Core Viewpoint - Hong Kong Mortgage Corporation Limited reported a significant increase in its unaudited consolidated profit after tax for the first half of 2025, reaching HKD 53.3 million, compared to HKD 9 million in the same period of 2024, driven by various factors including increased foreign exchange returns and net interest income [1] Financial Performance Summary - The adjusted profit after tax for the first half of 2025, excluding the performance of its wholly-owned subsidiary Hong Kong Annuity Limited and other adjustments, was HKD 874 million, with an annualized return on equity of 6.2% and a cost-to-income ratio of 14.2%, compared to HKD 468 million, 6.2%, and 22.4% respectively in the first half of 2024 [2] - As of June 30, 2025, the embedded value of the annuity business was approximately HKD 21.6 billion, comprising total equity of HKD 18.5 billion and the present value of future profits of HKD 3.1 billion, indicating a robust financial position to support long-term development [2] Capital Adequacy and Risk Management - The capital adequacy ratio for Hong Kong Mortgage Corporation as of June 30, 2025, was 18.7%, down from 19.9% at the end of 2024, remaining well above the minimum requirement of 8% set by the Financial Secretary [3] - The solvency ratios for Hong Kong Annuity Company and Hong Kong Mortgage Insurance Company were approximately 2.2 times and 3.7 times respectively, both significantly exceeding the regulatory minimum requirements [3] - In response to an uncertain market environment, the company has adopted a prudent financing strategy and is actively communicating with local and international investment sectors regarding bond issuance to support large loan purchases and refinancing needs [3]

近日，农业银行、光大银行等多家银行纷纷发行"二永债"（二级资本债、永续债）。数据显示，截至9 月24日，我国商业银行年内已发行二永债总金额达1.24万亿元。其中，国有大行发行"二永债"总额为 6950亿元，为发行二永债的"主力军"。二季度以来，或受资本充足率压力较大影响，中小银行发行节奏 明显加快，发行规模显著增长。成都银行（601838）、日照银行、莱商银行等9家中小银行均在8月完成 了"二永债"发行。 募集资金，提高资本充足率 9月19日，农业银行（601288）发布公告称，经相关监管机构批准，该行在全国银行间债券市场发行"中 国农业银行股份有限公司2025年二级资本债券（第三期）（债券通）"。本期债券发行总规模为人民币 600亿元，分为两个品种。其中品种一为10年期固定利率债券，发行规模为人民币350亿元，票面利率为 2.18%，在第5年末附有条件的发行人赎回权；品种二为15年期固定利率债券，发行规模为人民币250亿 元，票面利率为2.50%，在第10年末附有条件的发行人赎回权。 9月16日，光大银行（601818）在全国银行间债券市场成功簿记发行2025年无固定期限资本债券（第一 期），发行规模400 ...

Core Viewpoint - Shanghai Pudong Development Bank (SPDB) has entered a growth phase in its revenue for the first half of the year, primarily driven by a significant increase in investment income within non-interest income, alongside a slight growth in net interest income, reversing the declining trend of previous years [1][3]. Revenue Growth - In the first half of the year, SPDB achieved operating revenue of 90.559 billion yuan, a year-on-year increase of 2.62%, with Q1 and Q2 revenues of 45.922 billion yuan and 44.637 billion yuan, respectively, reflecting growth rates of 1.31% and 4% [3]. - The slight increase in net interest income is notable, as the bank has faced challenges with narrowing interest margins, with the net interest margin decreasing from 2.02% in 2020 to 1.41% in the first half of this year [3][4]. - Interest income for the first half was 134.089 billion yuan, down 8.09% year-on-year, while interest expenses decreased by 13.73%, leading to a key growth in net interest income [3][5]. Non-Interest Income Performance - Non-interest income showed improvement, with a total of 32.252 billion yuan in the first half, an increase of 6.79% year-on-year, outperforming net interest income [6]. - Investment income significantly contributed to this growth, amounting to 14.998 billion yuan, a year-on-year increase of 79.41 billion yuan [6][7]. Profit Growth - SPDB reported a net profit attributable to shareholders of 29.737 billion yuan for the first half, a year-on-year increase of 10.19%, with Q1 and Q2 profits of 17.598 billion yuan and 12.139 billion yuan, respectively [8]. - The bank's credit impairment losses decreased slightly, while losses from loans and advances increased, indicating a focus on managing non-performing loans [8][10]. Loan Quality and Risks - Overall loan quality has improved, with non-performing loans decreasing from 784.61 billion yuan to 731.54 billion yuan over the past few years, although there has been a rise in non-performing loans in the real estate sector [17][20]. - Non-performing loans in the real estate sector reached 14.744 billion yuan, up from 9.925 billion yuan at the beginning of the year, indicating a need for heightened attention [20][22]. Capital and Debt Management - SPDB's capital adequacy ratios have improved, with the capital adequacy ratio, tier 1 capital ratio, and core tier 1 capital ratio at 13.55%, 10.38%, and 8.91%, respectively, as of the end of the reporting period [12]. - The bank has issued multiple bonds to strengthen its capital base, including a 30 billion yuan bond and a 15 billion yuan technology innovation bond [12][14]. Compliance and Internal Control - The bank has faced several penalties related to loan management, highlighting weaknesses in internal controls that need to be addressed [27][29]. - SPDB is focusing on compliance and risk management, implementing measures to enhance internal controls and training for employees [29].

Summary of Conference Call Notes Industry Overview - The notes primarily discuss the fixed income market, particularly focusing on the issuance of long-term bonds in 2025, which is expected to be substantial with an average maturity exceeding 15 years, increasing market pressure [1][2][10]. Key Points and Arguments 1. **Market Pressure from Long-term Bond Issuance** The issuance of long-term bonds is significant, with an average maturity of over 15 years, leading to increased market pressure and limiting the buying capacity of various institutions [1][2][10]. 2. **Impact on City and Rural Commercial Banks** City and rural commercial banks are experiencing reduced funding due to lower deposit rates, which has shifted funds to larger banks and non-bank institutions, limiting their ability to purchase bonds [2][5]. 3. **Insurance Institutions' Shift in Strategy** Insurance institutions are reallocating funds to the stock market in search of higher returns due to a decrease in preset interest rates, resulting in a reduced allocation to long-term bonds [1][5]. 4. **Regulatory Pressure on Large Banks** Large banks are required to conduct stress tests to ensure that their interest rate risk does not exceed 15% of their Tier 1 capital, which limits their ability to absorb long-term bonds [4][6][7]. 5. **Duration Mismatch and Interest Rate Risk** The significant issuance of long-term bonds has led to duration mismatches for large banks, increasing their long-term interest rate risk and limiting their capacity to hold these bonds indefinitely [4][7]. 6. **Short-term Bonds as a Risk Mitigation Strategy** While purchasing short-term bonds can reduce average duration, it does not effectively lower total interest rate risk. The focus should be on total holding size rather than just duration [8]. 7. **Fund Selling Pressure** Funds are the primary sellers of long-term and ultra-long-term bonds due to fee reforms, prior duration extension behaviors, and redemptions of mixed products, which could further release interest rate risk [11]. 8. **Potential Market Issues** If the current market conditions persist, there could be significant issues, particularly with ultra-long bonds, as they concentrate interest rate risk. Solutions include reducing the issuance of ultra-long bonds or increasing market demand for long-term products [12]. 9. **Future Issuance Plans** The issuance plans for ultra-long bonds are closely tied to project funding and are unlikely to change despite market absorption capacity issues. Adjustments in issuance pace may occur, but overall supply and maturity structure are expected to remain stable [13]. 10. **Bank Capital Supplementation** Addressing bank capital to manage interest rate risk is a long-term planning issue, with options including ownership increases or issuing secondary bonds, which may further increase market supply [14]. 11. **Central Bank's Role** Direct purchases of ultra-long bonds by the central bank are not seen as a viable solution for managing interest rate risk due to existing liquidity management constraints [15]. 12. **Market Sentiment** The bond market should not be viewed as simply bullish or bearish; rather, it should be assessed based on the participation of configuration plates. Current conditions suggest a challenging environment for long-term bonds [16]. 13. **Configuration Value of Ultra-long Bonds** The configuration value of ultra-long bonds is uncertain, particularly for 30-year bonds, as there is no clear demand for them at present [17]. 14. **Asset-Liability Gap Concerns** Recent announcements regarding significant repurchase operations indicate banks' attempts to stabilize metrics, but this may not lead to a decrease in deposit rates [18]. 15. **Investment Strategy Adjustments** The recommended investment strategy is to maintain low leverage and adopt a barbell structure, focusing on short-term instruments and specific mid-term bonds while being cautious with long-term positions [19]. Other Important Content - The notes highlight the importance of monitoring total holding sizes and the implications of regulatory requirements on banks' bond purchasing strategies, emphasizing a cautious approach in the current market environment [1][4][6][8].

| | □分析师会议 特定对象调研 | | --- | --- | | 投资者关系活动类 | □媒体采访 □业绩说明会 | | 别 | □新闻发布会 □路演活动 | | | □现场参观 | | | □其他（请文字说明其他活动内容） | | | 调研人员：申万宏源林颖颖，HAO CAPITAL 王倬然 | | 活动参与人员 | 上市公司接待人员：董事会秘书朱敏军、计划财务部总经 | | | 理助理沈若弢及风险管理部和董事会办公室相关人员 | | 时间 | 2025 年 9 月 15 日 | | 地点 | 苏州银行总行 楼 12 | | 形式 | 电话会议 | | | 主要就苏州银行相关经营情况进行了交流，以下为投 | | | 资者问询及简要回复情况记录： | | | 1、贵行全年存款付息成本如何展望？ | | | 答：今年上半年，存款平均付息率 1.80%，较上年改善 | | | 29 个 BP，存款成本改善取得了较好成效。后续，本行将继 | | | 续紧跟市场利率走势，不断优化存款结构，持续改善全行 | | | 存款付息成本，推动存款规模与质量的较好发展。 | | | 2、近年来苏州银行保持较快的资产规模增 ...

Group 1: Profitability and Business Performance - Chengdu Bank reported a revenue of 12.27 billion yuan, a year-on-year increase of 5.91%, and a net profit of 6.62 billion yuan, up 7.29% year-on-year, indicating positive growth but a significant slowdown compared to previous years [4][5] - The net profit growth rate of 7.29% is notably lower than the double-digit growth seen in some peer banks, reflecting insufficient momentum in profitability [4][5] - The bank's net income from fees and commissions dropped sharply by 45% year-on-year to 250 million yuan, primarily due to a decrease in wealth management fees, highlighting challenges in its intermediary business [4][5] Group 2: Asset Quality and Risk Exposure - Chengdu Bank's non-performing loan (NPL) ratio remained stable at 0.66%, but the provision coverage ratio fell by 26.64 percentage points to 452.65%, indicating increased asset quality pressure [7][9] - The NPL rates in specific sectors such as real estate and wholesale retail have risen, with the real estate NPL rate at 2.44%, up 29 basis points, and the wholesale retail NPL rate at 2.09%, up 32 basis points [7][8] - The total overdue loans increased significantly to 6.40 billion yuan from 5.22 billion yuan at the end of the previous year, with various overdue categories showing growth, indicating escalating credit risk [9][12] Group 3: Capital Adequacy and Regulatory Challenges - The core tier one capital adequacy ratio decreased to 8.61%, down 0.45 percentage points from the end of 2024, while the overall capital adequacy ratio fell to 13.13%, down 0.75 percentage points [13][14] - Despite meeting regulatory minimum requirements, the declining trend in capital adequacy ratios raises concerns, especially in a challenging risk management environment [13][14] - Chengdu Bank received a regulatory warning in January 2025 for deficiencies in its fund sales business, reflecting weaknesses in internal controls and compliance management [14][15]

Group 1 - The core point of the announcement is that China Construction Bank's wholly-owned subsidiary, CCB Financial Leasing Co., Ltd., plans to increase its capital by RMB 3 billion to CCB Shipping and Aviation Financial Leasing Co., Ltd. [1][2] - The capital increase has undergone necessary internal decision-making procedures and does not require approval from the board of directors or shareholders' meeting [2][3] - This capital increase is not classified as a related party transaction or a major asset restructuring [3] Group 2 - CCB Shipping and Aviation is a wholly-owned subsidiary established in Hong Kong, primarily engaged in aircraft and ship financing leasing business, as well as the transfer and acquisition of financing leasing assets [4] - After the capital increase, the registered capital of CCB Shipping and Aviation will be USD 300 million and RMB 3 billion [5] - The purpose of this capital increase is to meet regulatory capital adequacy requirements, enhance the risk absorption capacity of the specialized subsidiary, and further strengthen the service to the group's strategy [6]

Core Viewpoint - China Construction Bank (601939) announced that its wholly-owned subsidiary, CCB Financial Leasing Co., Ltd. (referred to as CCB Financial Leasing), plans to increase its capital by 3 billion yuan to CCB Shipping and Aviation Financial Leasing Co., Ltd. (referred to as CCB Shipping and Aviation) [1] Group 1 - CCB Shipping and Aviation is a wholly-owned subsidiary established by CCB Financial Leasing in Hong Kong, primarily engaged in aircraft and vessel financing leasing business, as well as the transfer and acquisition of financing leasing assets related to aircraft and vessels [1] - The capital increase aims to meet regulatory requirements for capital adequacy ratio, which will help enhance the risk absorption capacity of the specialized subsidiary [1]

Group 1 - The core point of the article is that China Construction Bank (601939.SH) announced a capital increase of 3 billion yuan to its wholly-owned subsidiary, CCB Financial Leasing Co., Ltd. (建信金租), for its subsidiary CCB Shipping and Aviation Financial Leasing Co., Ltd. (建信航运航空) [1] - The capital increase aims to meet regulatory requirements for capital adequacy and enhance the risk absorption capacity of the specialized subsidiary [1] - CCB Shipping and Aviation is a wholly-owned subsidiary established by CCB Financial Leasing in Hong Kong, primarily engaged in aircraft and vessel financing leasing business, as well as the transfer and acquisition of financing leasing assets related to aircraft and vessels [1]

Core Insights - The banking sector in A-shares is characterized by "stable total, optimized structure, and regional differentiation" under the dual pressures of insufficient effective credit demand and continuous narrowing of net interest margins [1][2] Credit Growth and Regional Differentiation - Despite a slowdown in overall credit growth due to weak macroeconomic recovery, nine city commercial banks achieved double-digit loan growth, with notable performances from Xi'an Bank, Jiangsu Bank, Chongqing Bank, Ningbo Bank, and Chengdu Bank [2][4] - The total loan amount of listed banks increased by 7.98% year-on-year, with an increment of 10.2 trillion yuan, where corporate loans contributed 84.6% of the increase, highlighting the weakness in retail loan demand [3][5] Loan Quality and Asset Quality - The overall non-performing loan (NPL) ratio for listed banks remained stable at 1.23%, with corporate loan NPL ratios improving, while personal loans, especially business and housing loans, faced rising risks [6][7] - City commercial banks exhibited the lowest corporate NPL ratio at 0.76%, while state-owned banks had the highest at 1.35%, although they showed improvement [6] Net Interest Margin and Profitability - The banking sector's overall net interest margin was 1.39%, down 13 basis points year-on-year, with state-owned banks experiencing the largest decline [5][6] - Despite the expansion of credit scale, the continuous decline in net interest margins is constraining banks' profitability, with some banks facing capital adequacy pressure [7] Future Outlook - Analysts predict that with continued adjustments in LPR and housing loan rates, banks may experience further narrowing of interest margins by 5 to 10 basis points, while quality regional banks are expected to benefit from financing demands in infrastructure, manufacturing, and green transitions [7]