伴随着中国经济的持续增长与金融市场的深化改革，个性化的理财需求日益成为投资者关注的焦点。理财师作为连接投资者与金融市场的 重要桥梁，其专业素养和服务质量直接影响客户的财富管理和风险控制。在这个财富管理大时代，金融市场的快速发展对理财从业者提出 了更高的要求，理财师们不仅要具备更强的专业能力，还要具备更全面的服务技能和客户洞察力。 基于此，新浪财经与银华基金联合主办的2025第九届"银华基金杯"新浪理财师大赛再度启动。大赛旨在为理财精英提供一个展示风采、 提升能力的专业舞台，搭建优秀理财师与投资者之间的沟通桥梁。今年的赛事规模相比往届进行了全面升级，力求挖掘并表彰更多优秀的 理财人才，助力中国理财事业向更加繁荣的未来发展。 2025年第九届"银华基金杯"新浪理财师大赛坚持初心，继续为广大理财师及所在机构提供展示专业形象、提升综合价值的平台。大赛将 选拔符合市场需求、具有较强业务水平和良好职业道德的优秀理财师，并通过这一赛事普及国民理财知识，推动中国理财事业的健康发 展。与此同时，赛事将紧跟市场发展变化，通过创新的赛制和内容，为参赛选手提供更具挑战性和专业性的竞赛环境。大赛不仅仅是展示 理财技能的舞台，更是为广大 ...

7月8日，网商银行旗下银行理财专卖平台"稳利宝"发布2025年二季度报告。报告显示，凭借稳健收益和普惠性，稳利宝赢得更多用户信任。 截至6月末，"稳利宝"用户规模超400万人，新用户复购率和复购金额持续提升，每3个新用户中，就有2人投资两笔以上，超6成用户复购金额比第一笔 高。 收益与抗跌表现持续跑赢行业 二季度，"稳利宝"凭借严格的产品筛选与准入表现优异。 一是收益表现优于银行理财行业均值。截至6月末，"稳利宝"近一年平均年化收益率2.76%，高于2.51%的行业均值。 二是抗跌能力突出。5月，"稳利宝"主推产品正收益比例为100%，高于银行理财全行业的97.9%。 三是持仓体验良好。持有"稳利宝"三个月以上的用户100%实现正收益。 据悉，"稳利宝"所选产品100%为R2、R1等中低风险等级，底层资产主要配置存款、优质债券等固收类资产，使得收益与抗跌表现跑赢大盘。 用户复购率与复购金额持续提升 优于市场的收益表现和更为稳健的产品风格，使得"稳利宝"获得更多用户青睐。二季度，"稳利宝"用户规模突破400万人。 与此同时，用户对"稳利宝"的信任持续增强，复购意愿也愈加强烈。数据显示，截至6月末，每3个"稳利宝 ...

今年上半年，已有653家A股上市公司合计认购了4113.35亿元理财产品(包含到期后再投)，总规模与去 年同期相比有所缩水。具体来看，上半年，A股上市公司合计购买结构性存款2374.26亿元、银行理财产 品478.45亿元、券商理财产品312.71亿元、存款产品311.3亿元、逆回购产品245.78亿元、信托产品 125.34亿元、通知存款116.78亿元、定期存款82.5亿元、投资公司理财产品44.29亿元，还通过基金专户 购买理财产品21.94亿元。(证券日报) ...

对此，深圳市前海排排网基金销售有限责任公司研究部副总监刘有华对《证券日报》记者表示："理财产品整体收益率有 所下滑，同时出现了一定净值波动的现象，削弱了上市公司的配置意愿。" 本报记者 于宏 将闲置资金用于理财是A股上市公司提升资金利用效率的常见做法之一。 Wind资讯数据显示，今年上半年（按认购日期计），A股上市公司已斥资合计超4100亿元购买理财产品。与去年同期相 比，今年上半年A股上市公司购买理财产品的总金额有所下降，但券商理财产品的认购比例却从去年同期的5.62%上升至 7.6%。其中，券商收益凭证产品尤为受到投资者青睐。 盘古智库（北京）信息咨询有限公司高级研究员余丰慧在接受《证券日报》记者采访时表示："上市公司运用闲置资金进 行适度的理财产品投资，有利于提高公司资金使用效率，获取投资回报，提升公司整体收益水平。" 券商理财获认购规模 超300亿元 今年上半年，已有653家A股上市公司合计认购了4113.35亿元理财产品（包含到期后再投），总规模与去年同期相比有所 缩水。具体来看，Wind资讯数据显示，上半年，A股上市公司合计购买结构性存款2374.26亿元、银行理财产品478.45亿元、券 商理财 ...

本报记者 彭妍 2025年银行理财市场"半年考"成绩揭晓。普益标准数据显示，截至6月末，全市场存续理财产品4.23万只，存续规模达 30.97万亿元，较去年年底增长3.4%。 苏商银行特约研究员高政扬对《证券日报》记者表示，今年上半年，银行理财规模实现正增长，3.4%的增速虽较去年同期 有所放缓，但仍处于合理区间，这表明银行理财市场依旧保持着稳健扩张的态势。 产品结构方面，在总计存续规模达30.97万亿元的理财产品里，非现金管理类的固收产品依旧占据主导地位，存续规模达到 23.4万亿元，占比75.57%。现金管理类产品的存续规模为6.85万亿元，占比22.12%。混合类产品存续规模占比2.08%，权益类产 品存续规模占比0.09%，两者存续规模总计0.67万亿元。而商品及金融衍生品类产品的规模占比仅为0.05%。 上海冠苕信息咨询中心创始人周毅钦对《证券日报》记者表示，混合类、权益类产品的整体占比很低，是供需双方共同选 择的均衡结果。从需求方的角度来说，投资者的风险偏好整体保守，风险承受能力低，更青睐于风险较低、收益相对稳定的固 收类产品，这是银行理财客群的固有特征，短期内无法改变。从供给方的角度来说，银行理 ...

近年来，指数型理财产品数量与规模持续攀升，已逐步成长为资管市场的新兴力量。普益标准数据显示，2024年新发指数 型理财产品达208款，成立以来平均年化收益率4.75%，亮眼表现吸引市场广泛关注。进入2025年，市场热度延续，截至7月4 日，银行理财子公司今年发行的指数型产品已达193款。业绩方面，截至2025年一季度，指数型理财产品年内平均收益率为 4.96%，近一年平均收益率为4.70%，均高于银行理财全市场平均水平，同时也跑赢了固定收益类和混合类理财产品。 普益标准研究员杨颀表示，指数型理财产品持续增长并崛起为市场新势力，主要得益于双重驱动因素：第一，2024年第四 季度股市的强劲表现为其提供了有力支撑；第二，在传统银行理财产品同质化加剧、吸引力减弱的市场环境下，指数型理财产 品凭借其差异化的产品特性和收益优势，成功抢占市场先机，引发各大机构竞相布局。 指数挂钩型产品处于机遇期 本报记者 彭妍 近期，因中证1000指数在市场上表现强劲，兴银理财、工银理财以及招银理财旗下多只挂钩该指数的自动触发策略理财产 品触发了敲出条件，纷纷提前终止。 中信证券首席经济学家明明对《证券日报》记者表示，指数型银行理财产品的 ...

中国证券报记者注意到，近期多只中低风险短期持有型理财产品收益率走高，部分产品近一个月年化收 益率接近10%。 7月7日，记者走访多家银行了解到，近期短债行情较好，推动部分短期持有型理财产品出现较高收益率 水平；在多资产策略下，多家理财公司通过"固收+"增厚理财产品收益。此外，部分理财公司向新发行 产品倾斜资源，以期做高产品收益率，吸引投资人购买。 底层资产收益回暖 近期，多只中低风险的短期持有型理财产品收益率走高，部分产品近一个月的年化收益率接近10%。 例如，交通银行App显示，"交银理财灵动慧利9号7天持有C"近一个月（6月4日—7月4日）的年化收益 率为9.63%，该产品成立以来的年化收益率为5.06%。 | 历史业绩 | 历史净值 | | | --- | --- | --- | | 时间区间 | 区间收益率 (i) 年化收益率 (i) | | | 近1月 | 0.79% | 9.63% | | 2025/06/04-2025/07/04 | | | | 近3月 | 1.64% | 6.52% | | 2025/04/03-2025/07/04 | | | | 近6月 | 2.85% | 5.72% | ...

随着2024年年中经济动态的波动，美元汇率的显著下滑让年初涌向美元理财市场的投资者们始料未及。 不少投资者原本期待通过美元理财获取高于人民币存款的收益，却不料汇率的下跌让他们的投资计划遭 遇了挑战。 广东的投资者王林（化名）就是其中之一。他告诉时代财经，年初时他以7.35的汇率兑换了10万美元， 并投资于一款年化收益率为4%的美元理财产品。当时，他认为这一收益远高于人民币存款，但没想到 美元汇率持续走低，如今折算回人民币，他已经面临亏损。 2024年末，国内银行存款利率下调的背景下，美元理财因其相对较高的收益吸引了大量投资者的关注， 不少产品甚至出现额度紧张的情况。然而，自年初以来，美元汇率的持续下跌使得美元理财的"轻松获 利"变成了"高位套牢"。 据Wind数据显示，截至7月7日，美元指数已跌至97点附近，年内累计跌幅达到10.59%。当日，美元兑 离岸人民币汇率也跌至7.17左右。王林无奈表示，他只能将年初在汇率高点换汇投资美元的经历当作一 次教训，期盼能早日回本。 尽管美元汇率处于低点，但仍有不少投资者计划加速买入美元资产，希望在美联储降息之前锁定高息收 益。然而，业内专家提醒，美元产品短期内机会与风险 ...

Report Industry Investment Rating No relevant content provided. Core Views of the Report - The potential negative factors for the current bond market come from the fundamentals, including economic data disclosure and the progress of Sino-US negotiations. Under the consensus expectation, it is difficult to say that the bond market will reverse. Attention should be paid to the changes in bond market expectations caused by event shocks [2]. - The sentiment index of fixed-income sellers has reached a new high this year, while buyers mainly expect the market to fluctuate, and their sentiment has declined for three consecutive weeks [2]. Summary by Relevant Catalogs 1. Seller and Buyer Markets 1.1 Seller Market Sentiment Index and Interest Rate Bonds - This week, the weighted tracking index was 0.47, showing a mostly bullish view but lower than last week. The unweighted tracking index was 0.68, up 0.09 from last week. Currently, institutions generally hold a neutral-to-bullish view, with 18 bullish, 6 neutral, and 1 bearish [10]. - 72% of institutions are bullish, with keywords such as weak credit, slow economic recovery, external demand shocks, loose monetary policy, low supply pressure in July, and opportunities for a bullish flattening of the curve after the short end declines [4][10]. - 24% of institutions are neutral, with keywords such as the neutral impact of restarting treasury bonds, and potential disturbances from the stock-bond seesaw and unexpected Sino-US negotiations [4][10]. - 4% of institutions are bearish, with the view that the central bank's bond purchases are not the reason for the decline in interest rates, and the economic recovery in the second half of 2025 is expected to drive up prices and interest rates [4][10]. 1.2 Buyer Market Sentiment Index and Interest Rate Bonds - This week, the tracking sentiment index was 0.13, showing a mostly neutral view and lower than last week. Currently, institutions generally hold a neutral-to-bullish view, with 5 bullish and 18 neutral [11]. - 22% of institutions are bullish, with keywords such as loose funds and a possible quarter-on-quarter weakening of the economic fundamentals in the third quarter [11]. - 78% of institutions are neutral, with keywords such as the reduced expectation of broad credit after the second-quarter monetary policy meeting and the suppression of bond market sentiment by the equity market [11]. 1.3 Credit Bonds - Market hot topics include the recovery of wealth management scale and loose funds. The recovery of wealth management scale may further improve the demand for credit bonds, and loose funds, combined with weak fundamentals, support the overall strength of the bond market and a decline in benchmark interest rates [17]. 1.4 Convertible Bonds - This week, institutions generally hold a neutral-to-bullish view, with 8 bullish and 6 neutral [18]. - 57% of institutions are bullish, believing that with the new bond supply not accelerating significantly on the issuance side, the convertible bond market scale may gradually shrink in the second half of the year, and medium and large-cap convertible bonds among high-quality existing and newly issued bonds are worth attention [18]. - 43% of institutions are neutral, stating that there is still uncertainty about the US tariff increase, and the allocation value of convertible bonds will be better reflected after the valuation is moderately digested [18]. 2. Treasury Bond Futures Tracking 2.1 Futures Trading - Futures prices showed mixed trends. As of July 4, the prices of TS/TF/T/TL treasury bond contracts were 102.51 yuan, 106.26 yuan, 109.10 yuan, and 121.20 yuan respectively, with changes of -0.03 yuan, -0.01 yuan, +0.05 yuan, and +0.31 yuan compared to last Friday [21]. - The trading volume of treasury bond futures generally increased. As of July 4, from a 5MA perspective, the trading volumes of TS/TF/T/TL futures contracts were 640 billion yuan, 622 billion yuan, 766 billion yuan, and 988 billion yuan respectively, with changes of +3.04 billion yuan, +30.63 billion yuan, +77.98 billion yuan, and -19.99 billion yuan compared to last Friday [21]. - The trading-to-holding ratio of treasury bond futures generally increased. As of July 4, from a 5MA perspective, the trading-to-holding ratios of TS/TF/T/TL futures contracts were 0.27, 0.40, 0.38, and 0.85 respectively, with changes of +0.01, +0.03, +0.04, and -0.03 compared to last Friday [22]. 2.2 Spot Bond Trading - The turnover rate of 30-year treasury bonds decreased. On July 4, the turnover rate was 4.03%, down 3.90 percentage points from last week and up 0.61 percentage points from Monday, with an average weekly turnover rate of 4.21%. The weekly average turnover rate of interest rate bonds decreased, and the turnover rate on July 4 was 0.93%, down 0.09 percentage points from last week and up 0.28 percentage points from Monday [29]. - The turnover rate of 10-year China Development Bank bonds increased. On July 4, the turnover rate was 4.91%, up 0.45 percentage points from last week and up 1.60 percentage points from Monday [32]. 2.3 Basis Trading - The basis generally narrowed, while the net basis widened across the board. As of July 4, the basis (CTD) of TS/TF/T/TL main contracts were -0.02 yuan, 0.001 yuan, 0.14 yuan, and 0.25 yuan respectively, with changes of +0.05 yuan, +0.05 yuan, +0.16 yuan, and -0.07 yuan compared to last Friday [39]. - In terms of the net basis, the net basis of main contracts widened. As of July 4, the net basis (CTD) of TS/TF/T/TL main contracts were -0.05 yuan, -0.06 yuan, -0.11 yuan, and -0.11 yuan respectively, with changes of -0.01 yuan, -0.01 yuan, -0.07 yuan, and -0.12 yuan compared to last Friday [41]. - In terms of IRR, the IRR of T and TL main contracts increased, while the others decreased. As of July 4, the IRR (CTD) of TS/TF/T/TL main contracts were 1.65%, 1.69%, 1.89%, and 1.80% respectively, with changes of -0.20%, -0.23%, +0.03%, and +0.14% compared to last Friday [41]. 2.4 Inter-period and Inter-variety Spreads - Inter-period spreads showed mixed trends. As of July 4, the spreads between the near and far months of TS/TF/T/TL contracts were -0.12 yuan, -0.08 yuan, -0.08 yuan, and 0.13 yuan respectively, with changes of +0.01 yuan, -0.005 yuan, -0.07 yuan, and -0.01 yuan compared to last Friday [48]. - Inter-variety spreads of main futures contracts all narrowed. As of July 4, 2*TS - TF, 2*TF - T, 4*TS - T, and 3*T - TL were 98.77 yuan, 103.39 yuan, 300.92 yuan, and 206.13 yuan respectively, with changes of -0.06 yuan, -0.07 yuan, -0.19 yuan, and -0.14 yuan compared to last Friday [48].

华宝证券出品的2025中国金融产品年度报告《生态跃迁》，已经正式发布了。这是我们 连续第 十四年 发布这个报告。 图：2025中国金融产品年度报告封面 每当这份沉甸甸的报告最终成稿，我们的心中总会涌起一种满满的收获感。这不仅是对过去一 年辛勤耕耘的总结，更是对未来探索的期待。十四年的坚守与沉淀，见证了市场的风云变幻， 也见证了我们在专业道路上的稳步前行。 去年的金融产品年度报告中，我们首次提出 财富与资管行业迈向服务化 的转型方向。令人欣慰 的是，这一理念在业内引发了广泛共鸣。回首2024年，我们也清晰地看到，整个行业在这条转 型之路上已然迈出了坚实的步伐，不断探索前行。 然而，迈向服务化的进程并非单个机构的孤立行动，而是需要整个行业的协同共进，需要财富 生态的重构与升级。这是一场全方位、深层次的蜕变，我们将其称之为生态跃迁—— 这就是今 年我们报告的主题。 作为金融市场深刻变革的见证者和参与者，我们深知， 研究服务的价值不仅在于洞察趋势，更 在于搭建认知跃迁的阶梯。 优秀的研究应该如同一盏明灯，照亮前行的道路，帮助从业者们从 纷繁复杂的市场变化中捕捉到那些关键的信号，为行业转型提供坚实的方向指引。 | ** ...