这场看似不对等的较量背后，是印度掐准了三大底牌：俄油每吨省89美元的年均节省额、对美国市场仅占GDP4.2%的低依赖度，以及全球南 方国家反双重标准的集体情绪。 "我们每进口三桶油，就有一桶来自俄罗斯。 这不是选择题，而是生存题。 一个月内，美国对印度连砍两刀关税，先因贸易协议谈不拢加征25%，再以"购买俄油加剧乌克兰冲突"为由追加25%，部分印度输美商品税率 飙至50%。 但印度不仅拒绝削减34%的俄油进口份额，反而加速与俄罗斯签署军购协议、推动金砖国家扩容，甚至让莫迪四次拒接特朗普电话。 当特朗普的关税大棒撞上莫迪的"战略自主"，一场重新定义新兴经济体与西方关系的博弈正在上演。 2025年7月31日，特朗普以"印度设置贸易壁垒"为由，对印度输美商品征收25%基础关税。 不到一周后的8月6日，美国再以"印度购买俄罗斯 石油"为名追加25%惩罚性关税，使印度成为美国税率最高的贸易伙伴之一。 两项关税精准打击印度对美出口的"命脉品类"，服装、宝石和汽车零部件，这些领域占印度对美出口总额的50%以上，涉及数百万就业岗 位。 印度外长苏杰生直接在公开场合点破美国的双重标准："欧盟的匈牙利长期进口俄油，德国2024年 ...

古特雷斯指出，当今联合国正面临前所未有的考验：在加沙、乌克兰和苏丹，平民遭受袭击；在世界多地， 贫困与饥饿蔓延；气候危机导致火灾、洪灾和高温接连不断。他警告，如果缺乏强有力的多边机制，多极化格局 将面临巨大风险。 古特雷斯表示："我们不仅要捍卫联合国，还要加强联合国"。他强调《2030年议程》《未来契约》和联合国 八十周年倡议的核心是重塑国际合作的根基，为各国人民创造福祉。 当地时间9月22日，在联合国大会堂，联合国成立八十周年高级别纪念活动举行。人民网记者 李志伟摄 人民网联合国9月22日电 （记者李志伟）当地时间9月22日，在联合国大会堂，联合国成立八十周年高级别纪 念活动举行。联合国秘书长古特雷斯发表讲话，回顾联合国的历史使命，呼吁各国在全球危机加剧的当下，重燃 八十年前的希望之火，以团结和勇气应对当今世界的挑战。 联合国大会主席安娜莱娜·贝尔伯克在致辞中强调了《联合国宪章》的初心。贝尔伯克说："今天不是庆祝的 时刻，而是铭记教训、选择希望的时刻。"她呼吁各国在危机面前选择对话而非分裂，选择行动而非自满。 贝尔伯克强调，本届联合国大会以"同心协力"为主题，传达的不只是口号，而是代代相传的真理。她说："联 ...

Group 1 - The U.S. initially aimed to impose secondary sanctions on all countries purchasing Russian oil, but ultimately only pressured India while being lenient towards China [1][3] - The sanctions intended to curb Russian energy revenue have backfired, as India continues to buy Russian oil and resell it to Europe, undermining the sanctions' effectiveness [1][3] - The U.S. is facing a dilemma between maintaining its hegemonic stance and the realities of its interconnected global supply chains, leading to inconsistent policy decisions [5][7] Group 2 - The U.S. has temporarily suspended the implementation of a 24% reciprocal tariff on China, contrasting sharply with previous threats of much higher tariffs [3][5] - The geopolitical landscape indicates that a potential sanction on China could lead to global energy price increases, highlighting China's significant role in the global oil market [3][5] - The U.S. is using tariffs as leverage in trade negotiations with India, which has been purchasing Russian oil at lower prices, impacting U.S. shale oil interests [3][5] Group 3 - The U.S. domestic political landscape, particularly the upcoming midterm elections, is influencing its trade and tariff policies, resulting in erratic and unpredictable decisions [5][7] - The inconsistent approach to sanctions and tariffs has damaged the U.S.'s international credibility and weakened the deterrent effect of its trade policies [5][7] - The situation presents an opportunity for emerging countries like China and India to strengthen their cooperation and potentially reshape global governance [7]

Core Viewpoint - Iran's Foreign Minister Zarif publicly criticized Europe for lacking the authority to discuss or enforce mechanisms related to the Iran nuclear deal, particularly the "snapback sanctions" mechanism, highlighting the complexities of the Middle East nuclear issue and Europe's relatively passive role in international affairs [1][3][4] Group 1: Iran's Position and Strategy - Zarif's statement reflects Iran's firm stance on its sovereignty and nuclear technology development, indicating that any attempts to manipulate or reinstate sanctions will be deemed invalid by Iran [3][4][6] - The joint letter from France, Germany, and the UK to the UN threatening to reinstate sanctions if Iran does not reach a diplomatic solution by a set deadline may escalate tensions, as Iran prioritizes its national interests over external pressures [3][4][9] - Iran's rejection of European intervention signifies a shift towards a more assertive and independent foreign policy, positioning itself as a key player in the regional power dynamics [6][9] Group 2: Implications for International Relations - The current situation underscores the limitations of multilateral mechanisms in addressing conflicts of national interest, particularly when faced with a resolute state like Iran [4][7] - The renewed focus on the Iran nuclear issue increases uncertainty in the Middle East, as European attempts to enforce the deal through sanctions may not yield the desired outcomes and could exacerbate regional tensions [6][9] - The evolving dynamics suggest that traditional diplomatic tools and mechanisms are facing significant challenges in the new geopolitical landscape, necessitating a reevaluation of strategies to achieve a balanced and pragmatic resolution [7][9]

Group 1 - The S&P 500 index increased by 0.44% [1] - Brazilian President Lula emphasized Brazil's commitment to defending multilateral mechanisms [1]

Core Viewpoint - The ASEAN-China-GCC summit represents a significant opportunity for collaboration among China, the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC), and ASEAN, aiming to enhance global market stability and restore confidence in multilateral mechanisms [1][2]. Group 1: Summit Outcomes - The summit held on May 27 resulted in a historic partnership, establishing a new platform for cooperation among the three parties [1]. - The combined population and economic scale of China, GCC, and ASEAN presents substantial potential for economies of scale and synergy [1]. Group 2: Strategic Goals - The three parties aim to jointly explore new markets to mitigate the impact of U.S. tariff policies [2]. - A key objective is to inject certainty into the global market amidst rising tensions following U.S. tariff announcements, which have led to lowered economic growth expectations [2]. - The summit's joint statement emphasizes the need to restore confidence in a multilateral trade system centered around the World Trade Organization (WTO), highlighting the importance of protecting businesses and consumers globally [2]. Group 3: Broader Agenda - The summit addressed a wide range of topics, including international and regional issues, energy security cooperation among the three parties, and counter-terrorism efforts [2].

Group 1 - The core viewpoint emphasizes China's commitment to global cooperation and dialogue, rather than imposing its views on others, which is essential for addressing global challenges like climate change [1] - The Belt and Road Initiative is highlighted as a significant opportunity for participating countries, with examples such as the transformative impact of the Mombasa-Nairobi railway in Kenya, which has improved transportation and economic development [1] - The United Nations is recognized as a crucial framework for international order and stability, despite its imperfections, and the commitment of member states is vital for its effectiveness in addressing global challenges [2] Group 2 - Humanitarian efforts face severe challenges due to sudden cuts in aid from some countries, which has led to significant humanitarian crises, particularly highlighted by the impact of U.S. aid reductions [2] - The global landscape is characterized by distrust and inequality, necessitating a collective response to emerging challenges, as stated by the UN Deputy Secretary-General [2] - China's active participation in international humanitarian rescue efforts is acknowledged, showcasing its expertise and the need for its support in disaster response [3]

Group 1 - The core viewpoint emphasizes China's commitment to building partnerships based on dialogue and trust, rather than imposing its views on others [1] - The Belt and Road Initiative and the concept of a community with a shared future proposed by China promote global unity and cooperation, which are essential for addressing challenges like climate change [1] - The Belt and Road Initiative has provided significant development opportunities for participating countries, exemplified by the transformative impact of the Nairobi-Mombasa railway in Kenya [1] Group 2 - The United Nations was established to address global challenges such as conflict, climate change, and pandemics, and its effectiveness relies on member states' commitment to international cooperation [2] - Humanitarian work faces severe challenges due to sudden and significant cuts in aid from some countries, particularly the United States, which has created immense short-term difficulties [2] - The world is increasingly characterized by distrust and inequality, necessitating a collective response to global challenges [2] Group 3 - China's active participation in international humanitarian aid and its commitment to maintaining global peace and stability have been positively noted, particularly in disaster response scenarios [2]