日方编织虚假叙事、企图操弄舆论，根本目的是淡化国际社会对其危险战略走向的警惕，暴露出骨子里 的战略投机主义和冒险主义。国际社会普遍注意到，高市早苗上任1个多月来，接二连三释放强军扩武 的危险信号：提前两年实现防卫费占国内生产总值比重2%的目标，计划在与那国岛部署导弹，宣称将 强化太空作战力量，图谋修订"无核三原则"……这些危险动向值得高度警惕：一个热衷于在舆论场搅浑 水的日本，其危险性不会仅停留于舆论层面，背后是蠢蠢欲动的军国主义。日本正在穷兵黩武的道路上 越走越远。 一个热衷于在舆论场搅浑水的日本，背后是蠢蠢欲动的军国主义。日本正在穷兵黩武的道路上越走越远 近日，日方舰机频繁抵近侦察干扰中方正常演训活动，制造海空安全风险，却倒打一耙，渲染所谓中国 海军舰载机对日本自卫队战机进行"雷达照射"，将中国军队正常训练活动歪曲为"危险行为"。这种栽赃 嫁祸、颠倒黑白，企图误导国际社会的卑劣行径，尽显日方一贯混淆舆论、寻衅滋事的险恶意图，值得 国际社会高度警惕。 事情真相是，中国军队在相关海空域开展的演训活动，完全符合国际法和国际惯例，操作专业规范、无 可非议。舰载机在飞行训练时开启搜索雷达是各国通行做法，也是保障飞行 ...

Group 1 - The U.S. House of Representatives is targeting Chinese lidar sensors used in autonomous vehicles and critical infrastructure, proposing a bill to phase them out due to security concerns [1][3] - The bill mandates a ban on new procurement of Chinese lidar sensors after three years, with exemptions for research and cybersecurity, and a five-year transition period for existing equipment [1][3] - Chinese companies dominate the lidar market, holding 93% of the global passenger vehicle lidar market and 89% of the overall lidar market, according to Yole Group [1] Group 2 - The proposal is driven by fears that Chinese lidar technology could be exploited in conflicts, potentially leading to widespread system failures in the U.S. [3][4] - The U.S. Department of Defense has listed Hesai Technology, a major lidar manufacturer, on its military-related entity list, although the company denies any military sales [4] - The narrative of a "Chinese threat" has become a reflexive discourse in the West, reflecting an imbalance in the technological competition mindset [4][5]

高市早苗涉台错误言论严重破坏日中互信，其负面影响势必波及日本政治、经济、旅游、教育等多个领 域。尽快撤回涉台错误言论并公开道歉，是唯一的解决办法 日本首相高市早苗的涉台错误言论，激起了中国政府与民众的强烈不满。遗憾的是，无论是高市早苗本 人、日本政府，还是部分日本民众，都未能充分理解中国方面愤怒的根本原因。 高市早苗的言论严重违反国际法与《联合国宪章》，属于公然干涉中国内政。从字面意思来看，其言论 无异于否定《日中联合声明》中明确确立的一个中国原则，等同于否定日中关系政治基础。中国政府对 此的批评完全正当、无可非议。日本政府动辄指责中国正试图改变现有秩序，但事实上，企图破坏战后 国际秩序、改变台海现状的正是日本政府自身。 所谓"存亡危机事态"的法理依据来自2015年日本国会强行通过的新安保法案。日本本应作为践行"和平 宪法"的和平国家，洗刷过去侵略国的污名。但近年来却出现了倒行逆施的动向，这是极其令人遗憾 的。"安保三文件"事实上可以决定实施"先发制人"攻击战略，在这个意义上属于违宪文件。高市早苗涉 台错误言论严重破坏日中互信，反复标榜"守护国家与民众"的首相，如今却亲手严重损害了"国家与民 众"的安全，其负 ...

东亚和平来之不易，无法承受此类冒进行径。若日本政坛继续在敏感议题上采取挑衅姿态，只会削弱自 身战略空间，增加地区紧张。罔顾历史与现实的言行，最终都要为破坏稳定付出代价。 悬崖错作舞台：军事化言论的危险自嗨 | 新漫评 来源：中国新闻网 日本首相高市早苗近日在国会发表涉台挑衅言论，罔顾一个中国原则和中日四个政治文件精神，粗暴干 涉中国内政。面对质疑，日本政府相关部门还予以辩解，反映出右翼势力在日本政坛的活跃及军国主义 思潮的残余。 历史问题绝非"剑玉秀"，一旦被轻率操弄，受损的不只是国家信誉，更可能引发地区局势的动荡。历史 议题从来不应成为政治投机的工具。然而，日本一些政客却不断渲染"中国威胁论"，将对华"强硬"包装 成廉价政治资本，成为典型的"表演型政治"。 部分日本政客回避侵略历史的教训，忽视中日关系的政治基础，以冷战思维塑造对华立场，以对抗取代 合作。这种右翼政治思维在日本政坛隐隐浮现。 广告等商务合作，请点击这里 本文为转载内容，授权事宜请联系原著作权人 中新经纬版权所有，未经书面授权，任何单位及个人不得转载、摘编或以其它方式使用。 关注中新经纬微信公众号(微信搜索"中新经纬"或"jwview")，看更 ...

2025.12. 05 本文字数：902，阅读时长大约1.5分钟 封图 | 小野田纪美（左）与樱井周。环球时报截图 据环球时报援引日本《产经新闻》报道， 12月3日， 日本经济安保大臣小野田纪美就其关于"中国 人购买笠佐岛土地"的失实发言正式公开道歉，并撤回了错误言论。 报道称，部分日本媒体近来炒作所谓"中国人在日本山口县笠佐岛购买土地"，甚至与"国家安全"联 系起来煽动反华情绪。 在11月26日的日本众议院内阁委员会会议上，小野田纪美在接受质询时说，她对中国人购买笠佐岛 部分土地一事"已知晓事实"。这一说法被认为是日本政府已确认"中国人购买相关岛屿土地"属实。 然而，日本立宪民主党议员樱井周向内阁府核查此事后发现，日本政府其实从未对相关土地交易进行 过调查，也无法通过不动产登记确认所有者的国籍。因此，小野田纪美的说法并不属实。 12月3日， 樱井周在 内阁委员会会议上指出， 日本社会正蔓延着"土地是否正被外国人夺走"的疑 神疑鬼情绪。 马克龙访华，商务部：中法签署关于加强双向投资的谅解备忘录；美国财政部发行在外的国债规模突 破30万亿美元；美国防部最新报告称，防长在"泄密门"中行为违反联邦法｜早报 微信编辑 ...

Core Viewpoint - Canada has restricted the use of 973 Chinese-made drones by the Royal Canadian Mounted Police (RCMP) to non-sensitive tasks due to perceived security risks, highlighting ongoing tensions related to the "China threat" narrative [1][3]. Group 1: Drone Usage and Restrictions - The RCMP has limited the use of its 973 Chinese drones to non-sensitive tasks such as search and rescue, vehicle theft investigations, and community safety, while prohibiting data transmission during flights [1][3]. - Chinese drones account for approximately 80% of the RCMP's fleet of 1,230 remote piloted aircraft systems (RPAS), primarily used for monitoring the Canada-U.S. border and various police operations [3]. - The RCMP has stated that these drones were purchased before the government imposed restrictions in 2023 and have proven to be cost-effective in daily police work [3]. Group 2: Cost and Alternatives - The RCMP has not utilized any Canadian-made drones and plans to replace the Chinese drones, which would cost over 30 million Canadian dollars, with non-Chinese alternatives that are nearly twice as expensive, at approximately 35,000 Canadian dollars per unit [3]. - For high-sensitivity tasks, the RCMP will use 112 French drones, 96 American drones, and 24 Belgian drones, indicating a reliance on non-Chinese technology for critical operations [3]. Group 3: Security Concerns and Expert Opinions - Experts have raised concerns about the potential risks associated with the communication and data transmission systems of Chinese drones, suggesting that procurement for security purposes should prioritize Canadian manufacturers [4]. - The Canadian government is reportedly planning to significantly enhance drone monitoring capabilities along the Canada-U.S. border, which aligns with discussions on border security measures with the new U.S. administration [4]. Group 4: Historical Context and U.S. Influence - Following the election of former U.S. President Trump, Canada committed to strengthening border security through the acquisition of drones, but these Chinese drones were ultimately limited to search and rescue tasks due to U.S. security concerns [5]. - The U.S. has been a leading nation in expressing security concerns over Chinese drones, influencing Canada's stance on the matter [5]. Group 5: Industry Dynamics - The U.S. defense sector is facing challenges due to its reliance on Chinese components for drones, particularly in critical areas such as batteries and motors, which are predominantly controlled by China [8]. - Despite efforts to reduce dependency on Chinese technology, the U.S. has struggled to produce a significant number of domestically manufactured drones, indicating the complexities of the global supply chain [8].

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the recent comments made by UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer regarding China's role in global affairs, emphasizing the need for the UK to strengthen its engagement with China while also addressing perceived security threats posed by China [1][2]. Group 1: UK-China Relations - The UK Prime Minister stated that the UK cannot continue to lack engagement with China and must enhance trade and cooperation [1]. - The Chinese Embassy in the UK firmly opposes the notion of a "China threat" and other unfounded accusations made by the UK, asserting that China's development presents opportunities for mutual growth rather than threats [1][2]. - The Chinese stance emphasizes that Hong Kong affairs are purely a matter of China's internal governance, and the UK has no right to interfere [2]. Group 2: Principles for Development - The Chinese position on UK-China relations is based on mutual respect, non-interference in internal affairs, and principles of equality and mutual benefit [2]. - There is a call for the UK to adopt a rational and friendly approach towards China's development and to pursue a pragmatic policy that fosters healthy and stable relations [2].

Core Viewpoint - The Chinese side firmly opposes the UK’s allegations of a "China threat" and other unfounded accusations, asserting that China is a builder of world peace, a contributor to global development, and a maintainer of international order [1] Group 1 - China has a strong record as a major power in terms of peace and security [1] - China's development does not pose a threat to any country but rather offers opportunities for mutual development [1] - Hong Kong is an internal matter of China, and the UK has no right to interfere [1] Group 2 - The Chinese stance on Sino-British relations is consistent and clear, emphasizing mutual respect, non-interference in internal affairs, and equality for beneficial development [1] - The Chinese side hopes the UK will recognize the situation, adopt a rational and friendly attitude towards China's development, and pursue a pragmatic policy towards China [1] - The goal is to promote the healthy and stable development of Sino-British relations [1]

Core Viewpoint - The Chinese Embassy in the UK strongly opposes UK Prime Minister Starmer's remarks regarding China, emphasizing that China's development does not pose a threat to any country and instead offers opportunities for mutual growth [1] Group 1: UK-China Relations - Starmer highlighted the need for the UK to strengthen engagement with China, stating that the current lack of contact is unsustainable [1] - The Chinese side insists that mutual respect and non-interference in internal affairs are essential for the healthy development of UK-China relations [1] Group 2: Security Concerns - Starmer claimed that China poses a "national security threat" to the UK, which the Chinese Embassy refuted, asserting that China has a strong record in maintaining global peace and security [1] - The Chinese Embassy reiterated that issues related to Hong Kong are internal matters and that the UK has no right to interfere [1]

Core Insights - China imports approximately 66,000 tons of avocados annually, primarily from Peru, facilitated by investments in a super port that has reduced shipping time by 10 days [1] - Over the past two decades, China has invested several hundred billion dollars in global port infrastructure, solidifying its trade dominance amid rising global trade tensions [1][3] - Chinese state-owned enterprises have invested over $60 billion in 129 overseas port projects across various countries, outpacing similar efforts by other nations [1][3] Investment and Infrastructure - Six of the world's ten busiest ports are located in China, with 95% of China's trade relying on maritime transport, making global port network access a core strategic priority [3][5] - China's investments in overseas ports have accelerated since the Belt and Road Initiative, with no comparable funding or support from the U.S. government for similar projects [3][8] - The construction and investment in ports by Chinese entities are viewed positively by many countries, as they are crucial for economic modernization [8][9] Geopolitical Context - The U.S. media has raised concerns about potential military uses of Chinese-controlled ports, suggesting that 14 out of 17 ports controlled by Chinese entities could serve dual commercial and military purposes [4][7] - The U.S. has attempted to politicize commercial cooperation, particularly regarding ports in countries like Peru and Greece, reflecting a broader anxiety about China's growing influence [8][9] - Criticism from U.S. officials regarding Chinese investments often contrasts with the lack of substantial American investment in these regions, highlighting a disparity in commitment to infrastructure development [8][9]