Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the pervasive issue of fake traffic in the digital economy, highlighting how it distorts market order, erodes public trust, and damages industry ecology through various deceptive practices such as bulk likes, malicious reporting, and fake reviews [1][4]. Group 1: Nature of Fake Traffic - Fake traffic manifests in various forms, including systematic falsification of key interaction metrics like clicks, views, and likes, misleading advertisers and consumers [5]. - The most common method of generating fake traffic is through "machine brushing," where users employ software and virtual accounts to automate actions like likes and comments, creating a false sense of popularity [5][12]. - A notable case involved a software company that provided tools for purchasing fake followers and likes, resulting in significant financial gains for the perpetrators [6]. Group 2: Impact on Market Order - The practice of "brushing" leads to the creation of fake sales figures, distorting the true performance of products and misleading consumers [7]. - In a specific incident, a criminal group generated over 9000 fake orders within a week, significantly boosting a merchant's visibility and undermining fair competition on the platform [7]. - Fake reviews and comments on social media platforms mislead consumers, affecting their purchasing decisions and contributing to a cycle of poor-quality products dominating the market [10]. Group 3: Challenges in Regulation - The complexity of the fake traffic issue is compounded by the rapid evolution of technology and the inadequacy of existing legal frameworks to address new forms of online fraud [11][14]. - The lack of clear definitions between legitimate traffic operations and illegal activities complicates regulatory efforts, potentially impacting innocent parties [14]. - Enforcement challenges include difficulties in evidence collection and cross-border cooperation, as many operations utilize distributed systems and can easily alter or delete electronic data [15]. Group 4: Proposed Solutions - A multi-faceted governance approach is necessary, involving legal regulation, platform accountability, technological countermeasures, and industry collaboration to effectively combat fake traffic [17]. - Legal frameworks need to be updated to address the specificities of fake traffic, including clear definitions and penalties for various forms of fraud [17][20]. - Platforms are encouraged to shift their focus from mere traffic metrics to content quality and user satisfaction, thereby reducing the emphasis on quantitative indicators [18].

0:00 《经济参考报》1月8日刊发文章《色情视频被恶意"炮制" 几元就能买到预训练模型 警惕AI换脸技术滥 用滋生黑灰产》。 新华社音视频部制作 ...

对于为什么会出现类似谣言，上述负责人表示，实际上是黑灰产团伙为掩盖其违法活动而编造的借 口。"为了实施网络诈骗等犯罪行为，黑灰产团伙需要大量账号。他们通过非法手段获取账号后，往往 会使用外挂批量添加好友、高频次群发欺诈信息、发布同质化违禁内容等，这些明显违反使用规范的行 为，自然会触发平台的安全防护机制。为逃避打击，黑灰产团伙在内部传播所谓'养号教程'，将其违法 活动中采用的'异常行为模式'（如伪装地理位置等），伪装成'平台规则'向外散布，实际上是在为自己 账号被处理寻找借口，企图混淆视听。" 责任编辑：何俊熹 新浪科技讯 1月7日下午消息，今日，针对网上流传的"腾讯微信新规则"，微信安全中心回应称，此类 信息存在多种变体，例如"腾讯微信朋友圈新规"等均属谣言，微信官方从未发布过任何所谓的"封号新 规"，诸如"好友太多会被封""地址不变会被封"等。 微信安全中心相关负责人表示，正常的社交行为不会受到任何限制。"微信的安全策略旨在识别和打击 危害用户安全与体验的行为，不会因为用户好友数量较多、长期在固定地点登录、与亲友互动频繁等正 常使用情况，而对账号进行处置。" 微信安全中心相关负责人表示，正常的社交行为不会 ...

Core Viewpoint - The article emphasizes the importance of strengthening internet ecological governance as a crucial task for building a strong digital nation, highlighting the need for a collaborative governance model involving government regulation, platform responsibility, industry self-discipline, and public participation [1][3]. Summary of Key Points Current Measures in Internet Ecological Governance - Since the 18th National Congress, China has made significant progress in internet ecological governance, establishing a legal framework with key laws such as the Cybersecurity Law, Data Security Law, and Personal Information Protection Law, which form the foundation for governance [2]. - The government is actively working on legal construction to ensure platforms fulfill their responsibilities in content review, account management, and risk handling, promoting a balance between economic and social interests [2]. Challenges in Internet Ecological Governance - The rise of black and gray market activities has created a sophisticated industrial chain, utilizing advanced technologies for attacks, which traditional defense mechanisms struggle to counter [5]. - The current multi-stakeholder collaboration mechanism in governance is inefficient, with issues such as departmental barriers and information silos hindering effective responses to cross-platform attacks [7]. - There is a mismatch between regulatory updates and technological advancements, leading to challenges in adapting rules to new types of risks posed by automated attacks and cross-platform violations [8]. Recommendations for Improvement - The government should enhance its regulatory framework by focusing on legal and technological empowerment, establishing a robust legal system to address new types of attacks and ensuring precise enforcement against black and gray market activities [10][11]. - Platforms must prioritize both economic and social values, implementing advanced defensive technologies and actively fulfilling their responsibilities in compliance and safety management [12][13]. - A collaborative governance model should be established, involving industry associations and the public to enhance information sharing and collective defense against cyber threats [15][16].

转自：北京日报客户端 网络上出现了一则关于"腾讯微信新规则"的消息，引发网民关注。1月6日，微信安全中心回应称，此类 信息存在多种变体，例如"腾讯微信朋友圈新规"等均属不实谣言，微信官方从未发布过任何所谓的"封 号新规"。诸如"好友太多会被封""地址不变会被封"等说法，更是无稽之谈。 为逃避打击，黑灰产团伙在内部传播所谓"养号教程"，将其违法活动中采用的"异常行为模式"（如伪装 地理位置等），伪装成"平台规则"向外散布，实际上是在为自己账号被处理寻找借口，企图混淆视听。 微信安全中心表示，平台始终依据《微信个人账号使用规范》等公开透明的规则进行管理，请广大用户 勿信谣传谣。 来源：北京日报客户端 微信安全中心表示，正常的社交行为不会受到任何限制。微信的安全策略旨在识别和打击危害用户安全 与体验的行为，不会因为用户好友数量较多、长期在固定地点登录、与亲友互动频繁等正常使用情况， 而对账号进行处置。 为什么会出现这类谣言？记者了解到，这类说法实际上是黑灰产团伙为掩盖其违法活动而编造的借口。 为了实施网络诈骗等犯罪行为，黑灰产团伙需要大量账号。他们通过非法手段获取账号后，往往会使 用"外挂"批量添加好友、高频次群发 ...

22日晚的黑灰产攻击与快手反应处置此处不再赘述。那么，22日之前，是否有迹象透露出平台已被黑灰 产盯上？ 大数据安全企业知道创宇向第一财经提供的一份暗网雷达监测数据显示，近年来，暗网中多次出现涉及 快手相关数据或业务的交易宣称。 http://mapi/0026p7eXly1i8lx6npgt8j60k00dcn2202 【#暗网曾叫卖快手直播订单数据#】#短视频与直播平台频成黑灰产目标#12月24日，针对此次快手科技 （1024.HK）遭遇的黑灰产网络安全事故，资本市场态度渐趋和缓。港股开盘，快手股价维持下行走 势，盘中回调。截至发稿，快手股价涨0.54%。 规模空前的黑灰产网络攻击在直播间内暂告一段落，但此次攻防失守造成的影响仍在持续。直播平台该 如何做好内容生态平衡？作为攻击回报率较高的领域，直播平台该如何做好日常网络安全防御？黑灰产 如此大规模攻击到底图什么？ 根据现有公开信息分析，安恒研究院专家对第一财经记者表示，即便是如此大规模的攻击，筹备时间会 长至1-2个月，但消耗的资源其实并不大，只需要在灰产市场上购入僵尸账号、买通水军配合直播间人 气等虚假流量、结合如接码平台实现认证等，总体成本可控。而被 ...

针对12月22日晚间的平台异常情况，快手在最新公告中作出说明，强调其直播功能在2025年12月22日 22:00左右遭遇了网络攻击。公司表示已第一时间启动应急预案。 公告中还声明："本公司始终严守合规底线，坚决反对任何违规内容及行为。本公司强烈谴责此类黑灰 产的违法犯罪行为，已就上述事宜向公安机关报警并向相关部门报告。我们将视情况采取一切必要的法 律措施，以捍卫公司及全体股东的合法权益。" 公开资料显示，所谓"黑灰产"，是网络黑色产业与灰色产业的统称，指以谋取不正当利益为目的，利用 互联网实施违法犯罪，或游走于法律边缘的规模化、链条化违法犯罪产业生态。 据记者了解，涉黄、涉暴等内容属于国内互联网明确严禁的违规类别。目前，国内主流视频平台均建立 了"机审+人审"双重审核机制及实名认证制度，以防范此类违规内容。 12月23日，快手（1024.HK）股价开盘跳水，截至当日收盘，跌3.52%，报收64.35港元/股，最新市值为 2779亿港元，单日市值缩水101.5亿港元。 消息面上，12月22日晚间，众多网友反映，快手直播间出现大量色情内容，包括播放淫秽影片、主播擦 边低俗表演等，同时还有直播间出现血腥、暴力、恐怖 ...

快手-W(01024)发布公告，其快手应用的直播功能于2025年12月22日22:00左右遭到网路攻击，公司已第 一时间启动应预案，经全力处置与系统修复，快手应用的直播功能已逐步恢复正常服务。快手应用的其 他服务未受影响。公司始终严守合规底线，坚决反对任何违规内容及行为。公司强烈谴责黑灰产的违法 犯罪行为，已就上述事宜向公安机关报警并向相关部门报告，并将视情况采取其他适当的法律补救措 施，以保障公司及其股东的权益。 ...

Core Viewpoint - The article reports on the dismantling of a criminal gang in Shanghai that sold "OBD cheating devices" capable of altering vehicle emissions testing data, allowing high-pollution vehicles to pass inspections and continue operating on the roads [1][2]. Group 1: Criminal Activities - The Shanghai police uncovered the first case in the city involving the sale of "OBD cheating devices," leading to the arrest of five suspects and the disruption of a black market chain related to vehicle emissions testing [1]. - The gang, led by a suspect named Zhong, operated multiple online stores to sell these devices, which could be connected to vehicles to manipulate emissions data through a mobile app [2]. - Zhong had been purchasing components from suppliers and assembling the devices at home, with illegal profits exceeding 300,000 yuan (approximately 30 million) by the time of the arrest [4]. Group 2: Law Enforcement Actions - The police initiated investigations after discovering online advertisements promising guaranteed vehicle inspection passes, which led to the identification of Zhong and his network [1][2]. - Following a thorough investigation, law enforcement executed coordinated arrests in late September, apprehending all five suspects involved in the production and sale of the devices [2]. - The suspects are facing charges related to environmental pollution and providing illegal control tools for computer information systems, with further investigations being conducted in collaboration with environmental authorities [4].

Core Viewpoint - The recent incident regarding Tencent Video accounts facing potential bans due to exceeding device login limits has sparked widespread attention and discussion among users [1][3]. Group 1: Account Restrictions - Tencent Video VIP accounts are limited to a maximum of 3 devices for login, while SVIP accounts can use up to 8 devices, with specific restrictions on simultaneous usage [5]. - Exceeding the device limit triggers a security protection period, which increases in duration with each subsequent violation, potentially leading to a complete account ban after 6 violations [4][5]. Group 2: Industry Context - Other video platforms, such as iQIYI, also impose similar device login restrictions, indicating a broader industry trend aimed at preventing account sharing and piracy [8]. - The prevalence of black market activities, including account sharing and piracy, has prompted platforms to implement stricter security measures to protect their services [11]. Group 3: Consumer Rights and Legal Perspectives - Legal experts have raised concerns about the clarity of the device limit rules and the adequacy of user notifications regarding penalties for exceeding limits, suggesting that platforms may not fully meet their obligations to inform consumers [12]. - The lack of clear communication about the criteria for device limits and the corresponding penalties could impact consumer rights and fair trading conditions [12].