集团）股份有限公司 关于诉讼进展暨终审胜诉的公告 本公司及董事会全体成员保证信息披露的内容真实、准确、完整，没有虚假记载、误导性陈述或重大遗 漏。 特别提示： 1、案件所处的诉讼阶段：二审（终审）判决； 2、上市公司所处的当事人地位：一审原告，二审被上诉人； 本案经福建省高院审理作出一审判决：判处华映百慕大应于一审判决生效之日起十日内向华映科技支付 业绩补偿款3,029,027,800元；判处大同公司、中华映管就上述业绩补偿款承担连带清偿责任；案件受理 费、司法鉴定费、财产保全费由三被告共同负担。华映百慕大、大同公司不服一审判决结果，提起上 诉。后续因未按时交纳上诉费，华映百慕大的上诉被中华人民共和国最高人民法院（以下简称"最高 院"）裁定按自动撤回上诉处理（案件的具体情况详见公司2019-018号、2019-034号、2019-054号、 2019-114号、2019-130号、2019-140号、2020-010号、2020-019号、2020-047号、2022-005号、 ...

证券代码：000536 证券简称：华映科技 公告编号：2025-079 华映科技（集团）股份有限公司 关于诉讼进展暨终审胜诉的公告 本公司及董事会全体成员保证信息披露的内容真实、准确、完整，没有 虚假记载、误导性陈述或重大遗漏。 特别提示： 1、案件所处的诉讼阶段：二审（终审）判决； 2、上市公司所处的当事人地位：一审原告，二审被上诉人； 3、本次诉讼合计涉案金额：30.29 亿元； 4、对上市公司损益产生的影响：本次判决为终审判决，预计将对公司经营 发展产生积极影响。公司将根据案件后续执行情况和有关会计准则的要求进行 相应的会计处理，具体影响以公司后续财务核算结果为准。 一、 本次重大诉讼受理的基本情况 福建省高级人民法院（以下简称"福建省高院"）于 2019 年 1 月 4 日决定 立案受理华映科技（集团）股份有限公司（以下简称"华映科技"或"公司"） 就与中华映管（百慕大）股份有限公司（以下简称"华映百慕大"）因其他合同 纠纷事项提起的民事诉讼，后续华映科技追加大同股份有限公司（以下简称"大 同公司"）及中华映管股份有限公司（以下简称"中华映管"）为上述诉讼案被 告。 二、 有关本案的基本情况 本案经福 ...

Group 1 - The optical optoelectronics sector experienced a decline of 2.04% on December 11, with Huaying Technology leading the drop [1] - The Shanghai Composite Index closed at 3873.32, down 0.7%, while the Shenzhen Component Index closed at 13147.39, down 1.27% [1] Group 2 - The optical optoelectronics sector saw a net outflow of 2.387 billion yuan from main funds, while retail investors contributed a net inflow of 1.836 billion yuan [2] - The sector attracted a net inflow of 0.551 billion yuan from speculative funds on the same day [2]