盘锦市网约送餐行业工会联合会主席接振艳介绍，盘锦外卖骑手所在行业用工结构复杂，劳动关系认定 难、事故理赔难、权益保障难等问题长期存在。行业工会调研发现，骑手的法律需求集中在交通事故、 伤残赔偿、劳动报酬等5大类。为此，行业工会在盘锦市总工会的指导下成立劳动法律监督部，整合公 司法务、安全经理、保险公司等力量，建立"事故应急响应微信群"，实现第一时间介入、多方联动处 置。 面对不同类型纠纷，行业工会实施精准化援助模式。针对小额自摔事故，推动加盟商建立"一次性和 解"机制，将理赔周期从7天到15天压缩至24小时内，全年处理16起案件，累计赔付1万余元。针对三方 责任事故，创新"双重对接"，即对接对方保险公司和平台保险公司的机制，全年处理5起案件，累计理 赔7万余元，平均周期缩短至10天。针对重伤骑手，建立"伤残筛查+全程代办"机制，全年协助完成伤残 鉴定14起，申请补助金45万余元。 此外，行业工会坚持"维权与预防并重"，推动"算法+用工"双规范，督促平台明确最低报酬、超时免责 等条款，联合开展"新业态用工体检"，从源头减少纠纷。实行"一站式接收、一揽子调处"调解模式，调 解成功率达95%以上。 （来源：工人日报 ...

Core Viewpoint - The implementation of the new national standard for electric bicycles and the basic requirements for delivery platforms aims to enhance rider safety while raising concerns about potential income reductions for over 10 million delivery riders in China [1][2][3]. Group 1: New Regulations and Their Implications - The new national standard (GB 17761—2024) limits the maximum speed of electric bicycles to 25 km/h, while the basic requirements mandate an average speed of no more than 15 km/h for deliveries [7][8]. - The regulations are seen as necessary adjustments to improve rider safety, addressing the high incidence of traffic accidents in the delivery industry [5][4]. - Riders express support for the new regulations but emphasize the need for systemic changes in delivery rules, pricing structures, and assessment standards to ensure their income is not adversely affected [8][21]. Group 2: Impact on Riders' Income - Riders like Wang Wei estimate that limiting speed to 25 km/h could reduce their daily order volume by one-third, potentially halving their income [12][20]. - The current income model is under pressure, with many riders feeling that the delivery fees have decreased over time, exacerbating their financial concerns [20][19]. - The industry is characterized by intense competition, with platforms focusing on cost-cutting and speed, which may not align with the new safety regulations [17][18]. Group 3: Industry Dynamics and Future Outlook - The delivery industry is undergoing a transformation, with a shift from a focus on speed and low prices to a more balanced approach that includes safety and service quality [22]. - The new regulations are intended to address issues such as "ghost deliveries" and inadequate rider rights, promoting a healthier industry ecosystem [21][22]. - However, there is skepticism about the platforms' willingness to implement substantial changes, as many have yet to take significant action following the announcement of the new standards [23][24].

Group 1 - The new national standard for food delivery platforms aims to protect the rights of delivery personnel by regulating working hours, rest rights, and optimizing dispatch algorithms [2] - Delivery personnel are required to work no more than 8 hours a day, with platforms needing to issue a confirmation prompt for continued orders after this limit [2] - If delivery personnel work continuously for more than 4 hours, platforms must issue a fatigue alert and pause order dispatch for at least 20 minutes [2] Group 2 - The new standard mandates that delivery personnel should have at least one day of rest per week, which cannot be forced by platforms or employers [2] - Platforms are prohibited from implementing mandatory scheduling or performance assessments based on order volume for those not fully classified as employees [3] - The standard balances the calculation of delivery times with actual delivery durations, requiring platforms to monitor and manage unsafe driving behaviors [3]

Core Points - The article highlights the story of Liu Zhuang, a delivery rider in Beijing, who has made significant contributions to his community through blood donation and support for fellow riders [2][3][4] - Liu Zhuang's journey from a soldier to a delivery rider reflects his desire for freedom and his commitment to helping others [2][3][4][6] - The establishment of the "Xiao Ai" rest station for riders in Chaoyang District is a direct result of Liu's advocacy, providing a supportive environment for delivery workers [5][21] Group 1: Personal Background and Contributions - Liu Zhuang, a former soldier, transitioned to various jobs before becoming a delivery rider, motivated by a desire for freedom and enjoyment [2][3][4] - He has donated blood multiple times and made a notable contribution by donating hematopoietic stem cells to a child with blood disease, which he describes as a life-changing experience [8][12][14] - Liu Zhuang actively shares his experiences and knowledge with new riders, earning their respect and affection, and is affectionately called "Zhuang Ge" [6][7][21] Group 2: Community Impact and Initiatives - Liu Zhuang's efforts led to the creation of a rest station for delivery riders, which offers essential amenities and a comfortable space for them to relax [5][21] - He has become a representative for riders, voicing their concerns and challenges to improve their working conditions [21] - His online posts sharing experiences and tips for delivery riders have gained popularity, fostering a sense of community and encouraging others to contribute positively [16][17][21]

算法优化本质上是企业自主行为，其出发点和边界仍受商业逻辑制约。这种内在局限性决定了仅靠算法 难以全面保障骑手权益，还应强化制度保障。一方面，应持续完善算法设计，结合骑手个体差异与实际 需求优化机制；另一方面，应加大相关法律法规的执行力度，细化配套措施与实施细则。同时，还应加 强政府监管、行业自律与社会监督，推动构建多元共治格局。 "防疲劳"机制是保障骑手休息权的有益尝试，其有效性有赖于骑手的参与和认同。在后续完善时，应赋 予骑手更多话语权，在保障骑手安全的基础上充分尊重劳动自主性。我们乐见算法优化推动管理进步， 更应持续探索、系统推进，通过更多精细化举措进一步织密骑手权益保障网。 近期，外卖平台骑手"防疲劳"机制在全国主要城市陆续上线。该机制通过弹窗提醒、强制下线等方式， 对长时间工作的骑手进行提醒与约束，着力缓解疲劳跑单问题。 例如，美团规定骑手连续工作满8小时将触发休息提醒，满12小时将强制下线；饿了么则将每日累计配 送时间限制在11小时以内。设置工作时长预警、优化派单逻辑、改进评价体系……以技术手段引导骑手 平衡好工作和健康，表明平台企业正将骑手权益保障纳入重要议程。 从单纯追求配送效率到兼顾骑手工作状 ...

Core Points - The "block malicious customers" feature for Meituan delivery riders has been fully launched nationwide, allowing riders to block up to 2 users for a period of 365 days [1][3] - This feature was developed in response to strong demands from riders for a sense of fairness and respect, as highlighted in discussions earlier this year [1] - Riders can submit evidence such as recordings, videos, or chat logs to block users who engage in inappropriate behavior, ensuring they do not receive orders from those users for one year [1][3] Summary by Categories - **Feature Implementation** - The "block malicious customers" feature is now available across the country, allowing riders to block up to 2 users for 365 days [1][3] - The system will automatically match other riders to ensure order delivery is not affected, even if a rider blocks a user [1] - **Rider Support and Feedback** - The feature was introduced following strong feedback from riders regarding their need for more control and respect in their work environment [1] - Experts suggested increasing riders' decision-making power and improving their rights [1] - **Evidence Submission Process** - Riders can provide evidence of inappropriate behavior, such as recordings or chat logs, to support their request to block a user [1][3] - The blocking period lasts for one year, after which the block is automatically lifted, but riders can adjust their block list at any time [1]

Core Points - Meituan has launched a "block malicious users" feature in its delivery rider app to enhance rider safety and experience [1] Group 1: Feature Overview - The new feature allows riders to block users who engage in inappropriate behavior such as harassment or requesting personal information [1] - Riders can submit evidence like audio recordings, videos, or chat logs to support their request for blocking a user [1] - Each rider can block up to 2 users for a period of 365 days, after which the block is automatically lifted [1] Group 2: User Experience Considerations - The system ensures that even if a rider blocks a user, other riders will be automatically matched to fulfill the order, maintaining service continuity [1]

Core Viewpoint - The delivery industry is undergoing significant changes due to increased regulatory scrutiny, leading to improved conditions for delivery riders and a shift in management practices among major platforms [1][4][5]. Group 1: Regulatory Changes and Industry Response - Major delivery platforms, including Meituan, JD.com, and Ele.me, have announced the cancellation of late delivery penalties, replacing them with a service score management system [4][5]. - The regulatory environment has prompted these platforms to respond quickly to concerns about rider welfare and safety, indicating a shift from punitive measures to more supportive management practices [1][4][6]. - The National Market Regulatory Administration has been actively engaging with major platforms to address issues of unfair competition and to promote a more orderly development of the industry [5][6][7]. Group 2: Impact on Delivery Riders - The rights and welfare of delivery riders have become a focal point of public concern, with recent initiatives aimed at improving their working conditions, such as the introduction of full social security contributions by JD.com [3][4]. - The recent rumors about collective actions by riders were debunked by Meituan, which emphasized that these claims were fabricated and detrimental to the rider community's image [2][4]. - Platforms are exploring new ways to enhance rider autonomy and satisfaction, such as allowing riders to block problematic users and implementing flexible delivery timeframes [5][6]. Group 3: Future Directions and Industry Standards - The draft of the "Basic Requirements for Delivery Platform Services" aims to establish new industry standards, focusing on service quality, merchant support, and rider rights [7]. - The ongoing changes reflect a broader trend towards creating a balanced ecosystem that benefits consumers, merchants, riders, and platforms alike [7].

Core Points - The article discusses the evolving rights and protections for delivery riders in the food delivery sector compared to the stagnant situation for express delivery workers [3][12] - Recent initiatives by companies like Meituan, JD.com, and Ele.me include the cancellation of late penalties and the introduction of a service score management system for riders [1][3] - The express delivery industry faces systemic issues, including a problematic "complaint" culture that penalizes delivery workers for customer inquiries or order cancellations [4][7] Group 1: Rights and Protections for Delivery Workers - Food delivery companies have implemented measures to improve rider rights, such as eliminating cash penalties for late deliveries and introducing a service score system [1][3] - Meituan has also trialed features allowing riders to evaluate customers and block abusive users, enhancing rider protection [1] - In contrast, express delivery workers continue to face significant challenges, with their rights and protections lagging behind those of food delivery riders [3] Group 2: Issues in the Express Delivery Sector - The express delivery industry operates under a "complaint culture," where any customer inquiry is often treated as a complaint against the delivery worker, leading to confusion and unfair penalties [4][5][7] - This culture is prevalent across multiple express delivery companies, creating a systemic issue that affects both workers and consumers [5][7] - The reliance on fines as a management tool in the express delivery sector has led to a situation where penalties are used for revenue generation rather than service improvement [8][10] Group 3: Management Practices and Economic Pressures - The express delivery industry heavily relies on a franchise model, which has resulted in a management approach that shifts operational risks and costs onto delivery workers [8][10] - Companies like SF Express, despite being direct-operated, are increasingly outsourcing labor, leading to rising costs and continued reliance on punitive measures for management [8][10] - The competitive landscape has further distorted the purpose of penalties, turning them into a means of cost control rather than a method for enhancing service quality [10][11]

Core Insights - Major food delivery platforms in China, including JD.com, Ele.me, and Meituan, are shifting from direct fines for delivery delays to a service points system, aiming to enhance management through positive incentives rather than punitive measures [1][3] Group 1: Changes in Delivery Management - Meituan plans to eliminate fines for delivery delays by the end of 2025, having already initiated a pilot program in Quanzhou that uses a points system to reward timely deliveries and penalize delays [1][3] - JD.com is conducting trials in 25 cities, including Shenzhen and Nanjing, replacing direct fines with a service points system that deducts points based on the duration of the delay [1][2] - Ele.me is also testing a new service points system in cities like Nantong and Changzhou, with plans to expand to over ten provinces by the end of October [1][2] Group 2: Rider Perspectives - Many delivery riders support the transition from fines to a points deduction system, as it allows them to recover points through improved performance rather than facing immediate financial penalties [3][5] - Riders have reported that the previous fine system was burdensome, especially when delivery assignments were unreasonable, leading to delays [3][5] Group 3: Expert Opinions and Future Directions - Experts suggest that the new points-based management system enhances riders' professional identity and contributes to the sustainable development of platform economies [6][8] - Platforms are increasing investments in rider welfare, including additional subsidies during adverse weather and various support programs for riders and their families [8] - The shift from punitive measures to a dual empowerment system is seen as a response to policies promoting high-quality employment and improving service quality through enhanced rider recognition [8]