Core Viewpoint - The article emphasizes that the trade war and tariff policies initiated by the U.S. have no winners and are detrimental to all parties involved, urging the U.S. to abandon its extreme pressure tactics and resolve issues through dialogue based on equality and mutual respect [2][6]. Group 1: U.S. Tariff Policies - The U.S. has implemented a tariff policy that includes both exemptions and additional tariffs, which has been criticized as harmful and counterproductive [2]. - The Chinese government asserts that the U.S. is using tariffs as a weapon for unilateralism and economic bullying, which undermines global interests, including those of China and the EU [6]. Group 2: China-Latin America Relations - China maintains that its cooperation with Latin American and Caribbean countries is based on mutual support and does not involve geopolitical calculations, contrasting with U.S. actions that are seen as attempts to control the region [5]. - The article highlights that the U.S. has been accused of using tariffs and other means to exert pressure on Latin American countries, which is viewed as a form of neo-Monroeism [8]. Group 3: China-EU Coordination - China and the EU, as major global economies, are coordinating their responses to U.S. tariff policies, emphasizing the need for stability and certainty in the global economy [6]. - Both parties advocate for a multilateral trading system centered around the World Trade Organization (WTO) and aim to maintain healthy and stable global trade relations [6].

"世人看得很清楚，中拉合作是南南合作，只有相互支持，没有地缘算计。"林剑说，中方同拉美和加勒 比国家交往始终秉持平等相待、互利共赢的原则，从不寻求势力范围，也不针对任何第三方。美方反复 的抹黑攻击中国，一再渲染"中国威胁论"，不过是想以之为借口控制拉美和加勒比，注定不会得逞。 智通财经4月14日电，外交部发言人林剑主持4月14日例行记者会。会上有记者提问称：近日，美国国防 部长赫格塞思在巴拿马城举办的2025年中美洲安全会议上大肆渲染"中国威胁"，并就中国军队、中资企 业等发表攻击言论，宣称美方必须有力阻遏"中国在西半球威胁"，预防"战争爆发"。美国副国务卿兰多 在萨尔瓦多宣称，应只允许可信任供应商参与5G、网络安全、人工智能合作，防止中国进入。中方对 此有何评论? 美官员发布涉华消极言论 外交部驳斥：彻头彻尾的谎言和谬论 林剑对此表示，美方有关人士的言论充满了意识形态偏见和冷战思维，是彻头彻尾的谎言和谬论。是谁 将拉美和加勒比视为"后院"，大搞"新门罗主义"？是谁对拉美和加勒比国家的内政指手画脚？是谁高举 关税的大棒胁迫拉美和加勒比国家？是谁在全球大搞监听监控？是谁军事基地遍布西半球？是谁放任轻 小武器和弹 ...

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the ongoing tensions between the United States and China regarding the control of ports in Panama operated by Hutchison Whampoa, a Hong Kong-based company, highlighting the historical context and implications of U.S. actions against Chinese investments in the region [1][11][18]. Summary by Sections U.S. Concerns Over Chinese Influence - Since 1997, U.S. politicians and military officials have used Hutchison Whampoa's operations in Panama as a basis for promoting the "China threat" narrative, claiming it jeopardizes U.S. national security [1][11]. - Recent actions by the Panamanian government, under U.S. pressure, have led to claims that Hutchison Whampoa's port operations violate constitutional provisions, potentially paving the way for U.S. investment firms to acquire these assets [1][2]. Hutchison Whampoa's Contributions to Panama - Hutchison Whampoa has operated two key ports in Panama since 1997, contributing significantly to the local economy through tax payments and infrastructure investments totaling approximately $1.695 billion [6][7]. - The company has been a major employer in Panama, with 99.9% of its workforce being Panamanian, and has played a crucial role in enhancing the competitiveness of the ports [7][8]. Historical Context of U.S.-Panama Relations - The article outlines the historical context of U.S. control over the Panama Canal, including the controversial means by which the U.S. established its presence in the region, which has led to ongoing tensions regarding sovereignty and influence [19][22]. - U.S. military interventions and political pressures have historically shaped Panama's foreign relations, particularly concerning its dealings with China [21][24]. Recent Developments and Future Implications - The Panamanian government has initiated audits of Hutchison Whampoa's operations, which some officials claim may lead to the termination of its port operating rights, reflecting the increasing influence of U.S. interests in the region [16][18]. - The article warns that U.S. actions could destabilize Panama's economic development and its strategic position in global trade, particularly as the Panama Canal serves as a vital international shipping route [20][23].