Group 1 - China International Airlines Co., Ltd. experienced a stock price increase of 5.23%, reaching 8.45 CNY per share, with a trading volume of 827 million CNY and a turnover rate of 0.86%, resulting in a total market capitalization of 147.439 billion CNY [1] - The company, established on March 27, 2006, and listed on August 18, 2006, primarily engages in air passenger transport (90.64% of revenue), with air cargo and postal services contributing 4.43% and other services 4.93% [1] Group 2 - Tianhong Fund has a significant holding in China International Airlines, with Tianhong Multi-Strategy One Year Fund (010257) reducing its stake by 35,000 shares to hold 99,600 shares, representing 1.52% of the fund's net value, ranking as the tenth largest holding [2] - The Tianhong Multi-Strategy One Year Fund was established on November 18, 2020, with a current size of 516.762 million CNY, yielding a return of 2.41% this year, ranking 7412 out of 8199 in its category, and a one-year return of 3.76%, ranking 7226 out of 8131 [2]

Core Viewpoint - The long-standing and controversial airline "seat locking" phenomenon is expected to undergo rectification following a special investigation by the Jiangsu Provincial Consumer Protection Committee, which has interviewed ten domestic airlines and requested written responses regarding corrective actions [1][5]. Group 1: Investigation Findings - The Jiangsu Provincial Consumer Protection Committee conducted an investigation into the "seat locking" practices of ten major airlines, revealing that the proportion of locked seats during the purchasing phase ranged from 19.9% to 62.1%, with an average of 38.7% [2][3]. - Notably, Spring Airlines' Nanjing-Lanzhou route had a seat locking rate exceeding 60%, while Shenzhen Airlines' Shenzhen-Zhanjiang route exceeded 50% [2][3]. - Other airlines like Hainan Airlines, Eastern Airlines, and Xiamen Airlines had locking rates between 40% and 46%, while Lucky Air had a relatively low rate of less than 20% [2][3]. Group 2: Reasons for Seat Locking - Airlines provided various justifications for seat locking, including reserving seats for special passengers, ensuring emergency seat availability, and maintaining flight load balance [4]. - The investigation identified common issues with the "seat locking" phenomenon, including a lack of clear communication regarding seat locking rules, vague explanations, differential resource allocation based on membership levels, and unilateral rights granted to airlines [4]. Group 3: Consumer Feedback and Reactions - Consumers expressed dissatisfaction with the differentiation of paid and free seating areas in economy class, indicating that such practices increase travel costs and lead to a frustrating experience [6][10]. - Feedback highlighted that many passengers were unaware of the specific rules regarding seat locking, leading to limited seat choices, especially for families traveling together [10][11]. Group 4: Regulatory Actions and Implications - The Jiangsu Provincial Consumer Protection Committee has mandated that the airlines submit written corrective actions within 15 working days, including self-inspections and revisions of unfair terms related to "seat locking" [5][15]. - Legal experts have commented that the "seat locking" practice infringes on consumer rights and may violate consumer protection laws, suggesting that the committee's actions could serve as a model for regulatory oversight in other regions [15][16].

00753 臨時股東會代表委任表格 與本代表委任表格有關之股份數目 （附註1） 本人╱吾等 （附註2） 地址為 日期：二零二五年 月 日 簽署 （附註5） ： 附註： 為中國國際航空股份有限公司（「本公司」）股本中 （附註3） 股之H股之登記持有人，茲委任股東會主席及╱或 （附註4） 地址為 為本人╱吾等之代表：(a)代表本人╱吾等出席本公司訂於二零二五年十二月十六日（星期二） 上午十一時正假座中國北京市順義區天柱路30號C713會議室召開之臨時股東會（或其任何續 會）（「股東會」），以考慮及酌情通過召開股東會之通告（「通告」）所載之決議案（「決議案」）；並 (b)在股東會（或其任何續會）代表本人╱吾等以本人╱吾等之名義按照以下指示表決決議案； 如無作出該等指示，則由本人╱吾等之代表酌情表決。除另有說明者外，本代表委任表格所用 詞彙與通告所界定者的涵義一致。 | | 決議案 | 贊成 | （附註5） | 反對 | （附註5） | 棄權 | （附註5） | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 1. | 審議及批准關於公司符合向特定對象發行A股 ...

- 1 - 香港交易及結算所有限公司及香港聯合交易所有限公司對本通告之內容概不負責，對其 準確性或完整性亦不發表任何聲明，並明確表示概不會就因本通告全部或任何部分內容 而產生或因倚賴該等內容而引致的任何損失承擔任何責任。 00753 臨時股東會通告 茲通告中國國際航空股份有限公司（「本公司」）將於二零二五年十二月十六日（星期二）上 午十一時正假座中國北京市順義區天柱路30號C713會議室舉行臨時股東會（「臨時股東 會」），以審議及酌情通過下列決議案。除另有所指外，本通告所用詞彙與本公司日期為 二零二五年十一月二十八日的通函所界定者具有相同涵義。 1. 審議及批准關於公司符合向特定對象發行A股股票條件的議案。 2. 審議及批准關於公司二零二五年度向特定對象發行A股股票方案的議案。 2.1 發行股票的種類和面值 2.2 發行方式及發行時間 2.3 發行對象和認購方式 2.4 發行價格與定價方式 2.5 發行數量 2.6 限售期安排 2.7 上市地點 2.8 本次發行前的滾存未分配利潤安排 2.9 募集資金金額及用途 2.10 本次發行決議有效期限 上述第1項、第7項、第8項及第9項議案為普通決議案；其餘議案為特別 ...

证券代码：601111 证券简称：中国国航 公告编号：2025-058 中国国际航空股份有限公司 关于召开2025年第三次临时股东会的通知 网络投票起止时间：自2025 年 12 月 16 日 1 本公司董事会及全体董事保证本公告内容不存在任何虚假记载、误导性 陈述或者重大遗漏，并对其内容的真实性、准确性和完整性承担法律责任。 重要内容提示： 一、 召开会议的基本情况 （一） 股东会类型和届次 2025年第三次临时股东会 召开的日期时间：2025 年 12 月 16 日 11 点 00 分 召开地点：中国北京市顺义区天柱路 30 号国航总部大楼 C713 会议室 （五） 网络投票的系统、起止日期和投票时间。 网络投票系统：上海证券交易所股东会网络投票系统 股东会召开日期：2025年12月16日 本次股东会采用的网络投票系统：上海证券交易所股东会网络投票系统 （二） 股东会召集人：董事会 （三） 投票方式：本次股东会所采用的表决方式是现场投票和网络投票相结合 的方式 （四） 现场会议召开的日期、时间和地点 至2025 年 12 月 16 日 采用上海证券交易所网络投票系统，通过交易系统投票平台的投票时间为股 东 ...

Core Viewpoint - The recent practice of airlines locking seats and charging for seat selection has raised consumer concerns, as it is perceived as a means for airlines to increase revenue at the expense of consumer rights [1][2]. Group 1: Investigation Findings - A special investigation by Jiangsu Consumer Council focused on 10 domestic airlines, revealing that seat locking is prevalent, with the proportion of locked seats in economy class ranging from 19.9% to 62.1%, averaging 38.7% [1][2]. - The locked seats are primarily desirable ones, such as those in the front row, window, and aisle, limiting consumer choice to less favorable options [1][2]. - The investigation identified four main issues: widespread seat locking, disguised payment mechanisms, lack of transparency, and unfair contractual terms [2]. Group 2: Consumer Rights and Responsibilities - Airlines are legally responsible for protecting consumer rights and must ensure transparency in seat distribution and pricing policies [3]. - Airlines should provide equal seat selection opportunities for all passengers at the same fare and respect consumer autonomy in choosing seats [3]. Group 3: Required Actions from Airlines - Jiangsu Consumer Council has mandated airlines to conduct self-assessments and rectify their seat selection rules, particularly addressing excessive locking and disguised payment models [4]. - Airlines must revise unfair contractual terms that limit consumer rights and ensure that their policies are clear and transparent [4]. Group 4: Industry Response - Representatives from Southern Airlines and Lucky Air acknowledged the situation and stated they are evaluating the requirements set by Jiangsu Consumer Council [5]. - Experts have pointed out that while some seat locking for safety or special needs is acceptable, excessive locking for profit could violate consumer rights [5][6].

Core Viewpoint - The Jiangsu Consumer Rights Protection Committee has released a report highlighting issues related to seat locking practices by airlines, including widespread locking behavior, excessive locking of premium seats, disguised fees for unlocking, and infringement on consumer rights [1][4]. Group 1: Investigation Findings - The average seat locking rate among the 10 surveyed airlines is 38.7%, with rates ranging from 19.9% to 62.1% [3][4]. - Spring Airlines and Shenzhen Airlines have particularly high locking rates, exceeding 60% and 50% respectively, while Juneyao Airlines has a relatively low rate of under 20% [3][4]. - The investigation focused on the locking ratio, locking range, redemption methods, and customer service explanations [3]. Group 2: Identified Issues - Widespread seat locking practices are prevalent, with premium seats being excessively locked, limiting consumer choices to less desirable seats [4][5]. - The unlocking mechanism often requires payment or points redemption, which disadvantages non-members or infrequent travelers, effectively increasing travel costs [4][5]. - There is a lack of transparency in information provided to consumers, with unclear seat selection rules and inadequate customer service responses [4][5]. Group 3: Recommendations and Actions - The Jiangsu Consumer Rights Protection Committee has urged airlines to conduct self-examinations and rectify unfair terms in their agreements regarding seat locking [1][6]. - Airlines are recommended to ensure a reasonable and balanced distribution of free seat options, limiting paid options to only those necessary for special circumstances [7]. - Continuous monitoring of airlines' compliance with these recommendations will be conducted, with potential follow-up measures if necessary [8].

Core Viewpoint - The Jiangsu Provincial Consumer Protection Committee has raised concerns regarding the long-standing issues of seat locking and paid seat selection services among major Chinese airlines, highlighting the need for reform in these practices to protect consumer rights [1][2][3]. Group 1: Issues Identified - The practice of seat locking is widespread among the ten airlines, with the proportion of locked seats in the economy class ranging from 19.9% to 62.1%, averaging 38.7%, primarily affecting preferred seating areas [1][2]. - Airlines are increasingly using a mechanism that effectively charges consumers for seat selection, particularly disadvantaging non-members or infrequent travelers who lack the means to accumulate points for free seat selection [2]. - There is a lack of transparency in the information provided to consumers regarding seat locking rules and associated fees, with airlines often providing vague explanations that do not align with the high rates of seat locking [2]. Group 2: Required Reforms - The Jiangsu Provincial Consumer Protection Committee has mandated airlines to conduct self-assessments and rectify their seat selection rules within 15 working days, specifically addressing the excessive locking of seats and eliminating disguised paid seat selection models [3][4]. - Airlines are required to ensure a reasonable and balanced distribution of free seat options, retaining only necessary seat locks for special passengers or emergency purposes, while prohibiting the inclusion of standard economy seats in the paid category [3]. - The committee has called for a review and modification of unfair contractual terms related to seat locking, ensuring that consumer rights are not limited and that airlines' responsibilities are clearly defined within a transparent framework [4].

Core Viewpoint - The recent practice of airlines locking seats and charging for seat selection has raised consumer concerns, as it is seen as a way for airlines to increase revenue at the expense of consumer rights [1][2]. Group 1: Investigation Findings - A special investigation by Jiangsu Consumer Council targeted 10 domestic airlines, revealing that seat locking is prevalent, with the proportion of locked seats in economy class ranging from 19.9% to 62.1%, averaging 38.7% [1][2]. - The locked seats are primarily desirable ones, such as those in the front row, window, and aisle, limiting consumer choice to less favorable options [1][2]. Group 2: Consumer Rights Violations - The unlocking mechanism for preferred seats often requires payment through membership points or miles, disadvantaging non-members or occasional travelers who lack accumulation channels [2]. - Airlines have introduced additional paid options for unlocking seats, effectively splitting the basic seat selection rights into paid services, increasing travel costs for consumers [2]. - Information regarding seat locking rules and fees is often unclear, violating consumers' right to know, with customer service responses being inadequate and contradictory [2]. Group 3: Recommendations for Airlines - Airlines are urged to ensure transparency by clearly informing consumers about seat distribution and pricing policies [3]. - Fairness in rules must be maintained, ensuring equal seat selection opportunities for all passengers at the same fare [3]. - Airlines should respect consumer autonomy by safeguarding their right to choose and preventing disguised compulsory consumption [3]. Group 4: Required Actions - Airlines must conduct self-assessments to address excessive seat locking and eliminate disguised paid seat selection models, ensuring a reasonable and balanced distribution of free seat options [3][4]. - Unfair clauses in agreements related to seat locking should be reviewed and amended to avoid limiting consumer rights or increasing consumer responsibilities unfairly [4].

据江苏省消保委消息，近期，飞机"锁座"及有偿选座服务引发热议。为厘清行业经营边界，推动消费者 合法权益得到切实保障，江苏省消保委于11月21日线上约谈东方航空、南方航空、中国国航、海南航 空、厦门航空、深圳航空、山东航空、四川航空、春秋航空、吉祥航空等十家航空公司。会上，江苏省 消保委结合调查结果，通报了机票锁座服务市场存在的四个问题：一是锁座行为普遍存在，优质座位过 度锁定；二是解锁机制变相付费，挤压普通消费者权益；三是信息不透明且解释不合理，侵犯知情权； 四是协议文本存在不公平格式条款，权利义务设置不对等。江苏省消保委就飞机票锁座问题的整改工 作，向各航司提出两点明确要求，并于15个工作日内将整改情况以书面形式进行提交。 （文章来源：第一财经） ...