西方世界正在经历一场"头脑风暴"。斯塔默"不选边"的立场，在一定程度上体现了西方对过时的安全 观、文明观和国际关系观的反思。越来越多的西方有识之士认识到，盲目追随单一霸权、割裂世界联系 的做法，最终损害的是本国的发展与繁荣。这种冷战思维已经严重侵蚀了全球战略稳定与合作根基。法 国总统马克龙、加拿大总理卡尼、芬兰总理奥尔波两个月内相继访华，德国总理默茨也表达了访华意 愿。西方主要国家领导人密集访华的趋势，证明"忽视中国""疏远中国"这条路走不通。 英方此次主动释放改善对华关系的积极信号，是基于英国国家利益的理性选择，也是对"脱欧"后英国外 交定位的重新校准。在正式出访前，斯塔默已派遣5名部长级官员访华，显示出英方对此次高层交流的 重视。英国完全有能力、也有权利与各国保持建设性的良好关系，这是对国家利益负责任的成熟态度。 中国从来不是英国的安全威胁或发展障碍。希望这次访问不仅推动双方在各具体领域合作取得新突破， 也能为未来中英关系的长远发展定下务实、理性、共赢的基调。 英国首相斯塔默于1月28日至31日对中国进行正式访问，这是时隔8年英国首相再次访华。一个由50余家 英国大企业和机构代表组成的庞大商务代表团随行。 ...

英国首相斯塔默于1月28日至31日对中国进行正式访问，这是时隔8年英国首相再次访华。一个由50余家 英国大企业和机构代表组成的庞大商务代表团随行。斯塔默行前表态不会在美中之间"选边站"，被外界 视为英国在变动的国际形势中采取更加理性的外交立场。这清楚表明，即使在西方内部，"小圈子"和阵 营对抗思维也日益失去市场。 作为与美国有"特殊关系"的盟友，英方的相关表态令一些人感到意外，但其实很顺理成章。这当中有两 个大背景：一是中英关系经历了长达数年的低谷，唐宁街10号"忽冷忽热"的对华政策是主要原因，但它 显然没有给英国带来想象中的好处，有英国政府人士表示忽略中国"只会让英国更加贫穷、更加不安 全"；二是面对一个"不可预测"的美国，西方国家纷纷在对外关系中寻找更大的"可预测性"。斯塔默的 言论在西方国家领导人一系列的最新表态中，算是"跟上了潮流"，或者说，英国也醒过神来了。 距离英国首相上次访华已经8年了。即便是在所谓的"冰河时期"，中英经贸往来仍然总体呈明显上升趋 势。数据显示，中国是英国2025年的第四大贸易伙伴，贸易总额约1370亿美元。中国拥有14亿多人口支 撑的庞大消费群体，是英国企业想要大力拓展的重要市 ...

外交部：坚决反对美国个别政客对中美洲国家同中国的正常交往指手画脚 中新网北京1月26日电(记者 黄钰钦 李晓喻)中国外交部发言人郭嘉昆26日主持召开例行记者会。 有记者提问：我们注意到，自上月公布新版《国家安全战略》以来，美国明显加大了对西半球的投入。 近日，美国会众院"中国特设委"主席莫伦纳率团访问巴拿马等中美洲多国，声称是为应对中国对当地的 胁迫、施压和干预、对抗中国影响力等，并要在巴拿马运河港口运营等经贸安全领域竞赢中国。中方有 何回应？ 郭嘉昆：中方坚决反对美国个别政客对中美洲国家同中国的正常交往指手画脚。有关言论是彻头彻尾的 谎言谬论，只能镜像其自身意识形态偏见和冷战思维。 中方始终秉持相互尊重、平等互利、开放包容、合作共赢的原则同中美洲国家开展友好合作，为当地人 民带来了实实在在的好处，受到有关国家欢迎。我们敦促美方政客停止操弄涉华议题，多做有利于促进 地区发展繁荣的事。(完) 编辑：董文博 广告等商务合作，请点击这里 本文为转载内容，授权事宜请联系原著作权人 中新经纬版权所有，未经书面授权，任何单位及个人不得转载、摘编或以其它方式使用。 关注中新经纬微信公众号(微信搜索"中新经纬"或"jwvie ...

Core Viewpoint - The Chinese government firmly opposes the U.S. politicians' interference in the normal relations between Central American countries and China, labeling such statements as lies and a reflection of Cold War mentality [1]. Group 1: China's Position - China emphasizes the principles of mutual respect, equality, openness, inclusiveness, and win-win cooperation in its relations with Central American countries [1]. - The cooperation between China and Central American nations has brought tangible benefits to local populations, which has been welcomed by those countries [1]. Group 2: U.S. Actions - The U.S. has increased its investment in the Western Hemisphere following the announcement of a new national security strategy [1]. - The Chinese government urges U.S. politicians to cease manipulating issues related to China and instead focus on actions that promote regional development and prosperity [1].

关心国际政治的人，最近都注意到某种趋势性变化：从加拿大总理卡尼在达沃斯论坛的"中等强国必须 携手合作"赢得掌声，到韩国、加拿大、芬兰、英国、德国等国领导人"接连访华"或纷纷表达访华意 愿，在单边主义、霸权主义搅动世界的背景下，强化对华合作被认为在西方国家中"渐成趋势"。相关动 向显然不是孤立的。有声音认为，这很可能是国际秩序大变革浪潮中的一个标志性节点。 美国舆论高度关注这些动向。在连篇累牍的报道与分析中，我们注意到，有几种典型的涉华错误论调。 一种是"中国捡漏论"，认为美国与盟友间的"裂痕"让中国"有机可乘"，甚至挑动称"中国正在赢得新冷 战"；一种是"中国二次冲击论"，认为中国不断发展的产业链正在吞噬西方国家的"自留地"，警告强化 对华合作就是"任由中国侵吞"。还有一种声音，姑且称之为"投降中国论"，它将对华合作视作"软弱"， 是所谓"牺牲价值观换取市场"，进而宣称中国正在对西方文明形成"根本性挑战"。 这些说法都是披着不同外衣的"中国威胁论"，本质上仍然是基于冷战思维的二元叙事。它们假定了一 个"中美两极争霸"的国际格局，认为每个国家都必须在中美之间作出排他性选择，要么依附霸权，要么 靠拢中国。这当中还 ...

关心国际政治的人，最近都注意到某种趋势性变化：从加拿大总理卡尼在达沃斯论坛的"中等强国必须 携手合作"赢得掌声，到韩国、加拿大、芬兰、英国、德国等国领导人"接连访华"或纷纷表达访华意 愿，在单边主义、霸权主义搅动世界的背景下，强化对华合作被认为在西方国家中"渐成趋势"。相关动 向显然不是孤立的。有声音认为，这很可能是国际秩序大变革浪潮中的一个标志性节点。 美国舆论高度关注这些动向。在连篇累牍的报道与分析中，我们注意到，有几种典型的涉华错误论调。 一种是"中国捡漏论"，认为美国与盟友间的"裂痕"让中国"有机可乘"，甚至挑动称"中国正在赢得新冷 战"；一种是"中国二次冲击论"，认为中国不断发展的产业链正在吞噬西方国家的"自留地"，警告强化 对华合作就是"任由中国侵吞"。还有一种声音，姑且称之为"投降中国论"，它将对华合作视作"软弱"， 是所谓"牺牲价值观换取市场"，进而宣称中国正在对西方文明形成"根本性挑战"。 这些说法都是披着不同外衣的"中国威胁论"，本质上仍然是基于冷战思维的二元叙事。它们假定了一 个"中美两极争霸"的国际格局，认为每个国家都必须在中美之间作出排他性选择，要么依附霸权，要么 靠拢中国。这当中还 ...

Core Viewpoint - The speech emphasizes the importance of cooperation and development amidst global uncertainties, highlighting the need for multilateralism and mutual respect in international relations [3][4][5]. Group 1: International Relations - The global trend towards peace, development, and cooperation remains unchanged despite rising instability and uncertainty [3][4]. - The historical logic of mutual benefit in Sino-American relations persists, indicating that dialogue is preferable to confrontation [5][6]. - The principles of mutual respect, peaceful coexistence, and win-win cooperation are essential for a stable Sino-American relationship [6]. Group 2: Economic Development - China's economy is projected to grow by around 5% in the past year, contributing over 30% to global economic growth [7]. - The total trade surplus for China exceeded 1 trillion USD for the first time, showcasing its role as both a major exporter and importer [7][8]. - China is committed to high-quality development and high-level opening up, with significant opportunities in emerging industries such as new energy and biotechnology [7][8]. Group 3: Foreign Investment - China has reduced its foreign investment negative list to 29 items and is providing zero-tariff treatment to products from least developed countries [8]. - The number of newly established foreign-invested enterprises in China increased by 16.9% year-on-year, indicating growing foreign confidence [8]. - The potential for cooperation between Chinese and American companies in strategic emerging industries is significant, with a focus on mutual benefits [8].

Group 1 - The core narrative of the Pentagon's annual "China Military and Security Development Report" presents a dual perspective, portraying China as both a military threat and emphasizing the importance of stable U.S.-China relations under President Trump [1][2] - The report continues the long-standing narrative of "China military threat," suggesting that China's military development poses a direct threat to U.S. security, despite China's defense spending being maintained at 1.5% of GDP, below the global average [2][3] - China's defense policy is fundamentally defensive, aimed at safeguarding its sovereignty and security, and is not intended for hegemony or expansion, aligning military growth with national strength and international responsibilities [3][4] Group 2 - The importance of healthy and stable U.S.-China relations extends beyond bilateral concerns, impacting global prospects, with the Pentagon report highlighting the current administration's commitment to stabilizing these relations [4][5] - Dialogue and cooperation are emphasized as the only correct path for U.S.-China relations, with a focus on building a stable relationship framework based on mutual respect and benefits [4][5] - China's commitment to peace and global security is demonstrated through its active participation in international peacekeeping and security governance, countering the narrative of military threat presented in the Pentagon report [4][5]

Core Viewpoint - The first "Central Asia + Japan" summit held in Tokyo signifies Japan's strategic shift towards Central Asia, focusing on economic cooperation while reflecting geopolitical calculations against China and Russia [1][2]. Group 1: Economic Cooperation - Japan has pledged to provide 3 trillion yen (approximately 134 billion RMB) in grants and loans to Uzbekistan, Kyrgyzstan, and Tajikistan over the next five years for commercial projects [1]. - The summit resulted in the "Tokyo Declaration," which, while ceremonial, raises questions about the potential for practical cooperation that aligns with the long-term interests of all regional countries [4]. Group 2: Geopolitical Strategy - Japan views Central Asia as a critical source of strategic resources such as rare earths, uranium, and oil, aiming to establish a complete industrial chain from exploration to transportation to reduce reliance on China [2]. - The initiative is also seen as a countermeasure to Russian influence in the region, with Japan seeking to create alternative logistics routes that bypass Russia, thereby integrating into Western geopolitical strategies [2]. - Japan's diplomatic efforts are partly driven by domestic political needs, as the government seeks to improve its international image amidst tensions with China [2]. Group 3: Challenges and Limitations - Japan's historical engagement in Central Asia has been limited due to geographical distance, high logistics costs, and varying investment environments across the five Central Asian countries [3]. - The political undertones of Japan's cooperation efforts, which often link economic assistance to geopolitical goals, may not align with the multi-vector foreign policies favored by Central Asian nations [3]. - China's established relationships and mutual trust with Central Asian countries pose significant challenges to Japan's ambitions, as these nations prioritize long-term stability and economic benefits over geopolitical alignments [3].

Group 1 - Canada's diplomatic strategy has shifted from containment of China to seeking cooperation, with Prime Minister Carney acknowledging China as an important strategic partner [1][6] - The economic pressure faced by Canada, particularly in the agricultural sector, has driven this strategic change, as Canadian canola exports to China have significantly declined [5][11] - The relationship between Canada and the U.S. is strained, as evidenced by Trump's immediate termination of trade negotiations following Carney's statements, indicating a potential rift within Western alliances [3][8] Group 2 - Canada's previous alignment with U.S. policies against China is now seen as a misstep, as China is a major trading partner for many countries, including Canada [6][12] - The potential for cooperation between Canada and China is significant, especially in agricultural and commodity sectors where both countries have complementary needs [6][11] - Other Western nations, like Australia and Germany, are also reassessing their strategies and relationships with China, indicating a broader trend of countries prioritizing national interests over rigid alliances [8][12] Group 3 - The failure of U.S. sanctions against China has prompted Canada and other allies to reconsider their positions, as they face their own economic challenges [9][14] - For Canada to successfully re-engage with China, it may need to lift restrictions on Chinese electric vehicles and adopt more flexible trade practices [11][14] - The current global landscape emphasizes cooperation over confrontation, with countries urged to recognize the importance of mutual benefits in international trade [14][16]