来源：新闻坊 6月10日 一款全球唯一一只 薄荷色LABUBU 在永乐2025春季拍卖会上亮相 随着泡泡玛特旗下 人气IP搪胶毛绒产品LABUBU持续爆火， 线上线下渠道供不应求， 一夜之间 仿佛全世界都为它彻夜排队 甚至全球明星都在晒 更令人意想不到的是 落槌价为108万元，目前已结拍 粉丝为之疯狂的同时 这也让不少厂家瞅准 "商机"， 开始制作高仿版LABUBU。 6月10日，记者从宁波海关获悉，宁波海关所属北仑海关查验关员在对三批商品进行查验时，发现有未 申报的盲盒、毛绒玩具等商品，它们部分外包装上印有"泡泡玛特"的品牌标识，均是泡泡玛特当前最热 门的LABUBU系列。 宁波海关查获侵权货物 宁波海关查获的侵权货物 根据《中华人民共和国海关法》第四十四条、第九十一条的规定，海关依法对与进出境货物有关的知识 产权实施保护，违法进出口侵犯中华人民共和国法律、行政法规保护的知识产权的货物的，由海关依法 没收侵权货物，并处以罚款；构成犯罪的，依法追究刑事责任。 目前，海关已依法扣留这些货物。 无独有偶，不久前，关员对某公司申报出口的"背包""娃娃"进行查验时发现，申报货物上印 有"LABUBU玩具系列"及"So ...

Group 1 - LABUBU, a plush toy brand under Pop Mart, is facing challenges due to the emergence of counterfeit products, leading to supply shortages and delays in order fulfillment [1][3] - The brand has gained popularity among young consumers, resulting in high demand and price speculation in both domestic and international markets [3] - Counterfeit products not only infringe on the market interests of the original manufacturer but also violate intellectual property rights, potentially damaging brand image and consumer trust [3][4] Group 2 - Legal measures are being emphasized as a means to protect brands like LABUBU, with authorities urged to crack down on counterfeit manufacturers and regulate sales channels [4] - A recent copyright dispute involving Pop Mart resulted in a merchant selling counterfeit blind boxes being ordered to pay 10,000 yuan in damages [4] - The local market supervision authority in Yiwu has taken action to remove counterfeit LABUBU products from the market, highlighting the importance of regulatory enforcement [4]

近日，泡泡玛特旗下人气IP搪胶毛绒产品LABUBU，在海内外持续爆火。一些厂家瞅准 "商机"，开始 制作高仿版LABUBU。 据红星新闻消息，部分仿冒工厂甚至都出现了产能不足的现象。 另据宁波晚报报道，近日，宁波海关所属北仑海关查验关员在对三批商品进行查验时，发现有未申报的 盲盒、毛绒玩具等商品，它们部分外包装上印有泡泡玛特的品牌标识，均是泡泡玛特当前最热门的 LABUBU系列。 经联系权利人，海关关员确认这些商品均侵犯相关商标权和著作权。经清点，共有盲盒2350个，毛绒玩 具4410个，钥匙扣9400个，雨衣495个，梳子1200个。 与此同时，社交平台上一则 "义乌市场LABUBU一夜之间全部下架" 的帖子，引发广泛关注。 据九派新闻消息，义乌国际商贸城某家商户表示，该店还剩数量不多的高仿版LABUBU。"这批货没 了，我们就不做LABUBU了。因为违规总查，犯不上。" 义乌市市场监督管理局一工作人员称，生产和销售LABUBU必须获得正版授权，对于盗版他们一直是 严打的态度。"如果涉及的案量较大，还可能移送公安处理。" 潘翔说，商家除了向权利人承担停止侵权、赔偿损失，向消费者承担退一赔三的民事责任外，还应 ...

Core Viewpoint - The article highlights a nationwide initiative in China to destroy counterfeit and substandard goods, emphasizing the importance of intellectual property protection and the collaborative efforts of various government agencies to combat infringement and counterfeiting [1][2]. Group 1: Destruction of Counterfeit Goods - Over 211 tons of counterfeit and substandard goods were destroyed in a centralized event in Zhuji, involving more than 100 trainloads of products across 150 categories, including food, pharmaceuticals, clothing, electronics, and more [1]. - The event was part of a coordinated effort led by the National Market Supervision Administration and the National Quality Strong Country Construction Coordination Promotion Leading Group Office, with real-time video connections to 25 sub-venues across different provinces [1]. Group 2: Efforts in Zhejiang Province - Zhejiang Province has prioritized intellectual property protection and the fight against counterfeiting, with 16 member units collaborating to create a comprehensive protection network [2]. - In 2023, administrative law enforcement agencies in Zhejiang handled 4,987 cases of infringement, involving an amount of 106 million yuan, with fines exceeding 54.12 million yuan [2]. - The police solved 250 cases of infringement, arresting 935 suspects, while the prosecution and courts processed numerous cases, indicating a robust legal response to counterfeiting [2].

Group 1 - The national unified destruction action against counterfeit and inferior goods was launched on June 10, 2025, with participation from 25 provinces, including Suzhou, where approximately 68 tons of such goods were destroyed [1] - The destroyed counterfeit goods included 14 categories such as motorcycle helmets, health foods, alcoholic beverages, pharmaceuticals, medical devices, fire safety products, measuring instruments, meat products, and building materials, all confiscated by market regulatory and public security departments [1] Group 2 - Since 2024, Suzhou has intensified efforts to combat various forms of infringement and counterfeiting, with market regulatory departments handling 5,145 administrative penalty cases and public security cracking 250 criminal cases, resulting in the arrest of 425 suspects [2] - The local courts received 6,746 new intellectual property cases and concluded 6,385 cases, while the prosecution reviewed 97 cases involving 157 individuals and accepted 326 cases involving 651 individuals [2] Group 3 - A series of robust enforcement actions have been implemented to maintain market order, including special operations focused on intellectual property protection, drug safety, and the crackdown on illegal meat products [3] - Suzhou's market regulatory bureau has established a joint supervision mechanism for key cases with public security and prosecution departments, and has signed cooperation agreements for the protection of trade secrets with other cities [3] - Suzhou ranked first in the provincial assessment of intellectual property protection efforts, being recognized as an excellent performer [3]

高某甲、闵某、高某乙等9人均为武汉某信息公司前员工，相继离职后，入职了高某甲设立并实际控制 的4家公司。调查显示，2020年至2023年11月，高某甲等人违反保密义务，利用武汉某信息公司的秘点 技术，生产同类无线定位产品对外销售，合计收入1500余万元，销售毛利1100余万元。2024年8月，高 某甲等9人涉嫌侵犯商业秘密罪被提起公诉。2025年4月，法院对高某甲等9人以侵犯商业秘密罪定罪量 刑。 据了解，检察机关在该案办理过程中，聘请相关专业领域的技术专家作为特邀检察官助理和技术调查 官，并多次召开专家论证会对该案涉及的技术难题进行论证。同时，积极引导权利人实质参与诉讼过 程，在法院审理环节促成双方达成赔偿谅解，最终退赔权利人损失2300万元。 湖北省检察院相关负责人介绍，今年以来，全省检察机关落实专项行动要求，依法加大了对科技创新的 保护力度，包括加大对侵犯商标权、专利权、著作权、商业秘密的打击力度，保护科技创新主体知识产 权。 科技创新是湖北的"金字招牌"。 2025年，锚定打造具有全国影响力的科技创新高地目标，湖北开局即发力。为服务打造世界原始创新策 源地、全国成果转化优选地、全国创新生态新高地，助力 ...

★ 宏观动态 ★ 中办、国办印发《关于深入推进深圳综合改革试点 深化改革创新扩大开放的意见》 为深入推进深圳综合改革试点、深化改革创新扩大开放，中办、国办印发《关于深入推进深圳综合改革试点 深化改革创新扩大开放的意见》。意见部署，统筹推进教育科技人才体制机制一体改革，推进金融、技术、数 据等赋能实体经济高质量发展，建设更高水平开放型经济新体制，健全科学化、精细化、法治化治理模式。意 见明确，在更高起点、更高层次、更高目标上深化改革、扩大开放，创造更多可复制、可推广的新鲜经验，更 好发挥深圳在粤港澳大湾区建设中的重要引擎作用和在全国一盘棋中的辐射带动作用，为全面建设社会主义现 代化国家作出贡献、提供范例。 市场监管总局就《直播电商监督管理办法》公开征求意见 为加强直播电商监督管理，促进直播电商健康发展，市场监管总局在充分调研和广泛征求意见的基础上，会同 国家网信办研究起草了《直播电商监督管理办法（征求意见稿）》（以下简称《办法》），今日正式向社会公 开征求意见。《办法》明确了直播电商平台经营者在违规处置、资质核验、信息报送、培训机制、分级管理、 动态管控、信息公示等方面的责任。要求平台经营者建立健全平台协议规则 ...

在京东电商平台，一家名为"京胖宝库经营部"的珠宝店铺格外醒目——所售饰品均标注着"胖东来品 质"字样，产品标价从百余元到3万元不等。根据京东商城证照信息，该店铺属"个人经营者"，经营 地址为江西宜春市某小区仓库。 当记者以消费者身份咨询时，该店铺客服声称，"与胖东来为同一供应链"，并表示"货是一样的"，甚至 提到"可到检测机构检测"。然而，当被要求出示具体凭证时，商家却闪烁其词。 对此，胖东来工作人员对记者称，暂未在京东平台开设相关店铺，其对上述店铺"打擦边球"行为也颇为 无奈。"一直都在各个（电商）平台检索、取证，但数量太多了。"该人士表示，尤其是这种标注"胖东 来品质"而非明确标注"胖东来"的行为，维权难度更大，"还需要消费者擦亮眼睛，慎重选择。" 实际上，这种"蹭名"胖东来的现象并不少见。不久前，浙江海宁一家名为"胖都来"的商场开业，因名称 与"胖东来"高度相似，被指蹭热度。 胖东来迅速反击，不仅向浙江当地市场监管部门正式投诉，还向对方邮寄了律师函。"因为'胖东来'作 为零售行业的知名品牌，已经有显著的辨识度。'胖都来'的宣传行为容易造成消费者的混淆。"胖东来 相关负责人表示。 君悦（合肥）律师事务所主 ...

Core Viewpoint - The article highlights the ongoing efforts by market regulatory authorities in China to protect intellectual property rights, particularly focusing on trademark infringement cases, with significant actions taken against violators in various regions [1]. Group 1: Trademark Infringement Cases - In March 2024, the Jiangsu Province market regulatory authority investigated a case involving Suzhou Kaidong Clothing Accessories Co., which was found to be selling products infringing on the "YKK" trademark, leading to a criminal referral due to the severity of the case [2][3]. - The Shanghai Yangpu District market regulatory authority imposed a fine of 660,000 yuan on Shanghai Aidojun Cultural Communication Co. for facilitating trademark infringement by promoting counterfeit products on an internet video platform [4][5]. - The Guangdong Province market regulatory authority seized 3,448 boxes of counterfeit "Kayou" anime card products and imposed penalties on 12 individuals involved in the infringement [6][7]. - The Shandong Province market regulatory authority investigated a case involving a clothing studio that produced counterfeit "ERDOS" cashmere products, leading to a criminal referral due to the nature of the violations [8][9]. - The Shanxi Province market regulatory authority uncovered a scheme involving Shanxi Mingjia Paper Industry Co. that produced counterfeit "Vinda" sanitary products, with a total value of over 3.12 million yuan in infringing goods [10][11]. Group 2: Regulatory Actions and Strategies - The regulatory authorities are employing advanced methods, including cross-regional collaboration and the use of technology, to effectively combat trademark infringement and protect intellectual property rights [9][13]. - The article emphasizes the importance of cooperation between regulatory bodies, trademark owners, and online platforms to enhance the efficiency of enforcement actions against counterfeit products [5][12]. - The case involving malicious trademark registration by He Mousheng highlights the challenges of combating trademark squatting, with 102 trademarks registered without intent to use, showcasing the need for stricter regulations [12][13].

Core Viewpoint - The ongoing trade tensions between China and the United States have led to significant shifts in trade patterns, particularly in the oil sector, with China halting imports of U.S. crude oil for two consecutive months, resulting in the lowest U.S. crude oil export levels since 2020 [1][8]. Group 1: Trade Relations and Tariffs - The U.S.-China trade war began in 2018, initiated by the Trump administration's imposition of tariffs on $34 billion worth of Chinese goods, citing trade deficits and intellectual property concerns [1][3]. - China responded with tariffs ranging from 5% to 25% on U.S. products, significantly impacting U.S. agricultural exports, particularly soybeans [3]. - The trade conflict escalated with the U.S. targeting Chinese tech firms like Huawei, leading to further tariffs on $1.2 trillion and $1.8 trillion worth of Chinese goods [3][4]. Group 2: Economic Impact - The U.S. trade deficit has increased from $950.2 billion in 2018 to $1,211.75 billion in 2024, indicating that the tariffs have not achieved their intended goal of reducing the trade deficit [7]. - Over 90% of the tariff costs have been passed on to U.S. importers, downstream businesses, and consumers, leading to increased prices and living costs in the U.S. [7]. - Despite facing some export pressures, China has shown resilience by expanding domestic demand and diversifying trade partnerships, maintaining stable economic growth [7]. Group 3: Energy Sector Dynamics - The halt in U.S. crude oil imports by China is attributed to the U.S. tariff policies, which have diminished the price advantage of U.S. crude oil for China [8]. - The U.S. shale oil producers are projected to face losses of at least $10 billion due to the absence of the Chinese market, with U.S. crude oil exports dropping to 3.883 million barrels per day, a 4% decrease [8]. - China is actively seeking to diversify its energy imports, with agreements in place with Russia and Qatar to secure alternative oil and gas supplies [8]. Group 4: Global Economic Implications - The trade war has disrupted global supply chains, forcing multinational companies to reallocate resources and adjust production strategies, thereby increasing operational costs and risks [10]. - The unilateral actions by the U.S. have undermined the multilateral trade system, leading to slower progress in global trade negotiations and increasing trade disputes among nations [10]. - Some Southeast Asian countries have benefited from the trade war as they become alternative production bases for multinational companies, while those reliant on U.S.-China trade face economic slowdowns [10].