Core Viewpoint - Japanese Prime Minister Kishi Nobuo's recent remarks regarding Taiwan have sparked significant international backlash, highlighting concerns over Japan's potential military involvement in the Taiwan Strait and its implications for regional stability [1][2][5] Group 1: Reactions to Kishi's Statements - Kishi's assertion that Japan may intervene militarily in Taiwan under the guise of "collective self-defense" is viewed as a serious provocation against China's sovereignty and a challenge to post-war international order [2][5] - The comments have raised alarms about Japan's emerging militaristic tendencies and the potential for escalating tensions in East Asia, particularly regarding Japan's view of Taiwan as a potential conflict zone [2][5][6] - Local voices from Okinawa express deep concern over the implications of Kishi's statements, fearing that they could lead to a repeat of historical tragedies experienced during World War II [4][6] Group 2: Historical Context and Public Sentiment - The historical context of Okinawa's suffering during the war is emphasized, with local residents advocating for peace and opposing militarization in the region [4][6] - There is a growing sentiment among the Japanese public against the portrayal of China as a threat, with a significant portion of the population expressing negative views towards China, largely influenced by political rhetoric and media narratives [7][8] - The need for increased cultural and economic exchanges between Japan and China is highlighted as a means to counteract negative perceptions and foster mutual understanding [10][11] Group 3: Political Implications - Kishi's remarks are seen as aligning with a broader trend of right-wing nationalism in Japan, which could exacerbate tensions with China and undermine diplomatic relations [9][15] - The potential for Kishi's statements to incite further militarization and conflict in the region is a major concern, with calls for her to reconsider her position and adhere to existing treaties that promote peace [12][14] - The dialogue emphasizes the importance of addressing historical grievances and fostering a cooperative relationship between Japan and China, rather than succumbing to adversarial posturing [12][15]

Core Viewpoint - Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi's recent statements in the Diet suggest a potential military intervention in the Taiwan issue, marking a significant shift in Japan's defense posture since World War II [1][5][12] Group 1: Concept of "Existential Crisis Situation" - The term "existential crisis situation" was introduced by former Prime Minister Shinzo Abe a decade ago, allowing Japan to exercise collective self-defense under specific conditions [1][2] - This concept defines a situation where an armed attack on a closely related foreign country poses a clear danger to Japan's survival, fundamentally threatening the rights of its citizens [1][2] Group 2: Political Implications - Takaichi's remarks link Taiwan to Japan's "existential crisis situation," which has sparked significant domestic backlash, with critics arguing that Taiwan is part of China and not a threat to Japan's survival [5][12] - Analysts warn that Japan's historical narrative of "crisis" has often been used to justify military expansion and aggression, suggesting Takaichi's rhetoric may serve similar purposes [5][12] Group 3: Defense Policy Shift - Takaichi has proposed aggressive military expansion policies, including a significant increase in defense spending and the potential development of nuclear capabilities [6][8] - The ruling Liberal Democratic Party is set to discuss amendments to key security documents, aiming to raise defense spending to 2% of GDP and reconsider the "Three Non-Nuclear Principles" [8][11] Group 4: Domestic Reactions - Takaichi's statements have led to widespread criticism from former prime ministers and political figures, emphasizing that Japan should not interfere in Taiwan's internal affairs [12][13] - Public protests have erupted, with citizens demanding Takaichi's resignation and a retraction of her statements, reflecting a strong opposition to her militaristic rhetoric [14][15]

Core Viewpoint - Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi's recent statements in the Diet suggest a potential military intervention in the Taiwan issue, marking a significant shift in Japan's defense posture since World War II [1][5][10] Summary by Sections Concept of "Existential Crisis Situation" - The term "Existential Crisis Situation" was created by former Prime Minister Shinzo Abe a decade ago, allowing Japan to exercise collective self-defense under specific conditions [3] - This situation is defined as a clear and imminent danger that threatens Japan's survival due to military attacks on closely related foreign nations [3][5] Takaichi's Statements and Domestic Reactions - Takaichi linked the Taiwan issue to Japan's "Existential Crisis Situation," suggesting that Taiwan's situation threatens Japan's survival [5][10] - Her comments have sparked significant backlash within Japan, with former Prime Ministers and political leaders criticizing her statements as illogical and provocative [11][12] Defense Policy Shift - The ruling Liberal Democratic Party plans to discuss amendments to Japan's National Security Strategy and related documents, aiming to increase defense spending and potentially revise the "Three Non-Nuclear Principles" [7][9] - Takaichi's administration is pushing for aggressive military policies, including a substantial increase in defense spending and the possibility of acquiring nuclear capabilities [7][9] Public Protests and Political Pressure - Following Takaichi's remarks, public protests erupted in Tokyo, with citizens demanding her resignation and a retraction of her statements [12][13] - Various political figures and civil groups have expressed concerns over the implications of her comments for Japan's national security and international relations, particularly with China [10][12][13]

最近一段时间，新任日本首相高市早苗关于台湾问题的言论在国际社会掀起了轩然大波。台湾问题是中国内政早就是国际共识，也是日本政府对华的基本政 治承诺，为何高市一上任就突破了底线？背后折射出日本政坛怎样的危险转向？又将把中日关系带向何方？ 11月7日，日本新任首相高市早苗口出狂言，在日本众议院预算委员会会议这样一个正式场合下，作为一国首相，在回答议员提问时竟公然表示："台湾有 事"可能是日本行使集体自卫权的"存亡危机事态"。言外之意是，日本可能会以武力介入台海。高市早苗上台还不到一个月，这番言论瞬间让她成为东亚地 缘政治的焦点。 中国社会科学院日本研究所所长 杨伯江：在野党和执政党双方都可以借用这个平台向对方发起政治上的进攻，这次日本领导人的发言，应该说开了一个非 常恶劣的先例，第一次把这个"存亡危机事态"应用于中国的内政问题，也就是台湾问题上，这一点是中方所完全无法接受的。 "存亡危机事态"，是日本前首相安倍晋三在十年前，强行通过"新安保法"时炮制的一个法律概念。该法规定，即使日本没有遭到直接攻击，但若美国等密切 相关国家遭武力攻击进而威胁日本国家存亡时，自卫队便可行使集体自卫权。但具体标准是什么，一直语焉不详。 ...

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the provocative statements made by Japanese Prime Minister Sanna Takashi regarding Taiwan, highlighting a pattern of historical revisionism, colonial mentality, militarism, and erroneous perceptions of China that underpin his actions [1][2][3]. Group 1: Historical Revisionism - Takashi has gained notoriety for his historical revisionism, questioning established narratives such as the Murayama Statement and denying events like the Nanjing Massacre, which reflects a lack of sensitivity to Japan's colonial history in Taiwan [1]. Group 2: Colonial Mentality Towards Taiwan - Takashi has previously visited Taiwan and collaborated with pro-independence forces, indicating a strong pro-Taiwan stance. His administration has appointed several pro-Taiwan officials, leading to provocative actions such as awarding honors to pro-independence figures [2]. Group 3: Militarism - Takashi has aligned himself with extreme right-wing factions advocating for a revival of Japan's militaristic past. His government is pushing aggressive military policies, including significant increases in defense spending and discussions to amend Japan's nuclear principles [2]. Group 4: Misconceptions About China - There is a prevailing trend among Japanese politicians, including Takashi, to misinterpret China's rise and historical context, often resorting to "China threat" rhetoric. This misjudgment could lead to significant diplomatic repercussions if continued [3].

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the provocative remarks made by Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi regarding Taiwan, highlighting the underlying historical and political motivations that shape her stance and actions [3][4][5]. Group 1: Historical Context - Takaichi's rise in politics is marked by a history of revisionism, questioning established historical narratives such as the Murayama Statement and denying events like the Nanjing Massacre, indicating a disconnect from Japan's colonial past in Taiwan [3]. - The article emphasizes that Takaichi's comments on Taiwan are not isolated incidents but rather part of a broader pattern of historical distortion that influences her approach to international relations [3]. Group 2: Political Alliances - Takaichi has previously engaged with pro-independence forces in Taiwan, leveraging her connections to strengthen ties with these groups, which reflects a strategic alignment with Taiwan's independence movement [4]. - Her administration has appointed several pro-Taiwan officials, indicating a systematic approach to fostering closer relations with Taiwan [4]. Group 3: Military Posturing - Takaichi's government is characterized by a push for military expansion, including significant increases in defense spending and a reevaluation of Japan's nuclear policy, which aligns with a broader militaristic agenda [4]. - Recent reports suggest that Takaichi has initiated discussions within her party to amend Japan's "Three Non-Nuclear Principles," indicating a shift towards a more aggressive military posture [4]. Group 4: Misconceptions about China - The article critiques the Japanese political landscape for harboring misconceptions about China, with politicians often resorting to "China threat" rhetoric as a political strategy, which Takaichi has adopted [5]. - It warns that if Japanese leaders continue to misjudge the geopolitical situation, they may provoke significant backlash from China [5].

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the provocative statements made by Japanese Prime Minister Sanna Takashi regarding Taiwan, highlighting a pattern of historical revisionism, colonial mentality, militarism, and erroneous perceptions of China that underpin her actions [1][2][3]. Group 1: Historical Revisionism - Takashi has gained notoriety for her historical revisionism, questioning established narratives such as the Murayama Statement and denying events like the Nanjing Massacre, which reflects a lack of sensitivity towards Japan's colonial history in Taiwan [1]. Group 2: Colonial Mentality Towards Taiwan - Takashi has previously visited Taiwan and engaged with pro-independence forces, indicating a strong pro-Taiwan stance. Her administration has appointed several pro-Taiwan officials, leading to provocative actions such as awarding honors to pro-independence figures [2]. Group 3: Militarism - Takashi has aligned herself with extreme right-wing factions advocating for a revival of Japan's militaristic past. Her government is pushing for significant military expansion, including increased defense spending and discussions to amend Japan's nuclear policy [2]. Group 4: Misconceptions About China - There is a prevailing trend among Japanese politicians, including Takashi, to misinterpret China's rise and historical context, often resorting to "China threat" rhetoric. This misjudgment could lead to severe diplomatic repercussions if continued [3].

专栏丨什么样的"毒土"，长什么样的"毒苗" 什么样的土，长什么样的苗。有毒的土壤，必然长出有毒的"苗"。 近日，日本首相高市早苗在国会答辩时悍然发表涉台露骨挑衅言论，进行武力威胁，发出战争叫嚣。在 中方一再提出严正交涉后，高市拒不承认错误，拒不收回谬论，拒不消除恶劣影响，更证明其涉台"狂 言"并非一时失言，而是其蓄谋已久的公然叫嚣。 其二，对台殖民情结"毒土"。高市之前多次窜访台湾，与岛内"台独"势力勾肩搭背，为后者打"日本 牌"牵线搭桥。高市上台后，以日本跨党派议员联盟"日华议员恳谈会"核心成员为"选才库"，在自民党 高层和内阁安排多名"亲台派"心腹出任要职。不出所料，高市一上来就频频在台湾问题上搞小动作，如 安排"台独"分子领受日本皇室勋章，以至此番公然以武力威胁为岛内"台独"势力张目。 其三，军国主义幽灵"毒土"。高市上台前，与一帮鼓噪恢复"大日本帝国辉煌"的日本极右势力打得火 热，被这些沉浸于帝国旧梦的历史复辟主义者视为"最理想的首相人选"。高市对此心领神会，一上台就 大打"军事安保牌"，抛出一连串激进的扩军政策设想，包括超常规增加军费、全面解除武器出口限制、 大力提升日本先发制人攻击能力等。15日， ...

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the provocative remarks made by Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi regarding Taiwan, highlighting the historical and political context that shapes her stance, which is seen as a reflection of Japan's toxic political soil [2][3][4][5]. Group 1: Historical Context - Takaichi's rise in politics is linked to a historical revisionism that denies Japan's wartime atrocities, such as the Nanjing Massacre, and shows a lack of sensitivity towards China's historical grievances [2][3]. - The article emphasizes that Takaichi's views on Taiwan are influenced by a distorted understanding of Japan's colonial history in Taiwan, indicating a troubling colonial mindset [3]. Group 2: Political Alliances - Takaichi has established connections with pro-independence forces in Taiwan, leveraging her position to support these groups, which is seen as a strategic move to strengthen Japan's influence in the region [3]. - The formation of a cross-party alliance in Japan that supports pro-Taiwan policies is highlighted, indicating a shift in Japan's political landscape towards a more aggressive stance on Taiwan [3]. Group 3: Military Policies - Takaichi's administration is characterized by a push for militarization, including significant increases in military spending and a reevaluation of Japan's nuclear policy, which raises concerns about regional security dynamics [3][4]. - The article notes that Takaichi's government is considering changes to Japan's "three non-nuclear principles," reflecting a desire to enhance military capabilities and align more closely with U.S. defense strategies [3]. Group 4: Misconceptions about China - The article critiques the Japanese political elite's misunderstanding of China, suggesting that their rhetoric around "China threat" is politically motivated and ignores the historical context of Sino-Japanese relations [4]. - Takaichi's alignment with hardline views on China is seen as a continuation of a trend among Japanese politicians who misjudge the geopolitical landscape, potentially leading to increased tensions [4].

新华社东京11月14日电 综述｜日本多方人士批评高市早苗涉台错误言论 新华社记者李子越 梁晨 近日，日本首相高市早苗在国会发表的涉台错误言论在日本国内引发轩然大波。日本多方人士对其言论 的法律依据、政策逻辑及可能带来的地区安全风险表示担忧，认为相关判断缺乏事实和法理支撑，将误 导日本安全政策方向，进一步加剧日中关系紧张。 14日下午，日本政界人士及多个冲绳民间团体在东京举行集会，要求日本政府就近年来持续在冲绳推进 军备的行为作出说明，并对高市的言论表达担忧。 日本社民党党首福岛瑞穗在集会上指出，高市将"台湾有事"视为"存亡危机事态"的判断在逻辑上难以成 立，台湾并非国家，是中国的一部分，不应被纳入允许日本动用武力的情境。此种说法在法律层面明显 存在问题。她警告说，轻率扩大武力行使范围极为危险，可能对日本未来安全政策造成深远影响。 日本冲绳县宜野湾市前市长、参议院议员伊波洋一表示，"台湾有事"的说法和高市的不当言论将使自卫 队卷入其中，或将导致重大伤亡，而高市所谓的"存亡危机事态"是极其严重的表述。他批评称，日本近 年来持续强化军备，其所谓的"安保三文件"只谈准备战争，不谈避免战争，整体方向落入美国设定的战 略 ...