在改革创新中激发思政课建设主体性 □吴满意 作为落实立德树人根本任务的关键课程，思政课的建设质量直接关系到"培养什么人、怎样培养 人、为谁培养人"这一教育的根本问题。习近平总书记强调"坚持思政课建设与党的创新理论武装 同步推进"，"十五五"规划建议也明确提出"深化党的创新理论学习和宣传教育"。这不仅是政治要 求，更深刻揭示了思政课发展的内在规律，即同步推进思政课建设与党的创新理论武装，需要在 改革创新中激发思政课建设的主体性。 深刻把握思政课建设主体性的三重意蕴 "主体性"作为一个哲学概念，强调人的自主、能动与创造性。把这一概念引入思政课建设，意味 着思政课教育教学体系的主动性、生成性转向，具体体现在三个相互支撑的递进层面。 价值主体性。作为主体性的灵魂，价值主体性回答的是"为何而建"的根本动力问题。这种主体性 要求教育者超越单纯的知识传授，对课程所承载的意识形态属性与育人使命怀有高度自觉，确保 思政课为党育人、为国育才的政治方向不偏移。 理论主体性。作为主体性的智慧中枢，理论主体性要解决的是"以何育人"的内容供给问题。这要 求教育者应成为有效转化教育教学资源的"生产者"。借助这一主体性的发挥，教育者能够把握 ...

本文转自【光明网】； 你今天"搞抽象"了吗？如果你经常混迹于互联网，可能对"抽象"这个词不会太陌生。 简单来说，"抽象"就是通过一本正经的胡说八道，传达着一种与众不同的、甚至是毫无意义的观点。 比如网上有一则很火的"抽象"话术： "有对象了吗？""有一些。" "存多少钱了？""没多少。" "最近在做什么？""在做人。" 喜欢"搞抽象"的年轻人，通常以轻松、无厘头的玩梗方式，重新解构现实生活中的意外和困境，减轻内 心的压力，让自己变得乐观。 其实"抽象"早已超出了互联网流行语的范畴，成为了一种与世界和解的新方式。 在这个充满"意义饥渴症"的时代，很多人做每一件事都在追求一种意义感和好的结果。而"抽象文化"的 流行，正是在告诉人们，获取快乐的真谛，需要你——和生活开玩笑，而不是和生活讲道理。 所以，今天想和你聊一聊：怎样用"抽象"的生活态度，好好地与这个世界和解。 "搞抽象"的人 用淡淡的"癫感"去对抗世界的无趣 最初提到"抽象"，大家第一时间想到的可能是艺术家笔下那些难以理解的画作。但如今，"抽象"却成为 了反传统、反规则、反内耗的亚文化象征。 "在吗？""健在。" 它不追求被认可，而是让每个人都能摒弃社交面具 ...

智通财经编辑 | 李欣媛 "你的心情 现在好吗/你的脸上 还有微笑吗/你的所得 还那样少吗/你的付出 还那样多吗" 人们一边怀念"经济上行的美"，一边感叹此刻的紧绷与敏感。世界短暂敞开，又在一些权力话语之后迅速收缩，真实的人彼此照面，接着就被证明与较量的 身份焦虑包围。抽象的玩梗成了圈地抱团的语言，娱乐还是冒犯让人无从辨别。 智通财经记者 | 丁欣雨 出自孙悦上个世纪90年代金曲《祝你平安》的这段歌词，临近年底再度浮现于互联网的集体叙事中。只不过，它们不再是简单的问候，而是变成了一组精准 狙击当下人们普遍境遇的"年度诘问"。 2025，人们忙忙碌碌找自己，在言辞的推敲中校准爱自己的最佳姿态，也在和他人的关系中来回折返跑，把"建立主体性"的宣言贯彻了一整年。当"我值得 被爱"被重申，关系的失效就越发被确认，人们退回边界之内，隔离外在的连接，却又茫然于想要做的"自己"不知从何而来。 在不确定的世界里，人们该把希望投向哪里？这一年告诉你：至少不是"吃苦光荣"的父辈，不是炫耀特权的精英。优越感被集火，越来越难相信成功只来自 个人奋斗，无法承受的未来之"重"将人领向微小的治愈，邪修的灵妙，土味的逆袭。 流行文化瞬息万变 ...

Group 1 - The core argument of the article revolves around the philosophical influence of Slavoj Žižek, who critiques contemporary capitalism and its associated ideologies through a lens of radical universalism and skepticism towards social realities [1][2] - Žižek's work spans various fields including ideology theory, subjectivity, ethics, globalization, and cultural studies, significantly altering the discourse in these areas [2][3] - The concept of "madness" is central to Žižek's philosophy, representing a failure or excess within the order of being, which is essential for the generation of subjectivity [3][4] Group 2 - In the context of psychoanalysis, Žižek discusses the death drive as a fundamental aspect of subjectivity, highlighting the gap that signifies radical autonomy and the inherent threats to the symbolic framework of subjectivity [5][6] - The notion of the "real" is explored as a dimension that cannot be integrated into the symbolic order, serving as a foundational lack that shapes all symbolic and imaginary constructs [12][16] - Žižek's analysis of the "real" includes its subtle role in shaping reality, suggesting that it is not merely a negative force but also an intrinsic part of the construction of social realities [20][21]

心理学研究发现，越来越多的年轻人承认"经常为了迎合他人而压抑自己"。不少人经历着主体性的丧失 ——把自己看作接受指令的客体，不知道自己真正想要什么。意识到这种主体性的退让，一些年轻人开 始重新审视自身与外界的关系，审视自我与他人的关系，重新找回主体性成为他们的生命课题。 当"自我"成为他者的影子 主体性丧失最主要的体现是，自我认知建立在外部反馈上，过度在乎他人的眼光和评价，唯独忽略了自 己的感受。在这样的心理状态下，很多人觉得自己成为唯唯诺诺的边角料，体会到从"主角"到"配角"的 落差感，甚至没办法与自己和解。 在深圳生活的艺术疗愈师上上一直认为自己是一个主体性很强的人，无论是校园时期勇敢帮助被欺凌的 同学，还是坚持学美术考上美院，上上一直按照自己的想法规划人生。"直到毕业工作后，这种主体性 不知道什么时候开始慢慢离我远去，那是一种长期的'自动驾驶'状态。"上上无奈地说。 更隐蔽的主体性丧失体现在从"内卷"到"内耗"的过程中。主体性的丧失既是思维的懒惰，也是行为的惯 性，二者密不可分。为什么要参与一些看似无意义的竞争？因为"别人都在这么做"。从历经辛苦完成的 事情中，却得不到自己想要的价值，因此对自己失望、生 ...

以下文章来源于新潮沉思录 ，作者潮思 本文来自微信公众号： 新潮沉思录 ，作者：飞剑客，原文标题：《聊聊户晨风时代的"主体 性"与"觉醒文化"》，题图来自：视觉中国 近年来不只是在键政圈语境中，在社交媒体的日常语境中，"主体性"一词也颇为流行。我们常常会看 到这样的提问："主体性强的人有什么表现？""如何培养自己的主体性？"初次接触这个词汇的人，大 概会颇有几分格局打开的感觉。 新潮沉思录 . 新潮沉思录 不过多浏览知乎、小红书等平台的此类问题后就会发现，这类问题下的往往呈现出一种对"主体性 强"的标准化想象，比如： "不再关心别人看法，我的世界我自己的感受最重要。" 当然，有人会说，你看到这些说法都是伪主体性，"真正的"主体性是对自己的能力和定位有清晰的认 知，知道自己应该干什么能干什么，而上面刚刚提到的只知道要这要那的不是主体性强，那是巨婴。 主体一词之所以备受偏爱，一个原因可能是与近代中国经历的殖民压迫有关。近代中国经历殖民压 迫，反殖民斗争强调当家作主或民族主体性，赋予其积极的政治意涵。在此语境下，主体往往被理解 为主人翁，关键正在于"主"与"奴"的二元对抗。 如果追溯历史，我们能看到一个宏大的、关于 ...

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the increasing societal focus on "security" as a primary pursuit in life, reflecting a shift in personal and relational dynamics influenced by fear and uncertainty [1][2][4]. Group 1: Societal Trends - There is a growing trend of cautious decision-making in career choices, with individuals opting for stability and security, even in personal relationships, leading to a rise in AI as a substitute for human connection [2][5]. - The term "security" has become vague and is often used to explain various behaviors, such as reluctance to change jobs or engage socially [5][11]. Group 2: Psychological Insights - Discussions around "security" reveal that many individuals feel driven by fear and scarcity, leading to a perpetual state of striving without a sense of belonging [4][9]. - The complexity of personal relationships is highlighted, where individuals may express a desire for connection while simultaneously avoiding responsibility, resulting in emotional pain [10][12]. Group 3: Impact of Modernity - The evolution of societal norms and the emergence of various relationship models contribute to a pervasive sense of confusion and insecurity among individuals [15][16]. - The article emphasizes that the experience of insecurity is not solely influenced by early attachment experiences but is also shaped by broader societal changes [8][20]. Group 4: Digital Age Challenges - The rise of online interactions has created a paradox where relationships feel both closer and more distant, leading to a decrease in the sense of safety typically found in familiar environments [36][37]. - The public exposure of personal struggles in the digital space can exacerbate feelings of insecurity and shame, as seen in the tragic case of a doctor who faced online harassment [7][36]. Group 5: Strategies for Building Security - To foster a sense of security, individuals are encouraged to create mental space and pause before reacting to situations, which can help mitigate impulsive responses driven by anxiety [38][40]. - The importance of understanding and processing trauma is emphasized, suggesting that healing involves recontextualizing painful experiences rather than erasing them [24][25].

Core Insights - The concept of "agency" in AI refers to the ability of an entity to autonomously take action towards a target, distinguishing it from mere automation, which executes pre-defined solutions [1][14] - Current AI technologies lack true agency because they do not possess dynamic subjectivity, which is essential for understanding and responding to user needs in a nuanced way [7][14] Group 1: Understanding Agency - Agency is defined as the emergence phenomenon of life, which current AI technologies cannot replicate [14][16] - The distinction between agents and automation lies in the agent's ability to develop solutions based on user-defined goals rather than executing pre-existing solutions [1][14] Group 2: Limitations of Current AI - Current AI applications struggle to understand user needs deeply, often failing to recognize what users themselves do not know [2][12] - Users typically find it challenging to articulate their needs, which limits the effectiveness of AI in providing tailored solutions [12][15] Group 3: The Role of Subjectivity - Human interactions involve a level of empathy and understanding that AI currently cannot achieve, as AI lacks the ability to dynamically respond to the environment and user emotions [7][9] - The ability to resonate with users' underlying motivations is crucial in service industries, which AI has yet to master [4][6] Group 4: Market Expectations - The market's perception of AI is often misaligned with its current capabilities, leading to disappointment as users expect a level of dynamic agency that AI cannot provide [13][15] - Successful AI applications often reflect limited static subjectivity that resonates with user needs, rather than true agency [15][16]

Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the article is that "Mother's Single Love Battle" is recognized as the most relatable dating reality show, reflecting the ordinary outcomes of relationships rather than the high pairing rates typical in other shows [1][31] - The show features a unique approach where participants, referred to as "mother singles," display genuine emotions and awkwardness, contrasting with the more dramatic and polished formats of previous dating shows [4][31] - The participants undergo a six-week training program to improve their dating skills, including image management and interpersonal communication, highlighting their lack of experience in romantic relationships [9][17] Group 2 - The show captures the essence of modern dating challenges faced by young people, who often choose to remain single due to various pressures and fears associated with relationships [7][25] - Unlike previous dating shows, the participants in "Mother's Single Love Battle" do not engage in pretense and are more focused on genuine connections, emphasizing the importance of honesty and self-awareness in relationships [19][24] - The show has received mixed reviews, with initial high ratings dropping as the participants' emotional struggles and misunderstandings became more apparent, reflecting the complexities of real-life dating [27][31]

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the ongoing popularity of AI companion products, particularly in the consumer market, highlighting various innovative products and the emotional connections they foster with users [1][6][28]. Group 1: AI Companion Products - AI companion products like "Mirumi," "Moflin," and "LOVOT 3.0" are gaining traction, showcasing emotional interaction capabilities [1][6]. - The market for AI companion products is characterized by a diverse understanding of "companionship," influenced by individual user experiences and emotional needs [7][11]. - The concept of "subjectivity" is emphasized, where users are encouraged to treat these products as living entities rather than mere commodities, enhancing emotional engagement [19][20]. Group 2: Market Dynamics and Competition - Despite apparent similarities among products, true competition is limited due to differing target audiences and emotional expectations [39][40]. - The emotional bond established with users creates a unique value proposition that is difficult to replicate, leading to a sense of irreplaceability [42][40]. - The industry is still in a phase of non-consensus exploration, with many small teams innovating in ways that larger companies may struggle to replicate [29][39]. Group 3: Product Development and User Interaction - The importance of not allowing AI companions to speak is highlighted, as it can diminish the perceived emotional connection and subjectivity [24][26]. - User feedback has been crucial in shaping product features, with a focus on enhancing memory and interactive capabilities to foster deeper connections [26][30]. - The design philosophy emphasizes creating products that resonate emotionally with users, allowing for a more organic and engaging interaction [47][50]. Group 4: Future Outlook and Longevity - The expected lifespan of AI companion products is set at five years, with plans for upgrades to maintain user engagement and emotional connection [30][31]. - The potential for AI companions to evolve and adapt to user needs is seen as a key factor in their long-term success [32][33]. - The exploration of how technology can bridge emotional gaps in human relationships is a central theme for the future of these products [50].