Group 1 - The People's Bank of China and seven other departments released guidelines to support new industrialization, focusing on 18 targeted measures to enhance financial services for high-quality industrial development by 2027 [2] - The guidelines aim to prevent "involution" competition and promote the advancement of industries towards mid-to-high-end development [2] - The China Machinery Industry Federation issued an initiative against unfair competition in the photovoltaic industry, highlighting the negative impact of below-cost exports on the industry's reputation [2] Group 2 - The Ministry of Finance allocated 1.015 billion yuan for agricultural disaster relief, supporting regions affected by floods and droughts [2] - The National Health Commission and 16 other departments launched a plan to promote a healthy environment in China, aiming for improved drinking water quality and health literacy by 2030 [2] - The Shanghai Stock Exchange reported significant abnormal fluctuations in the stock of a company, urging investors to exercise caution [2] Group 3 - Xiamen Port Authority plans to acquire 70% of a container terminal group for 6.178 billion yuan [6] - Shandong Haihua intends to invest 2.32 billion yuan to acquire a 29% stake in a salt and alkali company [6] - Haimi Information reported a 40.78% year-on-year increase in net profit for the first half of the year, reaching 1.201 billion yuan [6]

(责任编辑：宋政 HN002) 【免责声明】本文仅代表作者本人观点，与和讯网无关。和讯网站对文中陈述、观点判断保持中立，不对所包含内容 的准确性、可靠性或完整性提供任何明示或暗示的保证。请读者仅作参考，并请自行承担全部责任。邮箱： news_center@staff.hexun.com 格隆汇8月1日｜"京东黑板报"发文称，近期，外卖行业补贴引发社会广泛关注，不少行业协会、商家发 声，希望停止"0元购"等内卷式补贴促销行为，构建良好行业生态，实现多方互利共赢良性发展。我们 在此承诺：规范补贴行为。京东外卖将继续坚持反内卷立场，坚决杜绝不正当竞争，抵制"0元购"等恶 性补贴，绝不以冲单量体现市场地位、制造市场泡沫。搭建简单透明的补贴机制，依法向商家和消费者 公示营销活动信息，商家可自主经营和参与促销活动。抵制恶性竞争。通过打造差异化特色菜品、提升 服务质量等，坚守品质定位，以技术赋能、供应链创新等打造核心竞争力，用产品、价格、服务赢得用 户口碑、创造长期价值，推动行业从"比补贴"回归"比品质"、"比服务"。 ...

近日，理想汽车新车上市发布会上播放的一段理想i8与一卡车100公里/小时对撞测试的视频显示，正面碰撞后卡车的四个车轮出现弹起，卡车驾驶室发生倾 倒，此视频引发争议。 该测试在互联网引起不少争议，在最初发布视频的时候，由于碰撞的重卡车型方向盘没有打码，网友发现该卡车品牌为乘龙卡车。 7月31日晚，"乘龙卡车"微信公众号发布《东风柳州汽车有限公司关于某品牌使用碰撞视频侵权的声明》。 乘龙卡车表示："某汽车品牌在2025年7月29日发布与乘龙卡车正面碰撞视频的行为，已构成严重侵权，并超过正常商业竞争范畴，严重误导和损害公众知情 权，对我司品牌及商业名誉带来了巨大负面影响，涉嫌违反《反不正当竞争法》《广告法》及《民法典》等相关法律。 截至目前我司了解到的情况，某汽车品牌未公开测试车辆状况（双方车辆是否改装、减配、卡扣是否固定、车辆是否过检等）、场景环境（测试场地状况、 车速、驾驶状态等），通过自定义碰撞条件，特定设计非常规测试场景，发布与公众认知的正常碰撞结果偏差较大的碰撞视频，不仅贬低我司品牌形象，还 容易对广大车主造成误导，形成安全隐患。" 理性传播:不过分炒作扩大,不被流量诱惑;不被某品牌利用,借机放大影响力。 ...

Core Viewpoint - The article emphasizes the commitment of JD.com to establish a healthy ecosystem in the food delivery industry by resisting unhealthy competition and promoting transparency in subsidy mechanisms [1][2]. Group 1: Subsidy Regulation - JD.com will continue to oppose unhealthy competition and resist "0 yuan purchase" and other malicious subsidies, ensuring that market position is not reflected through order volume [2][3]. - The company aims to create a simple and transparent subsidy mechanism, legally disclosing marketing activities to merchants and consumers, allowing merchants to operate and participate in promotional activities autonomously [2]. Group 2: Quality and Service Improvement - The focus will shift from competing on subsidies to competing on quality and service, with an emphasis on differentiated specialty dishes and enhanced service quality [2][3]. - JD.com is committed to maintaining food safety and integrity in operations, promoting a quality consumption experience, and actively working against food waste [2]. Group 3: Mutual Benefit Promotion - The company will provide various incentives to merchants, including commission incentives, advertising support, traffic assistance, delivery fee subsidies, and exclusive after-sales services to help merchants operate better [3]. - There will be efforts to optimize rider protection, enhancing the dignity and sense of gain for delivery riders, aiming to create a win-win ecosystem for consumers, merchants, riders, and platforms [3].

Core Viewpoint - Dongfeng Liuzhou Automobile Co., Ltd. (referred to as "Dongfeng Liuzhou") has issued a statement regarding unauthorized use and distortion of its truck collision test video by a certain automotive brand, claiming it constitutes serious infringement and misleads the public, damaging the company's brand and commercial reputation [1][2]. Group 1: Infringement Facts - The unauthorized release of a collision video by a certain automotive brand on July 29, 2025, is deemed a serious infringement that misleads the public and violates multiple laws including the Anti-Unfair Competition Law and the Advertising Law [1]. - The testing conditions used by the certain automotive brand differ significantly from real-world scenarios, as they have not disclosed vehicle conditions or testing environments, leading to misleading results that could create safety hazards for consumers [2]. Group 2: Technology of Chenglong Brand - Dongfeng Liuzhou, with a 71-year history, emphasizes user needs and adheres to the principle of "real scene protection" in its Chenglong truck safety system [3]. - The Chenglong truck features an industry-first dragon bone frame cabin and a four-layer energy absorption structure designed to maximize passenger safety by dispersing collision energy [4]. - The truck is equipped with a dual active safety system, including an Automatic Emergency Braking System (AEBS) and a cabin rearward shift technology, effectively reducing accident casualty rates [4]. Group 3: Industry and User Commitment - As a state-owned enterprise, Dongfeng Liuzhou actively supports national calls against unfair competition and aims to foster a fair market environment [6]. - The company advocates for safety as a priority, urging adherence to traffic regulations and regular vehicle maintenance, emphasizing that proactive prevention is more effective than any test [6]. - Dongfeng Liuzhou promotes integrity in competition, encouraging technological innovation and quality improvement to maintain a healthy industry ecosystem [6]. Group 4: Follow-up Accountability - The company is closely monitoring the situation and has established a special team to further investigate the incident, reserving the right to pursue legal action for any damages caused [8].

Core Viewpoint - Dongfeng Liuzhou Motor Co., Ltd. (Dongfeng Liuzhou) has issued a statement regarding infringement by a certain automotive brand, claiming that the brand's actions mislead the public and damage Dongfeng's reputation [3]. Group 1: Infringement Claims - Dongfeng Liuzhou accuses a certain automotive brand of "illegally publishing infringing videos" and "using specific test scenarios that differ significantly from actual operational conditions" [3]. - The company highlights that the brand's video, released on July 29, 2025, depicting a head-on collision with a Dongfeng truck, constitutes serious infringement and misleads the public, violating laws such as the Anti-Unfair Competition Law and the Advertising Law [3]. - Dongfeng Liuzhou emphasizes that the brand has not disclosed the condition of the test vehicles or the testing environment, which could mislead consumers and create safety hazards [3]. Group 2: Response and Future Actions - Dongfeng Liuzhou, as a state-owned enterprise, supports national calls against unfair competition and is committed to promoting a fair market environment [3]. - The company plans to establish a special team to further investigate the matter and reserves the right to pursue legal action for the damages caused [3].

7月31日晚间，据乘龙卡车微信公众号，东风柳州汽车有限公司发布声明，回应某品牌对撞乘龙卡车测试。 文中提到，某汽车品牌使用特定场景测试，与实际场景运营存在严重差异。截至公司目前了解到的情况，某汽车品牌未公 开测试车辆状况（双方车辆是否改装、减配、卡扣是否固定、车辆是否过检等）、场景环境（测试场地状况、车速、驾驶 状态等），通过自定义碰撞条件，特定设计非常规测试场景，发布与公众认知的正常碰撞结果偏差较大的碰撞视频，不仅 贬低公司品牌形象，还容易对广大车主造成误导，形成安全隐患。 WANT IN TANK ANNEW HAT H H H L L L T T 负面影响,涉嫌违反《反不正当竞争法》《广告 法》及《民法典》等相关法律。 (二) 某汽车品牌使用特定场景测试,与 实际场景运营存在严重差异 截至目前我司了解到的情况,某汽车品牌 未公开测试车辆状况(双方车辆是否改装、减 配、卡扣是否固定、车辆是否过检等）、场景 环境(测试场地状况、车速、驾驶状态等), 通过自定义碰撞条件,特定设计非常规测试场 景、发布与公众认知的正常碰撞结果偏差较大 的碰撞视频,不仅贬低我司品牌形象,还容易 对广大车主造成误导,形成安全隐患。 ...

Core Viewpoint - Dongfeng Liuzhou Automobile Co., Ltd. issued a statement responding to a specific automotive brand's crash test of its Chenglong truck, highlighting significant discrepancies between the test conditions and real-world scenarios [1][7]. Group 1: Response to Crash Test - The automotive brand conducted tests under specific conditions that do not reflect actual operational scenarios, leading to misleading results [1][3]. - The statement emphasized that the automotive brand did not disclose the condition of the test vehicles or the environment in which the tests were conducted, raising concerns about the validity of the test results [1][7]. Group 2: Safety Features of Chenglong Trucks - Dongfeng Liuzhou has a 71-year history and prioritizes user needs, adhering to the principle of "real scene protection" in its safety systems [4]. - The Chenglong truck features an innovative dragon bone frame cabin and a four-layer energy absorption structure designed to maximize passenger safety during collisions [4]. Group 3: Industry Position and Advocacy - As a state-owned enterprise, Dongfeng Liuzhou actively supports national calls against unfair competition and aims to foster a fair market environment [5]. - The company advocates for safety as a priority, encouraging adherence to traffic regulations and regular vehicle maintenance among users [5].

每经编辑｜金冥羽 7月31日晚间，据乘龙卡车微信公众号，东风柳州汽车有限公司发布声明，回应某品牌对撞乘龙卡车测试。 文中提到，某汽车品牌使用特定场景测试，与实际场景运营存在严重差异。截至公司目前了解到的情况，某汽车品牌未公开测试车辆状况（双方车辆是否 改装、减配、卡扣是否固定、车辆是否过检等）、场景环境（测试场地状况、车速、驾驶状态等），通过自定义碰撞条件，特定设计非常规测试场景，发 布与公众认知的正常碰撞结果偏差较大的碰撞视频，不仅贬低公司品牌形象，还容易对广大车主造成误导，形成安全隐患。 截至目前我司了解到的情况,某汽车品牌 未公开测试车辆状况(双方车辆是否改装、减 配、卡扣是否固定、车辆是否过检等）、场景 环境(测试场地状况、车速、驾驶状态等）， 通过自定义碰撞条件,特定设计非常规测试场 景，发布与公众认知的正常碰撞结果偏差较大 的碰撞视频,不仅贬低我司品牌形象,还容易 对广大车主造成误导,形成安全隐患。 二、乘龙品牌技术说明 东风柳汽 作为一家有71年历史的央国 企，始终以用户需求为导向，乘龙卡车安全体 系严格遵循"真实场景防护"原则： (一) 行业首创龙骨框架驾驶室： (二) 采用四层吸能结构(抗冲 ...

Core Viewpoint - The incident involving the collision test video of the Li Auto i8 and a truck has led to significant controversy, with Dongfeng Liuzhou Automobile Co., Ltd. claiming serious infringement and misleading representation by the automotive brand involved in the test [3][5]. Group 1: Incident Overview - The Li Auto i8 was tested against an 8-ton truck at a speed of 50 km/h, resulting in the truck's wheels lifting and significant damage to the truck's cabin, indicating a lack of impact on the i8 [2]. - The testing video has sparked public discussion, particularly regarding the truck brand involved, leading to a formal statement from Dongfeng Liuzhou [3][4]. Group 2: Legal and Ethical Concerns - Dongfeng Liuzhou asserts that the use of the collision video without authorization constitutes serious infringement and misleads the public, violating multiple laws including the Anti-Unfair Competition Law and the Advertising Law [5][6]. - The company highlights that the testing conditions were not disclosed, which could mislead consumers about the safety of their vehicles [6]. Group 3: Technical and Safety Standards - Dongfeng Liuzhou emphasizes its commitment to safety, detailing the advanced safety features of its trucks, including a unique frame design and a four-layer energy absorption structure [7]. - The company promotes a safety-first approach, advocating for adherence to traffic regulations and regular vehicle maintenance as essential for accident prevention [9]. Group 4: Industry Response and Future Actions - Dongfeng Liuzhou calls for fair competition within the industry, opposing practices that undermine market integrity and urging peers to maintain ethical standards [8][9]. - The company has established a special team to monitor the situation and reserves the right to pursue legal action regarding the incident [10].