Core Viewpoint - The case of Dr. Li Jianhua against Chen, a social media influencer, highlights the judicial protection of citizens' reputation rights and aligns with the national effort to strengthen online governance and punish online crimes [1][9]. Group 1: Background of the Case - Chen, who had no prior connection to Dr. Li, began a campaign of online harassment against him following a medical dispute involving another party, resulting in over two years of defamation through social media [2][10]. - The defamatory statements included accusations of "academic fraud" and "practicing medicine without a license," leading to severe personal and professional consequences for Dr. Li, including mental health issues and disruption of the hospital's operations [2][10]. Group 2: Legal Proceedings - After unsuccessful attempts to resolve the issue amicably, Dr. Li filed a civil lawsuit in November 2021, which resulted in a court ruling against Chen for defamation, requiring him to delete the defamatory content and issue an apology [3][11]. - Despite the civil judgment, Chen continued to spread false information, further damaging Dr. Li's reputation and undermining public trust in the judicial system [3][11]. Group 3: Criminal Charges and Sentencing - Dr. Li subsequently pursued criminal charges against Chen, leading to a conviction for defamation, with the court determining that Chen's actions met the legal criteria for severe circumstances, including high engagement metrics on his defamatory posts [5][14]. - The court sentenced Chen to 18 months in prison, emphasizing the importance of upholding legal standards in online discourse and the consequences of violating others' rights [6][14]. Group 4: Implications for Online Governance - This case serves as a significant precedent in the fight against online defamation and reinforces the message that the internet is not a lawless space, urging citizens to respect legal boundaries while exercising their freedom of expression [7][15]. - The ongoing efforts by the government to enhance online governance, including the implementation of new laws and regulations, aim to create a safer digital environment and reduce instances of online violence and defamation [6][15].

Core Viewpoint - The case of Dr. Li Jianhua from Guangzhou Aier Eye Hospital against online influencer Chen Mou for defamation highlights the importance of protecting citizens' reputation rights and reflects the government's ongoing efforts to strengthen online governance and punish cyber crimes [1][5]. Group 1: Case Background - Dr. Li Jianhua was subjected to online harassment by Chen Mou, who began spreading defamatory statements about him on social media after a medical dispute involving another party [1]. - Chen Mou published hundreds to thousands of defamatory posts from July 2021, falsely accusing Dr. Li of "academic fraud" and "practicing medicine without a license," leading to severe personal and professional consequences for Dr. Li [1][2]. Group 2: Legal Proceedings - After unsuccessful attempts to resolve the issue amicably, Dr. Li filed a civil lawsuit in November 2021, which resulted in court rulings against Chen Mou for infringing on Dr. Li's reputation and image rights [2][3]. - Despite the civil court's decisions, Chen Mou continued to spread false information, further damaging Dr. Li's reputation and undermining public trust in the judicial system [2]. Group 3: Criminal Charges and Sentencing - Dr. Li decided to pursue criminal charges against Chen Mou, leading to a conviction for defamation, with the court finding that Chen Mou's actions met the criteria for serious defamation as defined by legal standards [4][5]. - The court sentenced Chen Mou to one and a half years in prison, emphasizing the severity of his actions and the need for accountability in online spaces [5]. Group 4: Implications for Online Governance - This case serves as a significant precedent in combating online defamation and reinforces the message that the internet is not a lawless space, urging citizens to respect the legal boundaries of free speech [6]. - The Chinese government has been actively enhancing online governance through various laws and regulations aimed at curbing online infringement and violence, with new laws set to take effect in 2026 to further address these issues [5][6].

Group 1 - Shenzhen's internet information office is conducting a series of "Clear" special actions to combat malicious marketing in short video platforms, misinformation from self-media, abuse of AI technology, and corporate infringement issues [1][2] - The actions include the supervision of local websites and platforms to fulfill their responsibilities, clean up harmful information, and deal with non-compliant accounts to maintain a healthy online ecosystem [1] - Specific applications and accounts, such as "Tianyan" and "Tuqu AI," have been identified for spreading low-quality AI-generated content and failing to meet labeling requirements [1] Group 2 - The special actions also target the dissemination of vulgar information related to minors, false portrayal of campus violence, and exploitation of minors for profit [2] - Several accounts, including those on WeChat and gaming platforms, have been penalized for spreading false information and damaging corporate reputations [2] - Self-media accounts that spread subjective speculation and negative narratives have faced restrictions, including suspension of monetization rights and content display limitations [2] Group 3 - Actions against accounts that provoke negative emotions include those spreading abusive content and exploiting social issues for traffic [3] - Live streaming accounts that engage in vulgar inducement and deception for tips have been restricted or permanently banned [3] - The Shenzhen internet information office plans to continue strengthening governance over various online ecological issues and will publish typical case handling results to promote a clear and orderly online environment [3]

Group 1 - Shenzhen's internet information office is conducting a series of "Clear" special actions in 2025 to combat malicious marketing in the short video sector, misinformation from self-media, abuse of AI technology, and infringement related to enterprises [2][3] - The actions include supervising local websites and platforms to fulfill their responsibilities, cleaning up harmful information, and dealing with non-compliant accounts to maintain a healthy online ecosystem [2] - Specific applications and accounts, such as "Tianyan" and "Tuqu AI," have been identified for spreading low-quality AI-generated content and failing to meet labeling requirements [2] Group 2 - Multiple accounts have been penalized for malicious marketing, including Tencent's "Qingfeng Kanggao" for posting fake staged content and WeChat's "Guoneng Goudong Yike" for impersonating authoritative institutions [3] - The initiative also targets accounts that exploit minors, including those posting vulgar content or using minors' images for profit, with several accounts being shut down or restricted [3] - Efforts to purify the online environment for minors have led to the identification of accounts involved in spreading false information related to school violence and other inappropriate content [3] Group 3 - In addressing misinformation from self-media, several accounts have been suspended for spreading subjective and inflammatory statements, distorting historical facts, and promoting negative values [4] - The campaign against malicious provocation of negative emotions has led to the restriction of accounts that spread divisive rhetoric or exploit social issues for views [5] - The initiative also includes measures against low-quality live streaming and accounts that engage in vulgar inducement for tips, resulting in restrictions or permanent bans on several accounts [5] Group 4 - The Shenzhen internet information department plans to continue strengthening governance over various online ecological issues, enforcing laws against non-compliant websites and accounts, and publicly sharing typical case resolutions [6]

Core Viewpoint - The governance of the online ecosystem is a crucial task for building a strong network nation, impacting national development, security, and the interests of the people [1] Group 1: Political Direction - The leadership of the Party is essential for ensuring that online ecosystem governance progresses in the correct political direction [2] - The governance work has a distinct political attribute, necessitating adherence to the principle of Party control over the internet [2] - Strengthening ideological guidance is vital, with a focus on promoting the mainstream ideology's influence in the online space [2] Group 2: Organizational Support - A comprehensive governance framework involving multiple stakeholders, including Party leadership, government management, corporate responsibility, social supervision, and self-discipline by netizens, is necessary [3] - The integration of Party organizations within internet companies is crucial for ensuring that platforms fulfill their responsibilities [3] - Clear delineation of responsibilities among various departments is essential for effective governance [3] Group 3: People-Centric Approach - The essence of online ecosystem governance is to serve the people, with a focus on maintaining their legitimate rights and interests [4] - Recent actions have targeted significant online issues such as cyber violence and misinformation, demonstrating a commitment to addressing public concerns [4] - Enhancing public engagement in governance and fostering a sense of community in the online space is important for improving the overall ecosystem [6] Group 4: Innovation and Tradition - Balancing tradition and innovation is key to enhancing governance effectiveness in the online ecosystem [7][8] - The use of new technologies like AI and big data is essential for improving governance capabilities and addressing challenges [8] - A collaborative governance model involving various stakeholders is necessary to adapt to the evolving online landscape [8] Group 5: Legal Framework - Legal support is fundamental for regulating online behavior and maintaining order in the digital space [9] - A robust legal framework has been established through various laws, but ongoing legislative efforts are needed to address emerging challenges [9] - Strengthening inter-departmental cooperation in law enforcement is crucial for effectively tackling online violations [10] Group 6: Systematic Approach - A systematic perspective is required for online ecosystem governance, recognizing the interconnectedness of various subsystems [11] - Balancing development and security is essential, with a focus on promoting healthy online growth while ensuring safety [11] - Long-term mechanisms must be established to address both current issues and prevent future problems in the online ecosystem [12] Group 7: International Cooperation - Global cooperation is necessary for effective online governance, as it is a common challenge faced by all nations [13] - Engaging in international rule-making and combating online crime collaboratively is vital for enhancing global governance [13] - Promoting China's narrative and improving its international influence in cyberspace is a strategic goal [13]

Core Insights - Shanxi police will implement a new policing model based on "professional + mechanism + big data" by 2025, aiming to combat various online crimes effectively [1][2] Group 1: Crime Statistics and Enforcement Actions - Shanxi police plan to investigate over 6,700 online-related cases, apprehending more than 8,400 suspects and seizing assets worth 125 million yuan [1] - The police will focus on cases involving the infringement of personal information, with 75 cases leading to the arrest of 120 suspects and the exposure of over 220 million personal information records, resulting in asset seizures exceeding 30 million yuan [1] - A total of 131 cases of online rumors will be investigated, with 180 individuals penalized for spreading false information, and 51 illegal accounts shut down [1] Group 2: Cybersecurity and Information Protection - Shanxi police will guide key websites to enhance their platform agreements and privacy policies, focusing on user account verification, data security, and the protection of minors [2] - Over 3,200 harmful pieces of information will be cleared, and more than 50 applications illegally collecting personal information will be addressed [2] - The police emphasize the importance of personal information protection and encourage the public to report online violations to maintain their rights [2]

转自：北京日报客户端 中国网络社会组织联合会第二届理事会第五次常务理事会在京召开 12月25日下午，中国网络社会组织联合会第二届理事会第五次常务理事会在京召开。中央网信办副主 任、国家网信办副主任、中国网络社会组织联合会会长牛一兵主持会议并讲话。中网联常务理事及代表 出席会议，中网联监事、秘书处负责同志及各部门负责人列席会议。 会议审议通过中网联2025年工作报告和2026年工作计划，听取《中网联五年发展规划（2021-2025 年）》（调整版）实施情况总结评估报告，听取会长、秘书长工作述职，表决通过杨阳、董雅婷同志为 中网联副秘书长，审议同意吸收四川省网信人才发展促进会等10家单位为新会员、12家会员退会及取消 4家单位的会员资格，审议通过《中网联培训收费管理办法（试行）》等9项制度。 会议指出，2025年是中网联接续奋斗、全面推进高质量发展的关键之年。一年来，中网联带领广大会员 单位团结奋斗、开拓进取，强化政治统领始终不动摇，拓展品牌建设取得新突破，提升服务质效取得新 进展，加强规范治理取得新成效，为服务网信中心工作提供了有力支撑。 会议强调，各常务理事单位要进一步提高政治站位，以高度的责任感、使命感、紧 ...

视觉中国供图 受访者对社交媒体平台改进有哪些期待： 提供更多个性化内容管理工具（如关键词屏蔽、时间提醒） 43.79% 其他 0.11% --------------- 对于海南大学国际经济与贸易专业的大三学生汪涵而言，社交媒体平台满足了她的社交需求，也承载着 她的情感共鸣。但这种陪伴并不总是愉悦的，比如："突兀的广告植入时常打断沉浸式的浏览体验。" 袁浩宁是一名就读于天津理工大学机械电子工程专业的大二学生，日均社交媒体使用时长超过4小时。 虽身处短视频洪流之中，他却偏向于自己搜索信息，而非接受算法定向"投喂"。 加强内容审核，减少虚假与有害信息 77.48% 优化算法，避免信息茧房与过度推荐同质内容 69.70% 加强隐私保护功能 64.45% 完善举报/审核机制 60.55% 提供防沉迷工具 43.51% 减少广告推送频率 59.26% 为了更好地了解大学生群体的社交媒体使用习惯及其影响，中国青年报·中青校媒近期面向全国高校大 学生发起问卷调查，共回收有效问卷1772份。调查结果显示，微信（90.69%）是大学生最常使用的社 交平台。此外，抖音、B站等视频平台（72.18%）、QQ（56.94%）、小红书 ...

Core Viewpoint - The importance of strengthening network ecological governance is emphasized, reflecting the central government's commitment to building a strong network nation and ensuring a clean and positive online environment [1][2]. Group 1: Significance of Xi Jinping's Speech - Xi Jinping's speech outlines the strategic importance of network ecological governance, providing a framework for high-quality development in the internet sector and indicating the need for a long-term governance mechanism [2][3]. - The speech highlights the achievements made since the 18th National Congress, including the promotion of mainstream values and the effective suppression of various online issues, attributing these successes to the leadership of the central government [2][3]. Group 2: Theoretical Foundation and Implementation - The speech integrates Marxist worldview and methodology, addressing key theoretical and practical issues in network ecological governance, and emphasizes the necessity of adhering to party leadership and the rule of law [3][5]. - The Central Cyberspace Affairs Commission prioritizes the in-depth understanding of the speech, organizing various forms of discussions and learning sessions to ensure comprehensive implementation [3][5]. Group 3: Promoting Public Engagement - The speech has generated significant public response, with efforts to utilize online platforms for disseminating its core messages and engaging citizens in discussions about network governance [4][5]. - The Central Cyberspace Affairs Commission is leveraging new technologies to create engaging online content that resonates with the public, encouraging active participation in maintaining a positive online environment [4][5]. Group 4: Actionable Tasks and Responsibilities - The speech outlines specific tasks for enhancing network governance, including improving online content quality, strengthening legal frameworks, and addressing issues like account impersonation and rights violations [5][6]. - The Central Cyberspace Affairs Commission is committed to implementing a comprehensive action plan that includes promoting positive online narratives and enhancing the effectiveness of governance measures [5][6]. Group 5: Long-term Goals and International Cooperation - Network ecological governance is identified as a critical task for national development and security, with a focus on creating a sustainable governance mechanism that enhances the online environment [7]. - The importance of international cooperation in the digital space is highlighted, with initiatives aimed at participating in global rule-making and enhancing China's international communication capabilities [6][7].

Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the articles highlights the joint efforts by Beijing's housing authority and multiple departments to address and regulate the spread of misinformation and chaotic practices in the real estate sector through internet platforms [1] Group 2 - As of December 12, under the supervision of relevant authorities, platforms such as 58 Tongcheng, Douyin, Xiaohongshu, Xianyu, and Beike have collectively self-checked and cleared over 17,000 pieces of illegal and harmful information [2] - A total of over 2,300 accounts and live streams that amplified market fluctuations, spread anxiety, speculated on policies, and disseminated false content have been removed, including accounts like Beijing Apartment, Lao Li Talks about Beijing Housing, and others [2] - Lianjia, Wo Ai Wo Jia, and Maitian have screened over 1.3 million online housing listings, taking down and rectifying more than 480 non-compliant listings [2]