Core Insights - The article discusses the safety claims and recent events surrounding the Chenglong truck brand, highlighting its long-standing history and commitment to safety [1][3]. Group 1: Company Background - Chenglong Truck, established in 1954, is a state-owned enterprise with a legacy of 71 years, claiming to have ensured the safety of over one million truck drivers over billions of kilometers [1]. Group 2: Recent Events - On July 29, during the launch of the Li Auto i8, a crash test video was shown that involved a collision with a Chenglong truck, which resulted in the truck's four wheels lifting off the ground [3]. - Chenglong Truck has responded to the incident for four consecutive days, emphasizing the context of the crash test [3]. - Both Li Auto and the testing organization, China Automotive Research, issued statements clarifying that the crash test was solely to validate the passive safety performance of the Li i8 and was not intended as a quality assessment of other brands [3].

Core Viewpoint - The collision test of the Li Auto i8 conducted by China Automotive Research (China汽研) is aimed solely at verifying the vehicle's safety and does not involve safety evaluations of other brands [1][5][6]. Group 1: Test Details - The test was designed based on typical traffic accident scenarios on ordinary roads, with a focus on high-frequency accident conditions [5][6]. - A second-hand Dongfeng Liuzhou brand truck was used as a mobile barrier for the test, which was randomly purchased from the market [1][5]. - The Li Auto i8 underwent inspection and verification before the test, and the mobile barrier truck was modified and weighted to 8 tons [5]. Group 2: Company Statements - Li Auto emphasized that the purpose of the test was to validate and enhance the passive safety performance of the i8, not to evaluate the quality of other brands [6]. - The company clarified that it does not intend to make quality assessments of the Dongfeng Liuzhou brand truck and that there is no direct competition between Li Auto and Dongfeng Liuzhou [6]. Group 3: Public Reaction and Controversy - Following the test, there was significant public attention, particularly regarding the identification of the truck brand involved in the collision [7][10]. - Dongfeng Liuzhou responded to the controversy by releasing their own collision test video, highlighting the safety features of their trucks [7][10]. - The truck brand's social media platforms received numerous comments from users expressing concerns about the safety implications of the test [10][12].

Core Viewpoint - The collision test between Li Auto's i8 and a Dongfeng Liuzhou Chaochai truck has sparked controversy, with both companies issuing statements to clarify the nature and purpose of the test [1][2][5][6]. Group 1: Test Details - The collision test involved the Li Auto i8, which was showcased at its launch event, where it collided with an 8-ton truck at a speed of 100 km/h [1]. - The truck used in the test was a second-hand vehicle randomly purchased from the market, serving as a mobile barrier for the test [2][5]. - The test was not a standard vehicle-to-vehicle collision test and did not evaluate the safety performance of other brands [2][5]. Group 2: Company Responses - China Automotive Engineering Research Institute (China Auto Research) stated that the test was designed to verify the safety of the Li Auto i8 and emphasized the need for objective and rational discourse in the industry [5]. - Li Auto clarified that the test aimed to demonstrate the safety efforts of the i8 and that the truck was not intended for quality evaluation, expressing regret over the unintended controversy involving the Dongfeng Liuzhou Chaochai brand [6]. - Li Auto highlighted that it focuses on family passenger vehicles and does not compete directly with Dongfeng Liuzhou Chaochai, which is recognized as a leading brand in the Chinese truck industry [6].

Group 1 - The core purpose of the crash test was to validate and enhance the passive safety performance of the Li Auto i8, emphasizing user safety as a top priority [3][4] - The test was conducted by a third-party authority, China Automotive Engineering Research Institute, ensuring scientific credibility and transparency in the results [4][5] - The innovative short front suspension safety structure of the Li Auto i8 effectively mitigated impact forces during the crash test, demonstrating strong passive safety features [5] Group 2 - The test aimed to simulate real-world collision scenarios, specifically addressing the concerns of passenger vehicle users regarding small car versus large vehicle collisions [4][6] - Li Auto clarified that the test was not intended to evaluate the quality of other brands, and the use of Dongfeng Liuzhou's truck was merely as a movable barrier [6] - The company expressed respect for Dongfeng Liuzhou as a leading brand in the truck industry and emphasized that there is no direct competition between the two [6] Group 3 - The Li Auto i8 was developed in accordance with the latest national standards and has undergone rigorous testing, achieving high ratings from authoritative third-party evaluations [7] - The company is committed to continuous innovation in automotive safety technology and aims to contribute to the overall improvement of safety standards in the Chinese automotive industry [7]

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the safety testing of the Li Auto i8, emphasizing the company's commitment to user safety and the transparency of the testing process conducted by a third-party authority, China Automotive Engineering Research Institute (China Automotive Research) [3][5][10]. Group 1: Purpose of the Test - Li Auto prioritizes user safety and aims to create a secure travel environment for families, which led to the decision to conduct collision tests to validate the passive safety performance of the Li i8 [3][5]. - The testing was designed to simulate real-life collision scenarios, particularly the risks associated with smaller vehicles colliding with larger ones, a common concern among consumers [3][5]. Group 2: Test Performance - The collision test was executed by China Automotive Research, a reputable state-owned enterprise, ensuring the scientific authority of the results [5][10]. - The Li i8's innovative short front suspension safety structure effectively absorbed impact forces, with no significant deformation observed in critical structural components such as the A, B, and C pillars, and all nine airbags deployed correctly [5][11]. Group 3: Public Reaction and Clarifications - The test aimed solely to enhance the safety performance of the Li i8 and was not intended to evaluate other brands, clarifying that the used Dongfeng Liuzhou truck was merely a movable barrier [6][10]. - Li Auto emphasized that there is no direct competition with Dongfeng Liuzhou, as they focus on passenger vehicles while Dongfeng is a leader in the truck sector [6][10]. Group 4: Compliance with Standards - The Li i8 was developed in accordance with the latest national standards for vehicle safety, including GB11551-2014 and GB20071-2025, and has undergone over 100 internal tests to ensure compliance with safety regulations [7][10].

理想汽车新车上市发布会上，一段"理想i8对撞乘龙卡车致后者四轮弹起"的测试视频持续引发热议。该视频引发部分网友对被撞的乘龙卡车质量的质疑。 对此，8月3日晚，理想汽车回应称，"无意、也没有对其做出质量方面的引导性评价。导致东风柳汽乘龙品牌被意外卷入舆情争议，实属无心之举。"乘龙 卡车则已回应此事，并连续推送有关自身品牌车辆安全性能的文章。 涉事视频画面显示，在"正面对撞（100公里/小时）测试"时，理想i8和重卡正面对撞时，重卡四个车轮弹起，驾驶室几乎倒在理想i8的前车窗上。理想汽 车发布的视频画面上配字为："A柱、B柱、C柱、门梁均无变形"。 理想汽车发布的测试视频截图。 ▊阅读更多（戳下方标题） 点击图片阅读 深夜警情通报! 嫌疑人（男，29岁）在逃 ） 24.07.2025 СКОРБИМ С 点击图片阅读 金部遇难 a Ca 中国公民身份确认 点击图片阅读 知名男演员的 或暂别演艺圈 南都N视频记者注意到，随后几日，该账号连续发布了题为《乘龙卡友说 | 用户刘师傅：乘龙龙骨结构，关键时刻能救命》《活着，才有资格谈理想》 《硬核实力，可靠品质——乘龙车型B10寿命性能可靠为安全运输保驾护航》《龙的脊梁， ...

对于近期理想i8与乘龙卡车安全性碰撞测试引发的争议，理想汽车和中国汽研正式作出公开回应。 关于此次事件的舆论影响，理想汽车表示，本次测试目的只是为了验证和提升理想i8的被动安全性能， 并非针对其他任何品牌进行产品质量评价，测试结果也不应被解读为对其他品牌产品质量的论断。测试 所用东风柳汽乘龙品牌二手卡车仅作为移动式壁障物。 8月3日晚，理想汽车官博发布《关于理想i8安全性碰撞测试的说明》称，本次测试参照普通公路高频发 生的交通事故情形制定测试要求，委托中国汽研执行。中国汽研作为国资央企、国家一类科研院所，是 中国汽车行业产品开发、试验研究、质量检测的重要平台。理想汽车高度认可中国汽研的专业能力和测 试公正性，坚信其碰撞测试的数据和结果具有科学权威性。 测试结束后,理想i8 的乘员舱无明显变形,气囊展开正 常、电池包无漏液无起火、车门自动解锁、门把手自动弹开。 移动式壁障车经高强度碰撞后,驾驶室结构未发生明显变形、 整体结构完整、车门可以正常打开。 "我们无意、也没有对其做出质量方面的引导性评价。对于测试过程导致东风柳汽乘龙品牌被意外卷入 舆情争议，我们实属无心之举。"理想汽车还特别澄清，理想汽车与东风柳汽乘龙 ...

企业依据中国典型交通事故普通公路场景下的事故形态制定测试大纲，由中国汽研试验团队执行。根据 搭建交通事故场景的需要，仅以卡车整备质量作为选择标准，在市场端随机购买了二手卡车作为移动式 壁障车。 中国汽研倡议行业、媒体和公众平台客观理性，共同维护行业生态，维护网络清朗。同时，中国汽研将 保留对恶意解读、误导传播的平台和个人媒体的法律、声誉的追诉权。 回顾此次事件，7月29日，理想汽车发布首款纯电SUV理想i8，并在发布会上播放了该车型的重卡连环 撞击测试视频。视频显示，理想i8以61公里/小时的速度刮底刚性障碍物，电池包底护板结构完整；另 外，在100公里/小时的正面对撞和侧面碰撞重卡测试后，A柱、B柱、C柱、门梁均无变形，9个气囊全 部打开，电池包无漏液、无起火，车门自动解锁、门把手自动弹开。而在正面对撞测试中，重卡四个车 轮弹起，驾驶室与货箱分离，这一画面引发轩然大波。 此次测试视频发布后，由于碰撞的重卡车型方向盘一开始未打码，网友很快发现该卡车品牌为乘龙卡 车，视频中重卡碰撞后的惨状引发网友对其安全性的质疑。7月30日下午，乘龙卡车工作人员称，乘龙 卡车始终坚守品质至上与安全第一的理念，每一辆出厂的车辆都 ...

Group 1 - The core message of the news is that Li Auto clarifies the purpose of its collision test involving the Dongfeng Liuzhou Motor brand used trucks, emphasizing that it was not intended to evaluate the quality of other brands [1][3] - Li Auto aims to address misunderstandings and misinterpretations arising from the test process, asserting that it does not have a direct competitive relationship with Dongfeng Liuzhou Motor [1][3] - The test was conducted solely to verify and enhance the passive safety performance of the Li Auto i8, and the results should not be interpreted as judgments on the quality of other brands [3] Group 2 - Zhang Xiang, Secretary-General of the International Intelligent Transport Technology Association, commented that the collision video presented by Li Auto lacks significance due to the absence of national standards [1]

Core Viewpoint - The company emphasizes the importance of user safety and has conducted a collision safety test for the Li Auto i8 to validate and enhance its passive safety performance [1] Group 1: Purpose of the Test - The company prioritizes user safety and aims to create a secure travel environment for families, utilizing a "short front suspension safety structure" in the i8 design to balance spaciousness and passive safety [1] - The collision test was commissioned to a third-party authority, China Automotive Engineering Research Institute, to scientifically verify the safety of the i8 [1] - The test simulates real-life collision scenarios, particularly the critical "small car vs. large truck" situation, which is a major concern for consumers [1] Group 2: Test Performance - The i8's innovative safety structure includes three longitudinal force transmission paths and 11 energy-absorbing structures in the front compartment, effectively mitigating impact forces [1] - During the test, the A, B, and C pillars, as well as the door beams, showed no significant deformation, and all nine airbags deployed correctly, indicating high safety standards [1] - The battery pack remained leak-free and did not catch fire, and the doors automatically unlocked, showcasing the vehicle's safety features [1] Group 3: Public Response and Clarifications - The test aimed solely to validate the i8's safety and was not intended to evaluate other brands, clarifying that the used truck was merely a mobile barrier [1] - The company acknowledges the unintended controversy surrounding the truck brand involved in the test and emphasizes that there is no direct competition between the two [1] - The i8 was developed in accordance with the latest national standards and has received top evaluations from authoritative third-party tests, reinforcing confidence in its safety [1] Group 4: Industry Commitment - The company expresses confidence in the overall safety development level of the automotive industry and commits to continuous innovation in automotive safety technology [1] - The company aims to contribute to a fair and orderly industry environment and promote high-quality development in the Chinese automotive sector [1]