网络并非法外之地，相关自媒体账号恶意假冒国航飞行人员、凭空编造航空不安全事件，意图煽动公众 对民航安全不信任，并借机吸引流量营销其蜂蜜等产品，这一行为已严重影响国航的声誉和合法权益， 并对社会公众造成不良引导。国航提醒广大公众不信谣、不传谣。国航目前已对相关不实信息进行取证 收集，并将采取法律措施保障自身的合法权益，保留依法追究相关人员法律责任的权利。 来源：中国国航 近日，我司关注到个别自媒体账号（腾讯视频号"猪猪侠小卖部""一束花开始4314"，抖音账号"米莱传 媒"等）陆续发布"从万米高空到深山养蜂 女机长的逆袭""前国航机长拒飞被解雇 真相被掩盖了整整8 年"等视频内容，视频中当事人声称为国航前飞行员，因航空不安全事件被国航解聘后开始养蜂卖蜜。 经认真核实查证，视频中所述"林筱雨""方静云"等人员均非国航员工，视频中所提及的2016年11月3日 CA1348航班、2017年10月15日CA1832航班的始发地与目的地均与国航当日正常执行的CA1348航班、 CA1832航班航线不符，上述日期国航执行的CA1348航班、CA1832航班也未出现视频中所提及的单发 迫降、发动机损伤等不正常情况。 1月24 ...

Core Viewpoint - Bank of America Securities has a positive outlook on Asia-Pacific airlines for 2026, expecting profitability to be supported by sustained high ticket prices, healthy demand, improved cargo fundamentals, and potential benefits from excess oil supply [1] Group 1: Earnings Forecast - The average earnings per share forecast for Asia-Pacific airlines for 2025 to 2027 has been raised by 22% to reflect improved passenger and cargo unit revenue outlook [1] - The largest upward revision is for mainland Chinese airlines [1] Group 2: Target Price Adjustments - The average target price for Asia-Pacific airlines has been increased by 30% to reflect the earnings forecast adjustments [1] - China Eastern Airlines' target price has been raised from HKD 2 to HKD 2.9, maintaining an underperform rating [1] - China Southern Airlines' target price has been increased from HKD 3.1 to HKD 5.92, with the rating upgraded from underperform to neutral [1] - Air China’s target price has been raised from HKD 4.2 to HKD 8.3, with the rating upgraded from underperform to buy [1]

Core Viewpoint - Bank of America Securities has a positive outlook on Asia-Pacific airlines for 2026, expecting profitability to be supported by sustained high ticket prices, healthy demand, improved cargo fundamentals, and potential benefits from excess oil supply [1] Group 1: Earnings Forecast - The average earnings per share forecast for Asia-Pacific airlines for 2025 to 2027 has been raised by 22% to reflect improved passenger and cargo unit revenue outlook [1] - The largest upward revision is for airlines in mainland China [1] Group 2: Target Price Adjustments - The average target price for Asia-Pacific airlines has been increased by 30% to reflect the earnings forecast adjustments [1] - China Eastern Airlines' target price has been raised from HKD 2 to HKD 2.9, maintaining an underperform rating [1] - China Southern Airlines' target price has been increased from HKD 3.1 to HKD 5.92, with the rating upgraded from underperform to neutral [1] - Air China’s target price has been raised from HKD 4.2 to HKD 8.3, with the rating upgraded from underperform to buy [1]

Core Insights - The article discusses the prevalent practice of airlines locking certain economy class seats, which limits consumer choice and is seen as a method for airlines to increase revenue through service tier differentiation [1][2] Group 1: Airline Practices - A survey conducted by the Jiangsu Consumer Protection Committee revealed that none of the 10 major airlines fully open all economy class seats for selection, indicating that seat locking has become a common practice in civil aviation services [1] - The airlines surveyed include Eastern Airlines, Southern Airlines, Air China, Hainan Airlines, Xiamen Airlines, Shenzhen Airlines, Shandong Airlines, Sichuan Airlines, Spring Airlines, and Juneyao Airlines [1] Group 2: Seat Locking Statistics - The proportion of locked seats during the purchasing phase varies significantly among the surveyed airlines, ranging from 19.9% to 62.1%, with an average of 38.7% [1] - Specific routes with high seat locking include Spring Airlines' "Nanjing-Lanzhou" route, which has over 60% of economy seats locked, and Shenzhen Airlines' "Shenzhen-Zhanjiang" route, with over 50% locked [1] Group 3: Consumer Concerns - Consumers have raised questions regarding the reasons for seat locking, the extent of locked seats, unlocking methods, and related rules, but airline customer service responses have been vague regarding these issues [2]

Core Viewpoint - The practice of charging for seat selection in airlines is seen as a method to increase revenue by locking premium seats, which raises concerns about consumer rights and fair trading [1] Group 1: General Findings - The survey conducted by Jiangsu Consumer Protection Committee revealed that all 10 selected domestic airlines have implemented seat locking practices, with no airline fully opening all economy class seats [2] - The average seat locking rate across the surveyed routes is 38.7%, with some airlines like Spring Airlines and Shenzhen Airlines exceeding 60% and 50% respectively [2] Group 2: Payment for Unlocking Seats - Many airlines require consumers to use miles or membership points to unlock preferred seats, with specific examples showing that certain seats can require up to 2000 points for unlocking [3] - Some airlines have introduced additional paid options for purchasing points or miles, further pushing consumers towards paid unlocking methods [3] Group 3: Lack of Transparency - Airlines provided vague explanations for seat locking, citing reasons such as reserving seats for special passengers or maintaining flight balance, which do not align with the high locking rates observed [4][5] - Customer service responses were often unclear, failing to provide solid justifications for the locking practices [5] Group 4: Unfair Terms - The seat selection agreements of the airlines contain unfair terms, lacking clear communication about locking rules and fees, which may infringe on consumer rights [6] - Airlines are currently evaluating their policies to balance revenue optimization with consumer rights and improve transparency in seat selection information [6]

Core Viewpoint - The investigation by Jiangsu Consumer Protection Committee reveals that the practice of locking seats by airlines is widespread and raises concerns about consumer rights and transparency in the airline industry [3][4]. Group 1: Investigation Findings - The survey included 10 major domestic airlines, all of which confirmed the existence of seat locking practices, with no airline fully opening all economy class seats [4]. - The average seat locking ratio across the surveyed airlines is 38.7%, with some routes showing locking ratios as high as 62.1%, such as Spring Airlines' "Nanjing-Lanzhou" route [4]. - Preferred seating areas, such as front rows and exit rows, are commonly included in the locked categories, with higher fees or points required for unlocking these seats [4]. Group 2: Payment and Redemption Issues - Some airlines require consumers to use miles or membership points to unlock preferred seats, with specific examples showing redemption thresholds of 2000 points for premium seats [5]. - Airlines have introduced additional paid options for purchasing points or miles, further pushing consumers towards paid unlocking methods [6]. Group 3: Transparency and Communication - Airlines provided vague explanations for seat locking, citing reasons like reserving seats for special passengers or maintaining flight balance, which contradicts the high locking ratios observed [7]. - Customer service responses were often unclear, failing to provide satisfactory explanations for the locking practices, which raises concerns about consumer rights [7]. Group 4: Unfair Terms and Conditions - The seat selection agreements of the airlines contain unfair terms, lacking clear communication about locking rules and fees, which may infringe on consumer rights [8]. - Airlines often use ambiguous language in their agreements, avoiding the disclosure of free seat availability and locking practices, which benefits the airlines at the expense of consumer transparency [8].

香港交易及結算所有限公司及香港聯合交易所有限公司對本公告之內容概不負責，對其 準確性或完整性亦不發表任何聲明，並明確表示概不會就因本公告全部或任何部分內容 而產生或因倚賴該等內容而引致的任何損失承擔任何責任。 （於中華人民共和國註冊成立的股份有限公司） （股份代號：00753） 海外市場公告 本公告乃根據香港聯合交易所有限公司證券上市規則第13.10B條的規定而發表。 附件為中國國際航空股份有限公司於上海證券交易所刊發之 1. 中國國際航空股份有限公司關於向特定對象 發行A股股票申請文件的審核問詢函回覆的提示性公告 2. 關於中國國際航空股份有限公司向特定對象 發行股票申請文件的審核問詢函的回覆 3. 德勤華永會計師事務所（特殊普通合夥）關於 《關於中國國際航空股份有限公司向特定對象 發行股票申請文件的審核問詢函》的回覆 4. 北京市君合律師事務所關於中國國際航空股份有限公司 2025年度向特定對象發行A股股票的補充法律意見書（一） 承董事會命 中國國際航空股份有限公司 公司秘書 肖烽 中國北京，二零二六年一月十九日 於本公告日期，本公司的董事為劉鐵祥先生、王明遠先生、崔曉峰先生、Patrick Healy ...

《关于中国国际航空股份有限公司向特定对象发行股票 申请文件的审核问询函》的回复 德师报(函)字(26)第 Q00035 号 中国国际航空股份有限公司： 德勤华永会计师事务所(特殊普通合伙)(以下简称"我们")接受委托，审计了中国国际航空 股份有限公司(以下简称"公司"、"中国国航"或"发行人")2024 年度、2023 年度及 2022 年度的财务报表，并分别于 2025 年 3 月 27 日、2024 年 3 月 28 日及 2023 年 3 月 30 日出具 了德师报(审)字(25)第 P03582 号、德师报(审)字(24)第 P02372 号及德师报(审)字(23)第 P01765 号无保留意见的审计报告。这些财务报表的编制及公允列报是公司管理层的责任，我们的责 任是在实施审计工作的基础上对上述财务报表整体发表意见。我们的审计是根据中国注册会 计师审计准则进行的。 我们于 2026 年 1 月 9 日收到了公司转来的上海证券交易所(以下简称"上交所")出具的《关 于中国国际航空股份有限公司向特定对象发行股票申请文件的审核问询函》(上证上审(再融 资)〔2026〕10 号)(以下简称"审核问询函")。按 ...

北京市建国门北大街 8 号华润大厦 20 层 邮编：100005 电话：(86-10) 8519-1300 传真：(86-10) 8519-1350 北京市君合律师事务所 关于中国国际航空股份有限公司 2025 年度向特定对象发行 A 股股票的 补充法律意见书（一） 二零二六年一月 | 北京总部 | 电话: (86-10) 8519-1300 | 上海分所 | 电话: (86-21) 5298-5488 | 广州分所 | 电话: (86-20) 2805-9088 | 深圳分所 | 电话: (86-755) 2939-5288 | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | | 传真: (86-10) 8519-1350 | | 传真: (86-21) 5298-5492 | | 传真: (86-20) 2805-9099 | | 传真: (86-755) 2939-5289 | | 杭州分所 | 电话: (86-571) 2689-8188 | 成都分所 | 电话: (86-28) 6739-8000 | 西安分所 | 电话: (86-29) 85 ...

证券代码：601111 证券简称：中国国航 关于中国国际航空股份有限公司 向特定对象发行股票申请文件的 审核问询函的回复 保荐人（主承销商） 广东省深圳市福田区中心三路8号卓越时代广场（二期）北座 上海证券交易所： 中国国际航空股份有限公司（以下简称"发行人""公司"或"中国国航"） 于 2026 年 1 月 9 日收到上海证券交易所（以下简称"上交所"）出具的《关于中 国国际航空股份有限公司向特定对象发行股票申请文件的审核问询函》（上证上 审（再融资）〔2026〕10 号），中信证券股份有限公司（以下简称"中信证券" 或"保荐人"）作为公司本次向特定对象发行股票的保荐人（主承销商），会同发 行人及发行人律师北京市君合律师事务所（以下简称"发行人律师"）和申报会 计师德勤华永会计师事务所（特殊普通合伙）（以下简称"申报会计师"）等相关 方，本着勤勉尽责、诚实守信的原则，就审核问询函所列示的问题逐项进行了核 查、落实和认真讨论，现回复如下，请予审核。 本审核问询函回复中的字体代表以下含义： | 黑体 | 审核问询函所列问题 | | --- | --- | | 宋体 | 对问询函所列问题的回复 | 本审核问询函回 ...