"新质生产力"概念的提出为增强经济发展新动能提供了重要指引。资本市场作为金融资源配置的枢纽， 在风险共担和利益共享方面具备独特优势，以新质生产力推动经济转型升级，需要规范、透明、开放、 有活力、有韧性的资本市场赋能。 经济增长模式由"债务驱动型"向"创新驱动型"转换，金融体系也应该由"间接融资"走向"直接融资"。高 质量发展阶段，金融行业更注重"功能性"的发挥和淡化"规模情结"，面临盈利性下行和盈利模式转换的 双重压力。伴随着供给侧改革的深化、强监管周期开启，金融行业的盈利模式也将发生根本性改变。 资本市场是现代金融体系的核心和基石，强大的资本市场是现代经济的标配，也是打造"金融强国"的关 键要素 从融资端看，我国多层次资本市场各板块之间层次分明、定位清晰、功能互补，北交所的设立不仅补上 完善多层次资本市场的重要拼图，也是"科技金融"及"普惠金融"大文章赋能专精特新中小企业浓墨重彩 的一页。资本市场"四板—新三板—北交所—沪深交易所"梯度培育体系持续完善，覆盖科技企业全生命 周期的融资需求。完善多层次资本市场需要从畅通全市场转板机制、增强制度包容性、健全多层次资本 市场等方面发力。 智通财经APP获悉，五矿证 ...

Core Viewpoint - The 19th Huaxia Institutional Investor Annual Conference emphasized the themes of "vitality and resilience, innovation and empowerment," focusing on the future paths for financial development and the role of financial institutions in supporting the real economy [2]. Group 1: Financial Innovation - Tianjin Bank has successfully issued the first batch of technology-oriented innovative bonds in the country and the first in Hebei Province, with technology innovation loans growing by 26.21% year-on-year as of September 2025 [3]. - The bank has developed a specialized product system including equity, debt, loans, funds, and guarantees, and has successfully launched its first leasing business for computing power equipment and private satellite leasing [3]. Group 2: Green Finance - Tianjin Bank has issued the first energy-saving evaluation environmental loan in Tianjin, with significant year-on-year growth in both green bond investments and transactions [3]. - The introduction of innovative green financial products, such as energy evaluation-linked loans and green intellectual property-linked loans, marks an expansion of its green finance product system [3]. Group 3: Inclusive Finance - The bank has implemented the "thousand enterprises and ten thousand households" outreach initiative, with a total credit amount nearing 6.3 billion, leading in new credit issuance among city commercial banks in Tianjin [3]. - Inclusive corporate loans have increased by 51.7% year-on-year, reaching a historical high [3]. Group 4: Pension Finance - Tianjin Bank has upgraded its "Golden Autumn Harbor" pension finance brand and is issuing dedicated financial products, with steady growth in loans for the pension industry [4]. - The bank is integrating financial services into elderly care communities, creating a comprehensive product matrix for pension finance [4]. Group 5: Digital Finance - The bank's digital transformation has been recognized with 26 awards and 37 approved intellectual property rights, providing data support to the National Bureau of Statistics [4]. - The digital transformation efforts have received high praise from the National Bureau of Statistics [4].

Group 1 - The Northeast region of China is increasingly focusing on technological innovation and financial services, despite being traditionally viewed as an industrial and agricultural area [1] - The region's efforts are highlighted through various case studies in technology finance, showcasing support for industries such as biopharmaceuticals and smart manufacturing [1] - The aim is to draw attention to the Northeast's commitment to innovation in technology finance and its role in promoting scientific and technological development [1] Group 2 - Jilin Tonghua Jianxin Technology Co., Ltd. has been recognized as a "Manufacturing Industry Single Champion Demonstration Enterprise" and a national-level specialized and innovative small giant enterprise, receiving significant financial support from local banks [3] - Heilongjiang Fulun Agricultural Technology Co., Ltd. is one of the first batch of integrated seed enterprises, benefiting from increased loan support to meet its cash flow needs [5] - Heilongjiang Huida Technology Co., Ltd. integrates advanced technologies like Beidou navigation and artificial intelligence to produce smart agricultural equipment, receiving substantial financial backing from multiple banks [7] - China Construction Bank's Jilin branch has provided over 200 million yuan in financial support to key semiconductor enterprise Huamei Electronics, aligning with the needs of high-tech companies in the Northeast [9]

Core Viewpoint - The Northeast region of China, recognized as the "industrial cradle" of the new China, is strategically positioned to cultivate new productive forces due to its significant educational and scientific resources, including 11.3% of the national scientific and educational resources, 28 national key laboratories, and a talent pool of 2.3 million skilled workers. The 2023 Central Financial Work Conference prioritized "technology finance" as a key focus, providing a fundamental guideline for the Northeast to overcome transformation bottlenecks [1][5]. Theoretical Framework: Three-dimensional Collaborative Evolution - The empowerment of new productive forces through technology finance is a systematic project led by central strategy, implemented by local policies, and responded to by market innovations. The three-dimensional collaborative evolution framework reveals the dynamic adaptation of these three elements throughout the industrial lifecycle, offering a new perspective on understanding the development of technology finance in Northeast China [2][4]. Framework Core Dimensions - Central Government: Provides strategic guidance and institutional supply through top-level design, offering inclusive policies and common technical support, establishing unified national market rules [3]. - Local Government: Creates scenarios and gathers resources through differentiated policies, building risk-sharing mechanisms and information platforms to promote the geographical concentration of financial and technological resources [3]. - Market Entities: Respond to policy signals through technological innovation and product iteration, achieving the industrialization of technological achievements, with capital completing full-cycle allocation driven by profit motives [3]. Stage Adaptability Collaborative Characteristics - The interaction among the three entities is dynamic, evolving through the "startup phase, growth phase, and maturity phase" of new productive force cultivation, forming a closed-loop collaborative system of "strategy-execution-feedback" [4]. Practical Outcomes: Breakthroughs and Data Evidence in Northeast Technology Finance - The Northeast region has begun to form a collaborative effect based on the three-dimensional framework, achieving substantial progress in policy systems, financing channels, and ecological cultivation, laying a solid foundation for the cultivation of new productive forces [5]. Central-Local Policy Collaboration - The central top-level design and local characteristic policies effectively respond to each other, with the central government implementing targeted policies such as technology innovation re-loans and venture capital tax incentives, while local governments establish a policy system that integrates provincial and municipal characteristics [6]. Local-Market Factor Collaboration - Local governments are building platforms to promote resource aggregation, with market-oriented financing channels continuously expanding. The loan balance for technology enterprises in Northeast China increased from 420 billion yuan in 2021 to 680 billion yuan in the first half of 2024, with an annual growth rate of 17.8% [7]. Ecological Collaboration Cultivation - Local governments are improving ecological infrastructure, significantly enhancing market entity participation. Information platforms and risk-sharing mechanisms are being established, with notable increases in financing events and amounts raised [8]. Core Bottlenecks: Deep Deconstruction of Collaborative Imbalance - Despite progress, Northeast technology finance faces three imbalances: ineffective central policy transmission, insufficient local mechanism innovation, and limited market entity vitality, leading to inefficient matching of financial resources and innovation demands [9]. Central-Local Collaboration Imbalance - There is a mismatch between central inclusive policies and local actual needs, with policy transmission efficiency being insufficient. The average capital adequacy ratio of provincial policy guarantee institutions in Northeast China is only 12.3%, significantly lower than the 18.7% in the Yangtze River Delta [10]. Local-Market Collaboration Imbalance - Local government platforms are disconnected from market demands, with issues of information asymmetry and lack of risk-sharing. The interconnectivity rate of enterprise databases in Northeast China is below 30%, compared to 85% in Suzhou [11]. Market-Central Feedback Imbalance - The innovative demands of market entities lack effective feedback mechanisms to policy optimization, resulting in a lag in policy responses to grassroots practices. The proportion of state-owned venture capital in Northeast China is 68%, which is 23 percentage points higher than in the Yangtze River Delta [12]. International Comparison: Collaborative Models and Experience Extraction - Global innovation hubs have optimized their three-dimensional collaborative mechanisms, forming technology finance ecosystems that adapt to the laws of technological innovation, providing important references for Northeast China [14]. Silicon Valley: Market-Driven Collaborative Ecology - Silicon Valley's model emphasizes private venture capital, with the federal government supporting basic research and local governments focusing on ecological building, while market entities lead capital supply [15][16]. Israel: Government-Guided Collaborative Model - Israel's model features national risk coverage, local technology transfer, and market global expansion, breaking down capital entry barriers and focusing on the last mile of technology transfer [17]. Yangtze River Delta: Government-Market Linked Collaborative Sample - The Yangtze River Delta constructs a model of central strategic guidance, local digital empowerment, and market multi-dimensional collaboration, adapting to regional industrial characteristics [18]. Quantitative Assessment: Empirical Evaluation of Policy Collaboration Effects - The PMC index model evaluates the collaborative quality of Northeast technology finance policies, revealing that while the average score is 6.7 (out of 10), there are significant shortcomings in collaboration [19][20]. Path to Resolution: Innovative Solutions for Three-dimensional Collaborative Empowerment - To address the bottlenecks in Northeast technology finance, it is essential to build collaborative mechanisms from three dimensions: central-local transmission, local-market connection, and market-central feedback [21][22][23]. Conclusion - The core of empowering Northeast new productive forces through technology finance lies in achieving collaborative evolution among the central government, local governments, and market entities. While a preliminary framework for policy collaboration has been established, challenges remain in transmission, connection, and feedback. Systematic innovation is required to enhance the collaborative chain, ultimately transforming the region's rich scientific and educational resources into productive advantages [26].

Core Insights - Suzhou Rural Commercial Bank focuses on serving the needs of early-stage small and medium-sized technology enterprises, leveraging Suzhou's position as a hub for industrial and technological innovation [1][2] Group 1: Financial Support and Innovation - As of November 2025, the bank's technology enterprise loan balance exceeds 20 billion yuan, serving over 2,000 technology enterprise clients, with 80% being early to mid-stage technology companies [1] - The bank has launched specialized financial products such as "Talent Enterprise Loan" and "Venture Capital Loan," which cater to the credit needs of early-stage technology enterprises [3][4] - The bank's "Angel Loan" program provides 2 million yuan to startups, linking equity financing with bank credit to enhance financial structure and boost enterprise confidence [2][5] Group 2: Strategic Development and Collaboration - Suzhou is home to 24,300 national technology-based SMEs, ranking first in the country, and the bank actively collaborates with various institutions to develop tailored financial products for early-stage technology enterprises [2][5] - The bank has established a "Technology Financial Laboratory" to analyze key technology industries in Suzhou, creating industry research reports to better understand client needs and provide financing solutions [5] - The bank's credit approval process incorporates intelligent risk control and analysis platforms, allowing for rapid approval for well-documented enterprises [4]

在赤峰市宁城县天义镇中京工业园区，国家级专精特新"小巨人"企业——内蒙古京航特碳科技有限 公司生产正忙。企业生产的特种石墨产品广泛用于航空航天、光伏等领域，远销海外。随着产能扩张， 该企业原材料采购资金压力加大。中信银行赤峰分行依托"四张清单"精准识别企业需求，快速组建服务 团队，量身定制融资方案，最终核定2000万元综合授信并于9月末全部投放，有力支撑企业稳产扩能。 在精准金融服务支持下，赤峰市科技型企业展现出强劲活力。今年以来，全市已累计公示入库科技型中 小企业320家。其中，首次申请入库企业114家，地方创新活力持续增强。 开辟"多元渠道" 拓宽科创融资路径 内蒙古嘉宝仕生物科技股份有限公司是内蒙古自治区级专精特新企业、新三板挂牌企业，主要从事 农药原药与制剂研发。随着生产规模扩大，资金需求快速增长，但企业融资压力也更为凸显。在了解企 业困难后，兴业银行赤峰分行与赤峰恒德担保公司协同创新，推出"兴速贷—银担科创贷"专项产品，构 建起"政府部门组织+银行风控+担保增信+知识产权质押"四位一体服务机制，打破传统融资模式下的增 信难题。运用该机制，兴业银行赤峰分行成功为内蒙古嘉宝仕生物科技股份有限公司投放了3 ...

由车企为弥补模块缺失孵化出的瑞迪微，发展至今的业务特征比较鲜明——其业务基本盘、也是占比八成的 业务来自新能源车规级客户。这一特征决定了瑞迪微既有长期投资需求，也要承担在现金流上的压力。 据了解，像瑞迪微这样的功率半导体模块企业有两种生产模式，一种是IDM（垂直整合制造），即覆盖芯片 设计、制造、封装测试及销售全产业链的运营模式，另一种是Fabless（无晶圆厂模式），即企业做好设计后将芯 片制造环节外包给专业代工厂，其中，前者仅基建投资就不少于10亿美元。瑞迪微选择了无晶圆厂模式，除了前 端设计研发外，出于对产品上市周期、提升产品可靠性、促进设计与工艺协同等考虑，该公司还自建了产品交付 前的封装测试产线。尽管如此，对于这样一家未实现盈亏平衡的初创企业而言，前期投入仍是很高的。刘康伦告 诉记者，该公司在封装测试产线上的投入已有近2个亿元，设计研发的长周期更加重了前期投入负担，"由于研发 相对领先，我们将设计研发周期缩短到了半年至一年时间，不过在晶圆厂代工前，还有一到一年半时间的产品认 证导入期，这进一步拉长了我们的投入产出周期。" 保持长期投入的同时，有足够的现金流保证一批批产品交付和企业经营，也是刘康伦等管 ...

2023年中央金融工作会议指出，要做好科技金融、绿色金融、普惠金融、养老金融、数字金融五篇 大文章。科技金融作为"五篇大文章"之首，在金融强国建设和社会主义现代化进程中的地位举足轻重。 党的二十届四中全会提出，加快高水平科技自立自强，引领发展新质生产力。在此背景下，临沂金融监 管分局紧跟上级发展部署，立足沂蒙老区产业特色，持续完善同科技创新相适应的科技金融体制机制， 推动"科技—产业—金融"良性循环。截至2025年9月末，临沂科技型企业贷款余额达927.27亿元，较年 初新增107亿元，同比增长13%；高新技术企业贷款余额787.25亿元，增速17.5%，为助力创新型城市建 设注入强劲金融动能。 政策协同 锚定科技发展"路线图" 作为工业大市，临沂市规模以上工业企业数量居山东省前列，自2024年实施"翅膀工程"以来，围绕 装备制造等13条工业标志性产业链，持续推进创新链、产业链、资金链、人才链深度融合。截至2025年 10月末，全市科技型企业总量达3213家，各层级专精特新企业1070家，数量位居全省第四，形成传统产 业升级与新兴产业突破并行的产业格局，为科技金融落地提供坚实产业基础。 产品创新 打通成果转化 ...

Group 1 - The core idea emphasizes the need to build an adaptive service ecosystem for technology finance, focusing on the alignment of financial services with the varying needs of technology enterprises at different development stages [1] - There is a trend towards a diversified relay-style financial service ecosystem involving various financial institutions such as PE, VC, banks, and insurance to meet the financing needs of technology enterprises throughout their lifecycle [1][2] - Banks play a crucial role not only as fund providers but also as facilitators that gather resources from different financial institutions to support technology enterprises [2] Group 2 - The recent acceleration in the issuance of AIC licenses to banks is expected to enhance their ability to provide precise and professional financing support to technology enterprises [2] - Despite favorable policies, bank-affiliated AICs face challenges such as high capital requirements for equity investments and a tendency to favor later-stage projects over early-stage startups [3] - Local banks, while not directly benefiting from AIC licenses, can leverage their local market knowledge and agility to better serve small and early-stage technology enterprises [4] Group 3 - Banks need to enhance their understanding of technology innovation and the specific needs of technology enterprises to effectively engage in technology finance [5] - The establishment of a "loan research system" akin to the investment research system in equity investment is essential for banks to improve their service capabilities in technology finance [5] - Differentiated assessment and incentive mechanisms are necessary to encourage frontline staff to engage in technology finance, given the complexities and uncertainties involved [5] Group 4 - The exit strategies in equity investment, particularly for bank-affiliated AICs, face significant challenges, necessitating improvements in the market exit mechanisms [6][7] - Policy improvements are needed to enhance the exit channels for equity investments, including optimizing merger and acquisition processes and developing secondary funds for easier exits [7] - Collaborative efforts among financial, fiscal, and technology departments are crucial to transform the social effects of innovation into economic benefits, thereby reducing costs for technology enterprises [8][9]

做好科技金融大文章，需要构建适配的服务生态。何为"适配"？一般来说有两个维度：一是相关产 业政策、不同金融供给主体与不同行业及不同类型的科技企业之间的供需适配；二是针对科技企业在不 同发展阶段所需要金融服务的适配。同时，为了能够更好地推动科技企业发展，以适应发展新质生产力 战略的要求，金融供给主体急需提升自身的服务能力，这也是做好科技金融工作的重要基础。 如何让"构建适配服务生态"与"持续提升科技金融服务能力"齐头并进？如何让"建生态"更匹配科技 企业的需求，让"提能力"更有助于"适配生态"的完善？就上述问题，《金融时报》记者采访了青岛银行 首席经济学家、中国首席经济学家论坛理事刘晓曙。 《金融时报》记者：在近期科技金融政策叠加效应下，尤其是推动银行开展投贷联动、金融提供多 元化接力式服务的背景下，科技金融的供给（包括PE/VC/银行等）生态将呈现什么样的趋势？ 刘晓曙：科创企业在生命周期不同阶段所需融资类型及特点不同，对金融机构和投资者的要求也存 在差异。要满足科创企业全生命周期的融资需求，需要的是创投风投、基金、银行、保险等诸多金融机 构接续发力。例如，在科创企业种子期、初创期阶段，风险高、回报不确定，更 ...