庞氏骗局

Search documents
百亿骗局!上线9个月的奥拉丁Orgin如何卷走数十亿资金
Sou Hu Cai Jing· 2025-06-13 01:33
Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the emergence of a blockchain project named "Oladin Origin," which masquerades as a DeFi 3.0 initiative but is revealed to be a Ponzi scheme that has defrauded over 500,000 investors, accumulating more than 10 billion yuan in funds [1][3][21]. Group 1: Project Overview - "Oladin Origin" claims to create the world's first privacy-focused payment ecosystem and a comprehensive Web3 financial ecosystem [1]. - The project attracted over 500,000 members and raised more than 10 billion yuan within nine months, leveraging the reputation of the Olympus DAO core team [3]. - The project outlines a three-phase blueprint, including the use of the algorithmic non-stablecoin LGNS as a financial ecosystem's foundation [7]. Group 2: Mechanisms of Deception - The project employs a complex economic model with six contract systems designed to create an illusion of a closed-loop economy [7]. - It promotes a misleading "economic flywheel theory" that obscures its Ponzi structure [7]. - Users are promised high static returns through staking LGNS, with claims of a daily return of 1.2%, equating to an annualized return of 44% [10]. Group 3: Recruitment and Incentives - The project features a multi-level marketing structure, allowing users to earn commissions through a 15-level referral system [12]. - A strict membership tier system incentivizes users to recruit others, with potential earnings of up to 25% from team performance [13]. Group 4: Control and Manipulation - The project falsely claims that each LGNS token is backed by a stable asset, creating a false sense of security [17]. - The project manipulates token prices through automatic adjustments based on market conditions, allowing the operators to control the market signals [18]. - The design of liquidity and reserve bonds serves as a mechanism for the project to cash out while delaying token sell pressure [19]. Group 5: Warning Signs of Fraud - Promises of unreasonably high returns, such as a daily return exceeding 1%, are indicative of a Ponzi scheme [21]. - The reliance on a multi-level recruitment system is a hallmark of pyramid schemes [22]. - Lack of transparency in contracts and the anonymity of the team raise red flags about the project's legitimacy [23]. - The project employs deceptive marketing tactics, claiming to be an international initiative without substantial operational backing [24].
买黄金的人,要小心了!
大胡子说房· 2025-06-12 11:53
以下文章来源于大胡子财研社 ,作者湾区区长 大胡子财研社 . 真人实地调研,专注楼市研究10余年!大胡子教买房为您带来一手消息,助您预判楼市风向,实现资产 稳步增长! 最近黄金的价格相比关S谈判之后稍微往上涨了一点,最新的黄金价格已经反弹到了3345元/盎 司。 但是我要提醒一下大家,现在买黄金的话,要小心B雷。 最近关于黄金投资出了一档子事,那就是 浙江黄金综合服务商 - 永坤黄金的 庞氏骗局事件。 这件事是怎么回事呢? 简单说,就是投资人发现在永坤黄金购买的黄金产品无法提现了,平台客服电话也不再有人接 听。 一查才发现,这家黄金综合服务商不仅线下的门店没有了,据说连老板都跑路了。 这老板为什么跑路? 因为资金链断了,同时引发了大规模的挤兑。 而且最气人的是,这老板不是没钱,他是把钱都转出去买了比特币,把钱都洗白了。 等同于这人里面赚一道、外面又赚一道。 但是机构买的不是黄金,压根没有那么多现金流兑付,最后结果就只能是B雷。 那为什么这件事引起了很多人的反响? 因为涉及到的资金量太大,据说 涉及到了100多亿的RMB,中招的主要都是浙江本地的老板。 这些老板为什么买这个机构的黄金, 他们其实贪的不是黄金能涨 ...
比特币这玩意绝大部分都是在美国犹大财团手里
Sou Hu Cai Jing· 2025-06-12 01:51
Core Viewpoint - The article questions whether Bitcoin is truly a decentralized investment or a significant financial trap, suggesting that the reality behind Bitcoin is not as favorable as perceived by many [3][5]. Group 1: Bitcoin Ownership and Market Manipulation - A significant portion of Bitcoin is held by certain American financial groups, which manipulate the market by creating false demand through internal transfers [3]. - The potential for Bitcoin's price to rise is heavily dependent on the involvement of Chinese capital, which could lead to further price increases if they start acquiring large amounts of Bitcoin [3]. Group 2: Decentralization and Control - The notion of Bitcoin being decentralized is challenged, as transactions can be tracked through centralized exchanges, undermining the idea of true decentralization [5]. - Despite Bitcoin's lack of a central authority on the blockchain, its price is influenced by wealthy holders, indicating a form of centralized control over the market [5]. Group 3: Regulatory Environment and Future Implications - The regulatory actions taken by the U.S. against individuals in the cryptocurrency space, such as Zhao Changpeng, highlight the risks associated with operating in a market controlled by American regulations [7]. - The future of Bitcoin may be influenced by the ongoing regulatory pressures from the U.S., which could impact its market performance and the dynamics of capital flow [7][9].
又一巨头爆雷!央视曝光黄金骗局,涉案超40亿,数百家庭几近崩溃
Sou Hu Cai Jing· 2025-06-11 23:54
Core Viewpoint - The article reveals a significant financial fraud involving Yongkun Gold, where the owner absconded with billions, leaving hundreds of families devastated and highlighting the dangers of high-yield investment schemes in the gold market [2][12][24]. Company Overview - Yongkun Gold was established by Wang Guohai, who initially gained recognition as a gold trader and analyst in Shanghai. The company operated under a unique investment model that promised high returns, claiming to be a leader in the gold investment sector [16][18]. - The company had 23 physical stores before the owner fled, and its business model involved customers purchasing gold but not taking physical possession, instead agreeing to a buyback at a future date based on market conditions [18][20]. Financial Impact - Reports indicate that victims have lost between 20 to 40 billion yuan, with estimates suggesting total losses could approach 100 billion yuan [12][14]. - One victim reported investing over 5 million yuan, only to see it vanish when the company ceased operations [10]. Investment Model and Risks - Yongkun Gold's investment model was characterized by promises of guaranteed returns, with claims of annual yields reaching up to 9% [22]. However, this model has been likened to a Ponzi scheme, where new investments are used to pay returns to earlier investors [26]. - The company’s operations were marked by high leverage and unsustainable financial practices, ultimately leading to its insolvency [24][26]. Market Context - The article notes that the current international climate has made gold a favored investment, with predictions of significant price increases over the next decade [5][7]. However, this environment has also attracted fraudulent schemes like Yongkun Gold, which exploited investor greed [3][14].
浙江一金店暴雷!老板套现41亿完美隐身跑路,多名投资者血本无归
Sou Hu Cai Jing· 2025-06-11 10:00
Group 1 - The core idea of the article revolves around the fraudulent practices of Yongkun Gold, which attracted 4.1 billion yuan in investments through a deceptive marketing model promising low-risk, high-return gold investments [1][3][32] - Yongkun Gold's business model involved "gold custody," where investors would not physically hold their gold but would have it stored by the company, creating uncertainty regarding gold price fluctuations during the custody period [5][8][10] - The company promised investors that if gold prices fell during the custody period, they could receive a refund at the original contract price, which led to a surge in investments as it appeared to eliminate risk [10][12][16] Group 2 - Yongkun Gold expanded rapidly, opening over 2,000 stores nationwide and attracting a wide range of investors, including employees who invested their salaries [14][16] - The company provided "gold insurance policies" for each transaction, which misled investors into believing their investments were secure, while the fine print excluded coverage for company fraud [21][23] - Ultimately, the owner of Yongkun Gold absconded with approximately 4.1 billion yuan, leaving around 12,000 investors with significant losses, some reaching millions [32][36]
23家金店一夜暴雷,千万富豪被套牢,损失预估41亿,警方介入
Sou Hu Cai Jing· 2025-06-10 09:48
Core Viewpoint - The financial sector is facing a significant crisis as multiple gold investment firms, particularly Yongkun Group, have collapsed, leading to substantial financial losses for investors, some of whom have lost millions [1][20][30] Group 1: Company Overview - Yongkun Group operated a complex gold investment scheme that misled investors into believing they were purchasing gold with guaranteed returns, which turned out to be a Ponzi scheme [3][11] - The company promised annual returns as high as 9%, significantly above the bank deposit rate of 3.45%, which attracted many investors [5][6] - The investment model involved both online and offline channels, where customers signed contracts for gold storage and repurchase, creating a facade of security [8][9] Group 2: Investment Scheme Details - The contracts included clauses that promised to refund the original price if gold prices fell, which was a key selling point for attracting investors [6][11] - The scheme relied on continuous influx of new investors to sustain operations, ultimately leading to financial collapse when new investments dried up [11][24] - Prior to the collapse, the company was still actively promoting investment opportunities and running promotional campaigns, indicating a desperate attempt to gather more funds [15][16] Group 3: Investor Impact - Many investors, including families, invested significant amounts, with some losing over 12 million yuan, leading to extreme emotional distress and even suicidal thoughts among victims [22][30] - The network of victims expanded widely, with over 60% of investors being referred by friends, showcasing the extensive reach of the company's marketing tactics [24][26] - The collapse has left a large number of investors in financial ruin, with reports of individuals losing their life savings and facing severe financial consequences [20][22] Group 4: Management and Legal Issues - The company's founder, Wang Guohai, has been described as a key figure behind the scheme, with a history of operating multiple companies, many of which have been dissolved [26][28] - Following the collapse, it was revealed that the promised gold reserves, valued at 4.1 billion yuan, were nonexistent, leading to legal investigations [28][30] - The authorities have initiated investigations, but recovery of lost funds for investors remains uncertain, highlighting the risks associated with high-return investment schemes [30]
新骗局曝光!深圳水贝镀金饰品伪装真金,5359公斤黄金杀猪盘暴雷
Sou Hu Cai Jing· 2025-06-10 09:31
Core Viewpoint - The article highlights the dual issues in the gold market, focusing on the fraudulent practices in Shenzhen's Shui Bei area and the collapse of Yongkun Gold, which has significantly impacted investor trust and market integrity [1][3][36]. Group 1: Gold Market Overview - Gold has historically been a symbol of wealth and a safe haven in economic turmoil, with prices soaring to four-digit levels this year, making it less accessible for potential buyers [1]. - Shenzhen Shui Bei is recognized as a major hub for gold and jewelry, accounting for over 50% of the domestic gold transaction volume, but it has recently become a hotspot for fraudulent activities [5][9]. - The price advantage of gold in Shui Bei compared to branded stores attracts many consumers, especially during peak times like weekends [9][11]. Group 2: Fraudulent Practices - Investigations revealed serious fraud in Shui Bei, including the sale of gold-plated items disguised as real gold, which are difficult for average consumers to identify without professional testing [11][13]. - Common fraudulent methods include "gold-plated silver" and "aluminum gold," where merchants mislead consumers by marking fake items as genuine gold [13][15]. - The prevalence of such fraud has raised concerns about consumer protection and the integrity of the gold market [19]. Group 3: Yongkun Gold Collapse - Yongkun Gold, established in 2014, attracted many investors with seemingly attractive investment products promising high returns, but it turned out to be a well-structured scam [21][32]. - The company employed a Ponzi scheme model, using new investors' funds to pay returns to earlier investors, which became unsustainable as market conditions changed [34]. - Reports indicate that clients have entrusted Yongkun with 5,359 kilograms of gold, valued at approximately 4.1 billion yuan, highlighting the scale of the collapse [34]. Group 4: Market Implications - The fraudulent activities in Shui Bei and the collapse of Yongkun Gold serve as a cautionary tale for investors, emphasizing the need for vigilance and the importance of choosing reputable dealers in the gold market [36].
彻底崩塌!20亿黄金骗局吞噬中产阶级,你的本金还在吗?
Sou Hu Cai Jing· 2025-06-09 17:29
Core Viewpoint - Yongkun Gold has collapsed, affecting a significant number of middle-class individuals, small business owners, and wealthy families in the Yangtze River Delta, with the involved amount exceeding 2 billion [2] Group 1: Business Model and Operations - Yongkun Gold is not a traditional gold retailer but positions itself as a "comprehensive gold service provider," offering investment certificates instead of physical gold [4] - The company attracted investors with high-interest promises, initially offering annual returns as high as 9%, later stabilizing around 7%, significantly above market averages [4] - The business model relied on a Ponzi scheme structure, using new investor funds to pay returns to earlier investors rather than purchasing actual gold [6][8] Group 2: Investor Impact - Many investors, including families, invested substantial amounts, with some families investing up to 20 million [6] - As gold prices surged, investors rushed to withdraw their funds, leading to a liquidity crisis for Yongkun Gold, which could not fulfill withdrawal requests [7] - Employees of Yongkun Gold also suffered losses, with reports of them losing their life savings and facing financial distress [8] Group 3: Market Context and Warnings - The recent surge in gold prices attracted many investors seeking high returns, leading them to overlook the risks associated with high-yield investments [9][10] - The collapse of Yongkun Gold serves as a warning against high-yield investment promises, especially in a changing interest rate environment where traditional safe investments yield lower returns [12][19] - The situation reflects a broader issue of similar Ponzi schemes in China, indicating a systemic risk in the investment landscape [12]
爆了!今年最大黄金杀猪盘,老板跑路卷走40亿
创业家· 2025-06-09 09:54
以下文章来源于易简财经 ,作者陈璐瑶 易简财经 . 聚焦中国最有投资价值的公司 投资人懵了。 来源:易简财经 作者: 陈璐瑶 编辑 :张恺翀 6 月 3 日 ,据报道,从杭州上城区分局经侦队获悉,浙江永坤控股有限公司 ( 简称:永坤控股 ) 相关人员涉嫌非法吸收公众存款,已对该案 立案调查。 图片来源:网络 永坤以所谓的 " 黄金托管 " 服务 吸引 投资者 :你买下黄金但不提货 ,金价上涨 ,公司会支付收益,金价下跌,公司就退钱送积分。 该公司出具的一份保单显示,截至 4 月 28 日,其在保黄金资产至少有 41 亿元,堪称最大黄金杀猪盘。 而永坤的实控人汪国海或许已经携款逃匿于美国,无法抓捕归案。 01 精心包装的骗局 为了让投资者乖乖掏钱,永坤可是下了不少功夫包装自己。 实控人汪国海,据说是中国最早一批高级黄金分析师与上海黄金交易所注册交易员,前途无量。 2008 年,中国黄金市场刚开放,汪国海敏锐地察觉到黄金投资的巨大潜力,决定辞职创业。 企查查显示, 2014 年,永坤控股正式成立,注册资金 1.12 亿元。目前,汪国海仍为法定代表人。 在官网,永坤自称旗下拥有多家珠宝企业,包括永坤黄金、永坤黄金珠 ...
小心!投资黄金遭遇集资陷阱,多人中招
Zhong Guo Jing Ying Bao· 2025-06-08 05:13
Group 1 - The core issue revolves around Zhejiang Yongkun Holdings Co., Ltd. (Yongkun Gold), which has faced payment irregularities, preventing multiple investors from withdrawing their funds [1][2] - Yongkun Gold, while officially a jewelry retailer, has engaged in activities beyond its licensed scope, effectively conducting unlicensed gold asset management operations [1][3] - Legal experts indicate that Yongkun Gold may be involved in criminal activities, with the potential for charges related to illegal public fundraising and investment fraud [2][3] Group 2 - Yongkun Gold's investment model has been characterized as a Ponzi scheme, promising annual returns of 12% to 18% through products like "gold savings" and "pre-purchased gold" [2][4] - The company lacks the necessary qualifications to manage gold assets, raising concerns about its operations and the legitimacy of its investment offerings [3][4] - There are significant doubts regarding the actual management of gold assets, including the storage and insurance of claimed gold holdings [3][4] Group 3 - Investors are warned to be cautious of high-return promises, as legitimate gold investments typically correlate with market fluctuations and do not guarantee fixed returns [4][5] - It is advised that investors verify the qualifications and operational scope of investment institutions, particularly those involved in gold asset management [4][5] - Recommendations include avoiding non-regulated investment channels and ensuring that investments do not exceed 20% of household assets, with diversification into safer assets [5]