Group 1 - The core viewpoint is that Iran's cooperation with the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) is contingent upon the IAEA correcting its "double standards" regarding Iran's nuclear issues [1] - Iranian President Pezeshkian warned that any repeated aggression against Iran would be met with a more decisive and regrettable response [1]

Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the article emphasizes China's economic resilience and growth potential, highlighting that the country remains a "stabilizing source" for the global economy and a "gravity field" for shared development opportunities [1] - In the first five months of this year, China's total import and export value increased by 2.5% year-on-year, while retail sales of consumer goods grew by 5%. The implementation of a new tax refund policy for departing tourists saw a 116% year-on-year increase in tax refund applications [1] - International institutions like JPMorgan and Goldman Sachs have raised their economic growth forecasts for China, reflecting confidence in the country's long-term economic fundamentals and its commitment to high-quality development and high-level opening-up policies [1] Group 2 - China maintains a high level of openness to foreign enterprises, encouraging them to provide compliant technologies, products, and services, and supports economic globalization [2] - In response to the EU's restrictions on Chinese companies in the medical device sector, China emphasizes its commitment to market economy principles and WTO rules, advocating for dialogue to resolve trade disputes [3] - China opposes any provocations under the guise of freedom of navigation in the Taiwan Strait, asserting its sovereignty and territorial integrity [4] Group 3 - In light of the current Middle East situation, China is actively engaging in diplomatic efforts to de-escalate tensions and promote peace, emphasizing that military force is not a viable solution to international disputes [5]

Group 1 - The EU has imposed over 2000 sanctions on Russia by April 2025, including sanctions on Chinese companies, indicating a systematic use of "secondary sanctions" to pressure third-party countries [1] - The sanctions against Chinese companies are based on allegations of "indirect support for Russian military," but no concrete evidence has been provided [2] - The EU's actions reflect a double standard, as many countries, including the US and Europe, continue to engage in business with Russia while targeting Chinese firms [2][4] Group 2 - Europe's reluctance to fully align with China stems from concerns over China's growing strength and potential dominance in various sectors, which could disadvantage Europe [4] - The current geopolitical landscape suggests that Europe may prefer US leadership over a rising China, as it allows Europe to maintain some level of influence in manufacturing and technology [4] - The EU's strategy may involve balancing its relationship with the US while cautiously engaging with China, especially in sectors like AI and renewable energy [13]

Core Viewpoint - Malaysia criticizes the "double standards" regarding the violence in Gaza, highlighting perceived inconsistencies in international responses to the situation [1] Group 1 - Malaysia's government has expressed strong condemnation of the violence occurring in Gaza, emphasizing the need for a unified international stance against such actions [1] - The statement reflects Malaysia's broader concerns about human rights and the treatment of civilians in conflict zones, calling for accountability and justice [1] - The criticism points to a perceived disparity in how different countries respond to similar situations, suggesting that geopolitical interests may influence these responses [1]

Group 1 - The 2025 Eurovision Song Contest will be held in Basel, Switzerland, marking the first time since 1989 that Switzerland hosts the event, with the theme "Music Brings People Together" [1] - A coalition of 72 musicians who previously participated in the contest has signed an open letter urging the European Broadcasting Union (EBU) to ban Israeli participants and the Israeli national broadcaster from the competition, citing Israel's involvement in actions against Palestinians [1] - The musicians argue that allowing Israel to participate would equate to endorsing its national image, and they question the EBU's double standards in handling the participation of countries involved in conflicts, referencing the ban on Russian participants following the Ukraine conflict [1] Group 2 - Despite the controversy, it is expected that the open letter will not significantly impact this year's Eurovision, as a similar petition with over 56,000 signatures was submitted prior to the 2024 contest, yet Israeli contestant Golan still participated [2] - The EBU has implemented strict behavioral guidelines for participants, prohibiting political comments and harassment, in an effort to maintain order and reduce controversy during the competition [2]