FF305 翌日披露報表 (股份發行人 ── 已發行股份或庫存股份變動、股份購回及/或在場内出售庫存股份) 表格類別： 股票 狀態： 新提交 公司名稱： 貝殼控股有限公司 呈交日期： 2025年4月29日 如上市發行人的已發行股份或庫存股份出現變動而須根據《香港聯合交易所有限公司（「香港聯交所」）證券上市規則》(「《主板上市規則》」)第13.25A條 / 《香港聯合交易所有限公司GEM證券 上市規則》(「《GEM上市規則》」)第17.27A條作出披露，必須填妥第一章節 。 | 第一章節 | | | | | | | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 1. 股份分類 | 不同投票權架構公司普通股 | 股份類別 A | | 於香港聯交所上市 | 是 | | | 證券代號 (如上市) | 02423 | 說明 | | | | | | A. 已發行股份或庫存股份變動 | | | | | | | | | | 已發行股份（不包括庫存股份）變動 | | 庫存股份變動 | | | | 事件 | | 已發行股份（不包括庫存股份）數 目 | 佔有關事件前的現有已發 行股份（ ...

Core Viewpoint - The article highlights the increasing complexity and risks in real estate transactions, emphasizing the need for improved service standards and consumer protection mechanisms in the industry [1][12][30]. Group 1: Consumer Protection and Service Standards - The establishment of a special service guarantee fund by Beike, with an annual scale of 100 million yuan, aims to resolve disputes arising during transactions [4][15]. - Beike has created a "platform-level service commitment" structured as "3+3," which includes six service commitments designed to enhance transaction safety and consumer protection [15][17]. - The platform's proactive approach to handling complaints and disputes has led to the formation of a compensation mechanism that prioritizes consumer rights while sharing the burden with brand partners [23][24]. Group 2: Risk Management and Transaction Safety - Beike has developed standardized transaction processes and management rules to mitigate risks associated with real estate transactions, including the identification of risk characteristics and the establishment of a city-level risk management organization [19][20]. - The use of technology, such as VR for property handover, enhances transparency and reduces disputes during the transaction process [26][27]. - The platform's dual-layered security measures, including the compensation mechanism and service commitments, aim to minimize potential losses and ensure safer transactions [20][32]. Group 3: Industry Evolution and Impact - Beike's initiatives reflect a shift from merely supervising agents to actively participating in transaction resolution, thereby enhancing the overall service quality in the real estate market [12][13][30]. - The company's efforts have contributed to a more trustworthy and efficient transaction environment, fostering collaboration between consumers and service providers [24][30]. - Beike's role as a facilitator of industry infrastructure development has been pivotal in transforming the competitive landscape of real estate services [31][32].

Core Viewpoint - The controversy surrounding the high executive salaries at Beike has intensified public scrutiny, particularly in light of the company's fluctuating profits and the significant income disparity between executives and employees [1][3][20]. Executive Compensation - Beike's CEO and major shareholder, Peng Yongdong, has a reported salary of 400 million RMB for 2024, while co-founder Shan Yigang earns 299 million RMB, which is significantly higher than typical executive compensation in other companies [1]. - Over the past four years, Peng's salary has increased from 8.478 million RMB to 400 million RMB, while Shan's has risen from 6.853 million RMB to 299 million RMB [1]. - The company's net profit has been volatile, with losses in 2021 and 2022, a recovery in 2023, but a projected decline of 30% in 2024 [1][20]. Public Reaction and Employee Concerns - The public's focus has shifted from executive salaries to the relationship between executive compensation, company profits, and employee wages, especially given that Beike employs nearly 500,000 agents with an average annual income of 74,200 RMB [3][9]. - The disparity in income is stark, with Peng's salary being approximately 5,399 times that of the average agent [3]. - Discussions around labor relations have been reignited, highlighting the need for better employee compensation and welfare [3][9]. Corporate Response - In an attempt to mitigate the backlash, Beike announced that Peng would donate 9 million shares, valued at approximately 440 million RMB, to support healthcare for industry workers and rental assistance for graduates [1][17]. - However, this gesture has not significantly alleviated public concern regarding the income gap and the company's treatment of its employees [3][9]. Business Performance and Strategy - Beike's revenue is primarily derived from five business segments, with the core business of existing home transactions seeing a decline in profit margin from 47.2% to 43.2% in 2024 [20][22]. - The company has been actively seeking new growth avenues, introducing a "one body, three wings" strategy to expand into home decoration and rental services, which contributed approximately 31.6 billion RMB in revenue, a 64.2% increase year-on-year [22]. - Despite these efforts, the overall profitability remains a concern, and the company faces pressure to stabilize both its financial performance and employee morale [22][23].

表格類別： 股票 狀態： 新提交 公司名稱： 貝殼控股有限公司 呈交日期： 2025年4月28日 FF305 翌日披露報表 (股份發行人 ── 已發行股份或庫存股份變動、股份購回及/或在場内出售庫存股份) 如上市發行人的已發行股份或庫存股份出現變動而須根據《香港聯合交易所有限公司（「香港聯交所」）證券上市規則》(「《主板上市規則》」)第13.25A條 / 《香港聯合交易所有限公司GEM證券 上市規則》(「《GEM上市規則》」)第17.27A條作出披露，必須填妥第一章節 。 | 第一章節 | | | | | | | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 1. 股份分類 | 不同投票權架構公司普通股 | 股份類別 A | | 於香港聯交所上市 | 是 | | | 證券代號 (如上市) | 02423 | 說明 | | | | | | A. 已發行股份或庫存股份變動 | | | | | | | | | | 已發行股份（不包括庫存股份）變動 | | 庫存股份變動 | | | | | 事件 | 已發行股份（不包括庫存股份）數 目 | 佔有關事件前的現有已發 行股份（ ...

Core Insights - The upcoming May Day holiday has prompted many real estate companies and agencies to launch new promotional activities [1] - Beike Shenzhen has officially initiated the "Beike New House Festival, May Day Shopping Spree" event, which will run from April 27 to May 5 [1] - The event aims to integrate platform resources and collaborate with well-known developers to provide multiple benefits for homebuyers [1] Promotional Activities - The promotional activities will cover the entire country and include various methods such as lotteries, red envelope rain, home purchase vouchers, exclusive discounts on JD appliances, and renovation subsidies [1] - Discounts can reach over one million yuan, directly addressing consumer needs [1] - Beike has selected over 500 quality special-priced homes in Shenzhen, including entry-level, upgraded residential, and school district properties, with unprecedented time-limited discounts [1] Service Commitment - Beike Shenzhen has previously announced the "B-end Peace of Mind Service Commitment," which covers key aspects such as commission settlement, advance payment efficiency, and reporting guarantees [1] - The commitment aims to create a positive, transparent, and secure working environment for service providers [1]

FF305 翌日披露報表 (股份發行人 ── 已發行股份或庫存股份變動、股份購回及/或在場内出售庫存股份) | 第一章節 | | | | | | | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 1. 股份分類 | 不同投票權架構公司普通股 | 股份類別 A | | 於香港聯交所上市 | 是 | | | 證券代號 (如上市) | 02423 | 說明 | | | | | | A. 已發行股份或庫存股份變動 | | | | | | | | | | 已發行股份（不包括庫存股份）變動 | | 庫存股份變動 | | | | 事件 | | 已發行股份（不包括庫存股份）數 目 | 佔有關事件前的現有已發 行股份（不包括庫存股 份）數目百分比 (註3) | 庫存股份數目 | 每股發行/出售價 (註4) | 已發行股份總數 | | 於下列日期開始時的結存(註1) | 2025年4月23日 | 3,477,710,889 | | 0 | | 3,477,710,889 | | 1). 其他 (請註明) | | | % | | | | | 見B部分 | | | | | | | | 變 ...

FF305 翌日披露報表 (股份發行人 ── 已發行股份或庫存股份變動、股份購回及/或在場内出售庫存股份) 表格類別： 股票 狀態： 新提交 公司名稱： 貝殼控股有限公司 呈交日期： 2025年4月24日 如上市發行人的已發行股份或庫存股份出現變動而須根據《香港聯合交易所有限公司（「香港聯交所」）證券上市規則》(「《主板上市規則》」)第13.25A條 / 《香港聯合交易所有限公司GEM證券 上市規則》(「《GEM上市規則》」)第17.27A條作出披露，必須填妥第一章節 。 | 第一章節 | | | | | | | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 1. 股份分類 | 不同投票權架構公司普通股 | 股份類別 A | | 於香港聯交所上市 | 是 | | | 證券代號 (如上市) | 02423 | 說明 | | | | | | A. 已發行股份或庫存股份變動 | | | | | | | | | | 已發行股份（不包括庫存股份）變動 | | 庫存股份變動 | | | | | 事件 | 已發行股份（不包括庫存股份）數 目 | 佔有關事件前的現有已發 行股份（ ...

今日，社交媒体流传着一张深圳贝壳内部发放的通知截图。截图内容显示，深圳贝壳内部发放通知，要 求全员在岗，别休息，准备迎接新刺激。并提到，上次接到这个通知是2024年9月底，也是深圳贝壳提 前收到消息，提前准备，内部要求全员戒备。对此，记者问询了贝壳官方，对方表示：关于网传"深圳 贝壳内部发了通知"截图，经内部核查，公司从未发过此类通知。(新浪科技) ...

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the potential risks of forced delisting of Chinese companies listed in the U.S. and restrictions on U.S. investments in Chinese assets, highlighting the historical context and possible implications for the market [1][2][3]. Group 1: Historical Context of Delisting and Investment Restrictions - The U.S. government previously initiated a delisting crisis for Chinese companies from 2020 to 2022 due to the HFCAA, which required companies to meet PCAOB audit standards [8][11]. - The crisis peaked when 150 Chinese companies were placed on a "pre-delisting" list, leading to an average stock price drop of 60% for 19 tracked companies [11][12]. - Although the delisting risk was mitigated through negotiations, some companies like China Mobile were still forced to delist during the tensions [12]. Group 2: Current Risks and Potential Impacts - Recent statements from U.S. officials suggest the possibility of using the forced delisting of Chinese companies as a negotiation tool, indicating a "black swan" risk that should not be ignored [2][3]. - The article outlines the potential impact on various Chinese companies if forced delisting or investment restrictions were to occur, emphasizing that the likelihood of such actions is currently low but not negligible [2][3]. Group 3: Company-Specific Analysis - A table lists various Chinese companies, their U.S. ticker symbols, market capitalization, and the percentage of shares held by U.S. investors, indicating varying levels of risk exposure [3]. - Companies like Pinduoduo and Didi, which are solely listed in the U.S., would face the most significant impact if delisted, while those with dual listings may experience less severe consequences [20][21]. Group 4: Comparison with Previous Delisting Crisis - The current delisting risk is perceived to be more uncertain than the previous crisis, as it may involve more significant political stakes and core interests [18][19]. - The dependency of Chinese companies on U.S. markets has decreased, with the average trading volume in Hong Kong rising from 10% to 34% since March 2022 [20][38]. Group 5: Response Strategies for Companies - Companies that have established dual listings can transition their shares to continue trading in Hong Kong without significant legal hurdles [23][39]. - For companies solely listed in the U.S., there is a pressing need to convert to a primary listing in Hong Kong before any potential delisting occurs [23][39]. Group 6: Broader Implications of Investment Restrictions - If the U.S. government expands restrictions on investments in Chinese companies, the impact would be more severe than a delisting, leading to permanent capital outflows and potential panic selling [27][28]. - The average U.S. investor ownership in tracked Chinese companies is approximately 39.9%, which could lead to significant market disruptions if restrictions are enacted [28][30].

自4月3日美国总统特朗普正式宣布"对等关税"以来，中美之间多次互相提高关税，目前双方相互加征的关税都已在100%以上。且随着贸易摩擦的升温，中美两国 之间的角力有着进一步向其他领域扩散的风险。 值得关注的是：① 近日美国财政部长曾表示， 不排除以在美上市的中概公司强制退市，作为两国间谈判的筹码之一；② 2月21日， 白宫发布了"America First Investment Policy"备忘录中，也提及了在一定情况下限制美国资金投资于部分中国公司/资产的可能性。 虽然上述两条潜在的风险截至目前仅停留在口头阶段，美国政府尚没有进行任何实质性的动作。但历史上，中概退市威胁并非没有先例： 2020年~2022年间美国政 府就曾以HFCAA法案下，无法获得中概上市公司的审计监管权的原因，正式推进过中概在美退市。 尽管后续中美两国政府达成了协议，中概从美股全面退市并没真正发生，但仍有中移动等公司在争端期间被美政府强制退市，后有如中国石油等在争端缓解后仍 主动选择退市。 由此可见，无论是 强制中概从美股退市、抑或禁止美国资金投资中国资产，虽然最终落地的概率应当非常小，但属于存在先例、不能视而不见的"黑天鹅"风险。 海 ...