Core Points - Mexico's plan to impose high tariffs on imports from China has been postponed due to rising opposition from the private sector and members of the ruling party [1][3] - Mexican manufacturers have warned that the proposed tariffs would significantly increase production costs, impacting their competitiveness [1] - There are divisions within the ruling coalition regarding the tariffs, with some lawmakers supporting the president's efforts to protect domestic industries while others emphasize the importance of trade relations with China [3] Group 1 - The proposed tariffs could reach as high as 50% on products from China and other Asian countries, raising concerns about inflation and the overall economic impact [3] - The Mexican government is facing technical challenges in determining which products to tax, complicating negotiations with the private sector [3] - The Chinese government has expressed strong opposition to Mexico's unilateral tariff measures, emphasizing the need for inclusive economic globalization and cooperation [4] Group 2 - The Mexican government is evaluating the potential inflationary effects of the proposed tariffs, indicating a cautious approach to the implementation of such measures [3] - The Chinese Ministry of Commerce has announced plans to investigate Mexico's trade barriers against Chinese products, highlighting the potential for escalating trade tensions [4] - The situation reflects broader concerns about unilateralism and protectionism in international trade, particularly in the context of rising tariffs from the United States [4]

Core Viewpoint - Mexico has postponed its plan to impose tariffs on Chinese goods, with China firmly opposing any restrictions imposed under external pressure [1] Group 1: Economic Relations - China advocates for inclusive economic globalization and opposes unilateralism, protectionism, and discriminatory measures [1] - The essence of China-Mexico economic cooperation is mutual benefit and win-win outcomes [1] Group 2: Trade Cooperation - In the context of certain countries imposing tariffs, China and Mexico should enhance communication and coordination to jointly uphold free trade and multilateralism [1] - Both countries are important members of the Global South, emphasizing the need for collaboration to promote global economic recovery and trade development [1]

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the postponement of Mexico's plan to increase tariffs on imports from China due to opposition from private enterprises and members of the ruling party, highlighting the importance of mutual cooperation and free trade between China and Mexico [1] Group 1: Economic Globalization - China advocates for inclusive economic globalization and opposes unilateralism, protectionism, and discriminatory measures [1] - The Chinese government emphasizes the need to protect its legitimate interests against external pressures [1] Group 2: China-Mexico Relations - China and Mexico are both significant members of the Global South, with mutual benefit being the essence of their economic cooperation [1] - The Chinese side values the development of China-Mexico relations and aims to strengthen communication and coordination in the context of rising tariffs from certain countries [1] Group 3: Trade and Economic Recovery - Both countries are committed to maintaining free trade and multilateralism to promote global economic recovery and trade development [1]

Core Viewpoint - The Mexican government's plan to impose high tariffs on Chinese imports has been postponed until at least December due to increasing opposition from the private sector and members of the ruling party [1] Group 1 - The Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs emphasizes the importance of inclusive economic globalization and opposes unilateralism and protectionism [1] - China and Mexico are both significant members of the "Global South," and their economic cooperation is characterized by mutual benefit [1] - In the context of rising tariffs from certain countries, China and Mexico should enhance communication and coordination to uphold free trade and multilateralism [1]

Core Viewpoint - The Mexican government's plan to impose high tariffs on Chinese imports has been postponed until at least December due to increasing opposition from the private sector and members of the ruling party in Mexico [1]. Group 1: Economic Relations - The Chinese Foreign Ministry emphasized the importance of mutual benefit and win-win cooperation in China-Mexico economic relations, highlighting that both countries are significant members of the "Global South" [1]. - The Ministry advocates for inclusive economic globalization and opposes unilateralism, protectionism, and discriminatory measures against China [1]. Group 2: Trade and Tariffs - The postponement of the tariff plan comes amid a backdrop of rising tensions regarding tariffs imposed by certain countries, indicating a need for enhanced communication and coordination between China and Mexico to safeguard free trade and multilateralism [1].

Core Viewpoint - The plan by Mexican President López Obrador to impose high tariffs on Chinese imports has been postponed until at least December, according to reports from Mexican lawmakers and business leaders [1] Group 1: Economic Policy - The postponement of tariffs indicates a shift in Mexico's trade policy, potentially affecting trade relations with China and the broader economic landscape [1] - China's Ministry of Foreign Affairs emphasizes its commitment to inclusive economic globalization and opposes unilateralism and protectionism [1] Group 2: Diplomatic Relations - The Chinese government firmly opposes any measures that harm its legitimate interests and will take necessary actions to protect its rights based on actual circumstances [1]

Core Viewpoint - The article emphasizes that openness is a distinctive feature and a necessary requirement of Chinese-style modernization, highlighting the importance of expanding high-level openness to promote reform and development [1] Group 1: Economic Performance - Since the 14th Five-Year Plan, China has implemented a more proactive opening strategy, leading to a new pattern of high-level openness, evidenced by the total goods trade remaining the world's largest for several consecutive years and service trade exceeding $1 trillion for the first time, ranking second globally [1] - China's export share in the world has stabilized at over 14%, while the import share has increased from 9.7% in 2012 to 10.5% in 2024 [1] Group 2: Institutional Opening - The quality of bilateral investment has steadily improved, with a continuous reduction in the negative list for foreign investment access, and the removal of restrictions in the manufacturing sector [1] - The first batch of pilot measures for free trade zones has been fully implemented, showcasing China's commitment to embracing the world with an open stance [1] Group 3: Challenges and Opportunities - The article acknowledges the challenges posed by rising anti-globalization sentiments and increasing instability in global economic growth, emphasizing the need to expand high-level openness to counter these uncertainties [1][2] - It highlights the importance of actively engaging with international high-standard economic and trade rules, particularly in the service sector, and participating in the formulation of rules in emerging fields like digital trade and artificial intelligence [2] Group 4: Reform and Mechanism Improvement - There is a need to eliminate systemic barriers and promote mutual reinforcement between reform and opening, as deep reforms in domestic service industries and cross-regional openings face bottlenecks [3] - Issues such as "invisible barriers" faced by private and foreign enterprises, inadequate regulatory frameworks for new business models, and low standards for intellectual property protection need to be addressed to create a favorable market environment for innovation and investment [3] Group 5: Confidence in Openness - The confidence in advancing high-level openness stems from China's strong economic foundation, resilient potential, and advantages such as a complete industrial system, a vast market, and abundant talent resources [3] - The goal is to establish a new pattern of openness that is broader, deeper, and more extensive, injecting "open momentum" into Chinese-style modernization [3]

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the internal divisions within the U.S. as states like California and Washington take independent actions to strengthen ties with China, contrasting with the federal government's confrontational stance under Trump [1][3][10]. Group 1: Federal vs. State Policies - Trump's tariff policies, intended to pressure China, have inadvertently harmed U.S. states reliant on trade, creating confusion and instability [3][5]. - States are increasingly taking matters into their own hands, with officials openly criticizing federal policies and seeking direct engagement with China [10][12]. - The disconnect between federal and state approaches has led to a "self-rescue" movement among states, as they prioritize economic stability over federal directives [10][18]. Group 2: Economic Implications - Trump's tariffs are projected to result in a loss of 2 million jobs in the U.S., with families facing an average annual cost increase of $5,000 [5][21]. - Despite the challenges posed by tariffs, states like California still see significant trade with China, with exports to China accounting for 20% of California's total exports [20][29]. - Local businesses are finding ways to circumvent tariffs, indicating a resilience and adaptability in state-level economies [27][29]. Group 3: The Emergence of a "Second Track" - The article highlights the emergence of a dual-track U.S.-China relationship, where federal policies are characterized by uncertainty while state-level interactions are driven by mutual economic interests [18][20]. - This "second track" serves as a stabilizing force in U.S.-China relations, providing a buffer against the volatility of federal policies [21][23]. - The growing cooperation at the state level is seen as a response to the unpredictability of federal actions, with states offering a more reliable partnership for China [25][31]. Group 4: Future Outlook - The article suggests that the true winners in this scenario are those who can provide certainty and predictability, as these qualities become increasingly valuable in international relations [25][32]. - As states continue to forge their own paths, the potential for a more stable and interconnected U.S.-China relationship emerges, despite federal tensions [29][31]. - The ongoing internal divisions within the U.S. may lead to a "de facto decoupling," where states operate independently of federal policies, creating new opportunities for collaboration with China [31][32].

在这场关税博弈中，中国的反击从未偏离过捍卫合法权益、维护多边秩序的初衷。当单边主义仍在扰乱 全球经济时，中国坚定的立场，不仅保护了自身的利益，也为世界提供了应对贸易保护主义的有力范 本，这正是美国高层感叹背后的深层含义。 中国之所以能够引起美国高层的感叹，原因在于中国的回应不仅有力度，更具有可持续的战略支持。当 美国威胁要加征关税时，中国则通过在稀土等关键领域的反制措施，让美国意识到其供应链的脆弱性， 迫使美国改变态度，甚至承认"未必需要加征关税"。 中国的反制一直都不是简单的情绪反应，而是基于规则的正当防卫。例如，针对美国PVH集团等公司的 歧视性做法，中国依法将其列入不可靠实体清单，以此来保护国内企业的合法权益。这种"打蛇打七 寸"的精准反制，使得美国企业遭受实质性损失，从而对美国政府形成压力。如同美国经济学家拉弗莉 所说，"中国已经学会了如何打贸易战"，美国的关税威胁正在失去效力。 特朗普政府的关税政策已经显现出反噬效应。当中国对美大豆加征关税时，美国的大豆出口几乎停滞， 直到美国释放出下调"芬太尼关税"的信号，中国才恢复了少量采购。哥伦比亚大学教授萨克斯的批评非 常到位：美国将自己贸易逆差的问题归咎于 ...

Group 1 - Recent negotiations between China and the US in the economic and trade sector have shown both sides' willingness to make adjustments, with the US suspending the export control rule for one year and China announcing a similar suspension [1] - The US has set a benchmark for tariffs on Chinese goods, expressing surprise if other countries do not follow suit, as many have already imposed tariffs on Chinese exports [3] - Despite initial optimism about a potential trade agreement, no formal agreement was reached during the recent talks, and the US Treasury Secretary indicated that an agreement could be signed soon, which was later contradicted by further US actions [4][6] Group 2 - The US has initiated an investigation into whether China has complied with the trade agreement from the Trump administration, with plans to gather public comments and hold hearings [6][8] - The investigation is based on the claim that China failed to meet a target of purchasing an additional $200 billion worth of US goods, a situation complicated by the global pandemic and logistics challenges [8] - The US appears to be attempting to establish its tariff standards as global norms, with other countries like the EU and Australia already imposing tariffs on Chinese products, suggesting a coordinated effort influenced by the US [9] Group 3 - The timing of the US investigation suggests an attempt to shift blame onto China while the US itself has violated agreement terms through various export controls, disrupting normal trade and investment [11] - Following a meeting between the leaders of China and the US, there was no indication from the US of pausing the investigation, highlighting a unilateral approach that prioritizes US interests over bilateral agreements [13] - The investigation and related actions may serve as a political strategy for the Trump administration to manage domestic pressures while using these issues as leverage in future negotiations with China [15][17] Group 4 - The US's approach to trade negotiations, characterized by creating uncertainty, aims to keep China in a reactive position, potentially using these investigations as bargaining chips for concessions in other areas [17] - The unilateral actions by the US could hinder the recovery of US-China trade relations and disrupt the global economic landscape, affecting companies reliant on stable US-China trade [17] - The maintenance of international economic order requires collective efforts, and the US's unilateralism may lead to a decline in its credibility in the global economic arena [19]