Core Points - Japan is attempting to break free from the constraints of international law as a defeated nation in World War II, leading to a potential resurgence of militarism [1][3] - Recent actions by Japan, including the export of lethal weapons and discussions to revise security policies, indicate a departure from post-war international order [1][2] - The international community has expressed concern over Japan's shift away from its long-standing commitment to peace and adherence to international agreements [3][4] Summary by Sections Japan's Recent Actions - Japan has relaxed weapon export restrictions and is exporting lethal weapons for the first time since 2023 [1] - The ruling party is discussing revisions to the "security three documents" and plans to deploy offensive weapons in the southwestern islands near Taiwan [1][2] International Legal Obligations - International documents like the UN Charter and the Potsdam Declaration clearly outline Japan's obligations as a defeated nation, including disarmament and restrictions on military capabilities [2] - Japan's constitution and political agreements emphasize a commitment to peaceful development and conflict resolution through non-military means [2] Domestic and International Reactions - There is growing alarm among international scholars and governments regarding Japan's militaristic rhetoric and actions, which contradict its constitutional commitments [3] - Protests have emerged within Japan, with citizens demanding the Prime Minister retract controversial statements and uphold peace principles [3][4] Historical Context and Future Implications - The historical lessons from World War II highlight the importance of Japan adhering to international law and its own peace constitution to avoid repeating past mistakes [4] - The international community has a responsibility to uphold the post-war order and prevent the resurgence of Japanese militarism [4]

Core Viewpoint - Japan is attempting to break free from the constraints of international law as a defeated nation in World War II, leading to a potential resurgence of militarism, which poses a serious threat to peace and stability in Asia and the world [1][4]. Group 1: Japan's Recent Actions - Japan has made several dangerous moves, including the first export of lethal weapons since easing restrictions in 2023, discussions within the ruling party to revise security documents, and plans to deploy offensive weapons on islands near Taiwan [1][3]. - These actions are seen as a blatant disregard for international obligations and a significant challenge to the post-war order recognized by the international community [1][2]. Group 2: International Legal Framework - Key international documents, such as the UN Charter and the Potsdam Declaration, clearly outline Japan's obligations as a defeated nation, including the complete disarmament and prohibition of maintaining industries that could lead to rearmament [2][3]. - Japan's commitment to peace is further reinforced by the Japan-China Joint Statement and Article 9 of the Japanese Constitution, which emphasizes a path of peaceful development and the renunciation of war [2][3]. Group 3: Domestic and International Reactions - There is growing concern from the international community regarding Japan's right-wing movements that challenge fundamental principles of peace, including calls for military intervention in Taiwan and discussions to abandon the "Three Non-Nuclear Principles" [3][4]. - Scholars and officials from other countries, including Malaysia and Russia, have criticized Japan's leadership for its historical misconceptions, while domestic protests have emerged against the Prime Minister's controversial statements [3][4]. Group 4: Historical Context and Responsibility - The historical context emphasizes the importance of acknowledging past mistakes to avoid repeating tragedies, with a call for Japan to adhere to international law and its own peace constitution [4]. - The international community has a responsibility to uphold the post-war order and ensure that Japan's militaristic tendencies do not resurface, with a warning that any unilateral actions by Japan could lead to a reevaluation of its historical transgressions [4].

Group 1 - The Japanese government has completed the export of "Patriot" missile systems to the United States, marking the first export of lethal weapons since the relaxation of arms export restrictions [1] - Prime Minister Fumio Kishida has initiated the establishment of a new central intelligence agency, the "National Intelligence Agency," aiming to create a Japanese version of the CIA [1] Group 2 - There are efforts by Japanese right-wing forces to amend the "Three Non-Nuclear Principles" to introduce and potentially use nuclear weapons under the guise of "nuclear sharing" [2] - Kishida's provocative statements on Taiwan, history, territory, and security issues reveal a dangerous historical and strategic perspective held by Japanese right-wing forces [2] - The resurgence of right-wing thought in Japan is attributed to the incomplete reckoning of militaristic crimes post-World War II, compounded by U.S. encouragement of Japan's militaristic tendencies [2][4] Group 3 - The strategic anxiety of Japan's ruling elite is driven by stagnation in national power and the rise of China, leading to a desire to break free from post-war peace constraints and pursue a "normal state" status [4] - Japan is on a perilous path of undermining its "Peace Constitution" while attempting to assert itself in regional security matters [4][6] - The conservative shift in Japan's national security strategy poses significant risks to regional stability and security [6]

Core Viewpoint - The Chinese government has issued a strong warning to Japan regarding its involvement in the Taiwan Strait situation, asserting that any military intervention would be considered an act of aggression, and China will exercise its right to self-defense as per the UN Charter and international law [1][2] Group 1: China's Position - China's permanent representative to the UN, Fu Cong, emphasized that Japan's Prime Minister Kishi's remarks violate international law and provoke the Chinese people and nations that suffered from Japanese aggression [1] - The letter sent to the UN will be distributed to all member states, aiming to alert Japan to cease its provocative rhetoric and to inform the international community about Japan's dangerous legislative moves to expand its collective self-defense capabilities [1][2] Group 2: International Reactions - The letter has been described as the strongest wording used by China in response to the most severe bilateral crisis between China and Japan in recent years, with a clear message to defend its rights [1] - The Chinese Embassy in Japan referenced the "enemy clause" of the UN Charter, which allows for military action against nations that have previously engaged in fascist or militaristic policies without needing Security Council authorization [2] Group 3: Historical Context - Analysts highlight that Japan's attempts to exercise collective self-defense and military threats are legally unfounded, given its status as a World War II defeated nation and its constitutional commitment to renounce war [2][3] - The shift in Japan's stance from a peace-oriented nation to one seeking military capabilities poses a significant threat to regional and global stability, challenging the post-war international order [3]

Core Viewpoint - The provocative remarks made by Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi regarding Taiwan have escalated tensions in Sino-Japanese relations and have drawn widespread condemnation from various parties [1][3][15] Group 1: Political Context - Takaichi's statements suggest a potential military intervention in the Taiwan Strait, linking Taiwan's situation to Japan's collective self-defense rights [3][5] - The remarks have been met with strong criticism from both China and the international community, highlighting the dangerous implications for regional stability [5][9] - China's UN representative has firmly stated that any military intervention by Japan would be met with a strong defense of China's sovereignty [3][9] Group 2: Legal and Historical Implications - Takaichi's comments violate several key political documents, including the Japan-China Joint Statement and the Japan-China Peace and Friendship Treaty, undermining the long-standing political commitments between the two nations [5][7] - The assertion that "Taiwan's issues are Japan's issues" represents a significant departure from Japan's post-war pacifist constitution and international legal norms [9][11] - Historical documents, such as the Cairo Declaration and the Potsdam Proclamation, affirm Taiwan as part of China, further complicating Japan's legal standing on the issue [7][9] Group 3: Domestic and International Reactions - There have been widespread protests in Japan against Takaichi's remarks, indicating significant domestic opposition to her stance [3][11] - China has implemented countermeasures, including suspending imports of Japanese seafood and advising citizens against travel to Japan, to assert its position on the matter [13][15] - The international community has largely condemned Takaichi's statements, reflecting a broader concern over the resurgence of militarism in Japan [15]

为了一己政治私欲而置国家前途和世界和平稳定于不顾，高市早苗的错误言行正将日本引入好战必亡的 危险境地 《 人民日报 》（ 2025年11月22日 03 版） (责编：胡永秋、杨光宇) 高市早苗拿台湾问题做文章，背后有其政治算计。日方有识之士犀利指出，高市早苗明显存在一种政治 盘算，即通过持续炒作"中国威胁论"和"警惕中国论"巩固支持基础，以强硬姿态稳定基本盘。她全面继 承甚至激进发挥日本右翼政客的"政治遗产"，把严肃的国家政策异化为个人政治表演的工具，把事关中 日关系根基的台湾问题当作谋求私利的筹码。这种将本国前途命运捆绑于个人政治野心的做法，只会把 日本带入歧途，把自己碰得头破血流。 高市早苗的顽固立场，暴露了日本右翼势力的持续抬头和军国主义思想的不散阴魂。二战后，《波茨坦 公告》明确规定日本"禁止重新武装"，日本"和平宪法"也确立了"专守防卫"原则。然而，日本右翼势力 不断寻求突破束缚，从大幅增加防卫预算到谋求发展进攻性武器，再到图谋放弃"无核三原则"，在强军 扩武的道路上越走越远。高市早苗渲染所谓"存亡危机"，实质上是为推进军事松绑、修宪扩军寻找借 口。这种危险动向是对战后国际秩序的严重挑战，将把日本民 ...

版权声明 中国常驻联合国代表傅聪18日在第80届联合国大会全体会议审议安理会改革问题时表示，日本首相高市 早苗近期在国会发表的涉台言论极其错误，极为危险，粗暴干涉中国内政，严重违背一个中国原则和中日 四个政治文件精神。这是对国际正义的挑衅，对战后国际秩序的破坏，对国际关系基本准则的践踏，公然 背离了日本所作的走和平道路的基本承诺。这样的国家根本没有资格要求成为安理会常任理事国。 傅聪表示，今年是中国人民抗日战争暨世界反法西斯战争胜利80周年，也是台湾光复80周年。日本在二 战期间发动侵略战争，包括对台湾实施殖民统治，犯下罄竹难书的罪行，给中国和亚洲受害国人民带来深 重灾难。然而时至今日，日本国内仍有势力不断宣扬错误的二战史观，参拜供奉二战甲级战犯的靖国神 社、修改中小学历史教科书、否认南京大屠杀和强征"慰安妇"等罪恶史实，宣扬所谓"终战"而非战败等历 史修正主义言论，妄图歪曲、否认、美化侵略历史和殖民统治。 傅聪强调，众所周知，世界上只有一个中国，中华人民共和国政府是代表全中国的唯一合法政府，台湾是 中国领土不可分割的一部分。 针对日方的荒谬言论，傅聪在第二轮发言中指出，第二次世界大战胜利已经80年，二战事实 ...

Group 1 - The article discusses China's strong condemnation of Japan's recent provocative statements regarding Taiwan, emphasizing that Taiwan is an inseparable part of China and that Japan's remarks violate the one-China principle [3][4][5] - China's representative, Fu Cong, criticized Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida's comments as dangerous and a gross interference in China's internal affairs, undermining international justice and the post-war international order [3][4] - Fu Cong highlighted Japan's historical aggression and colonial crimes, questioning Japan's ability to adhere to its commitments to peace and international justice, especially in light of its militaristic past [4][5] Group 2 - The article warns Japan to cease its provocative actions regarding Taiwan, stating that any military intervention would be considered an act of aggression, and China would respond decisively to defend its sovereignty [5] - Fu Cong's statements reflect a broader concern about Japan's potential return to militarism, raising questions about its commitment to peace and its role in maintaining international security [4][5]

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the recent provocative statements made by Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi regarding Taiwan, which are seen as a serious challenge to China's core interests and a violation of established political agreements between China and Japan [1][3][5]. Summary by Sections Political Context - The diplomatic discussions between China and Japan on November 18 highlighted China's stern demand for Japan to retract its erroneous statements regarding Taiwan, which are viewed as a blatant interference in China's internal affairs [1]. - Takaichi's remarks are characterized as a significant deviation from Japan's historical commitments and the political consensus established through four key political documents between the two nations [3][5]. Historical Agreements - The four political documents, including the 1972 Sino-Japanese Joint Statement, affirm that Taiwan is an inseparable part of China and that Japan recognizes the People's Republic of China as the sole legitimate government of China [3][5]. - The 1978 Treaty of Peace and Friendship and subsequent agreements reiterate Japan's commitment to these principles, emphasizing that there is no room for misinterpretation regarding Taiwan's status [5][6]. Legal Implications - The article emphasizes that Takaichi's statements contradict the legal obligations Japan has under international law, particularly the principles outlined in the Sino-Japanese agreements [6][9]. - Experts argue that Japan's claims of "position differences" regarding Taiwan are unfounded, as the issue is clearly defined in both international law and bilateral agreements [6][7]. Military and Security Concerns - Takaichi's reference to a "survival crisis situation" stems from Japan's new security laws, which allow for military action even without direct threats, thus undermining Japan's post-war pacifist constitution [7][8]. - The new security framework has raised concerns about Japan's potential military interventions, which could lead to a significant shift in its defense posture and regional stability [8][11]. International Relations - The article critiques Takaichi's statements as a challenge to the post-war international order and fundamental principles of international law, such as non-interference in domestic affairs [9][10]. - The historical context of Taiwan's status is reinforced by international agreements, including the Cairo Declaration and the Potsdam Proclamation, which affirm Taiwan's return to China [9][10]. Domestic Reactions - There is a growing concern within Japan regarding the rise of right-wing ideologies that threaten the country's pacifist stance and historical narrative [11][12]. - Calls for a return to a peaceful national identity are echoed by various commentators, emphasizing the need for Japan to adhere to its commitments to peace and stability in the region [12].

日本首相高市早苗最近的激进言论背后，这个国家正以惊人速度突破和平宪法束缚，而经济命脉却依赖着它公然挑战的对象。 日本首相高市早苗在国会公然宣称"台湾有事"可能构成日本可行使集体自卫权的"存亡危机事态"，暗示可能武力介入台海问题。这一言论立即在日本国内外 引发震动，日本股市随之大跌，特别是旅游和消费类股首当其冲。 日本法政大学政治学教授白鸟浩一针见血地指出："股价持续下跌，反映了市场对中日关系恶化的担忧。对日本而言，中国是不可或缺的，是最大的贸易伙 伴国。" 高市早苗上台后，迅速推出一系列激进安保政策，其步伐之快、范围之广令人咋舌。 日本政府宣布将修改"防卫装备转移三原则"的实施方针，取消对防卫装备出口的部分限制。这意味日本生产的杀伤性武器将能更自由地流向国际市场。 更引人瞩目的是，高市政府计划将原定于2027财年实现的"防卫费占国内生产总值2%"的目标提前至本财年内达成。对于一个债务总额已达GDP两倍多的国 家来说，这一决定格外惊人。 日本还图谋发展核动力潜艇，并考虑修改"无核三原则"中不引进核武器的原则。这些动向预示着日本战后安保政策正在发生根本性转变。 近年来，日本已悄悄构筑了相当可观的进攻能力。日本政府 ...