据香港特区廉政公署（以下简称"廉署"）官网11月24日消息，廉署于11月21日落案起诉一名香港交易及 结算所有限公司（以下简称"港交所"）时任助理副总裁，指控其涉嫌贪污受贿15万港元，以披露上市公 司的机密资料。另有两名涉案人士被控妨碍司法公正，涉及廉署与香港证券及期货事务监察委员会（以 下简称"香港证监会"）针对内幕交易的刑事调查。 涉案被告谭卓彦（38岁）为港交所上市部资讯科技组前助理副总裁，被控两项公职人员接受利益罪名， 违反《防止贿赂条例》第4（2）（a）条。同案被告周子刚（38岁）及邓庆俞（39岁）则被控一项妨碍 司法公正罪名，违反普通法。 目前，上述三人已获廉署保释，案件定于11月25日在香港东区裁判法院提讯，控方后续将申请转介区域 法院答辩。 据悉，廉署此前接获香港证监会转介的贪污投诉，指称案件牵涉内幕交易，随即展开联合调查。调查显 示，谭卓彦在任职期间因工作需要获授权取阅港交所相关的电邮，其中包含上市公司敏感消息等机密资 料及文件。按规定，有关资料仅限指定上市部人员于执行公务时取用，并且不得向未经授权人士披露。 据指控，谭卓彦涉嫌于2024年6月及12月，从周子刚方面接受两笔贿款共15万港元， ...

很多新手炒股都抱着"赚点差价"的想法，没人会一开始就琢磨"买成大股东"这回事。但A股有明确规则：持股比例达到5%，你就从普通散户变成了"大股 东"，一言一行都得守规矩，不然可能赚的钱没了，还得吃罚单。 先把核心标准说清楚：不是只有控股几十 percent 的才叫大股东，监管层把"持股超5%"作为关键门槛。不管你是集中买还是分散在多个账户里，只要合计持 股摸到这个线，就必须启动一系列合规操作，第一步就是"举牌"。 这些规则本质是保护中小投资者。大股东持股多、消息灵，要是随意买卖，很容易操纵股价，小散户根本没法抗衡。 持股超5%后，你不再是"看客"，而是能参与公司决策的"话事人"，但权利和责任是绑定的。 从权利来说，你有权参加股东大会，对公司的重大事项投票——比如是否并购重组、修改公司章程、分配利润等。要是持股比例够高，还能提名董事、监 事，直接参与公司管理。遇到公司经营有问题，也能通过合法途径提出质疑，督促管理层改进。 但责任也随之而来。你必须持续关注公司的经营和财务状况，不能当"甩手掌柜"。如果公司出现违规操作，大股东要是知情不报，或者利用关联交易损害公 司利益，会被监管层追责，可能面临罚款、市场禁入等处罚。 ...

中华人民共和国证券法（2019修订） 第五十条 禁止证券交易内幕信息的知情人和非法获取内幕信息的人利用内幕信息从事证券交易活动。 第五十一条 证券交易内幕信息的知情人包括： （一）发行人及其董事、监事、高级管理人员； （二）持有公司百分之五以上股份的股东及其董事、监事、高级管理人员，公司的实际控制人及其董事、监事、高级管理人员； （三）发行人控股或者实际控制的公司及其董事、监事、高级管理人员； （四）由于所任公司职务或者因与公司业务往来可以获取公司有关内幕信息的人员； （一）公司的经营方针和经营范围的重大变化； （二）公司的重大投资行为，公司在一年内购买、出售重大资产超过公司资产总额百分之三十，或者公司营业用主要资产的抵押、质押、出售或者报废一次 超过该资产的百分之三十； （五）上市公司收购人或者重大资产交易方及其控股股东、实际控制人、董事、监事和高级管理人员； （六）因职务、工作可以获取内幕信息的证券交易场所、证券公司、证券登记结算机构、证券服务机构的有关人员； （七）因职责、工作可以获取内幕信息的证券监督管理机构工作人员； （八）因法定职责对证券的发行、交易或者对上市公司及其收购、重大资产交易进行管理可以 ...

Company Overview - MSC Industrial Direct Co. Inc. (MSM) is a leading distributor in the industrial supply sector, focusing on metalworking and maintenance, repair, and operations (MRO) products [5] - The company reported a total revenue of $3.8 billion and a net income of $199.3 million for the trailing twelve months (TTM) [4] - MSM offers approximately 1.9 million SKUs across various product categories, including safety supplies, tools, and industrial equipment [8] Insider Activity - Philip Peller, director at MSC Industrial Direct, acquired 6,666 Class A shares on November 13, 2025, valued at $600,873, marking a 232% increase in his direct holdings [2][7] - The transaction price of $90.14 per share was near the session high, indicating a strong market position at the time of purchase [7] - Following this acquisition, Peller's direct ownership increased significantly, reversing a prior trend of net dispositions, and he now holds a modest stake relative to the company's total float [7][10] Market Significance - MSM is considered a bellwether stock for the industrial and manufacturing sectors, with its performance closely watched as an indicator of broader market health [9] - The recent acquisition by Peller comes amid a year-to-date increase of approximately 18% in MSM shares, suggesting positive sentiment in the manufacturing sector [10]

Core Insights - Palantir shares experienced a significant decline due to increased insider selling activity, with CEO Alex Karp and other senior executives proposing substantial share disposals [1][2][4] Insider Selling Activity - Multiple senior executives, including Alex Karp, filed to sell shares, with Karp proposing to sell 585,000 shares valued at approximately $95.93 million at an estimated price of $163.99 per share [2][4] - In total, over 1.26 million shares are set to be sold by five executives, representing a combined market value exceeding $205 million [5] - The coordinated nature of the sales suggests possible ties to scheduled options exercises or executive sell-down programs [6] Market Reaction - Following the insider selling announcements, Palantir's stock closed at $155.74, down 5.85%, and continued to decline in pre-market trading [1] - The stock has broken below immediate support near the $160 region, with potential further pullbacks toward $150 if selling persists [7] - A recovery above $165 is necessary to restore bullish sentiment in the market [7]

苏州规划晚间公告，根据中国证券登记结算有限责任公司深圳分公司出具的《信息披露义务人持股及股 份变更查询证明》《股东股份变更明细清单》及相关主体出具的自查报告和承诺函等文件，在前述主体 出具的自查报告及承诺函等文件真实、准确、完整的前提下，该等主体在自查期间买卖公司股票的行为 不属于利用本次交易的内幕信息进行的内幕交易行为，不会对本次交易构成实质性法律障碍。 ...

浩瀚深度公告称，公司于2025年10月22日审议通过2025年限制性股票激励计划相关议案。按规定，公司 对激励计划内幕信息知情人在2025年4月23日至10月22日买卖公司股票情况进行查询。核查对象为内幕 信息知情人，他们均填报了登记表，公司向中国结算上海分公司查询并获书面证明。结果显示，自查期 间所有核查对象均无买卖公司股票行为，未发现信息泄露及内幕交易情形。 ...

（原标题：超八千万美元！特朗普一个多月大举买入债券） 根据美国联邦政府道德办公室（OGE）当地时间11月15日公布的财务披露文件显示，美国总统特朗普 在今年8月下旬至10月初这段时间内，购入价值至少8200万美元的公司债券和市政债券，其中包括在其 政策推动下受益行业的新投资。 路透社当天报道称，这些信息是根据1978年《政府道德法》这项透明度法律所披露的，并未列出每笔交 易的具体金额，仅提供了一个大致范围。在8月28日至10月2日期间，特朗普进行了超过175笔金融交 易。文件显示，这些债券购买的最大总价值超过3.37亿美元。 据报道，当天所披露文件中，列出的多数资产由市政当局、州、县、学区以及其他与公共机构相关实体 发行的债券构成。 特朗普最新购入的债券投资涉及多个行业，其中包括那些已因其政府政策变化而受益或正从中获益的领 域，例如金融监管放松这一政策。 "我希望他能专注于做好自己的工作——努力安抚市场、制定可预测的贸易政策，让市场做自己的事 情，而不是由白宫给出看似投资建议的东西。"佩因特说。 8月下旬，特朗普还购买了摩根大通等投资银行的债券。当地时间11月14日，特朗普要求美国司法部调 查摩根大通与已故富 ...

Group 1 - President Trump purchased at least $82 million in corporate and municipal bonds between late August and early October, benefiting industries aligned with his policy initiatives [1] - The total value of the bonds purchased exceeded $337 million, with over 175 financial transactions reported during this period [1] - The bonds included those from semiconductor manufacturers like Broadcom and Qualcomm, tech companies such as Meta Platforms, retailers like Home Depot and CVS Health, and Wall Street banks including Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley [1] Group 2 - Trump also acquired bonds from investment banks like JPMorgan Chase, while simultaneously requesting an investigation into JPMorgan's past relationship with Jeffrey Epstein [2] - Following the U.S. government's acquisition of Intel shares, Trump also invested in Intel bonds [3] Group 3 - There are allegations of insider trading involving members of Congress, including Nancy Pelosi, who is accused of timing stock purchases based on legislative actions [4] - Adam Schiff has called for an investigation into whether Trump's suspension of tariffs constituted insider trading or market manipulation, which led to stock price surges [4] - Concerns have been raised about Trump's posts potentially leading to market manipulation charges, as he holds significant influence over trade policy [4][5] Group 4 - Jim Angel, a finance professor, noted that investigations into potential market manipulation typically begin with exchanges like NYSE or NASDAQ, which report findings to the SEC [5] - The SEC's ability to take action is complicated by the lack of clarity on who might benefit from Trump's posts, making it difficult to identify potential violations of disclosure regulations [5]

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the financial activities of former President Trump, highlighting his significant investments in corporate and municipal bonds, particularly in sectors benefiting from his administration's policies, raising concerns about potential conflicts of interest and market manipulation [1][4]. Group 1: Trump's Financial Activities - Trump purchased at least $82 million worth of corporate and municipal bonds between late August and early October, with total bond purchases exceeding $337 million [1]. - The bonds acquired include those from companies like Broadcom, Qualcomm, Meta Platforms, Home Depot, CVS Health, Goldman Sachs, and Morgan Stanley [1]. - Trump's investments are linked to industries that have benefited from regulatory changes under his administration, such as financial deregulation [1]. Group 2: Investigations and Controversies - Trump requested an investigation into JPMorgan Chase's relationship with Jeffrey Epstein shortly after purchasing their bonds [2]. - There are allegations of insider trading involving members of Congress, including Nancy Pelosi, who reportedly profited from stock trades influenced by legislative actions [4]. - Adam Schiff has called for an investigation into whether Trump's actions regarding tariffs constituted insider trading or market manipulation [4]. Group 3: Regulatory Implications - Financial experts suggest that Trump's statements about market conditions could lead to investigations by regulatory bodies like the SEC, although proving violations may be challenging due to the vague nature of his comments [5][6]. - The SEC has not commented on the matter, and it remains unclear who might be implicated in any potential legal actions stemming from Trump's financial activities [7].