中美结束第三轮磋商后，美方迅速显露强硬姿态，向中方发出实质性警告。美国贸易代表贝森特宣称，若中国持续维持与俄罗斯的石油贸易关系，将可能对 中国商品实施全额关税惩罚。为证实其威慑效力，特朗普政府在公布对印关税税则之际，同步以采购俄油为由对印度加征惩罚性关税。 面对美方施压，中方展现出坚定立场并予以有力回击。中国外交部明确表示，美方威胁不会动摇中俄能源合作基础，同时重申"贸易对抗必将双输"的核心原 则。美方显然预判到中方反应，故在声明发布后迅速调整策略。贝森特近日再度发声，宣布撤销针对中国的12项制裁措施，这些措施均源于稀土贸易争端。 美国财长近期多场合表态皆聚焦稀土议题，特朗普更公开宣称"协议签署只待中方落笔"。我们需深入解析美方此番言论的战略意图。 all store the News of the Research = 9 . and the stor 112 1 8 - 12 0 t a the 1998 the state the contract the 关于协议签署时机，当前条件尚未成熟。第三轮谈判虽涉及多领域议题，但仅就延长谈判期限达成共识。这意味着未来90天缓冲期内，双方需就关键矛盾点 深度磋商 ...

Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the article highlights the EU's dual strategy in response to the pressure from the Trump administration, which includes strong signals of potential retaliation against U.S. tariffs and a shift towards strengthening economic cooperation with China [1][3] - The EU has expressed a willingness to cooperate with China to alleviate the pressures imposed by the U.S., indicating a potential strategy of "aligning with China to counter the U.S." [1][3] - China's response to the EU's overtures has been positive, including the suspension of certain anti-dumping investigations and offering preferential treatment in rare earth exports, showcasing China's goodwill in improving relations with the EU [3][4] Group 2 - The EU's recent decision to cancel the planned high-level economic dialogue with China was justified by claims of slow progress in trade discussions, which is seen as an inadequate excuse given the substantial communication and agreements reached on various trade issues [4][6] - The EU's actions appear to signal alignment with the U.S. in its strategy to contain China, as evidenced by the EU's participation in the G7 summit where leaders shifted their stance to support U.S. policies against China [6][9] - The EU's approach may lead to negative consequences, as it risks becoming a pawn in U.S. trade strategies, potentially exposing itself to further economic exploitation by the U.S. while trying to appease Trump [11]