神译局是36氪旗下编译团队，关注科技、商业、职场、生活等领域，重点介绍国外的新技术、新观点、新风向。 编者按：当产出归于算法，人类最后的筹码是无法被商品化的"主体性"。在意义荒漠里，你的独特偏见就是最贵的真资产。文章来自编译。 每个人都在担心人工智能是否会取代自己。 但我禁不住在想，人类经验中总有一些东西是无法被取代的。 我始终认为人类仍然渴望工作。也就是说，他们仍想创造些什么，与他人分享，并通过获得某种形式的报酬来让自己的贡献得到认可。这是人性中根深蒂固 的一面。遗憾的是，当"生产力"演变为我们的上帝，工作便成了一个被剥夺了意义的贬义词。 我不怎么担心工业化工厂式的工作被自动化取代。我们都清楚那种毫无灵魂的深渊会对人造成怎样的消磨。 通用人工智能（AGI）会包揽所有的散文创作和艺术生产吗？ 如果奋斗、地位和好奇心是意义的源泉，而 AGI 承诺要让我们摆脱这些，那我们该怎么办？ 如果真有那么一样东西是 AGI 无法取代的，那会是什么？ 在一个物质不再稀缺的世界里，你如何让自己成为稀缺品？ 我想分享关于工作未来的 6 个观点，包括作为创意工作者必须优化的技能和特质，以及最终如何在令人望而生畏的未来过上更有意义的 ...

与AI"对位"：泛创作时代的主体性之问 主体性在碰撞中得到确认 协同的赋格—— 创意可能性的急速拓展 "赋格"是一个音乐术语，要求每个旋律线条保持独立的同时又在相互应答中构筑起一个和谐、丰富的多 声音响空间。当下AI与人的创作关系，就如同一种创意协同的赋格实践。AI作为一个拥有庞大知识谱 系与强大生成逻辑的对位声部，将创意的门槛与边界推向了前所未有的开阔地带。 传统创作的核心困境在于苦等灵感的到来。AI介入的意义，首先在于它轻松地构建了创作的起点，如 同一张拥有无限可能的动态稿纸，能够迅速捕捉到一段雨夜霓虹的都市记忆、一种混着乡愁与未来的微 妙思绪，或是一个草原民谣混合电子脉冲的风格标签，将之转化为可感知的旋律、和弦或是编曲框架等 具象方案。一位业余音乐爱好者可以哼唱一段简单的旋律，让AI生成从巴洛克变奏到氛围电子乐的数 十种音乐风格；一位视频博主可以仅凭一段文字描述，就获得与其画面叙事完美契合的定制化配乐。在 这一阶段，AI打破了个人经验与专业技术的限制，将数百年音乐史中积累的浩瀚风格与方法，变成了 每个人都可以即时调用的公共素材库。 这场赋格实践完成了动态、交互的协同过程，因为对于绝大多数非专业创作者而言 ...

Group 1 - The article discusses the potential impact of AI on the future of work, emphasizing that while AI may automate many tasks, it cannot replace the intrinsic human desire to create and be recognized for contributions [2][4][25] - It highlights a fundamental aspect of human nature, suggesting that people will continue to seek meaningful work and connection, even in an AI-dominated landscape [3][21][44] - The author proposes that the meaning crisis in society has made meaning itself a scarce commodity, leading to a need for new structures and frameworks to generate meaning in work and life [6][19][23] Group 2 - The evolution of societal structures and the techno-economic base is discussed, indicating that as societies progress, the dominant worldview and value systems shift, impacting how meaning is derived [8][12][18] - The article outlines the transition from premodern to modern and postmodern worldviews, ultimately leading to a crisis of meaning that must be addressed in the upcoming age of intelligence [10][19][20] - It suggests that the future will require individuals to embrace their roles as creators and problem solvers, actively generating meaning rather than relying on external sources [41][47][48] Group 3 - The concept of the creator economy is introduced, positing that individuals will derive income and meaning from their creative endeavors rather than traditional employment [52][58] - Attention is identified as a scarce resource in the creator economy, with successful individuals capturing and leveraging it to build meaningful connections and communities [53][54] - The article emphasizes that the creator economy is not a zero-sum game, allowing for diverse paths to success and fulfillment beyond the pursuit of wealth [58][60]

Core Insights - The article reflects on the evolution of AI over the past three years, emphasizing the importance of being "all in" on AI investments and recognizing the high value of early-stage projects [2][3][4] - The discussion highlights the need for openness in investment decisions, particularly regarding international projects, as missed opportunities can lead to significant losses [4][6] - The future is seen as a "big science era," where AI will empower young scientists, and the focus should be on individual authenticity and self-expression in the AI age [22][24][29] Investment Decisions - The most correct decision made was to invest heavily in AI, with a recognition that the cost-effectiveness of projects was much higher in the past [3][4] - There was a missed opportunity to invest in Figure AI, which has seen its valuation rise from $800 million to $40 billion, illustrating the importance of being open to international investments [4][6] - The investment strategy should focus on converting money into computational power, as the future will be defined by intelligence driven by AI [10][13] AI and AGI Perspectives - The belief in AGI (Artificial General Intelligence) remains strong, with the expectation that AI will soon surpass human capabilities in verifiable environments [19][21] - The response of large companies to AI developments has been unexpectedly strong, impacting the potential ceiling for startups [15][18] - The integration of AI and embodied intelligence is crucial for achieving AGI, with both being seen as complementary paths [87][94] Market Trends and Future Outlook - The market for AI and embodied intelligence is evolving, with a notable shift towards the Hong Kong market as a new exit channel for companies [78][81] - The structure of market participants is changing, with more domestic capital involved in AI investments, indicating a maturation of the investment landscape [79][81] - The expectation for the next three years is optimistic, with a belief that funding will increasingly flow into China as innovative projects gain recognition [100][103] Personal Insights and Reflections - The concept of "life force" is emphasized, suggesting that true vitality comes from living authentically and not merely conforming to external expectations [106][108] - The importance of focusing attention on long-term, low-frequency signals rather than short-term noise is highlighted as a key to improving life quality [128][129] - The future will require individuals to express their true selves, as authenticity will be essential in a world increasingly influenced by AI [151][153]

当赵颖偶然得知，父亲将自己的抚养费悉数用于新家庭时，"家"这个字眼仅存的最后一点温度也彻底消 失了……纸房子被点燃，故事走向无法回头的结局。《纸房子》所呈现的，并不是一次完成逃离的成长 叙事，而是一段在无处可居的空间中被持续挤压的青春。 子》主视觉图 从青春疼痛到空间困境 近年，青春疼痛、原生家庭与校园暴力，逐渐成为东亚文化语境中不断被文学与影剧书写的母题。大量 作品试图通过呈现青少年成长过程中的心理创伤，来解释"痛"如何被塑造为一种情绪经验。然而，在这 些叙事中，真正制造痛感的往往不仅是情绪本身，而是那些看似日常、却早已失去容纳主体能力的空间 ——家庭、学校、小城……作为青少年成长的场所，这些空间却逐渐演变为被权力关系和社会期待层层 包裹、难以逃离之地。 以中式校园为背景的视觉小说《纸房子》，正是这样一部作品。它并不满足于再现青春的疼痛，而是持 续追问，当一个人无法在任何地方"居住"，主体性将如何被塑造？在游戏中，主角赵颖在家庭、学校与 情感关系之间反复移动，却始终无法获得一个稳定的位置。家庭空间的冷漠与暴力、学校空间的失序与 缺席、关系空间的短暂与脆弱，使她不断被排除、被驱赶、被迫调整自身姿态以适应他人的 ...

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the rising popularity of a middle-aged dating reality show titled "Sunset Time to Love You," highlighting how it differs from traditional dating shows by focusing on the experiences and perspectives of middle-aged participants rather than just romantic relationships [5][42]. Group 1: Show Characteristics - The show features participants with an average age of over 50, showcasing their dating experiences in a restaurant setting where they humorously need reading glasses [6][12]. - Unlike typical dating shows, the participants are described as "elite" individuals, including executives, artists, and technical experts, indicating a higher social status and self-discipline [19][20]. - The dynamics of the show reflect a more straightforward approach to relationships, where participants actively pursue connections without the emotional turmoil often seen in younger contestants [21][40]. Group 2: Participant Behavior - Participants exhibit a pragmatic attitude towards dating, with one female contestant expressing a desire to move beyond superficial relationships with younger partners [22][40]. - The interactions among contestants reveal a focus on personal agency and self-awareness, as they prioritize their own feelings and desires over traditional romantic expectations [39][61]. - The show presents a competitive atmosphere reminiscent of a corporate environment, where participants are more concerned with compatibility and personal satisfaction than with the romantic ideal [39][44]. Group 3: Audience Reception - The audience's interest in the show stems from a desire to learn from the participants' life experiences and social skills rather than just their romantic interactions [45][46]. - Viewers are drawn to the authenticity and directness of the participants, contrasting with the often scripted nature of younger dating shows [57][60]. - The article suggests that the appeal of the show lies in its portrayal of middle-aged individuals navigating relationships with a sense of realism and practicality, resonating with viewers who may feel disillusioned about love [66][90].

Group 1 - The core argument emphasizes the importance of integrating ideological and political education (IPE) with the Party's innovative theories to enhance the quality of education and address fundamental questions about the purpose and methods of education [1][11][12] - The concept of "subjectivity" in IPE is explored through three dimensions: value subjectivity, theoretical subjectivity, and practical subjectivity, each contributing to a more active and generative educational framework [2][3] - The current landscape presents both opportunities and challenges for IPE, necessitating reforms that align educational practices with the evolving societal context and technological advancements [3][4] Group 2 - The establishment of a collaborative educational ecosystem involving schools, families, society, and government is crucial for effective IPE, requiring a comprehensive approach to resource integration and collective effort [4][5] - The role of teachers as central figures in IPE is highlighted, with a focus on enhancing their political literacy and teaching skills to effectively convey ideological values [5][19] - The need for innovative teaching methods that engage students and foster meaningful dialogue is emphasized, moving away from traditional authoritative teaching styles [5][10] Group 3 - The synchronization of IPE with the Party's innovative theories is framed as a strategic necessity for cultivating a new generation capable of addressing contemporary challenges and contributing to national rejuvenation [12][13][14] - Practical approaches to implementing this synchronization include addressing discrepancies between rapidly evolving theories and stable educational materials, as well as ensuring effective communication of complex ideas to students [14][15] - The importance of continuous theoretical research and practical application in IPE is underscored, with a call for integrating innovative teaching practices and leveraging technology to enhance educational outcomes [16][17][18]

本文转自【光明网】； 你今天"搞抽象"了吗？如果你经常混迹于互联网，可能对"抽象"这个词不会太陌生。 简单来说，"抽象"就是通过一本正经的胡说八道，传达着一种与众不同的、甚至是毫无意义的观点。 比如网上有一则很火的"抽象"话术： "有对象了吗？""有一些。" "存多少钱了？""没多少。" "最近在做什么？""在做人。" 喜欢"搞抽象"的年轻人，通常以轻松、无厘头的玩梗方式，重新解构现实生活中的意外和困境，减轻内 心的压力，让自己变得乐观。 其实"抽象"早已超出了互联网流行语的范畴，成为了一种与世界和解的新方式。 在这个充满"意义饥渴症"的时代，很多人做每一件事都在追求一种意义感和好的结果。而"抽象文化"的 流行，正是在告诉人们，获取快乐的真谛，需要你——和生活开玩笑，而不是和生活讲道理。 所以，今天想和你聊一聊：怎样用"抽象"的生活态度，好好地与这个世界和解。 "搞抽象"的人 用淡淡的"癫感"去对抗世界的无趣 最初提到"抽象"，大家第一时间想到的可能是艺术家笔下那些难以理解的画作。但如今，"抽象"却成为 了反传统、反规则、反内耗的亚文化象征。 "在吗？""健在。" 它不追求被认可，而是让每个人都能摒弃社交面具 ...

Group 1 - The article reflects on the emotional state of individuals in 2025, highlighting a shift towards self-love and introspection amidst societal pressures and uncertainties [1][2][4] - The concept of "self-love" is emphasized, with individuals encouraged to appreciate their own struggles and imperfections rather than seeking validation from others [6][8][9] - The rise of "situationships" and the use of AI for emotional support indicate a new trend in relationships, where traditional commitments are being redefined [10][13] Group 2 - There is a growing backlash against elite privilege and a desire for grassroots success stories, as seen in the public's reaction to various influencers and their perceived failures [19][20][24] - The narrative around success is shifting, with younger generations questioning the traditional pathways to achievement and expressing skepticism towards the glorification of hardship [24][31] - The emergence of cultural phenomena, such as the popularity of "Labubu" and "邪修," reflects a desire for authenticity and a rejection of conventional success metrics [32][34] Group 3 - The article discusses the impact of cultural exchanges, particularly between China and the West, highlighting the role of social media in bridging gaps and fostering understanding [35][39] - The phenomenon of "China Travel" showcases a new wave of tourism and cultural interaction, driven by changes in visa policies and social media trends [35][40] - The narrative of nostalgia is prevalent, with individuals reminiscing about past cultural moments and expressing a longing for a time when success seemed more attainable [46][57]

Group 1 - The core argument of the article revolves around the philosophical influence of Slavoj Žižek, who critiques contemporary capitalism and its associated ideologies through a lens of radical universalism and skepticism towards social realities [1][2] - Žižek's work spans various fields including ideology theory, subjectivity, ethics, globalization, and cultural studies, significantly altering the discourse in these areas [2][3] - The concept of "madness" is central to Žižek's philosophy, representing a failure or excess within the order of being, which is essential for the generation of subjectivity [3][4] Group 2 - In the context of psychoanalysis, Žižek discusses the death drive as a fundamental aspect of subjectivity, highlighting the gap that signifies radical autonomy and the inherent threats to the symbolic framework of subjectivity [5][6] - The notion of the "real" is explored as a dimension that cannot be integrated into the symbolic order, serving as a foundational lack that shapes all symbolic and imaginary constructs [12][16] - Žižek's analysis of the "real" includes its subtle role in shaping reality, suggesting that it is not merely a negative force but also an intrinsic part of the construction of social realities [20][21]